This user has autopatrolled rights on the English Wikipedia.
Email this user
This user has extended confirmed rights on the English Wikipedia.

User talk:Calvin999

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
CAN'T RETIRE
This user tries to leave Wikipedia, but finds that he can't do so…

BBDCS[edit]

I did source the change with Billboard's official chart on its website, but sure go off. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alechuerta (talkcontribs) 19:23, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

You supplied a pre-existing source which says it is number one this week. Nowhere, did it say her 18th, or her 18th consecutive, or that the streak was still unbroken.  — Calvin999 19:55, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Since you were so pressed before, here's the source you demanded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alechuerta (talkcontribs) 21:40, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

I adhere to the rules that you should do also, what is your problem?

My problem is that you are acting foolish. Literally read the article, an original article from Billboard, not the chart. It says 18 number ones and current unbroken streak, surpassing Mariah, but somehow you're still up my ass about this edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alechuerta (talkcontribs) 19:07, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Yes I am being foolish (interesting choice of word) for not making changes without a valid source. Exactly what Wikipedia is about, huh... Carry on with your foolishness.  — Calvin999 19:12, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Since you can't seem to open hyperlinks, here it is, 18 number ones, Mariah now 6th: http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/chart-beat/7865881/katy-perry-swish-swish-dance-club-songs-number-one Sorry your fav is washed up.

I've already seen it, the other day. Your missing your own point. Not my fault you think it's okay to add unsourced info before correct information is released.  — Calvin999 19:14, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 5,6,7,8[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 5,6,7,8 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:01, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 5,6,7,8[edit]

The article 5,6,7,8 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:5,6,7,8 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 17:40, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Someday (Mariah Carey song)[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 19 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Someday (Mariah Carey song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "Someday" became Mariah Carey's third consecutive number-one single on the Billboard Hot 100? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Someday (Mariah Carey song). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Someday (Mariah Carey song)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 12:02, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Electronic music#Sub-project EDM[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Electronic music#Sub-project EDM as a participant of WP:WikiProject Electronic music. - TheMagnificentist 13:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Leona Lewis Tours[edit]

why do you keep reverting these? Like I said, Ireland is not a constituent country in any sense so that is false info, and the UK doesn't get a special pass for tours. Tour articles go by continents, not regions. The UK is part of the Europe, not separate. You are providing no legitimate reason for reverting. --97.127.112.18 (talk) 22:23, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Because you're providing no legitimate reason for changing what has been approved by an independent reviewer. If the tour doesn't visit mainland Europe, only GB and GB/Ireland, then why would you put Europe? These two are different in this circumstance.  — Calvin999 07:48, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
First, mention that in the edit summary then, that is what it is there for, and yes, I did provide a legitimate reason, the site lists continents on tour articles, that has been standard for years. And again I say, the UK and Ireland are not special cases. Look at every tour article, they go by continents, there is no reason to give a special pass for these. You don't see tours that only visit the US and Canada say "x amount of shows in US and Canada", they say "x amount of shows in North America". Not to mention on The Labyrinth tour it says 18 in UK 2 in Europe....that's just stupid. The UK is part of Europe, so why is it listed separate. There is no sense to it. Also, as I said in my edit summaries, listing "Constituent Country" is false because Ireland is not a Constituent country. You are basically giving conflicting reasoning here. --97.127.112.18 (talk) 03:45, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Also, please point out where this so called independent review is because the talk pages show nothing. --97.127.112.18 (talk) 03:46, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
They have been primarily GB tours, that's Great Britain. It's not UK if it doesn't go to all four parts of the UK, namely Northern Ireland because that's not in Great Britain. It's not special pass, each tour article is different and different methods apply.  — Calvin999 08:33, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Almost every tour article on this site doesn't follow that precedent, so why these need to be special still makes no sense, and again, where is this so called independent review? Because now it just seems you like it one way and don't want to change it still "because". And yes, it is still touring the UK if they don't visit NI. You can't say "this isn't a US tour because they didn't visit California". That's ridiculous reasoning. And once again, Ireland is still not a constituent country, yet you keep reverting that as well.
You don't seem to realise that these articles pass a review where someone signed them off as being worthy of a promotion. You're talking about most tours, which invariably cover mroe dates, more countries, and more continents. Just because one article does it one way, doesn't mean all have to. Every article is different. I don't know why you keep mentioning Ireland as a constituent country; a constituent country of what? I'm done with this conversation.  — Calvin999 08:42, 28 July 2017 (UTC)