User talk:Billertl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scoutinig Project[edit]

Hi. As you are obviously interested in Scouting, I invite you to join our project at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Scouting and participate in making the Scouting articles great. Rlevse 12:02, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Talk:Gary Sherman, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Diannaa (Talk) 04:21, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Gary Sherman a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. --Diannaa (Talk) 04:28, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wisconsin Barnstar[edit]

WikiProject Wisconsin Barnstar.png The WikiProject Wisconsin Barnstar
Many thanks for starting articles about various members of the Wisconsin-RFD (talk) 12:38, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Seconded. I've been seeing your new articles in newpages and wanted to thank you for your efforts. Much appreciated. Happy editing! “” Zachlipton (talk) 07:49, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wisconsin History[edit]

  • I like reading about Wisconsin History!RFD (talk) 11:31, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • I bought an (almost) complete collection of Wisconsin Blue Books, from 1887 to the present. I mostly got them to use as a reference when writing Wikipedia articles about Wisconsin History. I find Wisconsin History fascinating, too! Billertl (talk) 21:14, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled[edit]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

  • This permission does not give you any special status or authority
  • Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
  • You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
  • If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 12:23, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer granted[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. 

Dabomb87 (talk) 21:59, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wisconsin Legislature[edit]

I started articles for members of the 96th and 97th Wisconsin Legislature that had redlinks. I think there were 15-16 articles. Again-my thanks for doing the articles of the present Wisconsin Legislature. This help myself to complete the others that had to get done, Thank you-RFD (talk) 22:13, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wisconsin State Assembly special election[edit]

Hi On May 3, 2011, there was a special election for 3 seats in the Wisconsin State Assembly: Duey Stroebel and David Craig (Wisconsin politician) Republicans won and a Democrat Steve Doyle (Wisconsin politician) won. Are you willing to start articles for them? Many thanks-RFD (talk) 16:07, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The articles were started-the Craig/Stroebel articles vert short stubs. The Doyle article more detailed. Thanks-RFD (talk) 11:19, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

US National Archives collaboration[edit]

 United States National Archives WikiProject
Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the National Archives and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created WP:NARA to launch these efforts.

There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please sign up and introduce yourself. Dominic·t 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have mail[edit]

Hello, Billertl. You have new messages at Coquidragon's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Survey for new page patrollers[edit]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Billertl! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:41, 25 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Sd25.pdf[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sd25.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 21:32, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Sdist09.pdf[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sdist09.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 21:32, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish cemetery[edit]

Hi Billertl. I am trying to categorise the image you uploaded at File:Bnai Israel Cemetery.jpg. Can you remember where this cemetery is? I presume that it's somewhere in the United States. Skinsmoke (talk) 11:27, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This cemetery is located in Ashland, Wisconsin. I uploaded this image to use as part of an article I was going to write, but never got around to. That so long ago, I forgot all about it. Thanks for helping to categorize things. Billertl (talk) 05:55, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Many thanks for your help: it was the last file in the category that could not be categorised by country! Skinsmoke (talk) 13:05, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another cemetery[edit]

Hi Billertl. Sorry to mither (a northern English word meaning pester) again, but can you remember where File:Lapointegreenwood.jpg was taken? I presume it is also in Wisconsin, but there appear to be several Greenwood Cemeteries in the state. I suspect it's the one in La Pointe. Nice photo, by the way! Skinsmoke (talk) 11:57, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are correct. This cemetery is located at La Pointe, which is the town on Madeline Island, which is the largest of the Apostle Islands, in Lake Superior. Billertl (talk) 23:27, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help again. Must admit, I find there's something rather special about islands. Want to go there! Skinsmoke (talk) 11:49, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This island happens to have a very interesting history. It was one of the first places in Wisconsin to be settled by Europeans. There was a French fur trading post there in the 1600's. That was even before the United States became a country.
I actually spend a lot of time there, and I think it has a nice community. I've brought lots of people there to show them several points of interest. If you ever visit here, I highly recommend seeing the island.
There are actually several islands in this region with communities on them. If fact, I recently created a Wikipedia article about Populated islands of the Great Lakes. Billertl (talk) 20:59, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Documents at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library and Museum[edit]

hi

I work at the Gerald Ford Presidential Library and Museum, and we are uploading materials to Wikimedia Commons. We have a number of documents that might be of interest to you - they are located at Wikimedia, Category:Documents at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library and Museum.

If you are interested in writing articles/stubs, I may be able to provide you with pictures from our archives as well. We have a limited number of artifacts, to also at Wikimedia, Category:Artifacts at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library and Museum.

Let me know if I can help in any way, and please feel free to pass the word about these docs; I'd love to see some content generated around them....thanks! Bdcousineau (talk) 17:29, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Files missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 10:09, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks[edit]

Many thanks for starting articles about Wisconsin legislators. I have been starting articles about state and territorial legislators in Wisconsin and the other states. You have various family members who would served in the same state legislature and that is interesting. Again my thanks-RFD (talk) 17:44, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for your kind words. Also thank you for the Wisconsin articles that you've been creating. I think that together, we can put a lot of good information about our state on Wikipedia.Billertl (talk) 04:49, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Airports in Wisconsin[edit]

I noticed that you worked up some nice looking articles on Wisconsin airports! If you're taking requests, there are images at Commons at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Airports_in_Wisconsin but no articles for 2 airports. Shiocton has 2 images and 1 image for Manitowish Waters. I photographed both of them in my travels. I occasionally take road trips / vacations and have photographed much of the eastern half of Wisconsin. Thanks! Royalbroil 01:31, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Actually, I don't remember writing those articles. Do you maybe have me confused with someone else? Sorry. But thanks anyway, for your kind words. I hope no one hacked my account and wrote articles, maybe?? Billertl (talk) 04:34, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

James O'Neill[edit]

Hi-I found out there were two James O'Neill from Neillsville, Wisconsin. James O'Neill (Wisconsin settler) sawmill owner and Wisconsin legislator. He invited his nephew James O'Neill (jurist) to moved to Neillsville and practiced law. Both served in the Wisconsin State Assembly. The younger James O'Neill later served as Wisconsin Circit Court judge. It was a little confusing. Please look at the two articles and see what you think. You started the James O'Neill Wisconsin settler article. Thanks-RFD (talk) 23:08, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks, very interesting. Yes, it's indeed confusing. It's alwaus hard when you're researching different people with the same name. I think we now have some good articles written about both of them now. Billertl (talk) 16:07, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Root beer[edit]

The template is really designed for specific brands, like Hires, Mug, Barq's etc. Jones isn't known so much as a root beer brand, but more as a whole-brand manufacturer that sells root beer as one of its flavors. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 04:52, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm sorry but I disagree. Jones is very well known for their root beer, which makes up a signifigant portion of their sales volume. In fact, many retail locations that carry Jones Soda only carry their line of Root Beer, because it's so popular. Your argument that "they sell more than just root beer" can also be applied to many of the other brands in the template. For example, Fanta (which is also in the template) has over 100 flavors worldwide, according to it's article. Faygo also has many other flavors. So why not delete Fanta, or Faygo? I'm sorry, but I just don't understand your logic. Billertl (talk) 05:26, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Spenser Milton Marsh[edit]

Hi-I just sent an e-mail to the Clark County, Wisconsin Historical Society to see if they had an obituary about Spenser Marsh. I expanded the article about him and found out that he and his wife moved to San Diego, California in 1914. He then served as district attorney for San Diego County and then as superior court judge. An very interesting man. Many thanks as always-RFD (talk) 22:11, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Very interesting. For most of the bios that I create or work on for Wikipedia, I usually find something interesting about each person. But this guy, yes - looks like he lived quite a life, and went pretty far. Thanks and keep up the good work.

La Pointe, Wisconsin[edit]

Hi-You made a mistake with the move from La Pointe (community), Wisconsin to La Pointe (township), Wisconsin. The La Pointe (town) and La Pointe (community) article should be kept separate. Also in Wisconsin there are no townships just towns. See Political subdivisions of Wisconsin. Finally the should had bee a discussion about the move before it took place. I let The Catalyst31 know of my concerns so you may want to respond at The Catalyst31's talk page. This is very serious; the move should had been made without imput of the community. Thank you-RFD (talk) 11:41, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I made some comments at the La Pointe, Wisconsin article talk page. Thank you-RFD (talk) 12:06, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I revert your move to the La Pointe (town), Wisconsin article. Please see my comments at the La Pointe, Wisconsin article. Thank you-RFD (talk) 16:39, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for correcting my terminology. I agree with you, and you are correct. The correct term is "town", and not "township". Thanks for the correction.
However, I never merged the articles (like you accused me of). Merging an article is a serious change, and I would NEVER do it without discussing it on the talk page. Please don't misunderstand what I did.
On the talk page, I discussed my reason for moving the article, and I hope this makes sense. If you want to discuss it further, please let me know if there is anything we can do to further improve the article.
But I just wanted to take the opportunity to apologize, for not discussing the move before I did it. I still believe it's a positive change, but I should have discussed it first, and I'm sorry. In the past, many editors (including myself) have moved many articles without discussing it first. And most of the time, nobody makes an issue of the matter. But maybe I shouldn't have assumed that would be the case here, and so from now on, I will discuss the topic before I ever move an article. At the time, I had taken all the other necessary steps, including the checking of other articles with links that may be affected by the move.
You seem to be protective of certain articles, and I never meant to upset you in any way. So please accept my apology for not discussing the move first. Billertl (talk) 21:10, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am not protective of articles I just get concern about accuracy. My apologies for any misunderstandings on my part. I was born and raised in Wisconsin and am familiar with state people, geography, government and politics, etc. You are a good editor also. I probably misunderstand of what you are trying to do. Also I am a male. Thank you and again my apologies-RFD (talk) 21:34, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm glad that you two worked it out. I didn't get a chance to comment, but I would have opposed too. The whole state is done this way from the beginning. In 2003 (the very early days of Wikipedia), a bot (Rambot) was used to create article on the communities of the United States. It was programmed with the 2000 census data and it created articles for all of the government units. A prime example is Green Bay, Wisconsin (for the city) and Green Bay (town), Wisconsin for the town of Green Bay. Royalbroil 21:49, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, everyone seems to be in agreement that community articles should remain seperate from town articles. I agree with this now, also. But back in 2011, when I made the proposal to merge the two La Pointe articles, at the time I didn't realize having seperate articles for towns and communities is the standard Wikipedia method. We still have the seperate articles for the community of La Pointe and the town of La Pointe, and that's the way it will remain.
I've just been trying to improve these articles. I live in the northern part of Wisconsin, and I have a deep understanding of the local communities, the culture, people, government, etc. RFD and I are a lot alike, in the sense we're both from Wisconsin, and care about the Wisconsin articles on Wikipedia. And the more we cooperate, the better we can make the articles we're concerned about. So in the future, I'll try to make more of an attempt to discuss any major edits before I make any such big changes, because I value the input of other editors, like you guys. Thanks. Billertl (talk) 22:10, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
As for the current state of the articles, there are still some things in the town article that should be in the community article and vice versa. For instance, the infoboxes need to be switched, and the census data in the community article is data for the town. Personally I wouldn't have switched the scope of the two articles, but at this point it's probably fine. (I also might want to move the community one back to La Pointe (community), Wisconsin and make La Pointe, Wisconsin a disambiguation page for the sake of consistency, but only if there's a consensus to.) TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 22:17, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have no problems with the changes you suggested-thanks-RFD (talk) 22:23, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have no problems with your suggestions, either. Great point, I agree. Please go ahead and switch the infoboxes and move any information as you see fit. Thanks for this. However, I just disagree on one small point. In my opinion, it's probably best not to turn La Pointe, Wisconsin into a disambiguation page. I believe it would be much better to leave the articles rest at their current locations. The reason is because there are only two articles in question. I could see if there were a longer list of articles that needed to be on the disambiguation page, but in this case there are only two. And both articles have a hatnote, which links to the other article. The hatnote on each article serves it's purpose the way it should, according to policies and suggestions found at Wikipedia:Disambiguation. I just don't see or understand the necessity for making La Pointe, Wisconsin a disambiguation page for only two articles, when the hatnote link at the top of the pages serve the purpose correctly and adequately, as it should. But as far as making the other necessary changes you mentioned, I say yes-absolutely. There were still a few things on both articles I wanted to tweak, but you seem to have a good eye for these details, and I have no problem with you doing what you suggested with the infoboxes and switching a few other details. Thank you.Billertl (talk) 23:08, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Redford Theatre may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • to the nonprofit [http://redfordtheatre.com/mctos Motor City Theatre Organ Society] (MCTOS) (a chapter of the [[American Theatre Organ Society]], which had been leasing time at the theatre to

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:11, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Morsegreenwood.jpg missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:32, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Hi, I'm Dsprc. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, NorShor Theatre, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. --dsprc [talk] 07:50, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I click the wrong button. Sorry for that. --dsprc [talk] 07:52, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Is everything OK with the article? I hope it looks OK, and all is well. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Billertl (talk • contribs)
On a second review I have also removed the rather dubious .exe file that you have linked to as a reference. --dsprc [talk] 07:58, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your feedback on the article. I'm interested in addressing the things you tagged. As for any external links that may not follow guidelines, please let me know which specific link and the reason, and I will remove it. As for the article largely relying on a single sourse, I got most of the information from 3 sourses, although I know you deleted one reference that linked to an online database with relevant information about the building's organ. Please let me know what I can specifically do to fix things, and I will be happy to make the changes. And again, thank you.
I think I may have things corrected. I presume there are enough references now, so that it no longer relies on just a few sources. Please comment, or delete the tag. And again, thanks much for everything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Billertl (talk • contribs)
Sign your posts. Article is OK for the most part. A few WP:PEACOCK words toward the beginning and end of the first paragraph; I will try to iron those out later on when I'm more inclined. As for the database thing, I deleted it because it didn't behave like an exe or DLL that gets executed on the server-side. Instead, my browser tried to download the thing to my machine as a normal file. I don't run Microsoft Windows so, maybe my browser/system mime types are all jacked up and that has something to do with it. Who knows. --dsprc [talk] 09:59, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-a-thon in Madison[edit]

inline
inline
inline
inline

Billertl, I'd like to invite you to an upcoming edit-a-thon:

ART+FEMINISM EDIT-A-THON

RSVP on the event page if you plan to attend or have any suggestions. czar 00:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You received this message because you are a member of Category:Wikipedians in Wisconsin. To opt-in to future Madison event messages, add yourself to the mailing list.

Diocese of Superior-[edit]

Hi-I added a comment to the Diocese of Superior article. Many thanks-RFD (talk) 17:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge[edit]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Billertl. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.


Take the survey now!


You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Sorta-misidentified file, maybe[edit]

Just FYI, see Talk:Elizabeth (biblical figure) and a similar posting on the image talk page at Commons. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 18:03, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF). About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sdist29.pdf listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sdist29.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:39, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Billertl. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Super One Logo.png[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Super One Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Billertl. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Scott Krug for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott Krug is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Krug until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BJackJS talk 19:15, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Lapointe, Wisconain" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Lapointe, Wisconain. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 26#Lapointe, Wisconain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 19:26, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: May 2021[edit]

WikiProject Scouting | May 2021


Notes for May:

  • Congratulations to our Barnstar awardees!
  • Interested in coordinating a zoom meeting? Please let us know.


Other ways to participate:

--evrik (talk) 20:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: July 2021[edit]

WikiProject Scouting | July 2021


Things to watch for:


Other ways to participate:

--evrik (talk) 17:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: October 2021[edit]

WikiProject Scouting | October 2021

It is with sadness that we note the passing of Jim Howes. Throughout his life, Jim worked to make the world a better place. WikiProject Scouting now has no administrators listed as willing to help the WikiProject. If you are an administrator and are willing to help, please let us know here.

Things to watch for:


Other ways to participate:

--evrik (talk) 15:12, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: May 2022[edit]

WikiProject Scouting | May 2022


Notes for May:

Other ways to participate:

--evrik (talk)

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:10, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: July 2022[edit]

WikiProject Scouting | June 2022


Notes for June:

Other ways to participate:

--evrik (talk) 22:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: August 2022[edit]

WikiProject Scouting | August 2022


Notes for August:

Other ways to participate:

--evrik (talk) August 1, 2022



Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: January 2023[edit]

WikiProject Scouting | January 2023


Notes for January:

Other ways to participate:

--evrik (talk) January 16, 2023

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: March 2023[edit]

WikiProject Scouting | March 2023


Notes for March:

Other ways to participate:

--evrik (talk) March 16, 2023

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:48, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: July 2023[edit]

WikiProject Scouting | July 2023


Notes for July
  • On our To do list, we need to prioritize some tasks for articles outside of the US or the UK.
Announcements for the benefit of all
Other ways to participate

--evrik (talk)


Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 16:41, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Public venues with a theatre organ has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Public venues with a theatre organ has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:59, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Big butt disease" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Big butt disease has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 1 § Big butt disease until a consensus is reached. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 02:57, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Billertl&oldid=1211150826"