User talk:Bebaak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Desipundit[edit]

A tag has been placed on Desipundit, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ... richi 21:13, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

As requested: a stub template, but please add to it quickly, or another editor will delete it. In future, please only add pages that have significant content ... richi 21:25, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks Richi --Bebaak 21:26, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

{{Podcasting-stub}}[edit]

Hi - a stub template or category which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type, which was not proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 03:09, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Podbharti logo.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Podbharti logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Breno talk 11:15, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Podbharti[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

I have nominated Podbharti, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Podbharti. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ChiragPatnaik (talk) 09:03, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Desipundit[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Desipundit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:WEB; lacks sourcing in independent, third party, reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ScottyBerg (talk) 14:50, 2 May 2010 (UTC)