User talk:Bbb23

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Caution
  • Unless otherwise requested, I will respond on this page.
  • Please include links to pertinent page(s).
  • Click New section on the top right to start a new topic.

Why?![edit]

There was no reason to delete Jelle Van Vucht 4 times. Bring it back NOW or I'm suing you! User talk:MatthewBriglia2005 19:37, 29 June 2017 (EDT)

Questions on global banning "Bambifan101"[edit]

Infamous disney vandal Bambifan101™ hasn't show any signs that he'll stop disrupting Wikipedia for good. Given his past history of cross-wiki abuse over 9 years can you please advice on the suitability on placing a global ban against the notorius abuser?

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Bbb23. You have new messages at SahabAliwadia's talk page.
Message added 11:29, 3 August 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Vanjagenije (talk) 11:29, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar Hires.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you for all your service at SPI. Mkdw talk 17:08, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
What that person above me said. Drmies (talk) 21:11, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
+1 to the above two. Your efforts at SPI are much appreciated. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:56, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Cause for concern?[edit]

Hi B, this guy causes me some concern.

  • Brand new user circa August 2nd
  • First edit was user page creation (has the hint of typical sock redlink avoidance)
  • Has created a few articles already, with fully-fleshed Cite web references, suggesting familiarity with Wikipedia.
  • Some of the articles seem a bit promotional of potentially non-notable subjects, suggesting marketing ring member.
  • Suddenly he starts using Twinkle
  • And in the last 24 hours he's gone on a speedy-delete nomination spree.

The general shape of this feels funky to me. Not sure if it's enough for you to start poking around, but I'd be remiss if I didn't share with someone. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:05, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I just looked him over and he uses twinkle and has articles after only ten days? I'm new but it took me 2 months to figure out how to do that myself! As for the twinkle and all that; isn't he a bit new to be suggesting this? I'm not implying that newcomers don't know anything about Wikipedia but I've never seen that kind of speed before. Dinah In Wonderland 14:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: I think Bbb is out for a bit, but this looks to me like AwardPunjabi (but could also be any of the other Mohali based PR agencies that I've blocked), paging GSS-1987 to check on this. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 14:20, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

@SpacemanSpiff: Thanks mate. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:58, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Did a quick review of the 4 articles they've created and basically they're all probably strong candidates for deletion. Poor sources in all of them, a couple had sources that weren't even remotely connected (an article about a US based furniture company?!?!), suggesting some quick google searching with no effort to verify the results. Proded some, others can probably go as well. Ravensfire (talk) 17:00, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
He reminds me of WorldBoy (talk · contribs) a socpuppet of Singer Jethu Sisodiya who's behaviour and English was very similar to this user (please see contributions). He's definitely not a new user, registered 10 days back, made his first edit on 2nd August and already know how to ping multiple users and how to use Twinkle on both English and Hindi Wikipedia. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:08, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Quite agree. Amazing how well they are at using Iwinkle and CSD. Sent White Hill Music (record label) to WP:Articles for deletion/White Hill Music (record label). Time to start cleaning up this undeclared paid editor's articles. Ravensfire (talk) 01:04, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Thanks GSS, after seeing the history of the various socks, there's no doubt in my mind that this is one of the group and I've blocked as such. I'm inclined to just G5 all the new stuff, but I'll ping GeneralizationsAreBad to just confirm that my suspicions are right before doing that. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 01:50, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

User:PerfectlyIrrational[edit]

You may remember this editor, whom you blocked for sockpuppeting back on June 21.

Now comes Don1182 (talk · contribs), created June 30, who's plowing exactly the same fields as PerfectlyIrrational (talk · contribs). Am I right to be suspicious? --Calton | Talk 19:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Return of the ghost[edit]

Hello @Bbb23:

Following the advice you gave me a few months ago, as same problem seems to be = is arising with a certain editor I suspect is the ghost of [1] and its numberless socks: same tactics, same obsession with weight, size etc. used in article on her sons as were used on Marie Antoinette's article, then forcing & using the revert method in order to start an edit war. If you have time, please check the following:

The end result is that, in order to avoid an edit war, these articles remain with details that belong to gossip magazines & end up blocked, held hostages by one disruptive editor.

Best regards,--Blue Indigo (talk) 13:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

I just learned...[edit]

...that you are talking an extended break. I hope that, whatever reason you are doing so, it does the trick for you, but that you return to us as soon as you are ready. For what it's worth, I consider you to be one of the best admins on Wikipedia, and your work as a CU has been exemplary and very valuable to the community. My very best to you, Beyond My Ken (talk) 15:03, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Agree with BMK. Even though we sometimes disagree you do VERY important work. Thus hope to see your speedy return. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

A little ditty for you[edit]

Sung to the tune of Be Our Guest:

<clears throat>

You are missed!
You are missed!
We've got our knickers in a twist
No time for nappin socks to check, chéri
I hope you can't resist!

<collapses in exhaustion from the sheer effort of being so creative before my morning tea>--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 16:03, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #18996[edit]

Orologio blu.svg
A user you have blocked has opened UTRS appeal #18996 on the Unblock Ticket Request System. The reviewing administrator, Just Chilling (talk · contribs), has requested your input:

B dash (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Time: Aug 15, 2017 12:12:56

Message: Are you OK if I restore talk page access to enable a SO appeal be made?

Notes:

  • If you do not have an account on UTRS, you may create one at the administrator registration interface.
  • Alternatively, you can respond here and indicate whether you are supportive or opposed to an unblock for this user and your rationale, if applicable.

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:12, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) @Just Chilling: Bbb23 is on hiatus. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:09, 16 August 2017 (UTC)