User talk:Babitaarora

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Apurv Gupta Page[edit]

Hi,

This is regarding the page Apurv Gupta The neutrality of the article is contested and more neutral information should be added. The current body of work is biased and seems more like the opinion upon articles than actual fact.

Re: Sock?[edit]

Re your message: Yes, somebody's spambot is malfunctioning. I occasionally see a spambot get locked onto the wrong user page. Instead of posting to the correct account's user page, it gets stuck on some old account. I locked that particular user page.

On a side note, the comment just above this was funny. You must be doing something right. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk)

Why have you blocked me?[edit]

@Bbb23: Why have you blocked my account? On what basis you find me sock of Chander, can you explain?Babitaarora (talk/contribs) 04:51, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

@Materialscientist: Please help! Admin Bbb23 did not respond to me. Babitaarora (talk/contribs) 08:00, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Babitaarora (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

I'm not a sockpuppet of chander. You can check my past edit history. I'm a Rollbacker and I clearly know my limits and also aware WP:MULTIPLE. How can you blame me as sockpuppet?Babitaarora (talk/contribs) 11:06, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You're bl;ocked due to a technical match combined with similar edits, you would need to address these. Max Semenik (talk) 11:50, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Babitaarora (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

The last few days I was learning to make GA. Throughout I found some articles edited by some users (including listed sock editors) who were doing the same. Maybe that's why our editing is same. Babitaarora (talk/contribs) 16:26, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

There's far too much of a behavioral match (which you seem to allude to, above) to support the technical match. —SpacemanSpiff 17:02, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Babitaarora (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

This is my last Request... Actually I and Chander were using same Internet and Laptop but really i did not know that he was using multiple accounts. I took at least two years to reach this stage and to become a perfect user. You've ruined all my hard work, blaming me as a sockpuppet. You believe it or not it is your job. Babitaarora (talk/contribs) 14:55, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is indeed your last request. As it doesn't address the reason for your block, much less make any sense, I'm removing talk page access. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

Note WP:LITTLEBROTHER[edit]

I trusted you, but now you make me look like an idiot.

Nobody has told you yet, but administrators don't have the right to unblock any Check User block. If they unblock you, then they will be desysopped. Only Administrators with Check Users rights can unblock you.

You can only have two choice WP:BASC and WP:UTRS.

Most likely they will give you Wikipedia:Standard offer. And i suggest you take it.

Use your own laptop and stay away from Chander. I know you two are separate Humans. Your laptop should be your own. Don't allow your friend or cousin to use your laptop. --1.39.137.36 (talk) 15:13, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

E-Mail[edit]

Mail-message-new.svg
Hello, Babitaarora. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

95.141.31.25 (talk) 09:20, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Reply to message on my talk page[edit]

I have received a message on my talk page from an anonymous (IP) editor, claiming to be you, stating that you are not Chander, and asking for your block to be reconsidered. The message also said that you had sent me an email, but I never received an email from you. (I have recently had other experiences when Wikipedia's email system has for some reason failed to deliver an email.) Having spent a considerable time checking the editing history of the various accounts, I am inclined to believe you, so I have consulted the blocking administrator. I have restored your access to this talk page, and any future editing in relation to your block should take place here. I hope that this matter can be sorted out soon, but in the meanwhile I have to ask you to be patient, and unless and until the block is removed, you should not edit anywhere other than this page. Since you do seem to have made a few edits without logging in, I am going to block the IP address you have used. Your IP editing was no doubt done in good faith, and since you posted to my talk page stating who you were, you clearly had no intention of deceiving. Also, apparently your IP post to me was made only after your legitimate attempt to contact me by email had failed. However, any indication of block-evasion is likely to make it less likely that another administrator will be sympathetic to your request, so preventing you from evading the block may actually be to your advantage. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

@JamesBWatson: Thanks, You trusted me that's enough for me. I read your comments on Bbb23's talk page. I know, this case is more complicated than other and he(Bbb23) will have to re-examine the case which is the work of permutation. I understand that is not easy to trust someone while you don't know him personally. He would not convinced from me until then I will have to wait. If you have any doubt or question related to this case, you can ask me. Babitaarora (talk/contribs) 10:59, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Babita, I am talk page stalker of many admins and I see your matter has been on discussion. I don't know if Chander is your cousin or not, but if he is your cousin then you should not let him to use your laptop. It seems that you encouraged your siblings to edit Wikipedia once you started editing it but you should not do it. I can't say you will get unblocked or not but you can ask for "IP block exempt" so that only your id can log in from your laptop. But I don't know much about this rule. Usually one woman or man has one husband or one wife respectively, same is the thing for laptop, one laptop should have only one Wikipedia account. My younger brother takes my laptop but I advice him to not even read anything on Wikipedia. (Reality is that I use laptop of my younger brother). But my younger brother do his internet related work from his mobile, he need laptop only for non-internet related work. But I did not said my brother to not edit Wikipedia from this laptop, but rather I said him to not use internet from this laptop. You should say same things to your brothers. But as per recent improvement in my real life, I will be editing Wikipedia from my job place, but I may not edit Wikipedia much as earlier because of busy schedule. I am still very addicted to Wikipedia but there was a time when I thought I should get blocked permanently for some reason so that I will not edit Wikipedia and I will more focus on growth in my real life, I am still ready to get blocked on Wikipedia. You have been blocked permanently so I think you should take this positively and more focus on improvement in real life. I am not leaving Wikipedia just because I create articles on small villages from some region which I think no one else will create if I don't create it, and by now I realized that I am the only active and experienced Wikipedian from sub-national geographic region where I live, so entire responsibility on me to develop articles related to my region. Thats why I am still on Wikipedia. If you edit articles related to Indian celebs and entertainment related stuff then there are many active users who develop such articles so even if you don't edit it still it doesn't matters. You should tell any special reason to unblock you, so that admins will unblock you.--Human3015TALK  21:02, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Email[edit]

@JamesBWatson: I sent you an email. Babitaarora (talk/contribs) 12:03, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

It's a good thing that you told me about it, because for some reason the email went into my spam folder. I have read it, and all I can say is that we will have to wait and see what happens. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:10, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ujjwal Rana[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Ujjwal Rana has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 05:43, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Karan Tacker[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Karan Tacker has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- GB fan 11:35, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Meghan Jadhav[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Meghan Jadhav has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Eteethan(talk) 21:44, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Meghan Jadhav for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meghan Jadhav is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meghan Jadhav (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:50, 10 June 2016 (UTC)