License tagging for Image:Crowning as Emperor in Skoplje.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Crowning as Emperor in Skoplje.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:07, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with the page Miloš Obilić on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 18:23, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
License tagging for Image:Coat of Arms Hrebeljanovic.gif[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Coat of Arms Hrebeljanovic.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:05, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Bg007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ka1iban 16:12, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Please stop removing the paragraph on LGBT culture in Belgrade. The content is encyclopedic and relevant in the context of the article. Thanks, Ronline✉ 06:32, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
I think that LGBT for night life in Belgrade is totally irrelevant.They are not in serbian tradition,and there are more interessing stuff than small GAY parties.[reply]
I am NOT vandalising the page. I am simply following the directions found [1]. We do not list codeshares in Wikipedia. American Airlines do not fly their own metal to BEG, but only codeshare with British Airways to London. We only list the primary carriers in airport articles. Please read the instructions first before accusing other people of vandalism. Elektrik Blue 82 01:02, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I removed Adria Airways from the list because it does not show up in independent timetables like OAG.com. If you can show another source besides the airports' website, then it would be good to list them. Elektrik Blue 82 16:27, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
License tagging for Image:Cianfanini-Adoration.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Cianfanini-Adoration.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:05, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Crowning Tzar Dushan.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Crowning Tzar Dushan.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:05, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging for Image:Grb hrebeljanovica.gif[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Grb hrebeljanovica.gif. However, the copyright tag you've used is deprecated or obsolete, and should not be used. This could be because the tag is inaccurate or misleading, or because it does not adequately specify the copyright status of the image. For a list of copyright tags that are in current use, see the "Public domain", "Free license", and "Fair use" sections of Wikipedia:Image copyright tags.
Па, могао би да се прво упознаш са Википедијом мало боље, пре него што почнеш са изменама. Циљ те странице није да пропагира туризам у Београду, него да опише тренутно стање. Ово је енциклопедија, а не пропагандна страница. Можда тражиш ТОБ? Онај списак сам већ пре био пребацио на List of notable buildings in Belgrade. А не знам ко си и шта читаш, ал' у Београду најчитанији и најугледнији недељни часописи су НИН и Време. Европу нико не чита јер је, искрено, срање, а и вероватно Стандард такође, мада за тај никад нисам ни чуо, толико је угледан. Успут, обичај овде је да се подпишеш, тиме што после поруке ставиш ~~~~ или притиснеш одговарајући дугмић (трећи са десне стране изнад прозора за писање текста). Поздрав. --estavisti 00:11, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Брате, сасвим разумем твоју намеру, да што боље представиш Београд, ал' то нећеш постићи тиме што натрпаш чланак списковима. Пробао сам пре неки дан да предложим да чланак добије featured status, па видиш [2] да делимично баш због тих силних спискова није прошао. Ово што ја бришем се не брише са Википедије, то је све ту на другој страници (List of notable buildings in Belgrade). А за Будимпешту, није ни из далека близу featured status-у, и чланак о Београду je скоро два пута дужи, па не знам што ти је то неки пример. Оставио сам други коментар овде Talk:Belgrade#Tourism_.26_Media. --estavisti 01:03, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
License tagging for Image:Grb brankovica.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Grb brankovica.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:05, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Knez m..jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:07, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Cardusan.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:04, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
If the substance of this edit is accurate, feel free to re-add with citation. But please be aware that the locution "Jew George Soros" is more or less an ethnic insult. If the insult was accidental, be aware that the more appropriate way to write this is "George Soros, who is a Jew". - Jmabel | Talk 16:07, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Grb_kosaca.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading Image:Grb_oblacica-v.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Image tagging for Image:Paul_orlovic_death.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Paul_orlovic_death.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading Image:Smederev.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Image tagging for Image:Smederevo-forteress.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Smederevo-forteress.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Unspecified source for Image:Crowning Tzar Dushan.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Crowning Tzar Dushan.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Well, no; Kotromanics weren't Orthodox - most of them were Catholics (they were only originally Orthodox - the first two Bans); and what makes them "Serbian", and not "Bosnian"? --PaxEquilibrium 19:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Really? Are Bulgarians Serbs? --PaxEquilibrium 01:15, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The "Orthodox=Serb" can be easily applied to Herzegovina - but not Bosnia (Orthodox Serbs lived only in the easternmost parts of the Drina). Bosnia was not a component part of the Serbian Orthodox Church - and yes, what do you think, where did so many Bogomils come from? The Bosnian Church originates from the Bulgarians (to Bosnia it came after expulsions from the Serbian lands). An Orthodox Serbo-Croat in the Medieval ages could have any affiliation, expecially if he's not even an adherent of the SPC. Cheers! --PaxEquilibrium 01:34, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unspecified source for Image:Grb obilica.gif[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Grb obilica.gif. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Please tell us where you got this file; if you do not know where this file came from, do not upload it again. Kimchi.sg 15:32, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:King_dragutin.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading Image:Bel 212.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:05, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I wonder where did you get the info that Čedomir Jovanović is of Roma origin. I have never heard that except once when one user persistently put it back in the article until it was locked. He never wanted to provide any link or evidence to support his claims. Can you do that? Since information is totally new and widely unknown even in Serbia from where he comes I deleted it but of course you are free to put it back if you cite some source. Thanks a lot. --Trigor 11:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. But you still need to state your sources that his parents are of Roma origin. It is wrong to say that anybody who has a bit darker skin is a Roma. I think that Roma people would agree with that. I completely agree that if his parents are of Roma origin it would be ok to state that he too is of Roma origin. Thanks for replaying. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trigor (talk • contribs) 09:43, March 24, 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you to adhere to Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy for editors, which it appears you have not followed at Croatia. Thank you. -- xompanthy 16:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please do NOT remove warnings placed on your talk page! It is against policy and could be interpreted as vandalism. -- xompanthy 22:22, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Croatia, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This is your second warning. Serbs were neither the only refugees in the war, nor the majority. Please do NOT substitute fact for fiction. Thank you. -- xompanthy 19:22, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Are you just copy-pasting the warnings I put on your talk page on my talk page? Do you honestly think that will get you anywhere? You have a well documented history of not following wikipedia policy (90% of your talk page are BOT WARNINGS!). Trying to piss me off will not work in your favor, and will not help your comments survive reverts from apparently numerous other editors. It will only make me cranky, and will land you an administrative report, which I am filing out right now. -- xompanthy 21:54, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
One more thing... I never denied Croatian war crimes. And the only reason why YOUR generals are not in the Hague is because Radovan Karadžić and Ratko Mladić, two of the greatest mass murderers in the last 50 years have not been caught yet. Oh, and Slobodan Milošević died while on trial. I forgot that. As you can clearly see, the article (and this is the consensus) states that there were refugees on both sides. It doesn't even say (and the facts support this) the ratio of non-Serb refugees (Croatians, Bosniaks, etc.) to Serb refugees is like 50:1. It doesn't. 'Cause it really doesn't matter, in my view. Both sides did horrible things. Please take note, I am not denying this. Hell, my father is Serbian. So what in all honesty is your problem man? Are you saying there were NO non-Serbian refugees? That the Serbs were the ONLY people who lost their homes? 'Cause if you are, we really have nothing else to talk about. You might as well call Earth a ping-pong ball while you're on a roll. -- xompanthy 22:13, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh for the love of God... I never said that I don't care about the crimes. I meant I didn't care about the article mentioning the 50:1 ratio. Of course I care about the crimes, let's not get ridiculous here. And Thompson, he caters to a minority in Croatia. I don't listen to him, I don't like his songs. Never had an album, never will. I believe he's an asshole exploiting naive and stupid people, of which there are too many in both Croatia and Serbia. This discussion has all the potential to draw out into a 'we did this, but you did that too', so we might as well end it now. The whole point (that seems to have been lost along the way) is that you shouldn't insert into articles material that YOU would like to see there. The material needs to be NEUTRAL and UNBIASED. That's the point of wikipedia. And saying the Serbs were the refugees without mentioning the vast majority of others is NOT neutral. That's why I reverted your edit, and that's why other editors reverted it later on too. I, for instance, would like nothing more than to write 'Nikola Tesla is Croatian' in the Nikola Tesla article, but I'm not doing that, 'cause it's not neutral (or entirely true either). You see, Wikipedia is neither your's nor mine, so your and mine opinions have no place here.
That's pretty much it. I consider this matter closed. I hope in the future, you will reconsider your edits in view of NPOV policy before committing them. A sad brate ajmo dalje već, ovo mi je dosadilo... -- xompanthy 17:05, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, if you'd looked at my user page, you would have seen that I don't know Serbian, so I have no idea what your last line says. Second, uh... When did fixing spelling errors become POV? I have absolutely no idea what you're referring to. Not to mention that it looks very much like you just copied that comment directly from here to my page, so I'm rather at a loss as to what it is that you're accusing me of, or why. Care to clarify? -Bbik 00:09, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, at least that explains why you put the comment there, but I think you may have left it for the wrong person. I haven't written anything in that article, because I don't know nearly enough to contribute. The most I've done it fix obvious spelling errors and revert obvious vandalism and gibberish (No, I'm not considering what people add in Serbian to be gibberish, though I do tend to revert that as well, simply because this is the English Wikipedia.). This also means that in many cases, I haven't reverted things and instead leave it for someone else to revert later, because I don't know whether the additions/subtractions were done correctly or not. -Bbik 00:33, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Happy Easter to you, too :) -Bbik 19:24, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Cardusan.jpg)[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Cardusan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:07, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image tagging for Image:Coat of Arms Obilic 1386.gif[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Coat of Arms Obilic 1386.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Image tagging for Image:Grb Hrebeljanovica.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Grb Hrebeljanovica.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading Image:King_Dragutin.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
ANSWER AS YOU KNOW I CHANGED MY MIND AND WHEN I CONSIDER SITUACION I WAS DELETED 'CALLING VANDAL POST',SO YOU DON'T HAVE REASON TO BE BITTER.
I AM TRYING TO BE GOOD EDITOR,OK,EVERYONE MISTAKES.IT HAPPENS!
CHEERS!
No problem, sorry for (over)reaction; I noticed that you deleted the post to my talk page, but I didn't pay attention to timestamps correlating with the article history. Cheers. Duja► 07:46, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
My contribution to the Belgrade article you are working on[edit]
Note I added info that during World War I most of offensive occured near Belgrade and short intro into "why" with reference to Gavrilo Princip, see article Belgrade. Hope it doesn't get deleted as it is part of Belgrade's history!Bosniak 05:30, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Eh hvala sto si me zvao. Mora da se nesto uradi protive vandalizma za sve sto je Srpsko. kako che mo da sastavimo ovo? Pozdrav Bluewings 2:50, 29 June 2007
I assume you meant the fact that I removed that image? I had a reason. It was listed on WP:PUI after which I deleted it. I didn't realised the picture was also at Commons. Where, for that matter, it also is requested for deletion. Also, don't use words like vandalism when it obviously wasn't. Garion96(talk) 08:19, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Raketa alas 010707.gif, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself.CSDWarnBot 19:06, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Coat of Arms Obilic 1386.gif[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Coat of Arms Obilic 1386.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Grb Hrebeljanovica.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Grb Hrebeljanovica.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Their official web site does not show that they are planning flights to Belgrade. If you can provide a source then I will be glad to put EgyptAir back on the list. Here type in Cairo - Belgrade and see what you get http://www.egyptair.com.eg/English/IBE/FlightSchedule.aspx. Also Amadeus reservation system has not put these flights in any schedule. I don’t see how that is vandalism especially since I have helped to develop most of Serbia’s aviation articles on Wikipedia (among many others) and I’m not the one that deletes things for no good reason.
I transferred this image to Wikimedia Commons. The article about the GIRAFFE-System of the german Wikipedia needed it. If you are not content with my upload (perhaps you want its deletion), please let me know and contact me on my german user-discussionpage (Benutzer:High Contrast). You can find your image on Wikimedia-Commons here: Image:Giraffe Serbian Army.jpg.
What is this nonsense you've been spreading around the Wikipedia about Ceda, Korac and others??? --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 00:55, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly, what are your sources?
Secondly, what is the second sentence supposed to mean? PaxEquilibrium (talk) 21:00, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Šešelj is a Croatian name too, does that mean that the Serb Radicals are being led by a Croat? Oh, and how come is Mršić a Croatian surname? I don't know it - therefore, it's not everybody.
You haven't explained why you think his father is of Romany ethnicity.
Speaking about names, does Žarko Korać sound Jewish to you? Here's a Serbian Jew: Leon Cohen. That's a Jewish name.
And lastly, what facts precisely did I delete? And I cannot understand how could this relate to my support of their political opinions, I'm just defending the Wikipedia. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 18:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Even if that's true - yes, of course I want that...I mean really, what's the significance of that?!?
Ljubomir Mršić, father Marjan, Serbian Orthodox, born 1939, killed by the Ustashi in the WWII Holocaust in 1942 while still a kid in the Stara Gradiška extermination camp. Satisfied?
BTW, Find me at least one Šešelj that doesn't declare himself Croat. :)) I have around 20 Croatian politicians (just politicians) with that name (all ethnic Croats), and a loads more others - no Serb. :)
Ceda said he's Serb, even in the pre-electoral presidential campaign.
Here again I am convinced of your lack of knowledge of Serbian last names. Jovanovic and Nikolic are most common Serb surnames. What is the name of Zarko's mother? --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 00:09, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Facts about Ceda,Korac and others are maybe nonsense for you ,but not for others.Let us write facts.Your political opinion is totally irrelevant for wikipedia.
You can ask for every wrote sentence in Wikipedia for sources.
The fact about Ceda is that his mother maiden name is Mrsic.Everybody knows that Mrsic is Croatian last name,that is fact.Even croatian famous basketball player has same last name.About Korac I will put sources.
Secondly,you deleted some facts ,because you don't like that facts,or you want to hide.That means that you are not objective and means that you support their political opinions.
Yeah,you want to relativise fact that Mrsic is croatian last name.Find me only one Mrsic who declare that is Serb,and I will accept your point.I didn't find anyone,so far,...Mrsic Zvonimir -Member of croatian parlament,Damir Mrsic - basketball pl.,Veljko Mrsic - basketball player from Capljina,Stanko Mrsic -player NK Osijek,...I never heard that Ceda declared himself as Serb.Jovanovic is most common Orthodox Roma last name. Korac is last name from Krajina,but his mother was Jew.Publicly,as 'former' comunist,he declare himself as atheist.Here is the independent proof ,not acusation or propaganda http://www.internetjournalofcriminology.com/Anti-Semitism%20and%20the%20Christian%20Right%20in%20post-Milosevic%20Serbia.pdf
Please do not alter quotes from sources for POV reasons, as you did with this edit to Borovo Selo killings. I see from your contributions that you have also made a number of unsourced and often very partisan edits to other articles, including Croats, Behind Enemy Lines (film), Eurasian Avars etc. Please stop doing this or you will be blocked. -- ChrisO (talk) 09:10, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's a Hollywood film, of course it's stupid - it's made for Americans after all. :-) As for the Avar things, please bear in mind that Wikipedia is a source-based encyclopedia - we don't allow original research, unsourced content or content that's based on unreliable or unverifiable sources. If you add anything to an article, please make sure that it's based on a reliable source that you can cite. Take a look at how I've done it in Glina massacre for an example. -- ChrisO (talk) 08:48, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok,next time when I write something I will put sources especially for sensitive stuff.
You wrote very good ,the article is excelent now.Thank you for updating.Sorry about some comments.
Cheers Bg007
I see you have made good edits at Battle of Kosovo, but if you look closely at recent edit history of the page, you will see that User:Zakipfc has extensively vandalized the page, apparently without you or most other contributors realizing it. It is not the most blatant form of vandalism, is why you missed it, but if you look at the most recent diffs [3] involving Zakipfc's edits, I think you'll see what I mean. I'm notifying you because you and another editor have edited the page since Zakipfc, and undoing his vandalism would also erase your edits. 69.149.164.249 (talk) 14:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Agree w the previous comment. Stop privatizing the Serbia article (and lecturing people about Serbdom).
NeroN_BG
How dare you accuse me of being anti-Serbian![edit]
I am not anti-Serbian, I am not "anti-anybody". I have known a number of Serbs, including my high school accounting teacher named Mr. Pasic who was a good person. So don't you dare call me "anti-Serbian". I am neutral on the Yugoslav issues, people like you have in turn have accused me of being either "pro-Serb" "anti-Croatian" or "anti-Albanian. It's because I deny accepting nationalist rhetoric from any nation in the Balkans. If you ever post another insult or attack on my talk page again, I will report you for harassment.--R-41 (talk) 14:35, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Ŵïllî§ï$2 (Talk!/Cont.) 03:22, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have told you that I am no "anti-Serbian". I have known a number of Serbs, I was a friend of my high school accounting teacher who was a Serb. You have claimed that I am somehow "denying" the atrocious crimes of the Ustase. I am fully aware that the Ustase committed genocide that killed hundreds of thousands of Serbs. However because you still continue to accuse me of being "anti-Serbian" and accusing me of "minimizing" Ustase crimes, I am reporting you for uncivil behaviour.--R-41 (talk) 01:49, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user working on articles concerning the Balkans. Before any such sanctions are imposed, editors are to be put on notice of the decision. This notice is not to be taken as implying any inappropriate behaviour on your part, merely to warn you of the Arbitration Committee's decision. Thank you. SamuellLift me up or put me down 20:17, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Pretpostavljam da si na delu o sportu u članku "Serbia" najviše ti radio jer se tvoj username pojavljuje najviše puta u istoriji stranice... Uglavnom, smatram (a nisam jedini, uveravam te) da je taj deo članka preopširan. Sasvim je normalno da se ponosimo našim sportistima i da nas oni na lep način predstavljaju u svetu, ali mislim da je za istoriju jedne države i jednog naroda mnogo značajnija njegova nauka, književnost, slikarstvo, spomenici arhitekture itd. Mislim da "ne ide" da se u članku o Srbiji nađu slike svih naših tenisera, a nema slike nijednog srednjevekovnog vladara, pa ni novovekovnog, izuzev Karađorđa i Miloša Obrenovića (i Slobodana Miloševića naravno) niti slike nijednog srpskog naučnika ili umetnika... Da li Đoković više zaslužuje svoju sliku u ovom članku od Andrića? Vidić od Vuka Karadžića? Ivanovićeva od Nadežde Petrović? Na kraju krajeva, niko od ovo troje i ne živi u Srbiji, a na većini turnira ne predstavljaju Srbiju već sami sebe... Vidić igra za engleski, a ne za srpski klub. U ostalom, da li su samo teniseri naš ponos? Kao što piše na samom početku tog dela, ekipni sportovi su najpopularniji u Srbiji. Zašto se tu ne bi našla slika naših vaterpolista, odbojkaša, pa, zašto da ne, čak i fudbalera ili košarkaša? Sasvim bi prikladna (ako ne i prikladnija) bila i slika Beogradske arene, Marakane ili neka fotografija sa "večitog derbija". Ovako, to deluje kao dizanje u nebo trenutno popularnih (što to u ostalom i jeste), a nekome ko nije iz Srbije, a želi da sazna nešto o njoj deluje veoma ružno: kao hvalospev, reklama i pristrasno pisanje, dakle kao nešto što se ne može uzeti ozbiljno. Svestan sam mišljenja velikog dela nacije da su sportisti naš jedini ponos, ali imajući na umu to da ogroman broj čovečanstva ne zanima sport to ne mora nužno biti tako... Dakle, pozivam te:
1. Da, za početak promeniš slike, čisto iz estetičkih razloga. Stavi se u poziciju ljudi koji članak samo "prelete".
2. Da budeš objektivan i skratiš deo o sportu.
Još jednom, sve sam ovo napisao jer sam primetio da si napravio najviše edita na odeljku Sport. Ako nisi ti ovako kreirao ovaj odeljak izvinjavam ti se, i u svakom slučaju molim za pomoć oko ovoga...
I to je sve što imaš da kažeš kao odgovor? Poenta je u tome da taj deo treba malo skratiti i doterati - napisao sam na koji način, da se ne ponavljam - a ne u četvoro gorepomeutih... No, dobro, to će već neko drugi zainteresovan (ako ne i ja sam ubrzo) srediti... [[User:Ostalocutanje|Ostalocutanje]
Ok,ja se delimicno slazem sa tobom.Ja sam stavio sliku krunisanja Cara Dusana,vrlo cesto brisu postove,vezane za srpsku istoriju,jer to ocigledno mnogima smeta.Srbija je jedna od retkih drzava koja do skoro nije imala svoj odeljak o sportu.Stranu sam hteo da koncipiram kao sto je to napravljeno na drugim drzava,koje imaju mnogo manje stvari da stave.Ja zivim u Americi i ovde je skoro svako cuo i za Novaka i za Anu i Jelenu,za Vidica nisu culi.Mislio sam da cu postavljanjem njihovih slika,pribliziti pojedincima/korisnicima koji nisu bas puno informisani,a takvih je negde 95% korisnika.Ipak i dalje mislim da jedna mala drzava kakva je Srbija treba da se ponosi sportisitima koje poseduje i da to javno pokaze.Pozdrav! User:Bg007
Znam, i u pravu si: Srbija treba da se ponosi svojim sportistima, ali Wikipedia ima svoje standarde. Stavljam se u poziciju nekog sa strane ko članak čita. I sam sam hiljadu puta naleteo na članke koji izgledaju pisani kao hvalospevi i reklame, i to je jedna od loših strana Wikipedije... Danas sam pogledao članak koji se zove Sport in Serbia, ili Serbian sport, ne sećam se tačnog naziva, i u nemu postoji samo dugačka lista nacionalnih timova Srbije. Mislim da odeljak o sportu iz članka o Srbiji treba prekopirati i prebaciti u članak o srpskom sportu, a odeljak u članku Srbija malo doterati. Što se tiče naših sportista, postoje članci Serbs i List of Serbs.
Svestan sam tvojih napora da svetu pokažeš lepše strane jedne male države sa, treba li reći, jako lošim imidžom. Ja lično sam napravio desetine članaka o srpskim rok muzičarima, bendovima i albumima... I ja Wikipediju vidim kao odlično mesto za pružanju lepše slike o srpskoj kulturi svetu, ali se pri tom mora biti objektivan, ne pridavati nebitnom ili manje bitnom prevelik značaj i - to se podrazumeva - ne falsifikovati i prikrivati činjenice. Hajde da to radimo dostojanstveno i po standardima jedne ozbiljne institucije kao što je Wikipedia.
A što se tiče postova o srpskoj istoriji - ne mogu da kažem da to nisam primeto. Ja i još par ljudi smo imali posla sa jednim Bošnjakom koji je konstantno brisao sadržinu članka o srpskom roku... To su vetrenjače. Naše je da radimo a nekulturnih i necivilizovanih da brišu i kvare...
Hi Bg007, I would like you, when you have a few moments, to read WP:NPOV. This will greatly help you in your editing. Very seriously, following notifications here and here, I would advise you in the strongest possible terms that nationalist editing in Balkans-related articles is not allowed. It has led to various editors being blocked indefinitely. Please read Wikipedia:ARBMAC#Final_decision closely - I notice your name is already on the list. Please make sure that you discuss controversial edits at talk before you make them. If you don't, well, you know what the outcome will be. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 23:03, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I included Kosovo because, in a European context, I decided to include any nation which the majority of other European countries recognise as independent.
Please stop adding false information to articles, as you have been repeatedly doing to Belgrade Nikola Tesla Airport. The reasons why your edits are considered invalid have also been explained to you by more than one editor.
Also, please ensure that your edit summaries and all other input is in English. This is the English language Wikipedia, after all. Thanks. Jasepl (talk) 09:43, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey body,that is not my fault 'cause you don't understand sources in Serbian news or internet portals.I gave you a source,so it seems that you vandalize and put false informations on article about Belgrade airport,maybe you are better informed somewhere God knows where.Also you can use internet in other way,like to go in official site of Nikki,and check.They already sell tickets for such destinations,so I don't know what you are talking about?Most editors are only IP adresses,so I consider to ask administrators to put restrictions.Also I arrange this article couple of years...
Bg007l 13 october 2009
Samo da ti objasnim. Niki prodaje karte za Berlin i ostale destinacije na svom sajtu iz Beograda jer ce putnici moci preko Beca da se nadovezu na te letove. To nije isto kao da lete iz Bograda za te destinacije sto nije slucaj. LukaP (talk)
File source problem with File:Edgar degas'bust man in soft hat'.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Edgar degas'bust man in soft hat'.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:42, 22 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:42, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File source problem with File:The music lesson XX national museum belgrade.jpg[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:The music lesson XX national museum belgrade.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:59, 9 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:59, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for uploading File:Nova.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:01, 9 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:01, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Foča, you may be blocked from editing. ◅PRODUCER(TALK) 21:03, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
I fight against serbophobia and your islamic propaganda will be noticed to administrators.[reply]
Due to ongoing attacks by you on other nationalities and religions and Wikipedia users, you are blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. This type of behavior is absolutely not acceptable here and you are not welcome here if you practice it.
You were previously warned and then blocked for engaging in this behavior. Resuming the behavior when the prior block expired was unacceptable.
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Stara.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion,
a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ronline ✉ 06:32, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
I think that LGBT for night life in Belgrade is totally irrelevant.They are not in serbian tradition,and there are more interessing stuff than small GAY parties.
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Ŵïllî§ï$2 (Talk!/Cont.) 03:22, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user working on articles concerning the Balkans. Before any such sanctions are imposed, editors are to be put on notice of the decision. This notice is not to be taken as implying any inappropriate behaviour on your part, merely to warn you of the Arbitration Committee's decision. Thank you. Samuell Lift me up or put me down 20:17, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Foča, you may be blocked from editing. ◅PRODUCER (TALK) 21:03, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
I fight against serbophobia and your islamic propaganda will be noticed to administrators.
