- 1 Spanish-American War
- 2 Disambiguation link notification for October 4
- 3 Large-scale and unexplained removal of tags
- 4 DSA, Mantle, and citations
- 5 Disambiguation link notification for February 18
- 6 Disambiguation link notification for March 4
- 7 Reference Errors on 22 March
- 8 ArbCom elections are now open!
- 9 Elision
- 10 Adition of Qt to rendering APIs
- 11 ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
- 12 Zen production date
I do not understand why you have twice now deleted a sourced footnote I added -not even in the text body! - provideing a needed caveat to a disputed "fact" of history. Please discuss on the article talk page Solicitr (talk) 03:42, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- The problem is that it is not in the text body. References are not footnotes, you can not add personal commentary as a reference. If you feel confident enough about your addition you should find a way to integrate it into the text instead of trying to hide it a place it doesn't belong. Carewolf (talk) 13:06, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Qt (software), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NFC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Scandinavia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 14:29, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
I reverted YOUR deletion of content and templates, which you did to reignite an issue already debated on talk pages. Something YOU did without getting a new concent.Carewolf (talk) 18:24, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Scandinavia. Jeppiz (talk) 20:50, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
DSA, Mantle, and citations
I would like to discuss your claims surrounding the text I deleted which you reinstated. I have started a discussion on the Mantle talk page, and I would like to hear your side of this. Thank you. Korval (talk) 15:45, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fastelavn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Estonian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SSE4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AVX (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Reference Errors on 22 March
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Mantle (API) page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- Because it made no sense, you were complaining about cannot, and claiming it was removing letters, when all it removes is a space. Carewolf (talk) 08:13, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- You're kidding me, right? If you are unsure what the term 'elision' actually entails, read the first sentence of the page. It denotes the deletion of sounds, i.e. orthographical matters don't come into it. Can not = /kæn nɒt/, whereas cannot = /kænɒt/. Clear elision of one of the /n/s. -- Evan Rye (talk) 21:49, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Adition of Qt to rendering APIs
not sure that Qt belongs there, as I always perceived Qt as a fully fledged GUI framework (similar to MFC, win32, GTK, Cocoa) . Then again I'm no Qt expert, I gather it has more.. could it be qualified? is there some specific Qt rendering abstraction component or something? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fmadd (talk • contribs) 17:17, 16 June 2016
- Qt as whole does not. But Qt GUI contains the QPainter API which is the same API as Skia, since Skia was created specifically to implement the QPainter based API in WebKit. Carewolf (talk) 17:30, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Zen production date
Hi Carewolf, I notice you undid my removal of 2013 as the Zen microarchitecture production start date. This date is unsupported by any citation and I believe to be erroneous/conjecture. I have begun a discussion on the talk page to try and find a consensus. Dbsseven (talk) 15:54, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- The only problem I had with your edit was that you put a very specific date on it, that was clearly wrong. You can reintroduce it with something more loose. Carewolf (talk) 16:32, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- Similarly, my disagreement is with the specificity of the current "2013-2017" dating. The only firm information we have is that Zen is produced in 2017. There are no citable sources that I am aware of stating production began any earlier. And the 2013 date in particular appears both arbitrary and implausible. Dbsseven (talk) 16:44, 17 April 2017 (UTC)