User talk:BillTunell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Persondata[edit]

I refer you to WP:PERSON, Dates of birth and death section. Do not use templates within these fields, as they can interfere with data extraction Persondata is intended to be used for data extraction, which is why it cannot be seen by the normal user. Templates complicate things for bots trying t extract the data. Periglio (talk) 23:03, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

  • Sorry. I thought this had been done on the infobox. BillTunell (talk) 23:09, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
    • No problem. I have put the ISO dates back as the templates are flagging the article as possible vandalism. Periglio (talk) 23:22, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oklahoma City FC (NASL), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NASL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 19 June[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedians by alma mater:Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedians by alma mater:Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for four days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redrose64 (talk) 12:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for four days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redrose64 (talk) 12:30, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Robinson-contract.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Robinson-contract.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Notre Dame Invite[edit]

Hey! I noticed you are a Notre Dame alumnus, hence I wanted to invite you to join our project.

Notre dame coat of arms.png

Hello, BillTunell! We are looking for editors to join WikiProject Notre Dame, an outreach effort which aims to support development of Notre Dame related articles in Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of participants, check out our To Do list, and join the discussion on our talk page. Thanks!!!

NDU-Goldkuppel.jpg


ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Pei Plan Map highlighted.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pei Plan Map highlighted.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly hi! 10:08, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

File:OU-Logo-Transparent.png listed for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:OU-Logo-Transparent.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ❄ Corkythehornetfan ❄ 06:10, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

George Bednar article[edit]

Good morning, Bill. I have started a talk page discussion @ Talk:George Bednar, and I would be grateful if you would review my comments and chime in. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 09:25, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Wright-grays.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Wright-grays.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)