User talk:Bharat.varsh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bharat.varsh, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Bharat.varsh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

July 2017[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Meerut, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. AntiVan (talk) 06:56, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation into Meerut Municipal Corporation. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:09, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Bharat.varsh, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Indian Administrative Service have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IAS and IPS[edit]

  • IAS officers are posted as Special Secretaries to the Government of India. And they get the same pay as Secretaries to Government of India.[1] They are empanelled as Secy. equivalent by GOI under the Central Staffing Scheme.[2] So, the post's place in the table is justified. Edit- Secy. ranked officers are posted as Secy. equivalents whilst retaining their status, for example the Home Secretary, Rajiv Gauba, was designated OSD (Secy. equivalent) before taking the charge as HS,[3] and he was the Urban Development Secretary before his shift to the MHA.[3] - SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions) 22:00, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • The post/rank of ADG was created in the eighties to complete the quasi-equivalency of IPS with the Indian Army. Lt. Generals are of three grades viz. Apex (Level 17) - VCOAS/DCOAS/Commanders, HAG+ (Level 16) and HAG (Level 15). IPS officers at DG get both Apex (HoPF) and HAG+ scales (Non-HoPF), but not HAG. ADGs get HAG scale and therefore, are somewhat equivalent/analogous to Addl. Secy, GOI and Lt. General (HAG scale). Therefore, they should be listed at 25 on Order of Precedence, not 26 (which would be for Jt. Secy.s/Major Generals.SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions) 19:38, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • To add to my previous point, Sixth Pay Commission made a comment about 'established relativity' between IPS and Army Officers, the same was said by the Seventh Pay Commission, which refused to abolish the rank of DIG because of its relativity with Brigadier.

Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions) 22:00, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Sharma, Aman (April 19, 2012). "Government promotes 28 IAS officers to secretary and special secretary ranks". India Today. Retrieved September 1, 2017. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  2. ^ "Empanelment of Secy/Equiv level - 32 IAS officers of 1984 batch and 41 IAS officers of 1985 batch - Sh. Ajay K Bhalla and others" (PDF). Department of Personnel and Training, Government of India. May 4, 2017. Retrieved September 3, 2017. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  3. ^ a b "Rajiv Gauba - Executive Record Sheet". Department of Personnel and Training, Government of India. Retrieved August 31, 2017. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)

Edit war on Indian Administrative Service[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Indian Administrative Service shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. EvilxFish (talk) 19:31, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to vote on merger of Indian Administrative Service and District Collector[edit]

@Bharat.varsh:. Someone had put a merge tag on District Collector in June 2016, but forgot to create discussion for the same. So, I decided get this all done with and created the discussion in the original tagger's lieu. As you're a significant contributor for both articles. You're invited to put forth your views here.
Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions) 20:49, 5 September 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Edit summaries[edit]

Hi Bharat.varsh, please leave an edit summary after making contributions to articles. This makes it easier for other editors to go through the history of changes made to an article.

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

 

Empty This is a minor edit Tick Watch this page

By publishing changes, you agree to the Terms of Use, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License and the GFDL. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.

Publish changes Show preview Show changes Cancel

The edit summary field appears above the "Save page" button

Thanks. MTTrainDiscuss 17:29, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Bharat.varsh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating Indian Administrative Service for good article status[edit]

I am going to nominate Indian Administrative Service for WP: GA and as, you're the only other significant who is currently active on the English Wiki, can you go through the article before I nominate for GA status? After going through, do give me a feedback on what needs to be added/deleted or any other issue you may have with the article.
Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 14:09, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Minor barnstar
Good Edits on India related articles .. Keep going.. naveenpf (talk) 06:49, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Advise[edit]

Hi Bharat.varsh! As you are one of the few competent Wikipedians editing articles related to the governance and politics of Uttar Pradesh, I would just like to tender you some advise:—

  1. Please always use edit summaries, not using them can attract a block;
  2. Political, military and civil service offices ('minister', 'general', 'secretary' et al.) are often capitalised wrongly, per Wikipedia's manual of style on job titles, names of offices are generally common nouns, and hence, should be be written in miniscule;
  3. Try to back up everything you write with references and don't violate copyrights; and
  4. The normal way to edit Wikipedia can be arduous, try to use the Visual Editor, or the 2017 Wikitext Editor.

Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 08:08, 4 October 2018 (UTC); edited 08:09, 4 October 2018 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Bharat.varsh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Provincial Development Service (Uttar Pradesh)[edit]

Hello, Bharat.varsh,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Provincial Development Service (Uttar Pradesh)! I edit here too, under the username Rosguill}} and it's nice to meet you:-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The article needs more sources that are independent of the subject. Additionally, there's some acronyms that aren't explained at any point in the article, and I'm not sure how encyclopedic all of the recruitment information is.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed, Rosguill talk 08:35, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Divisional commissioner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jammu and Kashmir. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uttar Pradesh Tourism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Principal Secretary.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved your article Additional District Magistrate to draftspace. This is because the article currently does not have sufficient reliable sources to remain published. Please make sure to read our guideline on reliable sources. Once your article has sufficient sourcing, feel free to submit it for review, or if you are confident, move it back to its original location. If you have any questions or would like any help, feel free to contact me! Elli (talk | contribs) 14:28, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you interested in Civil Service related articles?[edit]

Are you interested in Civil Service related articles? then please join in Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian Civil Servants. Let's unite together. Thank you --Shaji issac (talk) 03:50, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Bharat.varsh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Additional District Magistrate, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bharat.varsh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Additional District Magistrate".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 15:17, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Varanasi City Police Commissionerate for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Varanasi City Police Commissionerate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Varanasi City Police Commissionerate until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 TT me 17:03, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Administrative divisions of Uttar Pradesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Banda.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Districts of Delhi Police[edit]

Hi @Bharat.varsh. The table you have added to Districts of Delhi Police is unsourced. Please add references to support the information provided in that table. Dhruv edits (talk) 19:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Manoj Kumar Singh (civil servant) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manoj Kumar Singh (civil servant) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manoj Kumar Singh (civil servant) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Wikishovel (talk) 14:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]