User talk:KH-1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:C759)
Jump to: navigation, search

For more information on counter-spam activities, see WikiSpamWatch



Hello, C759, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!  Flat Out let's discuss it 07:05, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

C759, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi C759! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Abigail Valte) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Abigail Valte, C759!

Wikipedia editor NearEMPTiness just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hi C759. I like your stub on A Valte, but it is still very short. Could you expand it a bit, please?

To reply, leave a comment on NearEMPTiness's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

About Empowr[edit]

Hello C759 I just noticed your edit on the Empowr page. Please leave a reason also, in the Talk area of the page. Further let me know your views if you can help. Thanks

  1. SatyamSatsContactMe11:07, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

All Is Well (film)[edit]

You removed a source from the page All Is Well (film). Please explain your edits in the edit summary if you remove content or sources from a page. Otherwise it would be considered as vandalism. Thanks!Rameshnta909 (talk) 14:59, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

A brownie for you[edit]

Brownie transparent.png Great work reverting vandalism! Romtamtalk 14:00, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Reverting edit[edit]

So so sorry! It was an accident!

Best regards, Romtamtalk 05:33, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Durgapur may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:19, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Barnstar of Reversion Hires.png The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For the swift reversal of a rather misplaced redirection on my talk page Amortias (T)(C) 16:36, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Gwar discography and other[edit]

why you undo my edits on those articles:

  • 1 at this moment charts, and certifications are not true, you removed sources and correct chart position that i add
  • 2 i did update discography and certifications
  • 3 in this article alredy have been written discography, i did use wikitable to sort all informations and add more sources
  • 4 as i have notify on edit summary timline and videography have been integrated with Gwar discography
  • 5 as i notify on edit summary article was integrated with List of Gwar members
  • i realize that there was war with some other user, but that was not me, what is the point to spend hours on rewriting and adding sources and go to edit war (talk) 10:04, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Hi, I'm BethNaught. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, OneWorld Foundation India, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. BethNaught (talk) 15:54, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

I tagged it with db-spam, so I'm not sure what the issue is.... -C759 (talk) 00:01, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Not sure if I understand why tracking down dead links and mirroring their content is considering "spamming"[edit]

Especially since Wikipedia has a NOFOLLOW policy on links to begin with. All these edits were made to the ref section, only to restore original citations lost to 404s and only mirrored when the original could not be tracked down... Wikipedia would rather have dead links I guess? Also several edits that had been up and considered good for months were reverted too. Seems a bit spiteful.

No good deed goes unpunished I guess. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 14:12, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

You're not the first to try this. Don't pretend that you have pure motives - it's not remotely convincing. -C759 (talk) 00:20, 18 September 2014 (UTC)


He is clearly not notable. Why not nominate it for speedy deletion??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 03:43, 19 September 2014 (UTC)


Perhaps my added content, pending agreeable references, could be reincorporated by other means? Lack of internet censorship and the moral implications of said phenomenon being the culprit. I would like to describe how this enhanced availability of suicide literature may be linked to recent deaths in the media. Eg Grant Li, Matthew Sattherthwaite and Kevin Boyle all used the internet as a means to acquiring either their method and/or the equipment it involved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redzimus (talkcontribs) 10:08, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Window film, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Homes and Ceramics. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Kicks from spurious deletion - Promotion/advertising?![edit]

Dear C759 I am at a loss to understand why you have sought fit to remove all my content - it all objectively links to third party websites proving that what I am stating is true, in summary based on the few contributions made this morning:

  • There is an additional 'Invictus' inspired song in the public domain to those listed on the Invictus page - so I simply stated that and linked to it, objectively with no promotional language etc etc;
  • There is an additional repository of photographic information on Cane Hill asylum, and I've linked to it, again with no promotional language etc;
  • There is an additional angle to anti-drug education, which I've linked to and provided simply as fact without any sort of promotion, citing third party media reports that verify what I have said...

...Having read the Wikipedia treatise on objectivity of content, what exactly is it that makes the many previous entries on Invictus, Cane Hill, Drug Education etc neutral where they refer to other people's creative works, yet my edits promotional, even though they do no more than simply objectively stating and linking as the other entries do?

I must say my confidence and motivation to now add anything at all to Wikipedia has now been singlehandedly destroyed, and even my inclination to use Wikipedia as a basic reference source has been severely altered - I now realize that users can spuriously remove content simply by alleging it is advertising, and that a time-apartheid approach to content entry only allows those with the most time to read unwieldly treaties and extensively argue out minutiae ad absurdium to create any bias of their intent under the banner of 'neutrality'. Ajs uk2 (talk) 09:47, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Looks like nothing more than name-dropping to me. What is your relation to the Thieving Names and the musical comedy? -C759 (talk) 10:35, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Karva Chauth may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ला इस दिन कुछ अलग दिखना चाहती है। आइए हम देते हैं कुछ टिप्स इस करवा चौथ पर ताकि आप दिखें सबसे खास। (Beautiful and attractive jewelry and clothes, along with make-up, are so enjoyable on festivals. On

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:54, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

iPhone 6 in China information[edit]

Hi C759 - you had removed a comment I made on iPhone 6 about its nickname in China. I'm an American living in China so I've heard this firsthand. I felt it was an unusual enough nickname that it merited citing a source, which was in fact a blog entry I had helped publish. This wasn't meant as self-promotion, but it was hard to find other English-language sources that describe this phenomenon. Can I re-add the comment and the attributed source?EmceeInPRC (talk) 03:02, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Blogs are not considered reliable sources. Also repeatedly citing sources that you are closely associated is seen as spamming and conflict of interest. -C759 (talk) 04:41, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Okay, understood. Good to know. Will refrain from re-adding.EmceeInPRC (talk) 04:43, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Relevant photos links from Scientific source[edit]

These days you're removing relevant, unique photos links from a science source. For example true, adequate photos of typhoon area (typhoons Rammasun and Kalmaegi 2014) or of a new soft drink (Mirinda Watermelon). Why you do this? Сароман (talk) 13:56, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

See WP:REFSPAM and WP:RS. Spamming will not be tolerated. -C759 (talk) 13:57, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
I know Wikipedia from its beginning. I'm almost 40 years old scientist. Why do you think that links to relevant, unique, true photos is "spam"? If you continue to think so, I'll report this issue to the higher community level. I know you became a respectful editor here, but I think you're wrong in this case. Linking to relevant photos isn't spam. Сароман (talk) 14:01, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Did you read WP:REFSPAM and WP:RS?-C759 (talk) 14:05, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
I think our debate here is no longer productive and because I'm a very busy family person, I informed about this issue already the higher Wikipedian level (i.e. here: I hope they (the admins) will create the right decision and we, both, can save our time for more constructive online or/and offline activities, dear C759. Have a nice day! Сароман (talk) 14:33, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Good one - WP:BOOMERANG. I'm not even going to bother. -C759 (talk) 14:34, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Electronic Cigarette RFC[edit]

Since you have edited the article reciently you may want to comment on the current request for comment on the talk page. AlbinoFerret (talk) 14:23, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Regarding Speedy Nomination[edit]

Hi, You just nominated the page I just created Splash math for speedy nomination. I was editing the page as a third party and have no affiliation whatsoever with the company. I am a teacher & use it in my classroom. Can you tell me how do I modify the page so that it doesn't look like a promotion. I Google-searched & tried to present as many facts as I can and also researched on few other pages of similar companies/products — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arpitjain11 (talkcontribs) 10:34, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Gaurav. Please let me know why you have removed the external link I have added in the page of SEO, as it was following all Wikipedia guidelines. The page I tried to link was informational based on actual facts and information from other authoritative resources.[edit]

FYI: User, Inc.. JohnCD (talk) 13:13, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Jason Tom[edit]

Hello C759, we have a team of editors working on the Jason Tom article and we are working on building content for it and would appreciate that you do not remove content as we are consistently building the article with reliable resources that back up the content that is provided and presented. We appreciate your interest in the topic and article. Thank you for your contributions. We do appreciate you and your time involved in the article. If you have any specific feedback and suggestions that would assist us we would appreciate it. Please respond here and we look forward in hearing from you. Thank you. Keep in mind we are working on it. Thank you again C759. Angel Light17 (talk) 00:17, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Who exactly is "we" and what is your relation to Jason Tom? -C759 (talk) 00:21, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

No relation. "We" includes you and I and editors from the Wikipedia community. Will turn to Teahouse for assistance. Thank you for your contribution. -Angel Light17 (talk) 00:56, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Regarding spamming[edit]

Hey, I see your message regarding me "spamming" with links. I knew that wikipedia puts rel="nofollow" on external links. That was the very reason I placed my website since I had no intent to boost my search rankings but rather people have better experience getting appropriate list. Those list are primarily constructed using Wikipedia and other reliable public data sources like Freebase. I am not even monetizing my site with ads. If still it is against some wikipedia policy then I won't post links. But my motive wasn't that of a "spammer". I only wanted to build something which can help. Sushant gupta (talk) 15:35, 10 January 2015 (UTC)


Wikipedia Rollbacker.svg

I have granted rollback rights to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. 14:38, 27 January 2015 (UTC)– Gilliam (talk)

Thanks. I'm happy with TW though. -KH-1 (talk) 12:48, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

OR tag on Death of Elisa Lam[edit]

I totally understand why you put it there, but please do understand that what's there is just the intro of the article as I will be expanding it further, including sources for most of the statements in the intro. If it's OK with you, can we take the tag off? Daniel Case (talk) 00:31, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Sure, but I don't think we should be giving credibility to fringe theories about paranormal interference. -KH-1 (talk) 00:40, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
They've been mentioned in a couple of reliable sources. I won't be devoting much to them, other than noting that they exist. Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 29 January 2015 (UTC)


     i respect your reviews. Can you please help me out in the page "Arlo Enterprises" to avoid it from speedy deletion. Thank you


     i respect your reviews. Can you please help me out in the page "Arlo Enterprises" to avoid it from speedy deletion. Thank you


Good catch. (re: Special:Contributions/Ktyrr1093) --— Rhododendrites talk \\ 21:44, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Rai Techintro Private Limited deletion query[edit]

I made a page for Rai Techintro Private Limited but it was deleted because of advertising and promotion article. Since I wrote my first article so it was done by mistake. I request you to please suggest me that which line should I remove from the the article to complete your terms of use. I want to rewrite the article on the same topic. Thanks!User:vsray (talk) 20:15, 26 February 2015 (IST)

Citations fixed[edit]


I have added citation and removed 404 page not found links on pagetraffic page Please review if its ok now?

Mikehose (talk) 09:10, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Removing references[edit]

Can you please not remove references? Thank you. Samsara 19:04, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

What exactly is it referencing?-KH-1 (talk) 23:57, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
The content of the article. Samsara 06:22, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
What you've inserted is an external link, not a reference. -KH-1 (talk) 06:38, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
If you feel the need to convert it to an inline reference, feel free. Deleting references, however, is not acceptable. Samsara 07:50, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi KH-1, i re-integrated my edits and undid your changes. I do believe they are significant to these topics and add value. Thanks for your understanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyk1ng (talkcontribs) 09:19, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

List of presidents of Croatia[edit]

Hello, I am sending you a message because you obviously did not know enough about the history of Croatia. First of all, Croatia was independent since 1991, since then we have the Croatian president, not the Communists who had de facto role The president of the Socialist Republic of Croatian (which was part of Yugoslavia and the Republic of Croatia became independent in 1991). Thank you for your attention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mica Maca Pipica (talkcontribs) 13:45, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

You should provide an edit summary explaining your actions when you intend on removing large chunks of information. -KH-1 (talk) 23:30, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Ray Marcano[edit]

How can I do a speedy delete on this page? Someone has created this and his handle is associated with porn sites. I don't want to be associated with this is any way — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmarcano (talkcontribs) 01:48, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fatubessi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portuguese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:48, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Response to alleged spamming[edit]

Dear KH-1, With reference to the alleged spamming, I would like to challenge your assumption and request that you reinstate the external links on the legal subject of Damages on the following grounds: (1) the external links were directed so as to take Wiki users to many pages of free materials of the highest educational standard on the subject (3) there is nothing for sale at the redirected web page so there is no commercial gain on my part, the external link is to entirely educational content (3) I effectively have 2 phds on the subject of damages having undertaken many years of research and having written a book on the subject (3) If you google "the law of damages" you will find my web page is the second most used resource on damages on the web (4) I contributed significantly to the Wiki page on Damages many years ago using my own name when editing (from about 2000 onwards), correcting many errors and making the content more accurate (5) I have not included any references to my book under References, which I could have done. The book is not currently offered for sale so there is no question of potential gain at this stage (6) The law of damages is a vast subject comprising centuries of law reporting throughout the English speaking world. It is not possible to provide anything other than an overview of the subject at wiki and numerous external links to further more detailed information are an inevitable consequence. At present there is only one external link (which suggests either no one is bothering to make the information more useful alternatively someone is blocking the addition of links) and the removal of the link in question effectively denies users access to materials which are the subject of high commendation by peers (7) Multiple links to different web pages were appropriate and should not have been regarded as spamming since each link directed readers to distinct web pages containing specific subject matter research. For example, under wiki page Chaplin v Hicks, which contains the barest/minimal detail, I inserted an external link to this page: (liability to pay damages). You will see that the web page specifically mentions the case in question and that it considers the wider principles associated with particular issue of law. Potentially, an external link to the same web page might be included at the following Wiki web page: Story Parchment. Thanks Lawdamages (talk) 17:27, 23 March 2015 (UTC) lawdamages.

March 2015[edit]

Information icon Hi KH-1. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Navfitness, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. The article isn't about a company; it's about a product made by a company. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers, criteria for speedy deletion, and particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion or proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Thanks! Gparyani (talk) 01:49, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

H. B. Beal Secondary School[edit]

Thanks for your work dealing with the stupidity going on with that article. It annoyed me so much that I deleted all of the revisions from when the mass attack started. I didn't want to give the students the satisfaction of saying "See what we did?". -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:54, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Happy to help. -KH-1 (talk) 02:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Organic certification[edit]

hi - thanks for removing that "and New Zealand", i'm not sure who added it and i was in two minds as to whether to roll it back Shaztastic (talk) 03:50, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Indian Tyre Manufacturer[edit]

Dear Mr KH-1 Wanted to add an Indian Tyre Manufacturing company, Innovative Tyres and Tubes Ltd, which I am authorized to do as member of team Innovative. No external link was included other than the reference of the company web site was there Unable to understand why you have deleted the entire entry, if you have objection to the mention of company web site, you could have deleted that portion only. In the same page where I wanted to include my company's name, a lot many web links are there. Can you claim that the existing list is complete and hence, you will not allow any more addition? Like to add my entry once again, how do I know that you are part of team Wikipedia and not an individual representing a company like me? Regards --Surabhisthan-1959 (talk) 14:32, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Credit Savvy[edit]

Hi KH-1 and thanks for the warm welcome and words of advice. Please can I take you up on your offer to review my draft submission to ensure it is objective and does not fall fowl of conflict of interest rules. I'm happy to receive and action any feedback you might have. I've posted the draft in my user space here: Credit Savvy (Draft) Alex at CreditSavvy (talk) 04:05, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Sure, I'll review it once there's more content. Let me know. -KH-1 (talk) 04:25, 15 April 2015 (UTC)


Not sure what happened here O.o — BranStark (talk) 13:54, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

You didn't revert far enough. -KH-1 (talk) 13:55, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Portal:Current events/Sports/Sidebar[edit]

Hi! Could you please have another look at this revert? It seems to me that this IP is putting a lot of work into maintaining this sidebar. You have restored some "upcoming events" that are now past. -- John of Reading (talk) 07:00, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

WikiDefender Barnstar Hires.png The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Thank You YoutubeViewer101 (talk) 09:00, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Window blind[edit]

You're on your way to a 3RR violation at Window blind (regardless of who is right). I suggest bringing it up at the talk page. Other user has been warned as well (found this on a request for semiprotection at RFPP, which I declined as ineffective). --kelapstick(bainuu) 15:50, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Reverting my edits as refspam[edit]

Hi, I saw that you are reverting my edits with the doubts of refspam. I wanted to let you know that I'm a paid Wikipedia editor however I edit only those pages where I see the scope of improvement and credibility. I am fully aware about WP:VERIFY and WP:NOTE and take complete responsibility of my edits. I want to make Wikipedia a better and more reliable information source and appreciate your efforts. Mr RD 14:44, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, i have picked up a word SimilarWeb form the section "See Also", so please don't revert it. Thanks Darkwarrior92 (talk) 08:38, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Deleting my Zeenyx Software page[edit]

Hello KH-1, I am responding to your deletion of my page Zeenyx Software. Could you please tell me why you marked my page with the "Speedily Deleted" status? You are claiming that I have yet to state how the company is notable. When I look at the notable guide on Wikipedia, my page cites two "reliable," "independant," "verifiable" sources. Could you please give me detailed reasons why you deleted my page so that I can fix the issue(s)? I would very much prefer to hear your reasons instead of you providing a link to the Teahouse/Questions or the notable definition page. I really want to do this properly. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjt2470 (talkcontribs) 14:16, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Still waiting for a response to my query above? (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 19:36, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Could you provide a link to the two sources? If you want to recreate the article your best bet is to go through WP:AFC.-KH-1 (talk) 02:36, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Reverting my recent edit on /wiki/Web_hosting_service[edit]

Hey KH-1 I was just wondering what I had done wrong in the citations, I'm still really new at editing but would like to contribute, I thought that my link was sufficient but maybe I layed it out wrong or perhaps the link wasn't strong enough being - Just wondering so I can improve. Thanks! -Understanded — Preceding unsigned comment added by Understanded (talkcontribs) 04:31, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

See this, particularly the first heading in bold. -KH-1 (talk) 04:33, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

I want to start my page. Please allow me to start. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srikanth.source (talkcontribs) 06:10, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Cannot contest the nomination for speedy deletion of the DLL Group page[edit]

Hello KH-1, I cannot respond to your nomination for speedy deletion on the DLL Group page itself, so that's why I am leaving a message on your talk page. I would like to contest this nomination, because I don't see why the page seems to be unambiguous advertising. DLL Group is a global enterprise and a fully owned subsidiary of Rabobank. DLL is comparable to organizations like Interpolis and Van Lanschot which are also represented on Wikipedia. The company operates in over 35 countries and has approximately 5500 employees and therefore should be represented on Wikipedia. The article describes (the emergence of) the organization but describes in no way why DLL Group is better/more successful/etc. than other companies. I am curious in which way the page seems to be unambiguous advertising in your eyes and would like to know how I can improve it so that it won't be deleted. Waiting for your respons. Thanks Amina.Sabanovic (talk) 11:43, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of SilverNeedle Hospitality[edit]

Hi I am writing on behalf of the page SilverNeedle Hotels which you have nominated for a speedy deletion. I would like to contest for this nomination however the page has been deleted already. SNH is a very popular hotel chain in Australia and there is no need to harp on for advertising on Wikipedia. As one of the main 3 star hotel chains in the country it should be represented on Wikipedia. Please let us know which part that you thought made it look like advertising as we would like to fix this and get this approved. Thanks World Trotter, Talk