User talk:Bailmoney27

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Bailmoney27. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

LeEco[edit]

LeEco have no parent/subsidiary relationship with LeTV (aka le.com). I don't think removing removing native language ref and name of the subsidiary would actually "help" the article. As wikipedia had lists of Intel product, it looks appropriate to keep a list of mobile phone of LeEco. Matthew_hk tc 04:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Hey Matthew, thank you for getting in touch. A few key points I want to point out: (1) I'll fix the LeTV / Le.com confusion there. I misunderstood while reading some articles in both Chinese and English. Thanks for the heads up! (2) I think you're right about the table of mobile phones, I want to clean it up a little bit and insert it under the LeMobile section. (3) I don't believe the native Chinese names are necessary on the English Wikipedia for every subsidiary, as I feel this is too much information that isn't relevant to English-speaking users. I've removed them for this reason. Thanks for the feedback, and feel free to ask or contribute any more information! Bailmoney27 talk 04:14, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
It is a wide practice that the private company that was owned by the largest shareholder of the public company, abuse to use the brand name of the public company to aid the private business, keeping the native name at least help bilingual user to tract record which company the subsidiary actually belong to, or which product referring to which company. (More example: It look crazy for Sinopharm to have six listed subsidiary isn't it? Mitsubishi in Japan were actually Keiretsu) The native name ideally should be used in the subsidiary's own article (on its lead), but since there is none, it is better to keep there as LeMobile isn't one to one translation of Chinese: 乐视移动智能信息技术, but rather a trading name or unofficial translation by the press. Matthew_hk tc 04:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)


Take a look at the latest revision and let me know what you think. I edited the names to translate smoother without the full legal name of the subsidiary, but rather the shortened version most commonly used. Bailmoney27 talk 04:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: US Mobile (May 21)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MassiveYR was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MassiveYR 08:17, 21 May 2017 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello! Bailmoney27, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MassiveYR 08:17, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Bailmoney27. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)