User talk:Avi Tuschman
Avi Tuschman's Talk Page
Welcome!
Hello, Avi Tuschman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! -- Jytdog (talk) 12:43, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Conflict of interest
[edit]I am providing you with notice of our conflict of interest guideline, so you are aware of it.
Hello, Avi Tuschman. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.
Thanks again for discussing your concerns on the article Talk page. Briefly, conflict of interest is managed in Wikipedia in two steps: disclosure of the conflict, and offering edits on the Talk page for others to review instead of directly editing the article. You have already disclosed the relationship (namely, you are the subject of the article), so the first part is done. As for the "peer review" part, the way we handle that in Wikipedia, is to ask conflicted editors to avoid editing the article directly, and instead offer proposals for changes to the content on the article Talk page. You can do that easily - and provide notice to the community of your request - by using the "edit request" function as described in the conflict of interest guideline. I made that easy for you by adding a section to the beige box at the top of the Talk page - there is a link at "click here" in that section -- if you click that, the Wikipedia software will automatically format a section in which you can make your request. Thanks. You can reply here if you have any questions or want to discuss anything, or you can ask at the article Talk page. See you at the Talk page! Jytdog (talk) 12:46, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Avi Tuschman, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Avi Tuschman! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:32, 20 May 2015 (UTC) |
May 2015
[edit]It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Evolutionary biology. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. You should not be presenting an obviously biased opinion to people, telling them that an article on "an amazing person" is being deleted Joseph2302 (talk) 21:59, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Joseph2302 (talk), thanks for your comment here. I just read about canvassing. I just thought that having a few more editors familiar with this field of knowledge would help the decision be made more quickly. Definitely didn't mean to take one side or another. In any case, I will definitely not leave any other requests, except on the talk page's space that was just set up for that purpose. Best wishes, Avi
- Whilst it might be true that more editors would be better, the tone of your comments were not neutral. Posting a message like "This article is up for deletion, if people want to have a look" is neutral, your message of "I'm an amazing person, come save my biography" isn't. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:11, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Joseph, I understand. May I post an article in that forum that says, "This article is up for deletion, if people want to have a look" and nothing more? Looking forward to your advice, which I will adhere to in either case
- Yes, that seems fine. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:21, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Many thanks for helping out this new user
- Yes, that seems fine. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:21, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Joseph, I understand. May I post an article in that forum that says, "This article is up for deletion, if people want to have a look" and nothing more? Looking forward to your advice, which I will adhere to in either case
- Whilst it might be true that more editors would be better, the tone of your comments were not neutral. Posting a message like "This article is up for deletion, if people want to have a look" is neutral, your message of "I'm an amazing person, come save my biography" isn't. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:11, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Introducing the new WikiProject Evolutionary biology!
[edit]Greetings!
I am happy to introduce you to the new WikiProject Evolutionary biology! The newly designed WikiProject features automatically updated work lists, article quality class predictions, and a feed that tracks discussions on the 663 talk pages tagged by the WikiProject. Our hope is that these new tools will help you as a Wikipedia editor interested in evolutionary biology.
- Browse the new WikiProject page
- Become a member today! – members have access to an opt-in notification system
Hope to see you join! Harej (talk) 21:06, 10 July 2015 (UTC)