User talk:Bollyjeff

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

talk page conventions[edit]

In this edit you placed a comment in the middle of one of my comments. This was counter to the talk page conventions we generally follow, so I moved your comment to after the end of my comment.

I've experienced a lot of frustration, going back to read older discussions, when I have found someone who looks like a moron has left fragmentary, incomplete, incoherent and unsigned comments. A bunch of times I have stepped through those discussions, one edit at a time, so I could place an {{unsigned}} template, identifying the author, and the time and date for those fragmentary comments. When I first started doing this I was both surprised and disappointed when I realize that what looked like fragmentary, incomplete comments had actually been one comment, a complete, not fragmentary comment, one that had been properly signed. What I found was that these comments made a lot more sense, before they were broken apart when someone didn't follow the convention of leaving their followup comment at the end of the original poster's comment, but had, instead, broken up the original comment by placing multiple followups in the middle. When the followup comments start to get followup comments of their own, the fragments of the original comment look more and more incoherent. It can be extremely unfair to the original commenter whose comment broken up. The more followups break up the fragments, the more unfair it is.

Sometimes the original commenter's comment, when viewed as a whole, was extremely coherent, made valid points, that deserved being taken seriously.

This is why I moved your comment to the end of the section. Geo Swan (talk) 01:53, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

I wanted everyone to know which of your statements that I was responding to, but no worries either way. BollyJeff | talk 02:01, 4 January 2015 (UTC)


I can understand your concerns about further cutting the SRK article. I don't want to lose to much either, but it was most concerning to me that Tim riley, an editor I respect more than most on here, thought it excessive and couldn't read it. It should be comfortable to read as an FA for anybody who isn't a Bollywood fan too.. I do think if SRK is really going to pass and to be approved of by our regular actor editors n the long term then it does need to be trimmed, by 8kb of readable prose as Crisco suggested might be good. I did add a fair bit, some of which might not be essential. I've created a Film career of Shah Rukh Khan entry so nothing is lost, which I think could be expanded as fully as possible with lots of reviews and production info and that could be brought up to GA/FA status in its own right.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:59, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

I don't think, and I believe neither will they, that the main article was trimmed enough yet. If you are having a new article, it should not have 90% identical content to an existing article. Shouldn't maybe all the career sections be as short as the first two to make it really worthwhile? For example, 'Romantic hero' could include just DDLJ, DTPH, KKHH and summary. Just a thought. I will also look for easier trimming meanwhile. BollyJeff | talk 08:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Well, the SRK article is now shorter overall than Priyanka Chopra which is FA. You'd expect the SRK article to be much longer... If you or a page stalker is interested in expanding the film career article into something really impressive at a later date then we'll keep it. If not then I'll db author it. But I think for somebody like SRK a really detailed article on his career for those who want it might be good for a lot of our readers.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:54, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
So you don't like my idea of keeping the new one and shortening the main one further? 'Challenges' could have just the Dreamz pictures and surgery info, with a summary mention of his successes. 'Resurgence' and 'present' could include just award winners, and summary of others. I don't know, these people seem more concerned about length than content, even though I have proven that there are other longer actor articles. Please do not delete the new one without checking with me. Oh, and thank you for creating it. BollyJeff | talk 14:28, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
It's a good length now I think, I'm not going to cut anything else. The idea is that the film career article is expanded in a way you'd ideally like for the main article without worrying about too much detail. In that article you can cover every film or at least most of them and adds more reviews etc.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:27, 7 January 2015 (UTC)


Hello, I am planning to take this film to FA status. I found Rediff, Behindwoods and Sify having Sivaji special news links which show all coverage of the film (mainly news about its making and release.). But, I am worried about Behindwoods as you mentioned in the FAC of Chandralekha that it wasn't reliable. What do I do? Face-smile.svgSsven2 speak 2 me 17:11, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Jeff mentioned in some earlier PR/FAC that he has a son, meaning "bro" does not look like the right name to use by us Face-smile.svg. And because Behindwoods has a well-developing Wikipedia article with external sources, I think it should satisfy RS. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:27, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
@Kailash29792: Oops, sorry, my bad. Didn't know he had a son. Changed it now. Face-smile.svgSsven2 speak 2 me 17:30, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Are you going to do a peer review first? I can tell you right away that the citation formatting is not good yet. If I were you, I would take Behindwoods to the reliable sources board to make sure it's okay. See Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. BollyJeff | talk 17:55, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
I haven't worked on the article yet. I have only collected sources and references. BTW, isn't Bollywood Hungama's article shorter than Behindwoods's article? — Ssven2 speak 2 me 03:11, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
I don't see how the size of their WP article's matters. Its about the qualifications of the people running the site, editorial oversight, and such stuff. BollyJeff | talk 03:26, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Oh, I see. Thanks for mentioning that. Here is the sandbox for my reference collection. BTW, would it be possible if I use those references from behindwoods that are confirmed news? Like for example if the webiste states that a song from a film was shot in Bilbao, Spain, then can I use that source to explain that news? — Ssven2 speak 2 me 03:34, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Vikram filmography[edit]

Hi! I have nominated the list for FLC and I invite you to review the nomination and suggest improvements, if any. Here is the nomination page. Thanks. -- Sriram speak up 13:21, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Well? -- Sriram speak up 14:19, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Kajol filmography[edit]

Hi Bollyjeff! I have a filmography up at FLC. If you are willing to review it, here is the link. Thanks in advance. --FrankBoy (Buzz) 12:12, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Sanam Teri Kasam is a 2009 film.[edit]

This refers to your edit made on 26th of October, in 2010 when the page on the movie, "Sanam Teri Kasam", was first created.

I have corrected the date of the release of the film from 2000 to 2009 citing ref. -

Your edit:-

Can you please correct the Title of the page which still is, 2000 ? Mamta Jagdish Dhody (talk) 22:11, 6 February 2015 (UTC)


Would you like to comment here as there is a discussion going on. Its Wp:Own case. Pls, help.—Prashant 07:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

So, I dont even have permission to introduce smaller changes into the lead? I really dont understand why you guys keep on reverting my edits? Each and every article is structured in the same way. If yo can watch Mukerji's article Successful career, successful films, four successful words are used. Why I am even tellibg you.—Prashant 18:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
I just removed it from Rani. BollyJeff | talk 18:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

And, Deepika and others?—Prashant 18:32, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Did you removed the same from Deepika's lead?—Prashant 18:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
No, I am not in the mood to hunt down every article and make them all appear the same just to make you happy. Do it yourself, if its important to you. Generally, articles should not change very much after FA. BollyJeff | talk 18:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

What about updates in an FA? It means the article should not be updated to maintain it?—Prashant 18:55, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes, of course. BollyJeff | talk 19:40, 11 February 2015 (UTC)


Kailash29792 sent me these sources to show the website's notability. Thought I might forward them to you. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 14:45, 11 February 2015 (UTC)


Why on Earth has he placed an evil-eyed cat's picture on both his user and talk pages? Could it be a sign that he has left Wikipedia due to the "side-effects" of his war with Prashant? But I don't think he did anything wrong apart from just preventing the inclusion of unencyclopedic content. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Wouldn't a lot of people be happy if I left? But no, I just need a breather from assholes. Also, the cat is to save me from buri nazar. -- KRIMUK90  02:47, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
That's a relief. Hey, can you give me your opinion on this: Wikipedia:Peer_review/Shah_Rukh_Khan/archive2#Question_from_Bollyjeff. BollyJeff | talk 11:30, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Peer review/Enthiran/archive1[edit]

I have opened the peer review for the film. Please do suggest any changes that I should make before I go for FAC. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 09:00, 12 February 2015 (UTC)


DDLJ is back! But why would the public have demanded it to continue running, when the last show at the theatre had very low occupancy, and would have remained that way? Kailash29792 (talk) 13:08, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. If it missed a few days of showing, but still showed at least one day during the week, would you say that it still counts as continuous? Anyway, it should sort itself out soon. BollyJeff | talk 22:27, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
I don't know. But now it is pointless to "continue" the run as it was finally interrupted; now it just looks like a re-release. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:37, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
I just thought: because the film will turn 20 this year, how about taking it to FAC? Kailash29792 (talk) 15:11, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
That's why I am fixing it up now, to see if it's going to be possible. Feel free to help. BollyJeff | talk 15:15, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Did you manage to buy this book? — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 12:54, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

No, too rich. I have been using the online portions of Anupama Chopra's book; I don't even own that one. BollyJeff | talk 13:01, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── I have archived all the references except #57, #58 and #83 as the website could not archive it. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 07:20, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Try webcite archive! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:36, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
@Pavanjandhyala: Even with that it didn't materialise. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 07:38, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Strange. Similar issue with Srinivas' PDF in Pathala Bhairavi. Let's see whether any other archive websites can be used? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:42, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Share your opinion[edit]

Hi Bollyjeff, It's a request you to please share your opinion on Talk:Sargun Mehta. Hetika (talk) 15:57, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Enthiran/archive1[edit]

I have opened the FAC for Enthiran. Feel free to leave comments. Face-smile.svgSsven2 Speak 2 me 14:21, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

I am going to abstain because of my previous experience with the article. Good luck though. BollyJeff | talk 18:02, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

"* Carlton Cards - Carlton Cards Limited, a Canadian greeting card company"[edit]

   IMO, your edit was constructively intended, and not part of what may be an effort by at least one IP to give the company an unwarranted level of exposure at the cost of cluttering WP. (An IP added the entry you eventually modified; if we were thoro enuf, it would have already been removed in light of the dab'n of "Carleton" to the sense "Carlton Cards" being alrady adequately, and less distractingly, implemented via the Dab-page link to Carlton (disambiguation).
--Jerzyt 06:51, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Pee Cee[edit]

can we add "Pee Cee" in her lead as she is widely regarded by this name. Now, she is evn more popular by this name as all the media and people call her that. What's your thought on this?—Prashant 11:15, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Well, in the Shah Rukh Khan article there is a source that actually says he is known as SRK. If you can find a source that states it as fact, then I think its fine. Don't just list multiple sources as evidence. BollyJeff | talk 12:36, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Well, let me see if I can find one. There was a source, I used in the further reading, that was removed way back in 2013. I hope I can find much more sources.—Prashant 14:14, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

I've got the sources for her name. Plus, she is also refered as "Desi Girl" and "Junglee Billi". They can be added too?—Prashant 14:54, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

You know that "Piggy Chops" is already listed in the 'In the media' section right? Please don't add every nicknanme, it's too much. Salman Khan has dozens of nicknames that the media calls him occasionally, but they are not listed in his article. This will cheapen the article (make it look less professional) in my opinion. On second thought I would prefer not to see PeeCee in the lead; makes me think of PC. Could you just put it in 'In the media' section? BollyJeff | talk 15:16, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Well, I've already added PeeCee or simply PC as she is popularly referred as. I have not added other names.—Prashant 16:10, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Govindudu Andarivadele[edit]

Would you like to conduct a GA Review on this article? Please let me know if you are interested in doing so. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:55, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

I posted this message almost 18 days back and no reply till now and you've been active since these many days. Hence i assume that you are not at all interested to take up a GAR of this article. Sorry for troubling you. Regards, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:53, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

DDLJ - Raj and Simran[edit]

Hi Bollyjeff I noticed you reverted my edits on the DDLJ page - Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge. It was pretty clear that both Raj and Simran did not ever see India and that their parents were in London since decades. So how are they Non resident Indians - Non resident Indians have an Indian Passport. I think it would be correct to say they were British Indians. I know its not a big deal but i thought wikipedia should have things more accurate, atleast on the TOP of the page. Cheers! Firdaushaque (talk) 14:17, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

You may, or may not, be technically correct; I don't think it was established if Raj and Simran were actually born in India. However, all of the sources used refer to them as NRIs, not British Indians, so we have to go with that. BollyJeff | talk 14:32, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
I basically think NRI, as implied by its name, means Non Residential Indian! One who does not live in India! Kailash29792 (talk) 14:23, 8 April 2015 (UTC)


The Native name and Nationality of a person is predefined in the infobox of a person in english wikipedia, how do you say that its not used? Ankush 89 (talk) 16:21, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Indic scripts were discussed and a consensus was formed. See Wikipedia:WikiProject_India#Indic_scripts_in_lead. Nationality in Info box is fine. BollyJeff | talk 16:32, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Editors Barnstar Hires.png The Editor's Barnstar
Hello Jeff this is dfrr. that edit you did on Mary Poppins (film) is just awesome you deserve this barnstar. also I am sorry for awarding the wrong user. my mistake. thank you and have a great day. Dfrr (talk) 19:40, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

saw you thank me:-)[edit]

hi bollyjeff I saw you responded on the barnstar. well You are welcomeDfrr (talk) 19:52, 16 April 2015 (UTC) (Talk to me:-)

Wikipedia:Peer review/Sargun Mehta/archive1[edit]

Hi Bollyjeff, I've opened a peer review, so i request you to please add your comments here. :) Hetika (talk) 16:57, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

thanks for your edit. Could you suggest me something about this?
  • 1) this link is published in hindi language and this is the only one that verifies her birth(6 September 1988). So this one is better?
The one you have looks okay, but the grammar could be better on the quote.
Actually the quote was a translation of the source text by Google Translate.
  • 2) this link is dead and is cited on her 2011 Golden Petal Award nomination, currently i've no any archive or other source, so please suggest me.
I tried to find an archived version of, but could only get back to 2012. Why don't they have their own list of past winners? Keep looking for notices from 2011. is RS or not? Previously i was removed this as Unreliable source. Hetika (talk) 16:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
I don't see her name listed there anyway. BollyJeff | talk
In this she was nomitated for her show Phulwa in the "Most Jaanbaaz Personality" category. I know Actors name are not listed in this, but their shows and characters name are exist. So please tell me, Is this RS or not? Hetika (talk) 17:03, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
It should be okay, since its the official channel. BollyJeff | talk 17:00, 20 April 2015 (UTC)


I'll look into your article shortly. I've recently seen Anand (1971 film). Would you be interested in helping get it to GA status?♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:59, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Not really. I want to branch out into some stuff other than Indian cinema after my two current projects. BollyJeff | talk

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
A long-overdue barnstar to one of the brilliant editors on Wikipedia. And, for your inspiring work on film articles. —Prashant 06:49, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Writers Barnstar Hires.png The Writer's Barnstar
For Featured Articles C E (talk) 11:43, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Enthiran - First Superstar FA![edit]

Great news! Enthiran is promoted! My first FA success! Hooray! Face-smile.svgSsven2 Speak 2 me 13:19, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Bollyjeff. Please check your email – you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

--C E (talk) 03:47, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge[edit]

Anurag Kashyap filmography[edit]

Please if you could take a look at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Anurag Kashyap filmography/archive1. Yashthepunisher (talk) 2:11, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

You should see the credits of Yudh, there is no director-producer anurag kashyap. He is just the creative director. Comment further here. Yashthepunisher (talk) 4:40, 21 May 2015 (UTC)


Yes, I am very happy to have gotten this important article to this level. Thank you, BollyJeff | talk 14:39, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

  • CONGRATS! This was indeed a very difficult job. Kudos!--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:43, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Hey congrats! Finally, we've got an FA on an Indian actor. Vensatry (ping) 08:15, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Yes, why should only the ladies be recognized? Someone needs to do Big B now. He is not even at GA. BollyJeff | talk 12:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Yep, why should only ladies have all the fun? :) We badly need FAs on stars like Big B, Rajini, Kamal and Aamir. As for SRK's article, it's good that you've covered even a film like Maya Memsaab, but I don't find a mention about critically acclaimed films like Hey Ram and Paheli. You could've left out the former citing the lack of a full-length role for him, but what about the latter? Vensatry (ping) 13:13, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
It was about the length. I don't know if you have been following this, but we had to cut a lot of good non-film info and move it into a separate article because reviewers complained about the length. The two films you mention did not win him any awards or set any records, but Maya was mentioned because it was controversial and explained why he never kissed on screen for most of his career. BollyJeff | talk 13:36, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Well, how can length be attributed exactly to comprehensiveness? Is winning an award the only yardstick to measure a film/actor's importance? I'm not able to find a mention of both the films in his filmography page either (in lede). I might sound a little opinionated here, I bet SRK himself would include at least Hey Ram among the best films that he's acted. The fact that he did not receive any payment for acting in Hey Ram is surely worth mentioning in his biography. Vensatry (ping) 13:58, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
The no payment fact was in there previous, but it was removed. You want to argue now that its promoted; where were you for both FACs and PRs?? Take a look at FAC1 to see how how length was an issue. If not reduced, it never would have been promoted, period! BollyJeff | talk 14:18, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
See, I'm not complaining about anything. By length, the reviewers would have meant the size of the article literally. I'm sure nobody would've told you to cut-short the degree of comprehensiveness of the subject. What amuses me really is you mention a film like Duplicate as if it's a landmark film in his career, and justify the exclusion of those two internationally acclaimed films solely based on length. I wasn't really aware of this FAC as nobody invited me for the PR or FAC either. If I had any intent to challenge the promotion of this article, I'd have initiated a discussion in the article's talk page straight away and not here. Vensatry (ping) 16:19, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
You are complaining and criticizing, which is really easy to do when you were not the one jerked around for a year by dozens of reviewers with opposing ideas of what should be included. You are free to edit the article any time you want. Go for it! Just make sure that your edits are FA quality. BollyJeff | talk 17:02, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────Well, if that's the way you comprehend things, you are free to take it that way. Vensatry (ping) 08:34, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Many congratulations on the success of the article. Although I have never been involved in the article, I have been wandering around the article since a considerable amount of time. Well done man! -- FrankBoy CHITCHAT 18:19, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Great job on this guys! Will be great to see it as Today's featured article on his 50th birthday. Cowlibob (talk) 03:41, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Sorry I've been slow on the uptake, indeed a great achievement, make sure he's TFA in November!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:40, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Blurb candidate is sitting at User:Bollyjeff/sandbox. It may be a tiny bit long, but perhaps not. BollyJeff | talk 23:15, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Peer review/Mayabazar/archive1[edit]

I have opened the peer review for Mayabazar (1957), the first Telugu film to be attempted for FA class. Feel free to leave comments. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:39, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

A gentle reminder! Face-smile.svg Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:58, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Thanks for your comments, which were resolved by Ssven2 in my absence. I've made a request at WP:GOCE for a thorough c/e. Any other issues? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:17, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Update : Miniapolis has completed a copy-edit on Mayabazar on 6 July 2015 upon a request at GOCE. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:14, 8 July 2015 (UTC)


I have just created a list of films that I have seen. What do you think of it? Face-smile.svgSsven2 Speak 2 me 11:42, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

As you are Bollywood lover (Good Article/Featured article)[edit]

Mr. India (1987 film), Shaan (film), Don (1978 film), Mohra, Johny Mera Naam, Teesri Manzil. --Cosmic  Emperor  12:12, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you![edit]

Wikipedia Library owl.svg

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

  • Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
  • Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
  • Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
  • Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
  • Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
  • Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Too Much Too Soon (album)[edit]

Hi Bollyjeff ! Would you be interested in reviewing or commenting on my newly opened FAC for the article Too Much Too Soon (album)? If not, please feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 04:04, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Andaz Apna Apna et al[edit]

I'd come across a Salman Khan fan who seemed insistent on changing all credits to place Salman first in multiple movies. I have no idea or interest in how the credits actually roll, but this seemed disruptive, especially as he's been warned on this before, so I issued a final warning. I'll leave it up to you and others to figure out how the credits should actually be laid out. —SpacemanSpiff 12:26, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Kill 'Em All[edit]

Hey Bollyjeff, can you make an update on the FAC and tell me what else needs to be corrected in order to receive full support? Appreciate your time.--Retrohead (talk) 20:56, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

TFA request submitted for Pather Panchali[edit]

Please be advised that a featured article to which you contributed, Pather Panchali, has been requested by me to be selected as Today's Featured Article for August 26th (the 50th anniversary of its official release). If you would like to support this nomination, please go to Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests. Thank you. Dylanexpert (talk) 01:16, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks so much for your support! The blurb edits are fine. Dylanexpert (talk) 13:59, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Kalidas (film)/archive1[edit]

The article on the first talking picture in Tamil is at FAC (nominated by Kailash29792). Feel free to leave comments at its FAC page. Thank you. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 09:24, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Shah Rukh Khan's father's death date[edit]

In this interview, SRK stated that his father died in 1981. Can it be used in the article? Kailash29792 (talk) 15:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Someone already used it a couple days ago. BollyJeff | talk 15:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
But I reverted as it was unconstructive, and other unconstructive edits by other amateur editors also happened shortly after, so I had to revert all. I guess you can re-add it as you know how to. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:34, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Indian cinema - comment requested[edit]

Hi there, this is a form letter. (Aren't you special!) Since you edit around Indian cinema articles, your comments are solicited at this discussion at the Indian cinema task force. The question is: Should box office gross totals be labeled as estimates?

Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:25, 25 August 2015 (UTC)