User talk:CambridgeBayWeather

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Sock of User:Zurich00swiss[edit]

I've just realized that Zurich Airport has continued to be vandalized by this indefed user's sockpuppets. Maybe you can freeze it for a while? HkCaGu (talk) 04:49, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Southern Poverty Law Center[edit]

IP is edit warring/vandalising article again. Could you help? Capitalismojo (talk) 03:26, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

I see that it was protected. Thanks for looking anyway! Capitalismojo (talk) 19:01, 6 May 2015 (UTC)


Hi CambridgeBayWeather. An ip has been going around posting personal attacks against myself and Vituzzu on select userspaces. He appears to be associated with the blocked Oldsettler/Brunodam, and has accused me of being a terrorist and Vituzzu of being in the mafia [1] [2]. I would revert the attacks, but I think it's better if an admin handles this. Could you please have a look? Please also see here [3]. Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 15:59, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, but the ip just posted yet another personal attack a few minutes ago [4]. The attacks contain apparent personal details on Vituzzu, so I think they should be reverted. Could you please take care of this? Best, Middayexpress (talk) 16:17, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Much obliged, CBD! Could you please also do the same for the ip's other attacks here [5]? Best, Middayexpress (talk) 16:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
I found another one of the spam posts by the ip; using a different dynamic setting, he/she again misrepresents my and Vituzzu's identities and insinuates personal details on another userspace [6]. Could you please block this ip as well and hide the dif? If you're too busy at the moment, I understand; please let me know and I'll ask Gyrofrog or one of the other regular admins to take care of this. If other personal attacks are found, a dynamic range block may perhaps also be warranted. Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 16:03, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. Cheers, Middayexpress (talk) 17:04, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi CambridgeBayWeather. Oldsettler/Brunodam has another sock and is spamming again the same libelous material on userspaces [7]. Could you please have a look? Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 18:12, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 18:49, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

An IP address of a sockpuppet in need of blocking[edit]

User talk: Also, please read the contributions as well as the edits at the A train article and you'll see exactly where I'm coming from. Thank you. JoesphBarbaro (talk) 22:28, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Protecting Benedict Cumberbatch again[edit]

The full protection ended, can you redo the semi protection? Thanks LADY LOTUSTALK 19:09, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. --kelapstick(bainuu) 19:55, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Fatimah Edits[edit]

Dear CambridgeBayWeather,

Please explain how my edits are "non-neutral." Then explain how the original content is supposedly neutral (because the original content is far from neutral). If you don't like the edits, I'm more than willing to change the wording; however, you reverting the changes every time without a proper explanation is frustrating. I'm not a PhD in this subject matter, but I've been taught by many of them discussing this topic and many others in an academic light. In fact, the Ali Vural Ak Center for Global Islamic Studies is a great resource for such discussions.

Looking forward to hearing from you and coming to a solution.

Fana92 (talk) 18:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to explain your edits. I will make the appropriate changes.

Fana92 (talk) 09:31, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Dreaming of You (album)[edit]

Renew PC? --George Ho (talk) 07:30, 13 May 2015 (UTC)


Thanks for reverting the edits on that page. You did exactly what I wanted. Appreciated, peace.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 16:52, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

User:TheGracefulSlick, that isn't why I reverted. I just wanted to go back to before the edit war and ensure that a discussion on the talk page would be held. I could have blocked both of you for edit warring but that just ensures that no discussion gets held. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:57, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
I wasn't edit warring. Just for your info. Almighty Camel (talk) 17:03, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Sure, you are just perfect and do nothing wrong. I'm moving on, this isn't worth my time.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 17:05, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
This would be a good place to move on, since you were obviously there to help instead of stalk. Almighty Camel (talk) 17:13, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Almighty Camel it's funny how you keep finding where I edit. Pure coincidence I'm sure, especially when you bring up stalking.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 17:26, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Actually, I only added the info back because it has been there per the reasoning of another user. If you actually look at the edit summary, you will know what I mean.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 17:01, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Just so you are aware, you can allow editing to the Camel toe article. Almighty Camel was identified as a troll and blocked indefinitely. I have no real ambition to edit it now that the troll is taken care of so it is only fair, in my opinion, to let others users go back to editing it. If you don't want to, I understand and won't complain. Peace.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 03:11, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

User:TheGracefulSlick. I wasn't home when I saw your message. Without thinking I went to the page on my phone. Had to explain to the woman sitting next to me what I was doing. Not sure which she thought was worse. My editing Wikipedia or the page I was looking at. That picture takes up most of the screen on a phone. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:46, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Oh my, apologies I didn't mean to cause any awkwardness. It is a very unflattering photo, which is why I mainly prefer to not assimilate with those types of articles. Anyways, thanks for allowing others to edit it, it only seemed fair since I see no reason for me to go back to it. Hopefully I won't place you in such a predicament again :) TheGracefulSlick (talk) 03:53, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Don't worry about it. Not your fault. I should have thought what was going to be the first thing visible. Until I protected it last month to stop an edit war I'd never seen the article. I just ended up back there now because it was linked on WP:AN. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:43, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Well, again, thanks for your understanding. I shouldn't be causing anymore disturbances. I'll get out of your hair so you can go back to your work. Best of luck to you.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 18:32, 17 May 2015 (UTC)


Well, you've protected the article from being edited further by reverting to an older version. Please go through the article and compare it to the most recent edit. There are unreadable bits in the article especially under secion 377 and wikipedia itself suggests that it needs some 'cleaning' and 'citations'. Moreover, there are unsubstantiated bits of information like section 377 being responsible for aids, which is absurd to say the least.

Since removing 377 is not a 'suggested reform' by any government committee which is the case with other sections, it would be incorrect to put it under a 'reform' heading. Hence the heading was changed to 'controversial sections'. The repeated restoration of the article seems to have been started by someone who does not know much about Indian criminal law, thus giving rise to an edit war.

Kindly look into the matter by going through the article yourself. The current version of the article perpetuates false beliefs and is an instrument of protest rather than a piece of objective and true information. I have nothing against the activists and as I pointed out in the comments, the section has its own wiki page.

P.s. : I liked this bit : "By the way the chances I have made a mistake are small. This is because I am cute and know everything. Plus I have reliable sources (grandchildren) to back that up." :D

Thanks. The truth is I don't know which is right or wrong there. That's why I fully protected it rather than semi-protect or block people. What is needed now is a discussion at Talk:Indian Penal Code. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:40, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Víctor Valdés[edit]

Hello CBW, could you please semi-protect Víctor Valdés.. Thanks, JMHamo (talk) 17:45, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Flipora wants a template[edit]

Hi CBW, could you add the appropriate pp template to Flipora? Some folks might wonder why the Edit tab went missing. Thanks. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 19:02, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Protection Icons[edit]

Could you please add those protection icon locks to the top of pages you protect? This way users can see which pages are open to editing, even if they are only protected for a few days. Thanks! Tinton5 (talk) 17:41, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Need help[edit]

these Filmsaaz, University Film Club, Aligarh Muslim University, Law Society, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh Muslim University Students' Union pages needs protection and improvement. One fellow out of grudges has nominated for deletion undermining the real facts and importance. These pages are of a world class university and has long standing.

Lukeno94 has gone out of mind.

Please help in retaining the pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arifjwadder (talkcontribs) 19:13, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Instantnood socks[edit]

Hi CambridgeBayWeather, thanks for protecting List of the world's busiest airports by passenger traffic. Could you also protect the others pages which have also been targeted by similar socks of the banned User:Instantnood: List of urban areas by population‎, List of cities proper by population, List of the world's busiest airports by cargo traffic‎,‎ and List of cities proper by population density‎, List of metropolitan areas by population? See discussion. Thanks! -Zanhe (talk) 01:40, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much! -Zanhe (talk) 16:53, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Bella and the Bulldogs[edit]

Hello. You protected this a while ago for a week, but it doesn't seem to have taken effect as seen by the history. I also don't see the traditional "Protected [article]..." but rather something about pending configuration? Amaury (talk) 21:55, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

There didn't appear at the time to be a lot of IP editing so I went with WP:Pending changes. It seems to have increased so I changed to regular protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:36, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Ah, okay. Thanks. Amaury (talk) 01:38, 23 May 2015 (UTC)


I need a favor, can You undelete the page history of My userpage. I know it was deleted once and some edits to that page are hidden. I hope it's not asking too much. Eddie 11:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for restoring My page history. Although there are revisions with the "Exicornt" stuff, I won't be restoring that to My page. I wanted to see if there was any useful content from 2005-06 that I can put on My current userpage. Eddie 15:07, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

United States[edit]

It is possible edit warring is starting up again.--Mark Miller (talk) 20:36, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Seems to have stopped for a while I'll check later. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:41, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Cool. Eyes are all that are needed, just in case. Thanks!--Mark Miller (talk) 02:32, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

IPC 1860[edit]

its very useful information thanks for that from my heart. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 19:30, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Sorry but I'm not sure what you are taalking about. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:34, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

James Rhodes (pianist) article and the ever widening disruption to wikipedia[edit]


I am sorry to bother you about this article again, but the disruptions and issues are continuing to grow. Could you please when you have a moment evaluate this entire situation in your administrator role, and try to end the disruption by the IP editor and Joseph2302. I am getting personally attacked by the IP editor, as well as Joseph2302 multiple times in the last few hours. Now,Joseph2302 is posting at the protection page that the protection needs to be dropped altogether. The IP editor is casting more aspersions at the BLP noticeboaed, plus two edit warring reports lay unresolved at that board. Thanks for anything you may be able to do to solve this brouhaha. Cheers! WordSeventeen (talk) 10:32, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Sorry to bother you, out there's a thread at WP:ANI in which the outcome seems to be that the above user is Wikihounding me. Also, please could you unprotect the page- the talkpage and WP:BLPN consensus seems to be that the sources there are fine, so stopping the IP editor from editing despite the fact they were editing with consensus seems unfair. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
I think it best to wait until the ANI is played out. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:42, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
That's fair enough. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:44, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

re: protection fail[edit]

Yes, that's the right page. I've never seen this happen before. I wish now that I'd taken a screenshot of the protection page, because it was freaky. The log entry was at the bottom saying it should be an indef TE lock, but it was totally unlocked. Hope they figure out what happened and fix it. *shudder* KrakatoaKatie 19:01, 27 May 2015 (UTC)


Hi. Just curious: you fully protected WUWT; but your note on Wikipedia:Requests for page protection says declined. I don't quite understand that William M. Connolley (talk) 22:00, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

User:William M. Connolley, I missed the "o" in the template which gave declined instead of done. I changed it a dew minutes later but you must have seen the original version. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:34, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Aha, yes, I'd missed that. Thanks William M. Connolley (talk) 22:39, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Suicide Squad[edit]

Could you please increase and extend the protection on Suicide Squad? Vandalism is still occurring. Rusted AutoParts 01:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

I guess so. Redlink accounts are still slipping in and readding unverified content despite being told not to add it. It's just being vandalistic at this point. semi protection just didn't seem to work. Rusted AutoParts 15:49, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

James Rhodes[edit]


was wondering if you would be kind enough to 'unprotect' the James Rhodes (pianist) page so people can update with more recent information. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glenngouldfan (talkcontribs) 10:48, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

I would support this. The ANI report ended with User:WordSeventeen being blocked for Wikihounding/harassing me, and seems to be universal support that the content being added is acceptable, and not a BLP violation like they claimed. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:55, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
User:Joseph2302 and User:Glenngouldfan. Done. This is really akward with no Internet and only the data on the phone. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:43, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Thank you very much. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:44, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Middayexpress "retired"[edit]

I want to notify you that user:Middayexpress is now "RETIRED", following some investigations (be informed that there it is also an investigation that is being done even on the website of Mappista59; read: [8] ) and complaints on ANI (you can also vote on Middayexpress "ban" here: [9]). A sympathizer of user:Chuckupd. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 15:14, 31 May 2015 (UTC)


Just popping by to say that the full protection of Mustang is due to expire tomorrow. Given the tone at the talk page and the article improvement sandbox, I have zero faith that edit-warring will not immediately resume. I have made a protected article edit request and we shall see what happens, but I'd just be grateful if you'd watchlist the article and be ready to slap full protection down on it again immediately (at currently protected version) if edit warring begins again. Montanabw(talk) 18:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)


Not sure semi was the right call on this (per privileging registered users over unregistered users). The IP stopped edit warring, used the talk page, and they do have a point (both in their edit summaries and talk page post). --NeilN talk to me 01:53, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Michelle Keegan[edit]

Hello! You recently semi-protected the article Michelle Keegan, and that expired earlier today. Well, we've already had two more IPs edit the article to change her surname to that of her new husband's just today, so I'm wondering if putting semi-protection back on the article may be necessary... Just so you know! --IJBall (talk) 04:23, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Vietnam People's Air Force[edit]

Cambridge thank you for the Page protection on the Vietnam People's Air Force, can you revert the last entire, the IP had changed reliable sourced text, with no counter reference per his/her claim -regards FOX 52 (talk) 16:39, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

I wasn't sure which was the correct version. Get a consensus on the talk page first. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:50, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
I'm not sure if you're understanding the situation, but the IP has been removing and changing material that was already sourced, and have put fourth no source of any kind, only to state "cause they say so". Note the IP is quite disruptive - FOX 52 (talk) 01:00, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello.FOX 52 Didn't Understand Why I Have An Reason.No.1,I was Actually Erase The Su-30MK2 And He Restored Back.36 Su-30MK2 Was In Service and 12 More MK2Vs On Order.So Please Don't Make A Point Of Numbers.Since When They Have a Sorces.I Mean The Su-30 Varites On The Qantitiy Need To Erace Actually.See The Sukhoi Su-30 MKK 4+20 In Services.Thank You. (talk) 06:21, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Please use Talk:Vietnam People's Air Force to figure it out. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:45, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Hey,I Think You May Need To Check It The Older Vietnam Air Forces.Seems Vietman Air Forces Dos Not Have 35 Su-27 And On Order Su-30 MKK.Cheak The Real Version.And We Need To Investigate The Vietman Air Forces.Kornet GSR (talk) 06:52, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Please use Talk:Vietnam People's Air Force to figure it out. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:55, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Could use assist[edit]

AN IP, immediately after my protection ended, starting harassing me on my talk page again. To say it bluntly, he has no life, and I need my page protected again, thanks.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 23:17, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

I just wanted to apologize for getting you involved, which resulted in that IP vandalizing your talk page. It was the third time this has happened, guaranteed to be by the same person, and I didn't know what else to do. Unfortunately, on June 20 he said I should expect him to be vandalizing again.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 03:57, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Protection question[edit]

If I up an indefinite PC-1 to a semi for one week, how do I make sure the article falls back to PC-1 at the end of the week? --NeilN talk to me 23:44, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Hey NeilN, I hope CBW doesn't mind my butting in here, but I am bored (and watching The Maltese Falcon). PC and semiprotection are set independent of each other. You can leave PC1-indef on while it is semiprotected, as the PC will have no noticeable effect, as PC1 only prevents non-autoconfirmed user edits from going live immediately (and of course semiprotection prevents them from editing all together. That way when the semi expires it is still under PC1. At least this is my understanding. --kelapstick(bainuu) 00:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks kelapstick, that helps. --NeilN talk to me 00:16, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks kelapstick. That sounds right. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:55, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Petr Čech[edit]

When you semi–protected Petr Čech, you placed {{pp}} which caused the template to be displayed incorrectly, the template is usually placed like this ({{pp-semi|small=yes}}). I have fixed it for you to save you time, this may help you when editing in the near future. Thank You TeaLover1996 Talk to me 22:17, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

OK Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:23, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Ghosts eat toast halfway up the lamp post. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John5545 (talkcontribs) 06:45, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Block evasion[edit]

Please block Against frustrated slovak IP editor agent (talk · contribs). It is obviously the same with the confirmed sock Againt frustrated chauvinist slovak IP (talk · contribs) (talk) 08:02, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

The Who protection level[edit]

Hello CambridgeBayWeather. On 19 November 2014 you template-protected The Who (log). As template protection is only meant to be used for templates, or other highly transcluded pages, did you perhaps mean to select a different level? Thanks, Evad37 [talk] 19:08, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Indonesian Airport Vandal[edit]

Hi CBW! Wondering if you can protect Antonio B. Won Pat International Airport. An IP from Indonesia keeps adding Manado for United Express which barely has a working plane to fly Guam-Saipan. Also Sam Ratulangi International Airport. Thanks! HkCaGu (talk) 03:32, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Can you just block that IP? 4RR already at Sam Ratulangi International Airport! HkCaGu (talk) 03:53, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Help sorting tables[edit]

I am currently trying to insert a table of climatological data to show statistics for improving the article Climate of Argentina, similar to how the featured articles Climate of Minnesota and Climate of India used it. However, I am having trouble with the sorting part of the table. It is currently in my sandbox that I will add in shortly once all the details are done. It seems like that when I click on the sort button, it does not sort properly. I did try going to the help page for sorting tables although I could not find anything to solve the issue. Could you provide any useful advice that could help allow the table to be sorted properly? Thanks. Ssbbplayer (talk) 16:44, 26 June 2015 (UTC)