Jump to content

User talk:Barkeep49

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 days ago by AM for Dubin in topic Glenn Dubin/Jeffrey Epstein BLP dispute

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 16

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:59, 1 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

I'd ask that you amend this to no consensus. There is not rough consensus that a sanction is no longer required to prevent disruption. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:14, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Which of these statements are you saying there is no consensus about?
  1. There was agreement there was a problem here.
  2. After reflection SmokeyJoe agreed there was a problem and committed to doing better.
  3. That was six weeks ago.
  4. There had been a request for this to be closed and in honoring that request this thread was unarchived.
  5. Since being unarchived there seems to be agreement that imposing a sanction now wouldn't be appropriate.
I am guessing your issue with 5? I already made clear that there was "agreement" (I intentionally didn't use consensus; compare to the close I decided was finally ready and did a few minutes after this) since being unarchived to not impose a sanction now (emphasis added). I stand by that as being an accurate reflection of the conversation. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 22:20, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Request withdrawn. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:45, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your RfC closure

[edit]

Mostly out of curiosity, did you intentionally use the plural form of the noun "criterion" in your closure statement? On Wikipedia we usually use the singular form. FaviFake (talk) 22:32, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

The wording of the question said "criteria" and to make it clear what the answer was, I also used it. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 22:34, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Good point! I've never seen it being used in this way on this site and I missed the RfC statement. Thanks for the closure. FaviFake (talk) 22:35, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

IP Pool Unblock Request!

[edit]

Hi Barkeep49,

Could you please reconsider the block on IP’ 2401:4900:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 This is my IP range too, and I’m an unrelated legitimate user. My account is fine, but seeing this range repeatedly blocked and extended over the years by different admins is honestly disheartening.

Could you please unblock the range for legitimate users and, if possible, block the specific problematic IP(s) instead of the entire /32?

Thanks :) Tenshi Uisu (talk) 09:58, 4 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Tenshi Uisu you may want to ask for IP Block Exempt which I think will help you with your need. Unfortunately the ongoing level of disruption on the IP makes it difficult to just unblock it completely at this time. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 14:18, 4 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question

[edit]

Hello Barkeep49, I have a question. There is a user who has a very large number of articles written, can you give autopatrolled to them. It is GoldenBootWizard276. In solidarity, Dafootballguy (Want to talk?) 23:48, 6 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Dafootballguy I've clearly not been able to get to evaluating this. You're allowed to request autopatrol for others at WP:PERM/A. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 21:04, 8 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Notification

[edit]

Just a heads up that I just quoted you at ANI. You're not the one I brought to the noticeboard, though. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 20:50, 8 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Superpower on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 21:31, 9 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Glenn Dubin/Jeffrey Epstein BLP dispute

[edit]

Hi Barkeep49. Can you help resolve a content dispute at Talk:Glenn Dubin#Innuendo? I found your name on the admin list and I see you're an experienced editor with sensitivity to BLP issues. I recently invited a different admin to this discussion, but she did not weigh in on the specific content being disputed. (She also encouraged me to avoid further participation in the discussion itself, due to my disclosed COI, and I will try to follow this suggestion.) Thank you so much for your time. AM for Dubin (talk) 15:35, 10 September 2026 (UTC)Reply