User talk:Brewcrewer/Archives/2010/November

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

It's raining thanks spam!

  • Please pardon the intrusion. This tin of thanks spam is offered to everyone who commented or !voted (Support, Oppose or Neutral) on my recent RfA. I appreciate the fact that you care enough about the encyclopedia and its community to participate in this forum.
  • There are a host of processes that further need community support, including content review (WP:GAN, WP:PR, WP:FAC, and WP:FAR). You can also consider becoming a Wikipedia Ambassador. If you have the requisite experience and knowledge, consider running for admin yourself!
  • If you have any further comments, input or questions, please do feel free to drop a line to me on my talk page. I am open to all discussion. Thanks • Ling.Nut (talk) 02:16, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

cargo

Hi -- you added material that was already covered in the article, in greater detail. Albeit lower, and I think your placement is better. I moved up the lower-placed, pre-existing material, in its place, as it is more detailed. Among the adds that I deleted was your add (with a new ref number) of a NYT article. You are now deleting all refs to the pre-existing ref number, and replacing it with your later-created number for the same article -- which does not work, as that ref has been deleted (as redundant to what we already had). Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 15:15, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

thanks. i did not notice the material. i think dating the ref name like "NYT1031" is better then plain "nyt1." I am in the midst of updating all the ref names to be consistent. If you disagree, I can leave the article alone. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 15:18, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
That's fine with me. No worries. (I let my computer program provide the ref number). Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 15:23, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

WP:ANI thread

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 17:33, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I commented there.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 19:34, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Natasha Bauman

I have turned down the speedy request for Natasha Bauman, because I believe that it is sufficiently different in terms of content from the version that was deleted more than 2 years ago. I have no objections however, to submitting it for an AfD to test its mettle. --Patar knight - chat/contributions 03:24, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

No probs.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:44, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Congregation Or Chadash

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Civilian casualty ratio

Hi Brewcrewer, since you're active in terrorism related topics, I thought this might interest you. If you can spare some time, I would greatly appreciate your help. Jalapenos do exist (talk) 22:27, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

looks like a great article. as my recent contrib history indicates, I edit very little these days, but i will try to help if time permits. thanks, --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 23:56, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
I self nominated it at T:TDYK, where your input would be welcome. Jalapenos do exist (talk) 20:13, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
looks good!--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:58, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

[Complaint about my propaganda]

Please do not vandalize article of Lydda Struggle with propaganda! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.172.186.59 (talk) 02:33, 30 November 2010 (UTC)