User talk:Bentogoa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Support request with team editing experiment project[edit]

Dear tech ambassadors, instead of spamming the Village Pump of each Wikipedia about my tiny project proposal for researching team editing (see here:, I have decided to leave to your own discretion if the matter is relevant enough to inform a wider audience already. I would appreciate if you could appraise if the Wikipedia community you are more familiar with could have interest in testing group editing "on their own grounds" and with their own guidance. In a nutshell: it consists in editing pages as a group instead of as an individual. This social experiment might involve redefining some aspects of the workflow we are all used to, with the hope of creating a more friendly and collaborative environment since editing under a group umbrella creates less social exposure than traditional "individual editing". I send you this message also as a proof that the Inspire Campaign is already gearing up. As said I would appreciate of *you* just a comment on the talk page/endorsement of my project noting your general perception about the idea. Nothing else. Your contribution helps to shape the future! (which I hope it will be very bright, with colors, and Wikipedia everywhere) Regards from User:Micru on meta.

Potential admin[edit]

Hi, I notice you're on Wikipedia:List of administrator hopefuls. Wikipedia would benefit from more admins. If you have been editing for more than 12 months (preferably 24+ months), and have been editing fairly consistently for the past 6 months (preferably 12+ months) with at least 100 edits a month (this tool will help) - or an explanation for any gaps, and haven't been blocked in the past three years - or a good explanation for a recent block, don't have a recent history of edit warring or arguing with other editors, feel you can explain why you wish to be an admin, can demonstrate some understanding of Wikipedia's procedures and processes, or know where to go for guidance, and are confident enough to go through a RfA, please get in touch with me. We can talk about it some more, and if all looks OK, I'll nominate you. SilkTork ✔Tea time 09:20, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

I don't have 100 edits per month , someday Bentogoa (talk) 05:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
If you do become more active, get in touch with me and we can talk some more. Regards SilkTork ✔Tea time 10:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Bentogoa (talk) 10:52, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[edit]

"Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Energy with this edit, you may be blocked from editing."

If you have a problem with something please indicate where the problem is. Refrain from writing mails such as above because you don't understand something. What exactly is your problem?

On this page:

The following was to be seen:

"In results can be considered as a definition of measurement of energy in quantum mechanics"

And since this is not correct English, I added the comment:

(this needs correcting).

And in response you made the empty claim quoted above - why?

kk (talk) 21:36, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Wrong way to put comments . see [[1]]

Tech News: 2015-36[edit]

21:36, 31 August 2015 (UTC)