User talk:Billy Hathorn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

November 2015[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. This block is in accordance with a consensus reached at the Administrators' Noticeboard/Incidents. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:15, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

This ban applies to you, the person, and hence applies to any account you have created or have been using. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Billy Hathorn (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

There was a disagreement about copying too closely in the Susan Pamerleau article. This issue was corrected. The article is now fully sourced and has no copyright problem. I would like to appeal the block. Billy Hathorn (talk) 11:29, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are banned from Wikipedia for persistent, ongoing and large-scale unwillingness or inability to follow Wikipedia copyright policy. Arguing about one specific item is irrelevant. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:05, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

Let me repeat, you are BANNED, not just blocked.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:08, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Here's the diff for the thread closure in case it is archived before this request is addressed. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:38, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Per this policy, you are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests from active blocks. Doing so again will result in the loss of your talk page access. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:02, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
TPA withdrawn. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Charles R. Scott of Shreveport, LA.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Charles R. Scott of Shreveport, LA.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Gary Jones (Louisiana politician) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gary Jones (Louisiana politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Jones (Louisiana politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 01:02, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Louise Alley[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Louise Alley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability. Only reference is a paid obituary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wiley W. Hilburn of LA Tech at Ruston.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wiley W. Hilburn of LA Tech at Ruston.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 25 February 2016 (UTC)


Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Holocaust survivor Rose Van Thyn of Shreveport, LA.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Holocaust survivor Rose Van Thyn of Shreveport, LA.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:52, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Harold B. McSween in his younger years.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Harold B. McSween in his younger years.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:01, 9 April 2016 (UTC)


Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Macel Pate Falwell of VA.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Macel Pate Falwell of VA.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 15:25, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Wiley W. Hilburn of LA Tech at Ruston.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Wiley W. Hilburn of LA Tech at Ruston.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 15:27, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

N.B. and other images per WP:NFCC#1, WP:NFCC#8, WP:NFCC#10. I will not list all here individually because the user is banned. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 15:55, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jack Batton.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jack Batton.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:45, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

This photo was replaced with an edited one with more clarity. E. R. Softwood (talk) 02:49, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:E. D. Gleason.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:E. D. Gleason.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Original photo replaced by a clearer one.Hot Furnace (talk) 03:38, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:J. D. Batton of Minden, LA.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:J. D. Batton of Minden, LA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:43, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Please delete. The original photo of J. D. Batton has been replaced by a clearer one. Hot Furnace (talk) 03:38, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Revised Floyd D. Culbertson, Jr.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Revised Floyd D. Culbertson, Jr.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:57, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Please delete. The original photo has been replaced by a clearer one. Hot Furnace (talk) 03:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Judge H. W. Ayres of Louisiana.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Judge H. W. Ayres of Louisiana.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:53, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Please delete. The picture originally there was replaced with another one. 2605:6001:F20B:C100:DC78:7743:B537:894 (talk) 03:48, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cleone Hodges.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cleone Hodges.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jesse L. Boucher of Springhill, LA.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jesse L. Boucher of Springhill, LA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of H. L. Willis for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article H. L. Willis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H. L. Willis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:31, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Orologio blu.svg
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Billy Hathorn (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #16516 was submitted on Sep 12, 2016 16:06:58. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 16:06, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Link to sockpuppetry case[edit]

The last sockpuppet blocked was User:Ramirez Tun on September 6, 2016, though that sock has not been appended to the SPI filing.

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Billy_Hathorn/Archive.

OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:02, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of James Whitfield Williamson for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Whitfield Williamson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Whitfield Williamson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:10, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Susybelle Wilkinson Lyons.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Susybelle Wilkinson Lyons.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Joseph Tabarlet for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph Tabarlet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Tabarlet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Businessman Tom Abraham of Canadian, TX.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Businessman Tom Abraham of Canadian, TX.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of L. B. Henry for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article L. B. Henry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L. B. Henry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:05, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gertrude Nelson[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Gertrude Nelson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability. Article is largely based on Find-a-Grave which fails WP:RS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:13, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hodding Carter, II, of Greenville, MS.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hodding Carter, II, of Greenville, MS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:L. B. Henry of Louisiana.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:L. B. Henry of Louisiana.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Don Allison for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Don Allison is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Allison until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 18:41, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Singer Don Allison of Lubbock, TX.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Singer Don Allison of Lubbock, TX.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:25, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of George P. Broussard[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article George P. Broussard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is another Billy Hathorn Louisiana biography without notability. The subject fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. The LA Secretary of State link only confirms his wife's voter registration and Find a Grave is self-published so this article rests on only one source, this book. While that source might be reliable (the entry indicates it's based on the family's documents, not independent research), it doesn't connote notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:19, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of George P. Broussard for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George P. Broussard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George P. Broussard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:58, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Robert O. Trout[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Robert O. Trout requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Toddst1 (talk) 23:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nell Womack Hedges of LA.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nell Womack Hedges of LA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:48, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Vidal M. Trevino of Laredo, TX.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vidal M. Trevino of Laredo, TX.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:22, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mike Nerren[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Mike Nerren has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notable. Local trial court judges are rarely considered notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:52, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Parker Self[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Parker Self has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability. Local trial court judges are rarely notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:54, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Mike Nerren for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Nerren is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Nerren until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:06, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Parker Self for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parker Self is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parker Self until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:40, 14 June 2017 (UTC)