User talk:KH-1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:C759)
Jump to: navigation, search

Click here to leave a message




Why did you revert this helpful edit (which verified the claim)? You check to see what the edits are before changing them, right? -- James26 (talk) 16:03, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

There was evidence of dead link spamming.-KH-1 (talk) 23:48, 9 January 2016 (UTC)


ok — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apurvajagma (talkcontribs) 09:47, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

hypnosis edits[edit]

very weird don't understand criteria for relevant citations and why some of my work is being deleted? Hypnosis article/ two citations in particular from a website which contained supporting content. Please advise. Are less citations better in this article or is there some types of domains which should never be referenced no matter what?? This is rather frustrating as time is spent searching for relevant citations which support statements made in the article but I do not see where a criteria FAQ is posted???? Please advise.

Jimmi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimiedwards (talkcontribs) 16:30, 21 January 2016 (UTC)



Undid revision 701253825 by KH-1. The referred article is one of the most notable publications on Computer Forensic Specialisations available.

Talk page attempted to correct this issue in 2013, but was ignored by the activists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Outback1964 (talkcontribs) 11:11, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Wahbi Khazri[edit]

Yes check.svg Done. GiantSnowman 13:19, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Why was the original link allowed, but not my edit?[edit]

Hi, I'm completely new to wikipedia, that was my only contribution ever, so I'm interested in learning what part of ELNO is relevant here, particiularly what's the difference between ELNO as applied to the original link (before it died, obviously), and the working generator I linked to. Did the original one just slip through before it died, or is there a difference? I think should be listed as it can generate, e.g. from the keywords:

"seasonal disarray melancholy emotive"

the backronym


for example. Is that not a valid backronym generator? And if not strictly, in your opinion, why not and is not the pursuit of an example of a working backronym generator any longer desired and if not, why not? Paulskypod (talk) 12:46, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

There's no difference - it shouldn't have been included either. -KH-1 (talk) 02:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)


Thank you. I was having some trouble undoing myself. 400 Lux (talk) 02:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Induction cooking[edit]

Why was my link removed? The useful magazine article I linked to was from 2009 and was clearly dead and I revived it. It shows the benefits of induction vessels and was an exact replica of the magazine article that is no longer appearing on the original website. The new link does not contain any spam whatsoever nor attempts to promote any products or services. Please kindly reconsider. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thegreatalbertlau (talkcontribs) 01:59, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Edit removal[edit]

Just wondering why the links I added were removed- did I make a mistake? I'm a bit new, so sorry if I was out of bounds. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bethany P. S (talkcontribs) 18:56, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Surname Lanzone/Lanzoni project by FtDNA[edit]

Why did you erase the external link to the surname project? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 17:17, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Why did you allow a similar link but not the one i suggested?[edit]

I see you have allowed on the page and not the one I inserted, which is similar.Can you tell me the reason so I could learn?I'm new around here.Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RadFalconio (talkcontribs) 06:49, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Regarding your message[edit]

Hi KH-1.

Thanks for your message. Could you please elaborate on why the links were inappropriate? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anotheridol (talkcontribs) 10:59, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello KH-1, Why were the two edits made by me was removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nazarsa (talkcontribs) 21:14, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, not spamming with external link[edit]


I am not spamming Wikipedia with external links. It was a dead link which was replaced by something important to Vitality curve.

The link which was added was not part of advertising or business intention, but as a reference, to what people think of the vitality curve and how thought leadership can edit for benefits.

If you can, please do me a favour of guiding external links which help to get an article more references.


Rajarshi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajarshi wikipedia (talkcontribs) 12:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

explain yourself please[edit]

Although I'm still upset at your approach of just removing everything added to a page... I'll attempt to justify the changes I made to your *%^* page that requested additional citations. I had added the only known united states directory(via Hostsearch) for web hosting providers and I had added another page that referenced the top hosting providers. I will agree that the last one may not have been needed for clarifications. However, I did contribute to your page by adding the only source available on the internet that can verify the statement requesting a citation. If justification is what you call collaboration then there you go. /ragequit — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 23:49, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

I'm referring to this edit you made. Not only is it uncivil, but it appears to be vandalism to a portal page. This is why I removed it and warned you for civility. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC) and I'm "referring to" the edits that were made to this page: — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 00:11, 23 March 2016 (UTC) I did not make the reversion to that page. If you have a dispute, please speak with KH-1, or discuss it on the article's talk page and ping KH-1 so that he can explain. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:14, 23 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk)

Please revisit your edits[edit]

Hi talk::KH-1,

Let me start by saying sorry if I made any wrong edits to the Wikipedia pages in question on my account. I truly thought that I was adding value to Wikipedia in general. If you deem the last edit I made as spam, simply leave it alone and I won't cite that source again however I believe many of my previous edits to be relevant and all from different reputable sources. In fact we can't source all citations from news websites or encyclopedias or does Wikipedia have a bias towards those types of websites? All these pages needed citations and I tried very hard to cite relevant documents and reputable sources to the full extent of my knowledge. If doing so is almost impossible, as it seems you have deemed according to your reversions of almost all my edits, I don't see anymore reason to contribute to Wikipedia.

These links were alive for more than a month since I registered and started contributing to Wikipedia. I would ask you to please revisit the following which I believe to be relevant and revert your edits if possible:

Business jet

Air transports of heads of state and government

George, Western Cape

Travel agency

Local store marketing

EdwardMatthews333 (talk) 06:55, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, regarding your message.[edit]

I received a message that I was spamming Wikipedia. I've not logged onto Wikipedia for the past 3 months, so I'm very surprised to see this message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 10:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Unreasonable changes[edit]

You recently undid several legitimate changes to the page for Dakota Ridge High School, without citing a reason. Evidence was provided and sources are legitimate for the updates that were made. The edits were made as part of a senior project to update the wikipedia in an effort to "leave a legacy" at the school. Please do not change content in the future without providing a reason.


Please advise as to how to make this revision, Personal Injury Please see this page self promotion ThanksRollerusa123 (talk) 02:41, 9 April 2016 (UTC)



please reply Priya2255 (talk —Preceding undated comment added 06:45, 16 April 2016 (UTC)


many other pages like, edukart showing same subject still appear on wikipedia . Then why only my page is deleted??? why are you doing this again and again ?? If u want to remove then remove all others too and educart remove these too, because this is not right that you are doing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Priya2255 (talkcontribs) 05:39, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

edit warring[edit]

Please do not undo my change with out giving a reason, this is the second instance. My comment is relevant to the article at hand and has a cited source.

thanks, Centurytreedesigns (talk) 01:28, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Centurytreedesigns - The source you used in your edits to Carpet cleaning here, here, here, and here use an external URL that multiple editors have reverted and consider as promotional. They are not the ones that are edit warring, you are. Please do not add this content or source back to the article without coming to a consensus with those involved on the article's talk page. Continuing to edit war will result in being blocked from editing. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:32, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Fetishism Hair[edit]

others cut short hair both men and women and differs person to person, there is no prevalence has this, between homosexuals and transsexuals and bisexuals — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 00:13, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

The E-commerce in Dental Industry of India[edit]

I noticed your speedy of The E-commerce in Dental Industry of India. This is the second time this page has been created in 24 hours by two accounts. Might want to keep an eye out. May need salted if it continues to be created. TimothyJosephWood 12:46, 28 April 2016 (UTC)


It's not promotional. It's a well-established company... Leave me alone please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AaronMHoliday (talkcontribs) 06:21, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Barnstar of Reversion Hires.png The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for helping keep the Chris Harris (journalist) page accurate and clean! Mpmacintosh (talk) 11:17, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Thanks Mpmacintosh.-KH-1 (talk) 14:04, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Miami Center for Media Diversity Report 001[edit] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeflytone (talkcontribs) 14:00, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Yeah? So what's your point? -KH-1 (talk) 14:04, 3 May 2016 (UTC)


Sorry. Misclicked. DrKay (talk) 05:55, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop.[edit]

Please refrain yourself from editing the Mayor of London Wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesgordon95 (talkcontribs) 14:24, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Adding spam?[edit]

Don't believe that I added an unrelated link. The section that I added the link to had 0 citations and I added a link to it that has the relevant information!

The question about what cookware can be used is readily available on the site I added if you scroll to the table of contents or just scroll down the page! — Preceding unsigned comment added by HarryWikiWiki (talkcontribs) 09:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Troy Ave[edit]

Hello, I added a section on Troy Ave's legal issues and you deleted it. Can you add it back please? Or, why not? He is a rapper who was arrested for attempted murder. Thanks. (talk) 01:08, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey[edit]

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

  • Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

I am a first time creator. My page got deleted. How do I get the page back so I can modify — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amy Swanson (talkcontribs) 05:34, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Tort Reform- dead link edit.[edit]

I'm an licensed attorney with years in experience, so I know I'm definitely qualified to edit an wikipedia article on tort reform. How is that the link got removed when I provided the citation the dead link was trying to provide but failed to do so and I did by properly giving the author credit to it's work according to legal guidelines??? Brettcarlson (talk) 13:47, 2 June 2016 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Brettcarlson (talkcontribs) 13:19, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove content unless you fix grammar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiexplorer13 (talkcontribs) 11:35, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Fire extinguisher page[edit]

Kh-1 why are you deleting new content that I've added? This page is a mess, there was no reason to remove relevant content, including photos that I shot myself and had released all rights to through Wikimedia Commons. Explain yourself!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Firetech117 (talkcontribs) 13:55, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Removed Table[edit]

RE: /wiki/Home_insurance

Just curious why you would remove the table I added and the information for basic, broad, and special forms. I know you don't want "commercial" citations but that's the best place I could find the information in an easier to understand way than what already exists on the page.

I feel like that table really helps readers understand the difference between structural and personal property coverage as well as introduces the concept of form limits. If you want, I can rewrite that whole section to remove what's currently there and replace it with the table, definitions of basic, broad, and special forms, and explain named perils and standard exclusions.

The current descriptions are so vague....

HO2 – Broad Form A more advanced form that provides coverage on a home against 16 listed perils (including all 11 on the HO1). The coverage is usually a "named perils" policy, which lists the events that would be covered.

This description doesn't even list the 5 new perils.

or this

HO5 – Comprehensive Form Covers the same as HO3 plus more. On this policy the contents are covered on an open peril basis, therefore as long as the cause of loss is not specifically excluded in the policy it will be covered for that cause of loss.

An HO3 plus more??? Again, no new or relevant information.

At least defining basic, broad, and special allows the users to figure out the core principals. How should I proceed?

Load Management - Revert[edit]


could you please clarify, why my edit was reverted.

Thanks ≈≈≈≈≈

Some bubble tea for you![edit]

Bubble Tea.png Face-grin.svg whoops! Thanks INVISIBLEknock! 06:01, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

≈ --2607:FB90:6E43:EC95:C717:264B:8EFC:2EC1 (talk) 23:11, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Individual Capital[edit]

An external link on the Individual capital page that I inserted was removed. I think it adds more value than a dead link or did I do something wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joedoohan (talkcontribs) 09:00, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Made Corrections Asked by Error Messages and you reversed them[edit]

Hey, I corrected 2 citations in the internet marketing article, which wikipedia was marking as corrections needed and you reverted them back to being incorrect after I made the edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markobravo7 (talkcontribs) 02:47, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi friend i am new to wikipedia and I think I did something wrong. Please help me correct this.[edit]

I had requested an edit for link [50] on the watch page of wikipedia, and you said it was spam. If you search my website through a link finder, you will see that I am not a spammer at all. In fact I have no links going to my site but this one that I requested because I was doing some research and started a blog and am now sharing interesting watch facts and stories on my blog. Please advise me friend what to do, as the link [50] is broken, and my link is about sapphire watches. Thank you Rob — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert9334rm (talkcontribs) 05:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Constantine Last editing[edit]

Hy, I have made some changes in the page and you reverted my changes.Please let me know if there was any deficiency or i have done something wrong according to Wikipedia policies.Please let me know :)

Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter Jhonson (talkcontribs) 15:43, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 26 July[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Dont edit relevant information because you think its irrelevant.[edit]


I am uncertain if it was an auto edit "good faith" or you personally. But please refrain from adding auto edits or editing articles of information that you deem irrelevant, as other people may deem it relevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 01:03, 28 July 2016 (UTC) is notable in China, it should not be deleted[edit]

Hi KH-1, is a notable website in China, it should be listed on Wikipedia.

  • has more than 100 million subscribers in China.
  • has obtained 3 rounds of investment, over 135 million USD in total.
  • has been reported frequently by TV, websites or newspapers, like (globle Alexa rank 9),
  • won lots of awards, please see the picture attached. Juanpi and Alibaba are all award winners. Sorry, I don't know how to upload a image...

Would you please recover this page and let me rewrite it?

Thank you

Lisarrrsteven (talk) 18:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC)LisarrrstevenLisarrrsteven (talk) 18:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

You'll have to speak to @Kudpung:. -KH-1 (talk) 23:54, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Books Citation[edit]

Could i know, Why you remove my book citation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unisankar (talkcontribs) 00:45, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Specific Strength[edit]


Last time I made changes you revered the changes, the link is still dead, not sure what I did wrong, I have included the link to the new data, please make the changes, and let me know whats wrong with the last change

page: link 13 is a dead link

new link

thanks Vladpaln (talk) 04:04, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Do u want to share or conciev more information about this text — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 12:49, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

About dead link[edit]


I write to you because you deleted my changes. I mean it: I tried to add new URL with content whose is not avaliable under older link. What I did wrong?

Best regards :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaakubb (talkcontribs) 22:00, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Atta Community[edit]

Sorry, but I do not understand why it was deleted a company page that was following the right model than this

Please, why Atta Community was deleted twice in less than a month and why is it possible to be published en Catalan viquipèdia and Spanish wikipedia instead. Thank you very much in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parauleira (talkcontribs) 11:33, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Question on removal of edit to instruction manual[edit]

The edit that I added to the page ( ) was a link to a manual that is widely used has been since its inception. I realize you say it is spam, but how can that be any different than the entry (just a few above the one I added) that looks like this (and was accepted):

Hardy, Kerrin (2009). Zen Cart CSS Guide - A complete Guide to Zen Cart Stylesheets. Australia: Kerrin Hardy.

There is no difference (the above references an external link as well). I strongly believe the link should be added back into the page as it is one of the main books zen cart users have turned to for increasing their sales. Likewise, if you feel the inclusion I listed does not belong, then the above one I referenced by Kerrin Hardy doesn't belong either and should be removed. Please explain the difference in the two listings ... one of which IS accepted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carrie at The Fischer Group (talkcontribs) 22:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Hair clipper[edit]

What was your reason for reverting my sourced information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Istorea3 (talkcontribs) 01:08, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

May I know the reverts reasons for the contributions made by me[edit]

The audio Social Media Definition.wav is about the definition of analytics in social media. And the Tools for Social media analytics are also verified from sources. The external links to these tools official websites is also verified. I want these to be part of the article. May I know how to make it into this article. Thanks and Regards.