User talk:Belinrahs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


I don't know, I just create the article so that I can hear other people's opinions, other people's voices. I saw the company on the internet and I saw it for a long time ago, so that I decided to create the article to see where it is going.

If you want to delete it or fix it, I don't have any opinions, but if you have patience to wait for editors who clearly know the company better than me, wait for them to show the proof, or the evidence, give more time to work on it, I can see it more useful :) but the decision is yours.

If it didn't derserved as an article, then I see it how worth the company is.

Best regards

Moved from userpage[edit]

Hi Belinrahs, it is nice to have you in the class. I wish you a very good luck for the rest of the semester. I hope you will enjoy this class by learning new things. Good luck to you.Pkotrike (talk) 04:40, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Feedback request[edit]

HI Belinrahs. I think your draft looks like it's off to a good start. Of course, the older material lacks sources almost entirely, which is a major concern.

With regards to your addition on privacy, I wouldn't start with "Researchers have noted..." I think a lot more has been written about this topic by privacy advocates and I would open with the concerns that they have expressed. Then I would follow up with the stuff about research - that academics have supported what activists have complained about. If you do that you make it more well-rounded; you start with the people who have (AFAIK) dominated the conversation. You also make it more interesting - "researchers have noted" just isn't the kind of wording that draws readers in. Does that make sense? Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:34, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Ian, you are absolutely correct. The reason for this is that I have only been able to use academic journal articles. Our professor in class has only told us to use academic articles as sources for our Wikipedia articles. As a long-time Wikipedia editor, I know that far more than just academic articles are allowable as reliable sources - but I don't want to be that guy in that class that corrects the professor. You may want to let our professor know more about what kinds of sources we can use for our articles - it would make my writing far easier, since academic articles only go so far... [Belinrahs|talktomeididit] 05:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
We do strongly encourage classes to use academic journals, and sometimes that probably comes across as only using them. Thanks for the heads up. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:28, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Hey, I seem to have missed a feedback request from you a couple days ago. Is there something I can help you with? Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:06, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Hey Ian! I moved our draft to the mainspace Image sharing article; just wondered if you could look it over and see if we missed anything/make suggestions for small improvements that can be made. We didn't add to the history section, as we didn't feel there were enough reliable sources we could use to expand it. Thanks! [Belinrahs|talktomeididit] 06:17, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Looks good! Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:01, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted[edit]

Wikipedia Reviewer.svg

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Belinrahs. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Marvell Technology Group logo.jpg[edit]


Thanks for uploading File:Marvell Technology Group logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 10 March 2017 (UTC)