User talk:Bonadea/Archive 10
|This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.|
- 1 Contested PROD on Terrorists safe havens in Pakistan
- 2 Patrick M. Collins page
- 3 Thankyou
- 4 Notice
- 5 AfD
- 6 Järpetorp
- 7 Thanks
- 8 Question Regarding Wikipedia Policy
- 9 speakasiaonline
- 10 Re Rajinikanth
- 11 Good job!
- 12 Brendan Kyle Hatcher
- 13 Deletion of "Linden Optometry"
- 14 July 2011
- 15 Adding spam links on Small business
- 16 Deleting Entry
- 17 Apologies
- 18 MACARONI KID
- 19 Digital Scrapbooking Supplies
- 20 Sport of Selling
- 21 Re: Methods of website linking
- 22 Pit Dernitz
- 23 Speedy Delete.
- 24 Regarding website eMangrol.com
- 25 Regarding FreeMiner.Net
- 26 A barnstar for you!
- 27 Being Born Again Couture Fashion Show assistance please and banner placement
- 28 Post to social network
- 29 Sorry i'm kind of a noob
- 30 A cookie for you!
- 31 Kimberly J. Bowles speedy deletion?
- 32 my love never faked
- 33 Sorry
- 34 Hello Bonadea
- 35 Survey for new page patrollers
- 36 Hey, thanks for the edit
- 37 Your note
- 38 Incredible but True
- 39 Parallel Kingdom COI editor
- 40 Creater of Shrubes Page
- 41 Kim Michaels
- 42 Talkback
- 43 E cigarettes
- 44 Micky Malka page
- 45 I didn't edit nothing.
- 46 Bengali_Brahmins
Contested PROD on Terrorists safe havens in Pakistan
FYI, I just contested your PROD on this article. Whether articles should be deleted because of POV issues is a debatable issue, so I think it is better handled by a discussion at AfD. Qrsdogg (talk) 19:00, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- Well, my belief is that this is inherently POV; there's a plethora of terrorism-in-Pakistan related articles, and I'm sure that the existing sourced content would be suitable for one of these. This is just my opinion, however. --bonadea contributions talk 10:34, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Patrick M. Collins page
Bonadea, I significantly updated the page last week and removed a ton of text, including anything that sounded like an advertisement. By doing such a complete overhaul, I thought removing the maintenance tags was warranted. I'm also confused by what constitutes a secondary source: Most of the articles cited in the wiki do take you to external secondary sources, i.e, newspaper articles, etc. Can you please give me an example, using the existing article, of how I could add a valid secondary source? I honestly can find no promotional language in the text now, but if you disagree with that, can you please point to specific language in the existing text? I would really appreciate that. Also, it is not true that no other wiki articles link to it; here's an example of several: Rod_Blagojevich_corruption_charges; David_H._Hoffman; and Pat_Quinn_(politician). And finally, can you please give me a little more guidance as to why would it be a conflict of interest for me to edit this article? I am absolutely committed to being neutral; I simply want to get the facts about Mr. Collins and his accomplishments posted to the page. I have no interest in doing anything other than that. Creating a promotional piece about Mr. Collins is not my intent! His notability is established by his role as a former federal prosecutor in notable cases (notably, the conviction of Governor George Ryan), and in his appointment by a current governor to chair an ethics reform commission in a state with a history of corruption. Those are just the facts. Please let me know what I can do to satisfy your concerns. Thank you in advance! Zoeykennedy1 (talk) 17:15, 4 May 2011 (UTC) Zoeykennedy1 (talk) 19:20, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Could i give my thanks to you for supporting me on this page Block Voting: Irland and UK. And rebranding the speedy deletion tag as i was uncertain myself if it was the right one... (It was my first time tagging a article for speedy deletion. Thanks Again Wilbur2012(talk) 11:45, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
Hey your external link on chain link fence is dead and i edited it but u changed it back to original, how can u post a dead link on external link,this is harming the reputation of Wikipedia pls check into this Saumil555(talk) 10:46, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Can you please review my comments on pages:
- Also, I believe the article News Publisher is not blatant advertisement as the article majorly talks of general online press release industry and provides neutral information on the topic. What are your thoughts on it? Also, will a link from site hotreviews.com be acceptable? http://hotreviews.com/press-release-submission-press-release-submitter-press-release-service-news-release-distribution-submit-a-press-release-submit-press-release-press-release-distribution-submit-press-releases-press-rele/ Ankit (talk) 13:35, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Can you please review: http://www.lifetimeupgrades.com/windows/network-internet/browser-tools/news-publisher/ Ankit (talk) 13:43, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
I only want to show reviews and stories from several site editors and admin of the site. It request you to not be biased to remove the article if I try to show you reviews, date verification and editor's comments from several links which can not be generated by user content. I have already shown you several links from review sites etc. I am only contesting the rationale here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ankit1 nagpal (talk • contribs) 14:34, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
- Anyways, I will leave the discussion. If you feel the article has no genuine links or is a blatant advertisement. Please feel free to delete the article. I was trying to save the article which talks of general information and with genuine links from review sites. If given more time, I can provide more reliable sources. Ankit (talk)
- And with reference to your comment: "You have been writing press releases for the company on several external websites, so clearly you are affiliated with it", all the links I have presented to you are neither owned by me, nor I am affiliated to any of those websites. For example, I am not the editor of Lifetimeupgrades.com who has written his review about the software on his website, and the same goes for other websites links and reviews. I can not force techbuzzblog.com to feature my product on their weekly features product review. Please stop considering me a spammer who has access to all reputed sites and can thus can publish information on every site I desire. Ankit (talk) 15:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
- It appeared to me that there is one article on Wikipedia: Universal_Converter_(Unit_Conversion_Software) with almost no reference from any reliable or unreliable source etc., would that not be considered a AfD? I am not trying to argue the rules, just want to me more clear why many articles on Wiki are perfect with no links, and I am showing many independent review links and they are not considered by moderators. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ankit1 nagpal (talk • contribs) 16:33, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comments - because you have made the same comments on the Articles for Deletion discussion pages, I prefer to reply there. Having the same discussion in different places is potentially confusing, and discussing an article on a user talk page means that fewer people will see the discussion. I'm watching the Articles for Deletion pages for News Publisher and Universal Converter, so I'll see when any new comments are made there - there is no need to notify me here. Thank you! --bonadea contributions talk 12:52, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
I´m delighted to see that my article attracted attention so rapidly, and have also adjusted the article according to your wish. And just FYI, Järpetorp is the collective name for "Stora Järpetorp", "Lilla Järpetorp" as well as "Lilleskog", which is a prominent part of Vänersborgs municipality. You were correct to point out that Järpetorp isn´t a municipality, but it is however an independent society willing to break out and form an own municipality. If you read the books i addressed in the article, you will find this piece of information. And thank you for your good work and rapid response :-) Rashmosh 17:29, 29 May 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rashmosh (talk • contribs)
Thank you for your helpful and polite response to my post, I suppose not every Junior footballer is a notable person worldwide! I'm also so impressed by your fluent English, it makes me pretty embarassed that my Svenska is limited to the names of a few football teams! In actual fact it was only really done as a birthday present, and I understand that this is not the proper way to use Wikipedia. Thanks again for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by DUFCPLAYA (talk • contribs) 13:23, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Question Regarding Wikipedia Policy
Hi Bonadea, thank you for you advice before regarding sources. I have a question: I'm a little confused with exactly how the Wikipedia policy applies to a situation like this: Talk:Alchemy#Issues with Article, New Contributor. Could you please read that thread (starting from where it says "Woah" down), and let me know. It's concerning whether the spiritual interpretation of alchemy should be given equal standing and a disagreement over what constitutes a reliable source. Please read it if you have the time and let me know your thoughts. Thanks, Will Timony, Ph.D (talk • contribs) 05:00, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi, the company has a strong impact in the market and many lives of people because if you google it they have taken $220 each from 2 million panelists that equals to $2.2 billion and if it goes fraud it will be the biggest fraud of the decade and one thing more. More than 4200 Multi level marketing companies work in INDIA and this was the fastest one that growed. It established this much in a span of 1.5 years.
For more info you can google it and can even sent me an email on email@example.com
Thanks! Never realised that I was being so mean. Question: do you view random pages for vandalism or do you use automated programmes?FlashingYoshi! 18:51, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Brendan Kyle Hatcher
Hi - just would like to know why this page which I created (Joh Adams for Huffington Post) has been marked for speedy deletion. It is cired and referenced with articles from CNN, government sources, news wires, etc and covers a very well-covered recent event with current implications. I have interviewed the person in question as well for additional details, but I left the article's biases out. If you have any suggestions as to how I could adjust the article so that is is printed, I am open to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 15:35, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Deletion of "Linden Optometry"
The Linden Optometry page which you deleted is/was still being updated. If you look at the most recent update, you will see that it is the story of Linden Optometry as a Pioneer in the healthcare field. It is not meant as an advertisement for an optometry practice, but rather a history of how a tiny company from the 1950's and 1960's developed and pioneered marketing and service strategies decades before Mega-Chains like Lenscrafters even existed (and I notice you did not delete Lenscrafters -- why, because they are so huge? -- that's not really an accomplishment, is it?) Many of the features advertised as "invented by Lenscrafters or other MegaChains" were in fact developed by pioneers like Linden Optometry and others decades beforehand: 1-hour eyeglass labs, "Featherweight lenses", Staying open 7 days and nights, no-line bifocals, Green Eyewear made from Recycled materials, Large Advertising campaigns to educate the public (vision care advertising was actually prohibited in those days by the American Optometric Association and AOA demanded that Linden cease and desist all advertising, but after years of fighting with them, the Federal Gov't sued AOA, saying AOA was interfering with consumer rights to be educated through advertising, so Linden was cleared). That event, in fact, set the stage for the Mega-Chains to come into existence! So, all of these topics and others to be listed soon are really pioneering in the vision care industry. It is not simply an advertisement for an eye doctor. If there are specific sentences in the story which you feel are inappropriate, by all means delete them or notify me, but the story itself deserves to be read by the public.
- Hello, and thank you for your message. First, please note that I did not delete the page; I merely tagged it for deletion. The administrator who reviewed the page agreed that it did not meet the requirements for being kept, and deleted it; the administrator in question was User:Jimfbleak. If you want to request undeletion, or ask for a copy of the page to be sent to you, please ask Jimfbleak. The main issues with the article were first that there were no indications that the company is notable according to Wikipedia's definition of notability, and second that it was entirely promotionally written; the latter can be fixed with a complete re-write, but as for the former issue, if there isn't significant coverage in reliable sources for the company, then it unfortunately can't have a Wikipedia article. Thank you! --bonadea contributions talk 19:38, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi Bonadea. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Custom wordpress theme, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Try PROD instead. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi, May I know the reason why my link was removed? www.newsbycompany.com is no spam site. It is small business news site. Although I am not associated with this site, I have seen people to use it to publish information...specially those with very small business setup. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shomikz (talk • contribs) 03:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
so then what do i do? i just want to page up about the book. i'll write the most neutral copy possible. this is very frustrating. i know people who put pages about themselves and their work all the time. heck, i even know people who have claimed to put up a page for their pet. i'm not trying to be difficult - really. Yogininyc (talk) 20:42, 14 July 2011 (UTC)yogininyc
My entry for Destinology has been deleted, could you please advise me on what to do to get it re-instated, and why it was deleted in the first instance?
When I posted the link on weight loss, I knew it was not the right place to put it. I wanted to put the link under the "weight loss" under open directories. Did not know how to do this. Please can you guide me on this? I have no intention to spam or create spam links. Apologize the inconvenience — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajendrashahyoga (talk • contribs) 01:44, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
I have noted your assistance on Macaroni Kid page that I created. I am a novice and I am truly lost with the references and how to properly cite. I appreciate your help and any input further would be greatly welcome. I am trying also to change the "tone" of the article as per "flags" indicated. Thank you!--Supahmommy (talk) 16:08, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Digital Scrapbooking Supplies
I was wondering why the link I added was removed. Digital Scrapbook Place is one of the original digital scrapbook supply sites and is the biggest on the web. As I saw other sites listed, I added ours.
It is not spam but a related link with a plethora of information on digital scrapbooking including free tutorials, classes, digital scrapbook kits both free and paid and a massive community forum and gallery. Clikchic (talk) 23:26, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
I have my good knowledge to create the plum graphix page. Let me know is any speedy deletion forms comes. i look for positive result.
I read the CSD A7 and CSD G11. I removed the contents which overate the rule, check the page
I added the external link to help webmasters to find reciprocal link partners. I know about the 'nofollow' tag for hyperlinks in wikipedia. The site offers free service and I thought it would be useful to webmasters. If you accept my view, reinstate the link or just leave it.Uksharma3 (talk) 01:35, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Sorry for the previous error i did. I am wrong supposed to delete that speedy deletion tag, sorry for that. i will be acknowledged with other good editings, i am new to this wikimedia project. thanks for ur talk.,
Hi there I added the reason. His death is of importance because it caused controversy and led to debates on the film "Savage Man Savage Beast". Thanks. --Violeta123321 (talk) 19:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Wow. My friend tried to find an article about him on Wikipedia, due to the "Savage Man Savage Beast" article not having enough info. I wish I could have had time to save the info to put it on that article.--Violeta123321 (talk) 19:47, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Regarding website eMangrol.com
Thanks for revising my page. But I am little bit surprised why the page of a properly running website called eMangrol.com has been put on speedy deletion by you. Please check the website in case you have any doubts about it. Also, few wikipedia pages are already having links to the site for users. Maybe, I am not an expert user of wikipedia and that is why my previous page about myself was deleted from here, even though I am a well known writer and journalist in Mumbai, India.
Humbly requesting you to see what is right and also guide me just in case I have violated any rule.
Expecting positive and guiding feedback from you.
thanks for notifying me. I just want to know what I could do so that this site can be accepted. My plan was to add a "See also" section to Minecraft, where I'd list all Minecraft-likes, that's why I've created the FreeMiner-page "in advance". You know what I mean? What could we do here? I'd be pleased to hear a solution to this :)
A barnstar for you!
|The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar|
|nice job on the quick catch for Wedding anniversary. The reference was probably meant to http://thebloggess.com/2011/06/and-thats-why-you-should-learn-to-pick-your-battles/ but is out of place in the list of presents. :) ejly (talk) 20:48, 18 August 2011 (UTC)|
Being Born Again Couture Fashion Show - banners help
In regards to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Being_Born_Again_Couture_Fashion_Show: I have referenced the Natalie Imbruglia and the Natalie Gruzlewski properly. Apologies that I put in the Samantha Harris 'references' - I understand why it is not to do with Samantha Harris being in the fashion show, thank you. 3 questions please: 1. Are photographic evidence enough to be referenced? ie I've put in references in actual photographs of Natalie Imbruglia wearing the skirt and Natalie Gruzlewski wearing the dress and referenced them? 2. Image marked for deletion: I copied the image from facebook on the left hand side. How do I reference that and where/which place do I put the reference there please? 3. I have taken out all descriptive words and checked cites/references - do I need to do more?
As per Ma®©usBritish's comments: "...put in the "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject" tag, what are their reasons for believing this - I don't like "hit and run" tagging - they need to open up a dialogue in the discussion page and express their concerns, otherwise the tag serves no purpose other than to deface the article. Can you please address this matter in their talk page as they appear to have added a few of these 4 banners, which suggests they know more about the topic than they're willing to contribute - which is a waste of time if they don't intend to give clearer feedback."
A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page. (August 2011) RESPONSE: I am very knowledgeable about this topic and hence am writing the wikipedia page for it. Short of one of the fashion designers or artists or models writing the page and giving it their "spin" and giving it their promotional point of view, I am writing the page from what I feel is an objective point of view and a very neutral point of view. Ma®©usBritish and Bonadea have helped me edit out all the things which are inappropriate and not to do with the article.
This article may contain wording that merely promotes the subject without imparting verifiable information. Please remove or replace such wording, unless you can cite independent sources that support the characterization. RESPONSE: I have referenced it properly and taken out all descriptive words. Ma®©usBritish and Bonadea have helped me. Please take out "This article may contain wording that merely promotes the subject without imparting verifiable information. Please remove or replace such wording, unless you can cite independent sources that support the characterization."
This article may contain inappropriate or misinterpreted citations that do not verify the text. Please help improve this article by checking for inaccuracies. (help, talk, get involved!) (August 2011) RESPONSE: I have cited all references properly and you can check - there is nothing that can be misinterpreted or misinformed. Ma®©usBritish and Bonadea have noted that there is little they can do considering that they have limited knowledge about fashion shows. I would like to have these 3 banners removed please. When will they be removed?
Hi Bonadea, Ma®©usBritish tried to guide me, but he can't advise me in a subject he knows little about. He told me to contact you, and get their concerns addressed ASAP. So can you please read my comments and responses to your questions and could you please remove the banners or tell me how to edit the article further to your satisfaction please? Thank you. Domenico.y (talk) 16:31, 13 September 2011 (UTC) Domenico.y
The technology allows you to add information that displays actions performed by user on your website in user feed.
The technology allows the user to meet your product on his personal social network page.
How it works?
The user is proposed to register using his social network ID.
2. Online activity at website
Any kind of activity may be displayed – acquisition of goods, registration, participation in promo campaigns, comments and discussions on goods and services etc.
3. Post to feed
Messages that show user activity on your site are automatically added to user’s feed. Text message shall be moderated by you and the link to your site shall be seen by user’s friends — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeorgiyKrasavin (talk • contribs) 12:26, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Sorry i'm kind of a noob
I have recently made some alteration in website, in which i have created a short summary for someone who may want to set up a website and you have reverted the changes because of the link i have included. I just want to say that i think the page would have benefited both from the post and the link and that was my only intention. My website even though about internet marketing is non-beneficial(you can see that i have not used google adsense or any other advertisement program)and really does include a thorough website development guide. Please reconsider in order to make wikipedia a better website. Redbahamut1991 (talk) 12:03, 9 September 2011 (UTC) P.M the noob thing is because, i don't know if this is the right place to post this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redbahamut1991 (talk • contribs) 12:05, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
|Hello Bonadea! I hope you enjoy this cookie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 07:10, 10 September 2011 (UTC)|
Kimberly J. Bowles speedy deletion?
I am contesting your recommendation that someone that was part of Major US Naval History page is deleted? I write stories on the military and this was one of the biggest stories in US Naval History and she was one of the Women, how is this not Signficant?? this article has valid references from major sources, I can maybe see an edit recommendation but not a full blown deletion. this is a debatable issue. starpreneurgoddess (talk)
working on my article please let me finish it you people are ready to delete it before I could write anythikng — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manpower121 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
my love never faked
Hello Bonadea, Thanks for revising the page but I think you make your statement too soon befoe I could work properly Please revise and reconsider it . And I am little bit surprised a properly running website called www.nikhilmahajan.com has been put on the external link and you can look for it too. Please check the website in case you have any doubts about it and do look for various places like ebay and search it for this book as it is listed there. I have seen some pages which are not even worth to be there but you r are delelting an important page. Maybe, I am not an expert user of wikipedia but some one meschivously had made this page for fun and due to which it is conidered to be in speedy deletion. Help me for it I will be highly obliged , even such a well known writer can be blocked from jammy and Kashmir, India. Again humbly requesting you to see what is right and also guide me just in case I have violated any rule. Expecting positive and guiding feedback from you. Regards
A reader of this book and this is my favorite one I wish this Author could talk to you for this else make a mail to the Author as the email is put inot the book you can get a copy easily over internet if you will search for it
I realize it was totally inappropriate, but I was testing to see how long the error would remain. I personally believe in the integrity of the information on Wikipedia, but have teachers who do not. I'm going to show the edit history and the talk message you left to one of my teachers as proof that Wikipedia actually is very well maintained.
As a small consolation, I planned on correcting the error myself within a day or two, if necessary.
Bone friend you call me evil Vandal, for the issues that I have in the article Cartoon Network Latin America, if those issues I have done to improve the article, not to ruin, amazing, everyone in this encyclopedia have a hatred irrational unstoppable against me, incredible.--OliverDF (talk) 14:35, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Survey for new page patrollers
New page patrol – Survey Invitation
Hello Bonadea/Archive 10! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part.
You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey
Hey, thanks for the edit
Incredible but True
In brief Bonadea, your message you sent me are calling me Vandal upset just because I made edits in the article Cartoon Network Latin America are to improve so that all who read it understand it and not to destroy, unbelievable, this encyclopedia all have an irrational hatred against me, incredible.--OliverDF (talk) 14:32, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Parallel Kingdom COI editor
Per your message:
Hi, just as a FYI about the COI tag at Parallel Kingdom - the user name of the article's creator tallies exactly with the person at PerBlue, the company behind Parallel Kingdom, who is responsible for PerBlue's PR (as verified by their website). Obviously it could be a different person by the same name, or the username could have nothing to do with the person's real name, but the editor's only activities have been related to PerBlue and their product. So the assumption of a COI is not particularly far-fetched, but I'm not going to restore the tag as it is just an assumption, and in any case the article has been edited by several other people recently. --bonadea contributions talk 14:09, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Creater of Shrubes Page
Hello Bonadea ,
I know i have written about my site but i have not written anything about it content .I just wane make sure that when people find my site good and search for its history people have reliable source as Wikipedia, tho i have putted a page on my site i wane give them a reliable source .Still if you find this is not good tell me what changes i should make or remove my articles.
The information provided was not spam. I am new to Wikipedia, made some mistakes and thought I was able to edit the information. After seeing that I accidentally cited twice, I removed the duplicate citation. I understand if the citation didn't fit Wikipedia guidelines, as I was not very clear on them, but the information and citation was not spam. Jprojectf (talk) 11:02, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Micky Malka page
I'm trying to create a page for Micky Malka. He and Wences Casares are business parters. Wences has a page but Micky does not. The page keeps getting deleted and I am making the requested changes each time. How can I solve this?
I have created a subpage on this topic and look forward to your feedback [Micky Malka Subpage]
I didn't edit nothing.
I didn't add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia; it's pissing me off, all you losers keep sending me messages, shit ain't funny no more! so next time before you send a message. make sure you know the person who messed up the Wikipedia page, because it wasn't me.
- That was back in 2009; it's not even really relevant any more. But there's no way to differentiate between unregistered users on a single IP adress; you may want to create an account. Kranix (talk) 08:15, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
In fact I would say that your last act on the page trying to correct Neil'e edit actually is a vandalism.
The article is about Bengali Brahmins, and in the list we find preachers of the Hindu religion from all sections of the populace... At best there should be a gap between the symbol and the personalities (as most of the personalities so mentioned are not Brahmins).
Giving you an example - how would you like if in a list of Saints, all Popes of the Vatican were included as a default?
Kindly rectify your mistake.