User talk:BillyMcSchmit

Azeus Systems moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Azeus Systems, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

Additional notes: Need non primary sources (i.e. no press releases), to back the notability of the subject up. – robertsky (talk) 07:56, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, BillyMcSchmit. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Azeus Systems, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 19:00, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello BillyMcSchmit. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:BillyMcSchmit. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=BillyMcSchmit|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 09:25, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot Hi good day to you, I am not being directly or indirectly paid or compensated to start or edit any pages on Wikipedia I am currently not associated or affiliated with any companies or organizations. I am just starting or editing a Wikipedia page that personally interest me thanks for understanding. BillyMcSchmit (talk) 09:52, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How did you pick these companies to edit about? The articles you have written so far aren't currently up to standards as they are largely sourced to press release type sources and routine coverage, not independent reliable sources with significant coverage of the companies, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. While it is not compulsory for most users, it is highly advised that users new to creating articles(the most difficult task to attempt on Wikipedia) first run them through the submission process at WP:AFC until they have had a few accepted and gain the experience. 331dot (talk) 09:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot I picked these companies based on my interest, mainly regarding tech companies, I have been involved with tech companies before when I am still active in the scene as I have said currently I am not associated and being compensated with any companies or organizations. BillyMcSchmit (talk) 10:05, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have claimed this logo as your own work and this image of a company headquarters as your own work. Please describe your connection to Xurpass now. 331dot (talk) 10:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@331dot As I have said I am not connected to any companies or organizations. I am not connected to Xurpas in any way, shape or form, that company is a mess due to mismanagement and struggling financially right now. How do I know this? They are publicly listed company and I can see their financials, the last thing I want is to be associated and connected with them. BillyMcSchmit (talk) 10:11, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As I said, you have claimed these images as your own work- which would mean that you personally created the logo and took an image of the company headquarters. If you didn't do these things, please explain. 331dot (talk) 10:15, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Billy. Could you please explain the situation with the images? I share 331dot's concern that something is amiss here. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:03, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would join in that concern. No editor has come to Wikipedia and created three promotional full company pages with less than 20 edits. The fact you have edited since the above request was made and NOT responded to the question is concerning. --CNMall41 (talk) 01:32, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Azeus Systems

The article Azeus Systems has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Holding company lacks sources meeting WP:CORPDEPTH.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 11:50, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Azeus Systems for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Azeus Systems is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azeus Systems until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:33, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Xurpas moved to draftspace

Please refer to the draft's Talk Page. MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:46, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Informatics Education for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Informatics Education is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Informatics Education until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:30, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:PinoyExchange

Hello, BillyMcSchmit. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:PinoyExchange, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Azeus Convene for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Azeus Convene is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azeus Convene until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Assirian cat (talk) 13:00, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]