User talk:Bosco.bosco9

Please do not copy materials from other websites

Your recent addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Also the material you have copied is written in a completely inappropriate tone for an encyclopedia. cab (talk) 06:07, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And you have done it again, with this edit, in which your second paragraph is directly plagiarised from Ms. Strauss. Stop that. cab (talk) 13:57, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attempt to whitewash your boss' biography

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. cab (talk) 06:07, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Robert Ng, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Deleting sourced content and replacing it with a summary of an Angelfile page (even one alleging to be a chapter from a book) is in violation of our policy on reliable sources --- and that excerpt is more a corporate history of the Sino Group rather than a discussion of Ng's personal role in it. cab (talk) 13:54, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Robert Ng. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. cab (talk) 05:58, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bosco.bosco9 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. cab (talk) 06:49, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for sockpuppetry. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 08:36, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]