- 1 Thanks for the cookie
- 2 Articles for Creation Appeal
- 3 my wiki
- 4 Fares Fares
- 5 Tova Milo's submitted page
- 6 Unreal Media Server
- 7 Help, please
- 8 Two-Tier Enterprise Resource Planning Feedback
- 9 Ure, Emily denied submission for Wikipedia page Guanico Abajo, Panama
- 10 HDtracks Article
- 11 Hope you like it!
- 12 Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Asclepias species by common name
- 13 ArbCom elections are now open!
Articles for Creation Appeal
|Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!
Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently the are 861 submissions waiting to be reviewed.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog.
Has my page been accepted ? Hey it says:"This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources."The sources all known blogs and websites like indiewire and imdb. Which sources in particular are not reliable in your opinion? I'd like to get this page accepted. Please let me know. thank you.
here is the link to the article i've created: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Mohamed_Dione
Tova Milo's submitted page
Thank you very much for the prompt review of my submitted page on Tova Milo. I have made some revisions to the page, please reconsider accepting it.
The mentioned award is considered one of the most important awards in the area (also listed as a notable award in other entries). I have added a citation from the award page stating that it is "awarded to the paper that had the most impact in terms of research, methodology, or transfer to practice over the intervening decade" in this premier venue.
I have also added other evidence of notability based on (a) publications and citations and (b) membership in editorial boards of the major journals in the field. I went through the "notability" guidelines and this seems to adhere to them.
In general, I have imporved the article by adding more references as required.
Many thanks for your work.
-- Adding link to the page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Tova_Milo
Unreal Media Server
OK, we don't have major INDEPENDENT OF SUBJECT magazines that have articles about this software. Why would they publish such an article? If you look through the references, you find couple of industry-related magazines that reviewed our product. This proves you such a product exists in this industry, and reading the articles in these magazines you can verify the information I provided for Wikipedia article.
This is just a proprietary software product, and yes it does have coverage in magazines related to streaming media software. Hope this is clear to you.
Now you can say - this is still not notable enough to be included in Wikipedia. OK, might be. But Wikipedia has articles discussing such proprietary software products, that's the thing. Take a look here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_streaming_media_systems
All products mentioned there are individual products that have more or less the same coverage in public sources as ours has. Our product has to be in this article, that's for sure! But it can't because you refuse to approve an article. What do you think about it?
Two-Tier Enterprise Resource Planning Feedback
Ure, Emily denied submission for Wikipedia page Guanico Abajo, Panama
Hello Avs5221. I have added references to support my article about a rural community I am a volunteer at in Panama. Unfortunately, it has not been researched by more than a handful of people and I can not produce many secondary sources. I attached all of the references I could locate on the internet that are applicable. I am a reliable primary source and am unsure how to reference my own work. Please let me know what I can do to have my Wikipedia page accepted. Thank you! Emily Ure
I'm confused. I've written this from a neutral, verifiable, third-party perspective. I've included notability links to Wall Street Journal, the New York TImes, CNN Technology News, Stereophile, etc. I was very careful to make sure that the story was NOT written as an ad for this website, and followed closely the examples from iTunes, eMusic and other digital music stores that have approved articles on Wikipedia. I think I was rather conservative in my description of HDtracks, especially when compared to the entries for competing companies like eMusic and iTunes.
HDtracks.com deserves to have an entry because they were the first ones in the industry to offer high-resolution music from all the major labels, the first to offer these files without any digital rights management, years before iTunes did with Apple, and have effectively pioneered this industry. Can I please get some specific examples of what it is you think makes this read like an advertisement vs the neutral, factual, third-party article that I wrote it to be? I'm not an HDtracks employee, I'm not writing an ad for them. Their parent company, Chesky Records, has a Wikipedia entry, which is referenced, too. I would appreicate some actual examples of what it is I need to change to get this approved rather than having to guess at it, as I have done my best to write it so it did NOT appear as an ad and was filled with factual, notable references to the company's important work for audiophile customers like myself.
Hope you like it!
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Asclepias species by common name
A tag has been placed on Category:Asclepias species by common name requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for four days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)