User talk:Minna Sora no Shita

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:Bigtop)
Jump to: navigation, search


Previous archives under the old username Bigtop


Can you tell me what the reliability problem is with the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by EP PUB (talkcontribs) 19:40, 30 July 2013 (UTC)


I still don't get how Business Better Bureau and Business Week isn't considered third party reliable sources. Both are well known and if those don't count, what do I have to put in my references to get it accepted?

Hi, I added some references to my article, Please consider searching by parts of the name to find more results . Search with CYC, or Christian Youth Channel or Coptic Youth Channel . Also Consider that the channel is an eastern minority channel to server coptic youth worldwide, so you will not find many articles about it in western media — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pola Edward (talkcontribs) 00:08, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

New References[edit]

I added some new references to the article. I believe they are in the right place. EP PUB (talk) 21:04, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

West Brook Wines[edit]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/West Brook Wines Can you explain the reasons why the article has been declined?

capnjimnzCapnjimnz (talk) 01:42, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

sources & submission[edit]

Hi Minna Sora, can you please tell me how many times can I submit my article for review?? is there a limitation?? so that I can various sources for referencing to provide credibility for the article. thanks, (talk) 08:44, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Reason for declining article[edit]

Hi Minna Sora Thanks for reviewing the article that I wrote. Earlier when you reviewed it you mentioned the comment but now I couldn't find any comment but a notice telling "This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability". I read about notability and as per the article said I've mentioned reference links the notable websites in the domain my website deals with. Please let me know what should I add as "notable" thing in my article. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skilrock (talkcontribs) 09:44, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Where can I view the comments of those who review my article?[edit]

Hello Minna where can I view the comments of those who review my article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MoneyArticleEditor (talkcontribs) 10:47, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[edit]

Hello, I want to correct my article about Diamond Nexus so that it can be accepted into Wikipedia, given they make the crowns for the Miss Universe Org. and that is notable. I removed unsourced information and also cited a reference to the date that the Miss Universe Org. officially made them crown makers. Please let me know how this looks and what you would suggest that I also do to make it more notable, if needed.

Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gemqueen46 (talkcontribs) 18:10, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Notability question[edit]

Can you please tell me what the problem is concerning the notability in this article? My sources are legitimate, mainstream media outlets.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Erinfwomack (talkcontribs) 19:11, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Re-assess blank article[edit]

I very recently submitted a blank article by mistake you rejected. I have corrected and resubmitted, made sure it wasn't blank, please re-assess and approve!

Reggie Sears[edit]

I am not quite sure I understand. I have listed notable sources I have a few more from "mainstream" publications. I am not understanding why you do not consider him "notable" enough, especially considering many of the clowns on here who have no notability or notoriety whatsoever with pages on here.

I am trying to author the wiki page for UniqTeas. It has been rejected twice due to inadequate citations. In the last request I added two citations from independent magazines. I am wondering if they were not good enough or do I just need more citations? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcaraway (talkcontribs) 20:22, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Poster Blogging[edit]

Dear Minna,

The post which I added has not been accepted..why is that? Cud u pls explain


gayendraGayendra (talk) 04:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Poster Blogging[edit]

Dear Minna,

The post which I added has not been accepted..why is that? Cud u pls explain


gayendraGayendra (talk) 04:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Poster Blogging[edit]

Dear Minna,

The post which I added has not been accepted..why is that? Cud u pls explain


gayendraGayendra (talk) 04:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Poster Blogging[edit]

Dear Minna,

The post which I added has not been accepted..why is that? Cud u pls explain


gayendraGayendra (talk) 04:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Poster Blogging[edit]

Dear Minna,

The post which I added has not been accepted..why is that? Cud u pls explain


gayendraGayendra (talk) 04:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Submission on my article[edit]

Hello, you have declined the submission of my article ( Could you please explain in details why is it? May be some advises? Julia.tretyakova (talk) 04:56, 1 August 2013 (UTC) Julia Tretyakova.

Regarding redirect of Yours Truly (Ariana Grande album)[edit]

It is a redirect. I clicked on the link and it redirected me to the article of Ariana Grande. Mr. Cookie 715 (talk) 00:38, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2013[edit]

Notable links[edit]

Hi Minna

As reported earlier I am still waiting for your answer. Could you please tell me what is "notable" for Wikipedia. I've included the most notable links related to the domain the company works with. You've been rejecting the articles but please provide the exact solution for the same. Thanks in advance. Waiting to get a reply from you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skilrock (talkcontribs) 04:24, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Decline of article[edit]

Hi Minna

As per your comment, I would like to bring into your notice that I've included links from, which is a reputed government site in U.S. Furthermore, our company is registered in Nasscom, which is another reputed organization in India. These two websites hold a good reputation and since we are Indian based company, being a registered member of Nasscom itself adds some authentication about the company. Please do reply me for the same. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skilrock (talkcontribs) 07:28, 5 August 2013 (UTC)


Hello Minna

I am waiting for further comments from you. Please let me know about the notable links that i've mentioned in my article are notable for wikipedia or no. Waiting for your response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skilrock (talkcontribs) 09:03, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 August 2013[edit]

Article re-submitted[edit]

Hi Minna

I've submitted the article once again, please let me know if it is alright now as per Wikipedia's guidance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skilrock (talkcontribs) 10:09, 12 August 2013 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Minna Sora no Shita. You have new messages at Dodger67's talk page.
Message added 17:55, 12 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:55, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

A Barnstar for You![edit]

The AFC Backlog Buster Barnstar
Goldenwiki 2.png

Congratulations, Minna Sora no Shita! You're receiving The Golden Wiki Award and Content Reviewers Medal because you reviewed 1378 articles during the recent AFC Backlog elimination drive! Thank you for you contributions to Wikipedia at-large and helping to keep the backlog down. We hope you continue reviewing submissions and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you, Congratulations, and keep up the good work! Mdann52 (talk) 17:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks so much! I've been waiting for this for quite some time! You know, July was only my first month reviewing AfC submissions! --みんな空の下 (トーク) 17:54, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Sorry about the wait - I had an family holiday is forgotten about! Anyway, congratulations on coming first (note - in future, it's easier now to put {{ping}} on your talk page when replying; It notifies the user in question you've replied to them) Mdann52 (talk) 18:15, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 August 2013[edit]

STiki emergency[edit]

The Signpost: 21 August 2013[edit]


Trophy.png Sorry
Sorry for editing your page. I have no idea this works and I am just a first time user. Killhead98 (talk) 23:03, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/PrithvirajKothari[edit]

I would like to know the reason of the above mentioned page being deleted. Awaiting your reply. Thanks Nicola frenandes (talk) 09:08, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

The Ambivalent Love Addict[edit]

Every day I come to Wikipedia to find out how to get my article The Ambivalent Love Addict reconsidered. I keep being told that Five Sisters Ranch owns the copyright to my article and they do not. They allowed me to post my article on their blog and I did. How do I prove that I own the copyright to this term and all the articles I wrote to brand it.

The first article I submitted gave the history of the creation of the term and since that was rejected I re-wrote the article leaving myself out and just describing in simple terms what this term means. It is gaining momentum and I want credit. Is this a bad thing?

susanpeabody490 The Ambivalent Love Addict Copyright 2004 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Susanpeabody490 (talkcontribs) 20:44, 29 August 2013 (UTC)


Attn: Minna Sora no Shita,

I haven't personally edited any Wikipedia pages in months, however I've found that my IP address ( has been logged as the producer of several vandalism-rated or less-than-helpful edits to pages referencing the Madagascar movies. I'm not sure how this could be the case. Is it possible that someone is using my IP remotely? How can I investigate this? I would appreciate any guidance you can give me.


Andrew Elam.

PS, I'm hesitant to publicly post an email address or phone number publicly, so please respond here with any feedback you have for me. I'll recheck this page within 24 hours. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 05:55, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry about that. The IP address seems to be shared, but are you accessing it from your home? --みんな空の下 (トーク) 07:15, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 August 2013[edit]

Your edit revert[edit]

Regarding youe edit revert here, I was trying to revert a robot revert of an edit at The Empress's Tomb where I had renoved a copyright violation (an enitre synospsis had been cut and pasted from a web page), placing a note on the Talk page. William Reid Boyd (talk) 04:28, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Not a biography of a living person.[edit]

Giles Deleuze died in 1995. So the fact that you think his article involves the biography of a living person speaks to a a lack of care. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 19:59, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Prithviraj Kothari.[edit]

Hi Minna,

You replied that my article has been deleted because of copyright violation. Can you please elaborate and point out the violation.

ThanksNicola frenandes (talk) 05:30, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 September 2013[edit]


Thanks for fixing my block noticed. Busted not hitting preview again. =\ -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:46, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Username reporting[edit]

Thanks for raising problematic usernames at WP:UAA! I just wanted to say, though, that WP:UAA is different from other noticeboards regardin prior discussion before being brought to WP:UAA in the sense that if the username is blatant enough to be reported, then {{uw-username}} or {{uw-coi-username}} should not be added to the user's talk page. Otherwise it gives the impression that there's going to be a discussion about the user's username, when really an administrator (such as myself) will be coming around to softblock the editor until the username is changed. So if it is blatant, just bring it up at WP:UAA. If it is not blatant, discuss it with the editor, and then raise it at WP:RFCN if you cannot reach an agreement. See also instruction #4 at the WP:UAA page. Thanks again for bringing them to an administrator's attention! Singularity42 (talk) 20:00, 9 September 2013 (UTC)


Hi Minna,

I have recently seen the article on Liviit has not been approved.

Do you have any tips so that I can be?


Matt — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 16:24, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Probably it's not acceptable unless you understand WP:COI (conflict of interest) and WP:NPOV (neutral point of view)... --みんな空の下 (トーク) 16:27, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 September 2013[edit]

Hi Minna, I am a member of the Holy Synod of Milan, and I would like the true about our Holy Orthodox Church would be our duty and not the duty of the so-called Autonomous Metropolia of America, etc. If You want to compare the source see the page dedicated to Holy Synod of Milan in Orthodox Wiki ( In there the article is written with respect of the True. I think is our duty to care our page.

other sources - official website of the Holy Synod of Milan:

In next day I will correct the errors of the text about our church.

Thank You

Mons. Vladimir — Preceding unsigned comment added by Volodymir (talkcontribs) 22:24, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Decline Anant Mane Article[edit]

Dear Minna,

Thank you for reviewing the article. As commented by you I have removed the IMDB link, as that was not the source of my research. This director is a historical figure and regional celebrity (Marathi language movie director) and my source is primarily from researching and translating Marathi web sites, magazine articles and the Marathi wikipedia page, and the international film database. This director is cross-referenced in several articles in wikipedia.

Thank you,

Vijay (talk) 18:06, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 September 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 25 September 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 02 October 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 09 October 2013[edit]

Hi, You left me a message for me saying you had reverted something I had changed. The page in question is not one I have visited. I have looked at the edit in question and can see that it is actually offensive. It wasn't me. Not something I would do, nor would I have any interest in the group it refers to. I'm not very familiar with editing on Wikipedia so can't check if they used my details to log in. There is no one else at my home that might have done this. I would appreciate any help or advice you can offer? PeterM88 (talk) 15:50, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 October 2013[edit]

Bay Area Council[edit]

I created an article for the Bay Area Council, giving it the main name, with the other uses having more specific names. I dont think your info from your requested article is sourced well enough to add it, but at least it exists now. I hadnt seen you tried to create it until now. thanks for trying, this is a major organization.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 16:48, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 30 October 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 06 November 2013[edit]

You are not nice[edit]

you hurt my feelings because you deleted my works and ruined my happiness. I can no longer sleep because of you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 03:39, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 November 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 20 November 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 04 December 2013[edit]

  • Featured content: F*&!

The Signpost: 11 December 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 18 December 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 25 December 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 01 January 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 08 January 2014[edit]

Re: "The Evil Side of Religion" page submission[edit]

Hi Minna, one of my submissions was rejected on the grounds that I cited tumblr which is not reliable. However the actual source is a review in a magazine from 1987 and tumblr is simply hosting the only scan of this review that I know of. Furthermore my submission was intended to help clean up and add more outside sources for the page Deceased (band). I would like you to perhaps reconsider, or offer some advice as to what would be a better site to host this scan, as the only other thing I can think of is to download it and re-upload it somewhere else. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uncle slam (talkcontribs) 03:41, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 January 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 22 January 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 29 January 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 29 January 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 12 February 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 19 February 2014[edit]

My Hag Game[edit]

Please stop blocking me on this. We have had hours of fun playing this, and I am very proud of it. Its a very fun game. I want to share it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThePincheburro (talkcontribs) 02:33, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Articles for creation March 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive[edit]


Hello Minna Sora no Shita:

WikiProject AFC is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1, 2014 to March 31, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 0 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script has been released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks.
Posted by Northamerica1000 (talk) on 02:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation

The Signpost: 26 February 2014[edit]

(test) The Signpost: 05 March 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 12 March 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 19 March 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 26 March 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 02 April 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 09 April 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 23 April 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 30 April 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 07 May 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 14 May 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 21 May 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 28 May 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 04 June 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 11 June 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 18 June 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 25 June 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 02 July 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 09 July 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 16 July 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 23 July 2014[edit]

hello — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 05:05, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 July 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 06 August 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 13 August 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 20 August 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 27 August 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 03 September 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 10 September 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 17 September 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 24 September 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 01 October 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 08 October 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 15 October 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 22 October 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 29 October 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 05 November 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 12 November 2014[edit]

Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews[edit]

Hello Minna Sora no Shita. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.

The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.

If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)

If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.

Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.

I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).

       Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 November 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 03 December 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 10 December 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 17 December 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 24 December 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 31 December 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 07 January 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 14 January 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 21 January 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 28 January 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 04 February 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 11 February 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 18 February 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 25 February 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 25 February 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 04 March 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 11 March 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 18 March 2015[edit]


The Signpost – Volume 11, Issue 12 – 25 March 2015[edit]

The Signpost, 1 April 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 01 April 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 08 April 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 15 April 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 22 April 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 29 April 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 06 May 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 13 May 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 20 May 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 03 June 2015[edit]

AER P60[edit]

Do you have a source on the displacement of the AER P60, as I have yet to find anything anywhere that mentions it? Supposedly AER is not wanting to admit the displacement to the public. The359 (Talk) 00:13, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 June 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 17 June 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 24 June 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 01 July 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 08 July 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 15 July 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 22 July 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 29 July 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 05 August 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 12 August 2015[edit]

Gedeon Kibonge[edit]

Major General Gedeon Kibonge Mulomba born 16 March 1954 in Kananga, he is from Mwenga(south of Kivu). Kibonge is chief of military academy, the army of the Republic Democratic of the Congo. He is also known for having a feud with former Vice-president Jean-Pierre Bemba after he allegedly refused to take part in his crimes, for which Bemba is actually on trial at the International Criminal Court. He is one of the well trained and recognised officers of his generation, graduated from the 7th edition of EFO Kananga, Fort Benning(Georgia-USA), Fort Bragg(Noth Carolina-USA), 24th edition of kenitra(Morocco) and second edition of Nanjing in China. Throughout is career, He has trained and formed several other military officers including fellow major general Gabriel Hamisi Kumba known as Tango Four, who turns out to be the uncle of one of his children called Fidele Kibonge. When colonel in Bunia, Kibonge was a high member of MLC, the political party founded by Jean-Pierre Bemba, but eventually he left years later to PPRD. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mociado (talkcontribs) 05:29, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 August 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 26 August 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 02 September 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 09 September 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 16 September 2015[edit]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Distance Love.PNG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Distance Love.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξxplicit 06:02, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 September 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 30 September 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 07 October 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 14 October 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 21 October 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 28 October 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 04 November 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 11 November 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 18 November 2015[edit]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)