User talk:Brianjd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

M.C. Brown Shoes[edit]

I filed an RFD, then retracted and tagged it for G1. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 22:43, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of KrisWorld[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

I have nominated KrisWorld, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KrisWorld. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Russavia Dialogue 04:17, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Life on Earth[edit]

The following comment by me is exactly the same as the one at Talk:Carbon#Life on Earth, except for the link added in the first line to preserve the context [Brian Jason Drake 02:11, 30 April 2009 (UTC)]:

The article carbon states:

Carbon compounds form the basis of all life on Earth...

Huh? According to Wikipedia's article, we don't even have a good definition of life! Even if we did, it's not entirely clear (at least from what I've read) that we know about all life on Earth. Brian Jason Drake 13:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


Dear Brian, that article is about what we know, not about what we don't know. As a scientist, I agree that any fact can be questioned, but there is a threshold for what we consider "knowledge", and in this question, the threshold is long passed. If start adding such tags[dubious ], then most wikipedia articles will be unreadable. Best regards. NIMSoffice (talk) 23:28, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Why does this, as you claim at Talk:Carbon#Life on Earth, belong here? Brian Jason Drake 02:11, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Message regarding your use of the No Multi License Template[edit]

In case you are not aware, the Wikimedia Foundation has proposed that the copyright licensing terms on the wikis operated by the WMF – including Wikipedia – be changed to include the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA) license in addition to the current GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) as allowed by version 1.3 of the GFDL. The community has approved this change with 75.8% in favor, and on June 15, 2009, the change will take effect.
You currently have {{NoMultiLicense}} on your user or user talk page, which states that your edits are licensed under the GFDL only. On or before June 15, this template will be changed to reflect Wikipedia's new licensing terms. If you accept the licensing change, you do not need to do anything (and feel free to remove this message); if you do not accept it, we regret that you will no longer be able to contribute to the encyclopedia. Please join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#NoMultiLicense template if you have any comments.

Delivered by The Helpful Bot at 20:17, 2 June 2009 (UTC) for the Village pump. Report errors here.

sorry[edit]

oh i know what you mean! by tempting Blocked Users it means i tried to make them write back Right?

'MJfan9 (talk) 19:20, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
It's not just that you tried to make them write back, it's that the way you asked that question seems likely to upset them, and therefore likely to tempt them to write something nasty back. Brian Jason Drake 03:42, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

sorry! i'll think next time by the way please leave messages comments or Replies on my talkpage next time

'MJfan9 (talk) 20:07, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Clean Urban Transport for Europe[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Clean Urban Transport for Europe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Ephemeral project. No independent sources. Does not meet WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:59, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Fuel Cell Bus Club for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fuel Cell Bus Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuel Cell Bus Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan Griscom (talk) 19:49, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Murdoch Transit Link[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Murdoch Transit Link has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Long-abandoned proposal that never went anywhere.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Drover's Wife (talk) 07:23, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Harry Potter and the Forest of Shadows listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Harry Potter and the Forest of Shadows. Since you had some involvement with the Harry Potter and the Forest of Shadows redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 07:11, 2 December 2015 (UTC)