User talk:Callmemirela/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:17, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
The Disaster Artist
I just don't know why people are having such trouble grasping the concept of no source=no content. The sources say Alison Brie has an explicitly undisclosed role. Do you think we should submit for page protection? DARTHBOTTO talk•cont 03:04, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- @DarthBotto: Ugh, I know. All we have is one source stating her role, but she currently has no name that we know of. As for the protection, it's too early. It'd be declined or a very short protection of, say, 24 hours. It's best to wait until it gets more frequent to send it to RPP. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 03:12, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- It's also frustrating, because we know that Nathan Fielder's in the movie and the name of the agent is Iris... but there haven't been any reliable sources to substantiate it and plainly confirm it. So frustrating. DARTHBOTTO talk•cont 21:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Requesting to join a debate for James Stunt
@Callmemirela: I'm requesting you to join this Afd discussion. Your comment is valuable to us. Please help us reach a consensus. Thanks -Khocon (talk) 19:12, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Khocon: Hi. I unfortunately will not comment on the AfD discussion only people I was never involved with the article. I hope you understand. Thank you. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 22:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Yo Ho Ho
_(14586469407).jpg)
MarnetteD|Talk is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec15b}} to your friends' talk pages.
- Make sure to click on both pictures to see them full size Callmemirela as they will give you a chuckle. May your 2016 be full of joy and special times. MarnetteD|Talk 03:18, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Evoland 2
I am very disappointed in your review of my article Evoland 2. I had many sources, and quite frankly the article was much better than a lot of the other video game articles that get accepted onto Wikipedia. I've updated the article with some more sources and cleaned it up a bit. I hope you reconsider. EggsInMyPockets (talk) 20:35, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- @EggsInMyPockets: I have declined the article once again. You are missing a lot of sources for different content. "I am very disappointed"? Disappointment isn't the word. You've missed one of the one main policies here on Wikipedia WP:Verifiability. If you want your article to be accepted, then please read that page. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 20:41, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Callmemirela: What more sources do I need? I have a plethora of 3rd party game reviews, I have links to the awards page, the metacritic, and to the platforms where it was released. Consider the article from the original game, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evoland. This article has sources from the developer website itself, the platforms where it was released (Store.steampowered.com, GOG.com, and mobile stores) and the rest of the sources are reviews, exactly like mine. The original Evoland article is what I based my article on. What kind of verifiable sources are you thinking of? To me, a 3rd party source is quite verifiable, especially from reputable websites like the ones I cite.
- @EggsInMyPockets: It seems although I may have redirected you to the wrong page as it does not have the explanation I want. All pages I have searched lead me to that one. Regardless, I am talking about unsourced content. You are missing sources.
"The character moves in an open world made of bridges, caverns, valleys, islands, forests and villages full of NPC. In addition to completing the story mode, players can also attempt to find hidden collectible stars, cards, and other items like Maana or Orikon Ore that are scattered around the game world."
This is unsourced."Evoland 2 is the sequel to the original Evoland, with its graphics style similarly changing as the player travels through time and its varied gameplay styles being revealed as the player moves along the storyline. The scenario is based on on time travel and different gameplay styles that are linked to the story and the player’s actions. These gameplay styles emulate older games from which the developers got inspiration. The game also features a stronger narrative than the first.[1]"
- @Callmemirela: What more sources do I need? I have a plethora of 3rd party game reviews, I have links to the awards page, the metacritic, and to the platforms where it was released. Consider the article from the original game, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evoland. This article has sources from the developer website itself, the platforms where it was released (Store.steampowered.com, GOG.com, and mobile stores) and the rest of the sources are reviews, exactly like mine. The original Evoland article is what I based my article on. What kind of verifiable sources are you thinking of? To me, a 3rd party source is quite verifiable, especially from reputable websites like the ones I cite.
"The story of Evoland 2 takes players through four different time periods, each with its own historical setting and graphical art style. The player controls a character named Kuro, who befriends a girl named Fina. The two travel together and meet different characters with the ultimate goal of saving the world from a huge explosion. The story takes place during a war between the Empire and the Demons of Demonia. By jumping through time, players can change consequences in the future to alter the world.[2]"
These two paragraphs only contain one source each to sourced on sentence."The design of the game emulates graphics and styles of older video games. Similar to the first game, Evoland 2 was inspired by The Legend of Zelda, Final Fantasy, Mario, Donkey Kong, Fire Emblem, Double Dragon and Street Fighter gameplay. The game has many references to movies, pop culture and video game history."
This part of the lead came out of nowhere as it is not stated in the article thus original content and unsourced.
- Those are my issues. You are missing sources for content. Even if the source represents the entire paragraph, add the source for that sentence. If those issues are cleared, I am more than happy to accept your draft. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 20:55, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info. I've updated the article again with direct sources to the sentences. Saying what the problems were for each paragraph above me helped a lot. EggsInMyPockets (talk) 21:41, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
References
- ^ Roux, Paul (September 22, 2015). "Review: Evoland 2 Will Have You Chrono Triggered - #egmr". Retrieved 2015-09-27.
- ^ Anderson, Trevor (August 25, 2015). "Evoland 2 Review | MOUSE n JOYPAD". Mouse n Joypad. Retrieved 2015-09-27.
To Callmemirela, I'm asking if you could contribute some of your Portuguese language knowledge to the related phrasebook at English Wikivoyage. Wikivoyage is like Wikipedia, but for travel guides. And over at Wikivoyage, we have phrasebooks for travellers to get by in the place where that language is spoken, and the current Portuguese phrasebook is only at outline status (similar to Wikipedia's stub, start, C and B classes). We especially need help improving pronunciations for the translated phrases (using a pseudo-phonetic guide). If you need help at Wikivoyage, visit "Welcome, Wikipedians", ask at the Travellers' pub or at my talk page. Thanks. Seagull123 Φ 18:40, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
WikiCup 2016 is just around the corner...
Hello everyone, and we would like to wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2016 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to sign up. There are some changes we'd like to announce before the competition begins.
After two years of serving as WikiCup judge, User:Miyagawa has stepped down as judge. He deserves great thanks and recognition for his dedication and hard work, and for providing necessary transition for a new group of judges in last year's Cup. Joining Christine (User:Figureskatingfan) and Jason (User:Sturmvogel 66) is Andrew (User:Godot13), a very successful WikiCup competitor and expert in Featured Pictures; he won the two previous competitions. This is a strong judging team, and we anticipate lots of enjoyment and good work coming from our 2016 competitors.
We would also like to announce one change in how this year's WikiCup will be run. In the spirit of sportsmanship, Godot13 and Cwmhiraeth have chosen to limit their participation. See here for the announcement and a complete explanation of why. They and the judges feel that it will make for a more exciting, enjoyable, and productive competition.
The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring and talk pages. The judges are committed to not repeating the confusion that occurred last year and to ensuring that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Wikipedia.
If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Figureskatingfan (talk), and Godot13 (talk).--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi, The information I put on The Next Step's Wikipedia is 100% true. I simply added tour dates. I even put the website of the tour so people could see that it is a real source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Misseli05 (talk • contribs) 22:42, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
User 86.149.35.180
Hi Callmemirela. During events at Politics in the British Isles, I left a warning at user 86.149.35.180 talk page for disruptive behaviour. Since then I have conversed with him on my talk page regarding the need for reliable references for the content in question. He understands this. Yet he claims he is now being wrongly accused and his edits targeted elsewhere on Wikipedia. I believe he is referring to actions such as this.
Personally I see nothing wrong with the edit he made, or the comment he subsequently made on the articles talk page. Yet I do not know if there is any truth to the accusation he is a sock; he claims to reject those accusations saying there is no evidence to it. Therefore, if you believe he is a sock, could you direct me to where you have reported him to the administrators? Thanks. Antiochus the Great (talk) 18:20, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Antiochus the Great: Before I begin the reply, please remind yourself of WP:Canvas. The IP has engaged in canvassing by telling you in a non-neutral way of their situation with me. Secondly, I have reverted this IP because per WP:3RRNO,
"Reverting actions performed by banned users, and sockpuppets of banned or blocked users."
I am permitted to revert them. Why are they a sock? Please take a look at my SP investigation. This IP has the tendency to edit war over content, wikihound and make personal attacks. That the fact the IP randomly started reverting Snowded (just like the others) and edit war screams sock. Also, all previous IP were geolocated to Great Britain, which is the case of 86.149.35.180. Have you not seen that there were 2 IPs (2.98.169.215 and 86.149.35.180) reverting the same content. 2.98.169.215 was blocked on December 31 at 13:41. Once that happened, at 14:11, 86.149.35.180 joined in on the edit war. This, again, screams sock. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 18:30, 1 January 2016 (UTC)- Thank you Callmemirela for the link to the investigation. Hmmm, it does indeed look like a case of "If it looks like a duck...". I hope you took no offence to my above comment... you see, my involvement in this whole saga is rather limited, and once he indicated to me he was being accused, I wanted to know if there was any ongoing investigation so I could see the evidence to myself. Yes I saw that two IPs were disputing over the same content, I even mentioned to 86.149.35.180 that it "looks a little, strange, to say the least". Antiochus the Great (talk) 18:55, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Antiochus the Great: No, no. I completely understand. With little understanding of the situation can make us question the accuser. I also know that it's sock farm or a farm itself, but at least it justifies my reverts. Whilst we may never see the end of this, the SPI is a start. The IP is claiming that I have no evidence and I am wrongly accusing them when it is not the case. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 19:03, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Antiochus the Great: [1] Now they've confirmed to continue socking per that message. This is why I am reverting them and hope this clears everything. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 19:46, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Assistance
Hi there CALLMEMIRELA, from Portugal,
thank you very much for your kind note. However, I have (hopefully!) no problem with writing/understanding Spanish (and of course, Portuguese, my main tongue), so I think i'll be fine there.
Happy 2016, keep up the good work --84.90.219.128 (talk) 16:10, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
WikiCup 2016: Game On!
We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.
We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:03, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
WikiCup 2016: Game On!
We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.
We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:08, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:02, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
Hi,
You left a message saying my addition to Law & Order: Special Victims Unit (season 17) had to be removed because I added copyrighted material. I don't understand what I added that was copyrighted. I'd appreciate it if you would identify this material.
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oak Splitter (talk • contribs) 03:27, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Oak Splitter: I sincerely apologize. After looking through your contributions on the article, I warned the wrong person. I have removed my warning on your talk page. I am so sorry. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 03:58, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Code Black (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Hollingsworth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:52, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Wayward Pines
The generic warning refers to violating 3RR but the text discusses edit warring, which you are doing even though you have not technically reverted three times. I get that this random new editor is creating the disruption, but your edit summaries do not explain why this information is valid, and you have not engaged in any discussion or provided a source. You're not the only one engaged in this, but as an established editor you should try to behave more appropriately. Thanks.— TAnthonyTalk 19:51, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- @TAnthony: Well, then next time don't add the article in the warning. Twinkle, which is what I am assuming you're using, is capable of doing so. Secondly, the IP is a sock of two other IPs, engaging in disruptive editing and mounting to harassment on my talk page. I know my edit summaries haven't been helpful, but the socking if self-evident and requires a stop to it. Rather than engaging in WP:BRD, they continue to sock and, well, revert. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 19:58, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Apology
Sorry about what I did earlier. I will refrain from making unnecessary edits.300Orrs (talk) 03:16, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Character descriptions on Code Black
C, I removed the details regarding characters in Code Black because they're WP:INUNIVERSE. Character descriptions should be broad overviews that describe the characters at any time in the series. Details such as the two doctors' relationship are plot points specific to a certain period of time. They are appropriate to a character article, but not the descriptions. --Drmargi (talk) 05:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Drmargi: I only realized this after you reverted me. I was looking for answers, because plot points, to me anyways, meant spoilers. And I completely understand and I apologize for my revert. I should had checked more properly. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 05:42, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:33, 6 February 2016 (UTC)