Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Mike V • Talk 15:46, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas W. Libous, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EmmanuelPriest (talk • contribs) 21:10, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Bingresident. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Jason Garnar, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Jason Garnar to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.
If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.