User talk:Billinghurst/Archives/2011/April
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Signpost: 4 April 2011
- News and notes: 1 April activities; RIAA takedown notice; brief news
- Editor retention: Fighting the decline by restricting article creation?
- WikiProject report: Out of this world — WikiProject Solar System
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments, new case, proposed decision for Coanda case, and motion regarding CU/OS
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 11 April 2011
- Recent research: Research literature surveys; drug reliability; editor roles; BLPs; Muhammad debate analyzed
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two cases closed – what does the Coanda decision tell us?
- Technology report: The Toolserver explained; brief news
Template:Cite MotT
Hello. On the redirect Template:Cite MotT, you placed the redirect template {{R to redirect template}}. The target of Template:Cite MotT, Template:Cite Men of the Time, is not a redirect template. Redirect templates categorise redirects ({{R to redirect template}} is a redirect template). Because of a deletion discussion, there is no longer a general redirect category for redirects within the template namespace; however, {{R from template shortcut}} can be used for shortcuts to templates (such as Template:Cite MotT). I have corrected your mistake. Thank you for your assistance in categorising redirects. McLerristarr | Mclay1 05:58, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- Also, you do not need to wrap redirect templates in <noinclude></noinclude>. McLerristarr | Mclay1 06:00, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 April 2011
- News and notes: Commons milestone; newbie contributions assessed; German community to decide on €200,000 budget; brief news
- In the news: Wikipedia accurate on US politics, plagiarized in court, and compared to Glass Bead Game; brief news
- WikiProject report: An audience with the WikiProject Council
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Case comes to a close after 3 weeks - what does the decision tell us?
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
In Template:Cite Men of the Time is there any reason for setting ref="Men of the Time" rather than the more usual ref=harv ?-- PBS (talk) 09:49, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
- Umm, I don't remember. Cannot think of a reason why not to use
{{harv}}, so have changed. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:45, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 April 2011
- News and notes: Survey of French Wikipedians; first Wikipedian-in-Residence at Smithsonian; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Somerset
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Request to amend prior case; further voting in AEsh case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News