User talk:Carriearchdale

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Carriearchdale's Navigation bar
user page

home

Leave me a message

talk

Changes

contribs

https://tools.wmflabs.org/supercount/index.php?user=Carriearchdale&project=simple.wikipedia

edit count

https://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/pages/index.php?name=Carriearchdale&lang=simple&wiki=wikipedia&namespace=0&redirects=noredirects

articles

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PrefixIndex/User:Carriearchdale/

working

Sandbox

workshop

Userboxes

email

To do

to do

Wikipedia by Giulia Forsythe
Please append new notes to bottom of the page.
United States Capitol west front edit2

my favorite wikipedia quotes " Thanks for reviewing Philippine Native Plants Conservation Society Hi Alternativity, Thanks for reviewing Philippine Native Plants Conservation Society. I really just created the article because I saw the Society red linked in the article you created about Leonard Co. The article about him was quite interesting and well done. I hope I did not step on your toes by starting to create the article about the Society. Please feel free to expand the society article if you are so inclined. I have done a bit of research on the society and will be adding a few more references in the coming days. I do enjoy working in collaboration with others! ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 08:46, 16 June 2014" "(UTC)

Hi Carriearchdale! :D Thanks. :D I have to disagree about the Leonard Co being "well done" at this point because it's only about a tenth of the quality it should be. Hehe. But thank you. :D Thanks for getting to work on the society article. I've got a huge "to create" list still to get to and I'm afraid the society page isn't very high on my priority list yet. So I'm WAY glad someone's working on it. Hm. One suggestion, btw: are you active on Tagalog Wikipedia? Because there's a lot of work that needs doing there, making articles for native Philippine species. Anyway. Thank you for your work. Knowledge is an important weapon in the movement to protect Philippine biodiversity. And every helping hand is a step forward. :D Happy editing! -- Alternativity (talk) 11:29, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Mount Rainier mountscape.JPG
Wikipedia Reviewer.svg

Welcome to my talk page! This is a great way to contact me as I check here daily.

Contents

While you are posting here, please follow a few rules:[edit]

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Use Wikiquette.
  3. Please sign your comments.
  4. Please create a new heading/headline for each new conversation.'
Quality, not quantity. This user believes that a user's edit count does not necessarily reflect on the value of their contributions to Wikipedia.

Memorable quotes[edit]

one of my favorite well written wikipedia quotes

rebuttal I agree with your concern about the burn out on editing. I do not agree that comments on ANI pages should exclude new editors. I also do not agree that that I have significant disregard for BLP. I have done exactly two edits in Ronan Farrow page (the biography is about Ronan, BTW, not Woody), the first edit was supported by an administrator on the BLP page as appropriate, and the second was to precisely respond to an experienced editors request. I have gotten ZERO feedback on any BLP violations except ad-hominem attacks. I am primarily a medical editor who is trying to learn the skills of controversial editing in an area with less importance (and zero importance to me, but I intend to see it through to its logical end, which could be as simple as an experienced editor with a calm voice saying: "bob, do X", which I will instantly). My position is well researched and your accusation is unfounded. As for my returning the favor to Carrie of reading the record and commenting, as we had previously tried to work together in another article. We have some established good faith, with exists broadly within Wikipedia editors, so can hardly be considered bad. I have read the transcript, and gave my opinion. You have chosen to attack the messenger with no assumption of good faith. I assume your good faith in wanting a good encyclopedia, but perhaps you might want to listen and see if there is a good argument being made by Carrie or I, and dispute the content on the basis of balance rather than assumptions. I doubt that you will find two more earnest editors than Carrie or I on Wikipedia, and if you want to attract more earnest editors Wikipedia should find ways to engage each of us on content rather than false accusation, misrepresentation, POV, or what you think our intent is. Wikipedia will die if it cannot find new voices and chooses to descend into a vacuous testosterone pit.Bob the goodwin (talk) 20:57, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks and accolades![edit]

Thanks[edit]

Lyme Wars Thanks for coming in and helping. I am not very good at Wikipedia (yet?) editing. If you look at my sandbox, you can see where I was trying to head. I have 40-50 sections in the sandbox, and expert help can make this an excellent article. User:Bob the goodwin/sandbox The Sceptical Chymist actually put the page up, but was working from my research. I appreciate any help to get that article complete. Bob the goodwin (talk) 09:04, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Athiyur Hi there, just wanted to say thanks for all the work you've done cleaning up the Athiyur article. I have been trying to do this for months now, but the content seems to keep being re-added to article. I know you have asked questions about the article and the editor who keeps reverting and asking for edit protection. I have tried to explain to that editor in the edit summary and on his talk page why his edits were being removed or edited, but I don't think he fully understands how Wikipedia works. I get the impression he thinks that whatever he adds should stay, regardless of other editors or policy. The editor has even added welcome messages and holiday greetings to the reader, so I obviously haven't been able to get through to him. I'm thinking the difference in languages has something to do with this, as what makes no sense to me may make complete sense to him causing him to be annoyed when he gets reverted. Regardless of all this, I think it's obvious he is trying to contribute to the article in good faith, so it's not a bad idea to leave him a message if you happen to have to revert his edits. Anyways, like I said above, good work getting this cleaned up. Cmr08 (talk) 22:17, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the note Cmr08. I had just left you a note on your talk page. I am nearing the completion of my copy-edit work on the article Athiyur, and I am hopeful that there will be no more problems with inappropriate material, text, or images being added to the article by any editor. Of course all editors are welcome to edit the article, but I really hope we all have the same goal of improving the article and Wikipedia. I hope everyone has a great day today! Carriearchdale (talk) 22:25, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

...and btw Cmr08, thank you for noticing my copy edit work, and you are quite welcome! Carriearchdale (talk) 22:27, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, I seen the note. I think we were both messaging each other at the same time. Like I said above, I think this has more to do with not understanding how Wikipedia works, but considering he made no attempt to discuss and has been re-adding removed content without explaination, I don't really know what the story is. In situations like this, it's always best to assume good faith until we have a reason to assume otherwise. We will have to see how he reacts to the copy edits. Cmr08 (talk) 22:35, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Hi Carriearchdale. Thanks for reviewing Adam and Eve (public house). Yes, the article is short at the moment but I believe there are multiple secondary sources to improve the article (including finding a conclusive date of earliest record to a tavern on its site, either 1241 or 1249). May I ask your reason for tagging the article as an advertisement, and how I can solve that issue? Best, Duffit talk 14:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi Duffit, The one external link you have listed on the article is also used as an inline citation in the article. http://www.thegoodpubguide.co.uk/pub/view/Adam-&-Eve-NR3-1RZ That site appears to be done in a promotional or advertisy writing style. Perhaps you could a different source to verify the saxon well. I think that having that link in the external links is probably okay, but if it were possible to have a source for the citation from a different secondary or tertiary source,that would be most ideal! Anyways I do very much like the way you have put the list together. If you have any more questions, or if I can help in any way with the article please do not hesitate to ask... I hope you a have a very great Saturday. Cheers!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 14:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the super quick response, Carriearchdale. :) I've completely excised the inline citations to the Good Pub Guide, but kept it as an external link as the GPG is a nationally known directory of pubs in the UK. I replaced the citation to the Saxon well to the Eastern Daily Press newspaper source. Does that solve the advertising issue? Hope you have a lovely Saturday too :). Best, Duffit talk 15:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I don't know what a citation barnstormer is, but it made me really happy. I am not sure I am doing a good job, but I want a good encyclopedia. I also want to learn to work within this environment. There is a lot of work that can be done if I figure it all out. I happen to think the Lyme wars stories is one of the all time great stories, I hope you are enjoying working with it. Let me know if I can do anything for you. I live in Seattle, and tend to stay up late, its nice to see someone awake at the same time! I will send you an email, if you want to discuss offline. Bob the goodwin (talk) 08:15, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Samsung Gear Fit Hi, Thanks for the talk message. I didn't actually create the article however; I had created it as a redirect to the Samsung Gear page, which was later turned into an article by another editor. I'm more than ready to help improve the content, regardless. --RaviC (talk) 14:22, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Wideo.co article Hey Carriearchdale, not sure if this is appropriate location for a response as I'm still getting used to the communications side of this, but thanks for the message re the Wideo.co entry! I intend to spend some more time improving the article tomorrow so will certainly take your suggestions on board and will probably be in touch for further assistance! Thanks, Will. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WillDalton (talk • contribs) 00:50, 12 March 2014 (UTC) Great, please let me know if you have any questions, or if I can help in any way on the article. ciao! Carriearchdale (talk) 02:31, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you![edit]

Kitten in a helmet.jpg

Thanks for the review of Groundnut pyramids. I know I see a lot of new articles during our Guild of Copy Editors' Drives, so it's nice to know my own articles pass scrutiny. Thanks again!

PaintedCarpet (talk) 15:08, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

  • thanks so much! how sweet of you. I really did like the article, it stood out among the rest of the new article crop!

ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 20:11, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Schlafendes Kaltblut.JPG Reviewer Award
I saw on your profile that you like horses. Here's an image of a horse for you! You deserve a rest, just like the horse. I'm just passing by to say thank you for reviewing pages that I created! See you around :) 001Jrm (talk) 01:00, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment on California Farmer[edit]

I appreciate your taking the time to comment on a starter page!Valli Nagy 18:09, 1 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ValliNagy (talkcontribs)

You are welcome[edit]

You are welcome. Its my honor and duty to write articles on various academics!--Mishae (talk) 13:37, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Tag still there - possible edit conflict[edit]

Thanks for reviewing my latest contribution, Liane Davey. However, it seems the new article tag is still there... maybe there was an edit conflict that prevented the removal? Thanks again. Woz2 (talk) 23:35, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. I resaved it as reviewed, I think that got it. It was a really well done article. I enjoyed reading over the article.

ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 00:37, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, yes. Cheers! Woz2 (talk) 00:38, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Soraya Post[edit]

Please take a look at the refs for Soraya Post. Thank you!--BabbaQ (talk) 21:07, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Take a look at Paula Bieler. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:18, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Someone has added new refs on Sorayas article. Please take a look when you got the time for it.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:07, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Please take a look at the refs for Cristina Scuccia.--BabbaQ (talk) 08:45, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing Llandissilio[edit]

Thanks for reviewing Llandissilio. It's only an infant, but hopes to grow over the next few days. All the best, Tony Holkham (talk) 11:39, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your review of Gustav Adolf Wohlgemuth[edit]

Thanks! Robert P. O'Shea (talk) 04:45, 31 May 2014 (UTC). Perhaps you would also like to review Instrument myopia, which I just created. It is a little more rough than Adolf Wohlgemuth's page; I will be seeking expert advice about the history of instrument myopia and will add it once I have it.Robert P. O'Shea (talk) 05:35, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Committed identity: 35caa4a267862279964ca051ed1a8eba14a3a4295aaeb8b9b47f980323618632437738f6675c8ba8a3db694ebffe9024216e6218cd86

2f44d9aa8fb7b2b2b8b5 is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

Old book bindings.jpg Old Friends
“I jealously guard my research time, and I love fully immersing myself in those dusty old books and papers and stacks. It's one of the most enjoyable parts of my day.” ― Carriearchdale
messages section

Please comment on Talk:Donald Sterling[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Donald Sterling. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Google Spain v AEPD and Mario Costeja González[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Google Spain v AEPD and Mario Costeja González. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Zinedine Zidane[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Zinedine Zidane. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Palestinians[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Palestinians. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tim Huelskamp[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Tim Huelskamp. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Albert Einstein[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Albert Einstein. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mike Todd[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mike Todd. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Narendra Modi[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Narendra Modi. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Stefan Molyneux[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Stefan Molyneux. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Roosh V[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Roosh V. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Charles R. Pellegrino[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Charles R. Pellegrino. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Black Sabbath (album)[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Black Sabbath (album). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sabancı family[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sabancı family. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

more messages...

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
1,731 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Jean Piaget (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Add sources
19 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Túath (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
1,602 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Ink Master (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
1,321 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Objective-C (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
249 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Solntsevskaya Bratva (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
372 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Chat room (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
1,085 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Personality psychology (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 2.0 Cleanup
705 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: A Juan Pablo Montoya (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
98 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA Educational neuroscience (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cleanup
51 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start Dave Blaney (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
276 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA Societal attitudes toward homosexuality (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Expand
91 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: GA Big Dig ceiling collapse (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
1,068 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Russian mafia (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Unencyclopaedic
127 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: FA Emigration from Europe (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Unencyclopaedic
33 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Coda alla vaccinara (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
197 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start People skills (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
1 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Neivelivadapathy (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
6 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Lushei tribe (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
1,550 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Internet Relay Chat (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Wikify
544 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Dario Franchitti (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Wikify
11 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C 2011 TC 2000 season (talk) 2.0 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
1 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Cholapuram (Orathanadu) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
8 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Victor Bisonó (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
1 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Serpenticaulis wolfei (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
73 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Charlotte Leslie (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 2.0 Stub
33 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Cheez-It 355 at The Glen (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
7 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Le chat dans le sac (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
22 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Camping World RV Sales 301 (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
883 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Chris Núñez (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
7 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Johann Adam von Ickstatt (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:21, 2 May 2014 (UTC

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
26 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Talagang (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
59 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: B Jhelum District (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
1 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Tarap, Attock (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
12 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Spertus Institute for Jewish Learning and Leadership (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
10 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Jodhra (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Dhaular (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
29 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Military College Jhelum (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
121 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Near West Side, Chicago (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
110 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B West Pakistan (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
66 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Jhang District (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
12 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Daradas (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
63 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA History of African Americans in Chicago (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
15 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Bhaun (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
97 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Dargah (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
575 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Hinduism in Pakistan (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
5 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Numbal (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
112 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Hephthalite Empire (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Merge
27 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Mong, Punjab (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
112 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Pakistan and state sponsored terrorism (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Wikify
8 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Kala Gujran (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Race House (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Ghazial (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Peer Syed Abdullah Shah (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
0 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Dhok darbal (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
5 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Chakwal Tehsil (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
5 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Mulhal Mughlan (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
9 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Kallar Kahar Tehsil (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Constituency NA-61 (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
9 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Choa Saidanshah (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Jhatla (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:49, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
227 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Greater Noida (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
6 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Naiduthota (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Chintalagraharam (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
204 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: B Coastal Andhra (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
1 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Loyola Institute of Technology and Management (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Dibbapalem (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
114 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start ITM University (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Pranalinga (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
55 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Kavali (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
116 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Politics of Andhra Pradesh (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
21 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Ritchie's Archipelago (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
115 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Elections in Andhra Pradesh (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
31 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Coromandel International (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
277 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: Start Kakatiya dynasty (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
34 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Dhone (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
384 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Relative standard deviation (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
8 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Palamaneru (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
267 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
7 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Marripalem (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
468 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Nashik (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
63 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Srinivasa Reddy (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
30 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Nannapaneni Rajakumari (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
1 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Karikkode (village) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Kate Bellm (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
12 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Tenneti Park (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Visakhapatnam South (Assembly constituency) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
5 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Visakhapatnam North (Assembly constituency) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
24 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start 2011 India–Pakistan border shooting (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
159 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Mosayile Kuthira Meenukal (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
20 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Davallia (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:50, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
227 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Greater Noida (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
6 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Naiduthota (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Chintalagraharam (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
204 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: B Coastal Andhra (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
1 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Loyola Institute of Technology and Management (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Dibbapalem (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
114 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start ITM University (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Pranalinga (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
55 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Kavali (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
116 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Politics of Andhra Pradesh (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
21 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Ritchie's Archipelago (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
115 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Elections in Andhra Pradesh (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
31 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Coromandel International (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
277 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: Start Kakatiya dynasty (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
34 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Dhone (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
384 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Relative standard deviation (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
8 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Palamaneru (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
267 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
7 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Marripalem (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
468 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Nashik (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
63 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Srinivasa Reddy (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
30 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Nannapaneni Rajakumari (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
1 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Karikkode (village) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Kate Bellm (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
12 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Tenneti Park (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Visakhapatnam South (Assembly constituency) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
5 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Visakhapatnam North (Assembly constituency) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
24 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start 2011 India–Pakistan border shooting (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
159 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Mosayile Kuthira Meenukal (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
20 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Davallia (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:50, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
8 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Mindi (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
126 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Sam Lake (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
19 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub The Rascals (gang) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Visakhapatnam East (Assembly constituency) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Visakhapatnam West (Assembly constituency) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
28 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Little Andaman (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
88 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Camping (gaming) (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
22 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Hinduism in Seychelles (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Salekasa (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
35 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Tamil South Africans (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Woollahra Colleagues RFC (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
2,557 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Abu Dhabi (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Expand
54 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: C Freeskiing (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
121 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Visakhapatnam district (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
13 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: A Columbia River Crossing (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
28 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start International Federation of Competitive Eating (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
44 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Major League Eating (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
707 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Nagpur (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Merge
10 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Abdul Bari Jahani (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
2,327 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Gujarat (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Wikify
476 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Maratha (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
1 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Somalinga Palem (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Narasingapalli (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Paddada Jagadeeswar Rao (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
9 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Claude Wathey (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
29 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Pakistani poetry (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Tunglam (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
7 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Dolphin Nose (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Placido Fabris (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Gajuwaka (Assembly constituency) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:37, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
48 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Cantonese Pinyin (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
56 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Anakapalle (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Tarimul (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
1 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Sureddipalem (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Pendurthi (Assembly constituency) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
82 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Malla Reddy Engineering College (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
19 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub International Institute for Population Sciences (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
5 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Lisa Gluskin Stonestreet (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
1,002 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Big Boss (Metal Gear) (talk) 2.0 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
24 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Jangareddygudem (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
2,646 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Big Time Rush (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 2.0 Expand
188 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Paulo Campos (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
37 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Palakol (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
42 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Misal Pav (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
14 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Kalingapatnam (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
577 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: B Professional certification (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
1,522 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Toyota Supra (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
93 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: List, Predicted class: Start Shreya Ghoshal discography (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
197 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Mount Isa (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
458 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA USS Carl Vinson (CVN-70) (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Wikify
14 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Yoga for children (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Kushaleshwar Temple (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
18 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: B Confessions Page (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Narsipuram (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
5 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Pedagantyada (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
14 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start S.A. Engineering College (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
31 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Sakshi TV (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
8 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Tankara (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Anakapalle (Assembly constituency) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Narsipatnam (Assembly constituency) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:27, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

reply[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Carriearchdale. You have new messages at Bob the goodwin's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

GOCE February blitz wrapup[edit]

Guild of Copy Editors Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Blitzes/February 2014 wrap-up
Writing Magnifying.PNG

Participation: Out of seven people who signed up for this blitz, all copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Progress report: During the seven-day blitz, we removed 16 articles from the requests queue. Hope to see you at the March drive! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Miniapolis and Baffle gab1978.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by

It all just looks like the POT calling the kettle black!!![edit]

pot calling the kettle black This is a phrase that states that the person you are talking to is calling you something that they themselves are (and generally in abundance).[1] from: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=pot%20calling%20the%20kettle%20black

Please comment on Talk:Georgism[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Georgism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

GOCE June 2014 newsletter[edit]

Guild of Copy Editors May 2014 backlog elimination drive wrap-up
Writing Magnifying.PNG

Participation: Thanks to all who participated! Out of 51 people who signed up this drive, 33 copy edited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Progress report: We reduced our article backlog from 2,987 articles to 2,236 articles in May, the lowest backlog total since we began keeping records in 2009! Since at least 300 new articles were tagged during May, that means we copy edited over 1,000 articles in a single month. Amazing work, everyone!

Blitz: The June blitz will run from June 15–21. This blitz's theme is Politics. Sign up here.

Election: You can nominate yourself or others for the role of Coordinator for the second half of 2014 here. Nominations will be accepted until June 14. Voting will begin on June 15 and will conclude on June 28.

Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, and Miniapolis.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:27, 5 June 2014 (UTC)


Please comment on Talk:Kerry Bishé[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kerry Bishé. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to MILHIST[edit]

Please comment on Talk:Nikola Tesla[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nikola Tesla. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-24[edit]

07:39, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your review of Instrument myopia[edit]

Thanks!Robert P. O'Shea (talk) 04:25, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

You are quite welcome! Thanks for the note. I really appreciate it. It is really touching when an article writer takes a moment to say thanks. ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 04:29, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks![edit]

Thank you for your feedback on Carol Reardon Article! SamanthaMes (talk) 15:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Desireé Cousteau[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Desireé Cousteau. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

ReConnect Café[edit]

Thanks for your encouragement! It's an important effort and balances out some of the more obviously touristy stuff in Brooklyn--Aichik (talk) 18:07, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kenji Miyazawa[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kenji Miyazawa. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Category talk:People with disabilities[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Category talk:People with disabilities. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-25[edit]

07:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

My first time using Wikipedia, trying to figure out how to add Citations[edit]

Would you mind giving me a few minutes to figure out the process? In fact, would you be open to helping me add the references with me? I can email them to you and we can split them. There's a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Morningstar90 (talkcontribs) 10:35, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

-Morningstar90 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Morningstar90 (talkcontribs) 10:32, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Please let me know what I can help you to do. If you would like me to look at what you have you can email me by going here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:EmailUser/Carriearchdale Thanks, Carriearchdale (talk) 13:11, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

2014–15 Al Ain FC season[edit]

Hey, Why did you add this? http://www.gulf-times.com/pdflinks//PDFs/2014/5/14/Doha%20Stadium_2014_05_14_000000.pdf Sm3a (talk) 18:28, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the note. I think I had a clipboard error because that file was used on a different article. I fixed this article though. Sorry for the inconvenience.Thanks for letting me know! Looks like the article is shaping up well! ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 18:40, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Your rollback request[edit]

Hi Carriearchdale, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism, spam and blatantly unconstructive edits; using it to revert any other type of edit - such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with - can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning, as some admins do not give a warning if they become aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, use a manual edit summary instead of using the rollback tool. For practice, you may wish to review Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback.

Also, I noticed that you were blocked earlier this year. I think you'll be fine with the rollback tool, hence why I granted it to you, but I would take extra care with it: if you're blocked for breaking 3RR again you could end up with rollback being removed from your account, even if you didn't use it to edit war. Good luck. Acalamari 21:00, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you @Acalamari , I appreciate you setting that for me. I did have that one block several months ago, but that whole incident was well out of character for me, Since then I have been doing my very best to help to improve articles, and the encyclopedia as a whole. If you got a chance to look at some of my contribution list then I hope you saw something good. I will be very careful. Thanks! ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 21:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)


Deadbeat parent[edit]

hi, i recently had my deletion of some content in the "Deadbeat parent" article reverted by you. for reference, the section i deleted was:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Deadbeat_parent&oldid=612559577#Opposition_to_the_use_of_the_term

my edit comment at the time was:

"zero citations and lots of loaded language is ample reason to delete"

i feel that this was a good explanation for my action. note that there are, in fact, no citations in the entire section and there are two 'citation needed' entries, both six months old. additionally, the language of the section was full of loaded language: "so-called" debeat parents, "fraught with error", the new jersey legal system "ignoring" wibur's als. there is, to me at least, a strong feeling of bias in the whole section -- and no sources to back it up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.53.130.94 (talk) 21:46, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello, It probably would have been a better idea to place a more references needed tag, or a citation needed tag just after the statements that you did not agree with. That would have given other editors an opportunity to find some more references, or citations to verify the statement. Blanking out a whole section is never the best thing to do because the community and editors as a whole would need to come to some sort of consensus to delete parts of, or all of the article. If you have any other questions, please feel free to ask. ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 21:56, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you![edit]

Kitten in a helmet.jpg

Thanks for the review of Groundnut pyramids. I know I see a lot of new articles during our Guild of Copy Editors' Drives, so it's nice to know my own articles pass scrutiny. Thanks again!

PaintedCarpet (talk) 15:08, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

  • thanks so much! how sweet of you. I really did like the article, it stood out among the rest of the new article crop!

ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 20:11, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment on California Farmer[edit]

I appreciate your taking the time to comment on a starter page!Valli Nagy 18:09, 1 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ValliNagy (talkcontribs)

Thanks![edit]

Schlafendes Kaltblut.JPG Reviewer Award
I saw on your profile that you like horses. Here's an image of a horse for you! You deserve a rest, just like the horse. I'm just passing by to say thank you for reviewing pages that I created! See you around :) 001Jrm (talk) 01:00, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

XfD[edit]

Just a general note: The AfD system is not a forum. Please do not comment on these pages as though they were threads. Thank you. I am Quibilia. (talk) 16:05, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Willie Jerome Manning[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Willie Jerome Manning. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:(Carriearchdale)[edit]

User:(Carriearchdale), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:(Carriearchdale) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:(Carriearchdale) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Fram (talk) 08:44, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library: New Account Coordinators Needed[edit]

Hi Books & Bytes recipients: The Wikipedia Library has been expanding rapidly and we need some help! We currently have 10 signups for free account access open and several more in the works... In order to help with those signups, distribute access codes, and manage accounts we'll need 2-3 more Account Coordinators.

It takes about an hour to get up and running and then only takes a couple hours per week, flexible depending upon your schedule and routine. If you're interested in helping out, please drop a note in the next week at my talk page or shoot me an email at: jorlowitz@gmail.com. Thanks and cheers, Jake Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Oscar López Rivera[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Oscar López Rivera. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCIX, June 2014[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:00, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-26[edit]

07:20, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Shahrukh Khan[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Shahrukh Khan. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Michael Thompson (Aryan Brotherhood)[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Michael Thompson (Aryan Brotherhood). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

User SW[edit]

Hello user Carriearchdale Science.Warrior (talk) 18:19, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:John Anthony Brooks[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:John Anthony Brooks. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Madison McKinley[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Madison McKinley. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:John Anthony Brooks[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:John Anthony Brooks. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thanks sir for your appreciation regarding my contribution on Wikipedia. --Jeeteshvaishya (talk) 12:48, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

You are certainly quite welcome! If you have any questions, or if I could help you with anything, please do not hesitate to ask! Please have a lovely day.

ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 13:14, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

GOCE July 2014 newsletter[edit]

Guild of Copy Editors July 2014 newsletter is now ready for review. Highlights:

– Your project coordinators: Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978 and Miniapolis.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:27, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-27[edit]

06:53, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

.

Tech News: 2014-28[edit]

07:07, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Copy edits[edit]

Can you do more copy edits on these pages Nizamabad,Telangana.--Vin09 (talk) 06:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Sure, I will get back and finish the copyedit presently. Please do let me know if you have any other pages you would like copyedited. You are doing a wonderful job with all the articles you are creating! ciao!!! ````

Thank you very much, definitely I'll work with you. One more page for copyedit - Guntur.--Vin09 (talk) 11:36, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Why is your user page so cluttered?[edit]

Just curious, but you have like four and a half Babel boxes. ミーラー強斗武 (talk) 07:41, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Indefinite Block Proposal[edit]

  • Carriearchdale, pending resolution of that discussion, I have removed your Reviewer and Rollbacker rights. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:35, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── In your appeal to Jimbo you write:

My name on wikipedia is Carriearchdale and I have been a registered member of wikipedia since 2007 contributing globally across some 35 wikipedias.

However, the SUL report for this account shows that you have contributed to 21 WMF projects. Under what account name did you make contributions to 14 other projects? BMK (talk) 22:36, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

response My account name is Carriearchdale. Always has been and always will be. Thank you for stopping in to enquire. I do appreciate that. Perhaps maybe you should update all your wikimedia softwares and such. Because I did make an error when I said around 35 global wikis. It is actually 38.

THIRTY EIGHT

global account Statistics: 12961 edits on 38 wikis. Most edits on en.wikipedia.org (12427). Oldest account on en.wikipedia.org (2007-11-21 06:11).

Edits by project:wikipe...metacomm...1/296.3%

Edits by language:en

Other99.8%

See also recent activity, recent edits, global user manager

Local accounts

wiki edits registered groups unified login block

enwiki 12427 2007-11-21 06:11

unified

metawiki 305 2014-01-05 09:39

unified

commonswiki 128 2014-01-06 20:31

unified

simplewiki 29 2014-01-08 05:52

unified

enwiktionary 27 2014-01-06 22:13

unified

frwiki 8 2014-01-06 15:48

unified

wikimania2014wiki 7 2014-02-07 14:06

unified

idwiki 5 2014-01-27 01:34

unified

eswiki 3 2014-06-16 08:01

unified

fiwiki 3 2014-06-16 20:27

unified

wikidatawiki 3 2014-01-06 22:13

unified

zhwiki 3 2014-02-07 05:34

unified

arzwiki 2 2014-02-10 02:16

unified

dewiki 2 2014-01-13 14:33

unified

enwikiversity 2 2014-01-06 22:13

unified

itwiki 2 2014-02-09 00:17

unified

enwikisource 1 2014-01-06 22:13

unified

fawiki 1 2014-06-23 15:25

unified

incubatorwiki 1 2014-01-06 22:13

unified

lawiki 1 2014-02-23 05:42

unified

mediawikiwiki 1 2014-01-06 22:13

unified

arwiki 0 2014-06-12 17:58

unified

enwikibooks 0 2014-01-06 22:13

unified

enwikinews 0 2014-01-06 22:13

unified

enwikiquote 0 2014-01-06 22:13

unified

enwikivoyage 0 2014-01-06 22:13

unified

fjwiki 0 2014-04-18 07:11

unified

loginwiki 0 2014-01-05 09:39

unified

nlwiki 0 2014-06-17 08:59

unified

outreachwiki 0 2014-03-11 08:55

unified

plwiki 0 2014-03-02 20:35

unified

ptwiki 0 2014-03-02 20:35

unified

sourceswiki 0 2014-03-21 20:47

unified

specieswiki 0 2014-01-06 22:13

unified

svwiki 0 2014-03-02 20:34

unified

tawiki 0 2014-02-27 02:54

unified

testwiki 0 2014-04-27 10:43

unified

viwiki 0 2014-03-02 20:34

unified


open-source and released under the CC-BY 3.0 license

Again I do thank you for the inquiry. Plese do stop back in again sometime.

ciao!!! I do hope everyone has a great and fabulous evening! Carriearchdale (talk) 23:24, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Bullshit. For the last 17 on the list you don't even have a single edit. G S Palmer (talkcontribs) 23:58, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Yes, the Global Contributions verifies: contributions to 21 projects. BMK (talk) 01:05, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
      • Why does it matter if she's active on however-many projects? ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 02:31, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
        • It matters because she posted an appeal/justification on User talk:Jimbo Wales in which she seriously exaggerated her contributions to WMF projects in order to make herself look better. She wrote:

          My name on wikipedia is Carriearchdale and I have been a registered member of wikipedia since 2007 contributing globally across some 35 wikipedias.'

          This simple sentence is full of false impressions and exaggerations. Her account was made in 2007, but she didn't edit until January 2014, so the implication that she's a long-term editor is false. She is registered on 38 WMF projects but only actually edited on 21 of them, and on 11 of these her edits were simply to create a user page. That means that she's not "contributing globally across 35 [or 38] wikipedias", she's contributing to 10 WMF projects, and on four of those ten she's only got edits to a couple of articles. In truth, she's only contributed any significant edits to en.wiki, Commons, simplywiki, en.wiktionary and meta.

          Now people contribute what they can when they can, everyone can do as much or as little as they like, so contributing 12,980 edits is a good thing (if they are good edits -- the AN/I seems to be showing that many of them are not). What's wrong is exaggerating your contributions in order to make yourself look better so that your unsupported allegations of another user being a paid editor might have a chance of being taken seriously. That's why it matters, not in the abstract, but because of how she presented herself. BMK (talk) 03:37, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

          • I saw this on ANI a little while after I asked, so sorry that you had to explain here too. Also it's good that you put this up at Jimbo's talk page and ANI. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 03:53, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

A chance for you to redeem yourself[edit]

Hello User:Carriearchdale, I'm User:Sturmgewehr88. It appears that, because of your behavior in the last few months, you are about to be indefinitely blocked on English Wikipedia. Because I believe in WP:Good faith, I'm going to spell something out for you: while many editors support indef blocking you, a majority of them are in favor of later unblocking you if you learn from your misdeeds and accept that what you did was wrong. They're not asking you to kiss their ass, just accept responsibility for your actions. I have also volunteered to be your WP:MENTOR after you're unblocked. I look forward to helping you become a better contributing editor to Wikipedia, but you have to take the first step. Also, when you request to be unblocked, please don't sound like a "victim"; you must genuinely regret and repent your past actions, otherwise no admin will unblock you. Cheers~ ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 23:06, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

I do thank you for stopping in with your kind offer. I will certainly take it in under advisement. I am and always will fully accountable for my actions. I always have been and I always will be.

Also thanks for the note about the broken user boxes and such. I may be brilliant but I never said I could make a correct user box. I have been renovating on my user page, so please do pardon the dust. There is all kinds of code swirling around over there. I like your signature coding. I am very attract to the different script to write a couple in japanese script! Please do stop back in another time. Have a great evening! Also please see the response to the user who posted a question just above yours.

ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 23:32, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Let us all have a spelling lesson!!![edit]

Let us all have a spelling lesson!!!

Okay now, sound out each letter as we spell the big long difficult word!!!

Who can spell it,

who can say it?

If you don't want to to learn a word that most of you do not have a good understanding of, please exit now!!!

And now, very politely, here we go.............................

W H I S T L E B L O W E R

ciao!!! I hope everyone has a wonderful rest of the evening!!!

Carriearchdale (talk) 00:27, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

You can stop patting yourself on the back. Whistleblowers come with evidence of the malfeasance they're blowing the whistle on. You, however, have presented no evidence whatsoever, just unsupported accusations. You appear to merely be harassing an innocent editor. If you have real evidence of paid editing, then provide it, please. Put up, or shut up. BMK (talk) 01:09, 10 July 2014 (UTC)


oh, but I already have user bmk!!! I have done my due diligence. Maybe it's just that you are too far down on the FUCKING totem pole that you don't even know about it yet!!!

BE GONE!!!

ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 02:13, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Don't you want me to have a wonderful rest of the evening? BMK (talk) 02:16, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Both of you, stop acting childish. Carriearchdale, this section reads more like "I'm getting blocked anyway, YOLO" and violates WP:CIVIL, please don't make this any worse for yourself than it already is. And BMK, you should know better than to poke at her. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 02:38, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
As another editor said about Carriearchdale (not me), she exhibits "Scary, vicious, totally insupportable and unconscionable behavior". If someone behaves in that manner, they really should expect to get a tiny bit of their own back every now and then. In any case, I still want to find out if I'm supposed to have wonderful rest of the evening or not -- I won't to able to go to bed until I know. BMK (talk) 02:47, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Wow, that sarcasm made me chuckle. Anyway, I understand your frustration with this behavior, but again that doesn't mean you can turn around and give it back. If it bugs you so much, don't post on her talk page (although if she does this somewhere else, that's a different story. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 02:53, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Again, and for the record, I have not, nor have I ever received any form of payment or compensation from anyone in any manner, shape, or form regarding my endeavors on Wikipedia. Anyone who states that this is not correct is making false, fraudulent, and libelous accusations, and is a liability to the organization as well as to editors whose sole aim is to contribute in good faith. Thank you to all of you for your support in this unwarranted and unfounded matter by this editor, Daniellagreen (talk) (cont) 03:09, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

@Daniellagreen: Be careful about using the "L" word ("Libel") as it could be interpreted as a legal threat, which can get you blocked from editing. I don't believe you meant it that way, so, if I am correct, you should make a statement here on the order of "I have no intention of taking legal action," if that is indeed the case. Please take this advice very seriously. BMK (talk) 03:14, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Right, thanks. I have absolutely NO intentions of taking legal action regarding my prior comment, and am only trying to look out for Wikipedia's benefit. Thanks, Daniellagreen (talk) (cont) 03:19, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

more retaliatory battleground behaviour from User:Beyond My Ken[edit]

here=[104]

ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 02:31, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Ummm... it's "battleground behavior" when I move a comment I posted from the wrong place and put it in the right place? BMK (talk) 02:34, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
It's battleground behavior when you say/do something to instigate a conflict. What she said wasn't right, but that doesn't give you the right to do something you know is just as wrong. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 02:42, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Oh Geez Louise, get fucking real, dude, your account is named after two deadly Nazi weapons, and you're lecturing me about this crap? Get over yourself - and I suggest you withdraw your offer to mentor Carriearchdale, you're clearly not qualified to do so, she'd eat you alive. BMK (talk) 02:50, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Really? For one, "Sturmgewehr" is a generic word, and any weapon is "deadly". And yes I am lecturing you, because you're violating these policies. And I find that unlikely. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 03:05, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Beyond My Ken can be brash at times but as a whole he is generally spot on when it comes to policy. I do not see a problem with what he said, it is a little more forward than what I would have said, but as a whole he is correct when describing recent behavior, especially considering the discussion at ANI. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 04:37, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
@Solarra: All I have to say is that if I'd only chastised Carriearchdale, I wouldn't have received this "brash" comment. I have no wish to escalate things with him. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 05:44, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── @Sturmgewehr88: This edit to me is extremely borderline, and if you do have an issue, I suggest taking it up with Beyond My Ken directly, but I do see where you have an issue. If both of you are amiable to it, I'd be happy to mediate. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 05:50, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

@Solarra: Other than it being dickish, I don't have an issue with it, and will walk away and let User:Carriearchdale revert him. It was this edit that offends me, but again I'd prefer to walk away. Thanks for the offer though. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 06:05, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
@S88: You need to get your facts straight -- I did not make that original edit, someone else did, I merely reverted you - but the other editor's change was accurate, and you need to give Carriearchdale the chance to make her own decisions, neither you nor I can make them for her. BMK (talk) 06:14, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Incidentally, I'm backing away - you might want to consider doing so as well. BMK (talk) 06:18, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
I never said you made the original edit, I said you reverted me, after I restored the page to its original version, and left a dickish edit summary, which I could care less about. And what do you mean "you might want to consider doing so as well"? Was "I don't have an issue with it, and will walk away and let User:Carriearchdale revert him" not straightforward enough of my intentions? ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 06:48, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

need more edits on that page, has many issues, please correct them based on copy-edit tag. Vin09 (talk) 05:10, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Yes Vin09, I will try to get back there today to finish. Thanks for the note. Please have a good day!!! ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 15:08, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Question[edit]

Carriearchdale, I've been wondering. Why do you tell people to "govern [themselves] accordingly"? According to what? Yngvadottir (talk) 20:15, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

@Yngvadottir: It is to this link [105], but I'm not sure what the point of it is. Piguy101 (talk) 22:20, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing based on community discussion here. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.   the panda ₯’ 22:53, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

It is worth noting that you received an offer to be mentored by one of the commenters at the ANI discussion. If I were in your current position, I might very seriously consider indicating whether you would be willing to accept such an offer. John Carter (talk) 23:23, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

many thanks and much gratitude to all!!![edit]

I really would love to thank all my supporters both on this wiki and elsewhere. I was extremely proud to accept all the kudos I have been given here at wikipedia, as well as all my wonderful fans over at twitter. Although everyone has been most supportive, I would especially like to thank a group of persons who have excelled each at their own craft --- @AxMorgan, @QueenAmy13, @ZoeIrvin, @DonaldGResha, @YBE, @RealRagnvald, @nycdave, and all to the rest as well my some 11,000 thousand followers there at twitter!

I hope everyone will have the brightest day ever!!!

ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 08:28, 12 July @LollyGirlLou over at twitter

Tech News: 2014-29[edit]

07:49, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

my newest most favourite quote on wikipedia ever[edit]

"I will say it again. I liked Carrie. I really don't want to spend the time to look into the story that has everyone so worked up, but if I did, I might still think she had points. I am a rational person, so if she was getting in the way of the project I would not see that as a good thing, but I am not sure I am so thrilled with the implied threat that if I spoke up for her, that would mean that I was a bad guy too. But in a way, I am not much value to Wikipedia, because I couldn't contribute much without attracting buzz saws, so the implied threat has little to do with me be honest in my opinions, and has more to do with the aggressive community being at homeostasis.Bob the goodwin (talk) 08:51, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

I perused a lot of the stuff on Carrie. She definitely got on the wrong side of the crowd, but my sense is that the project didn't care if she was right, and mostly didn't want a trouble maker. It feels like the project is just fine with hidden paid editors, and there are probably a ton of them out there, but the project has very little supervision, and does not want anyone taking up oxygen by complaining. That is probably why I failed as well, as I was horrified at the aggressive games that undermined scholarship. I tried to make a case against her as I read the stuff, but it mostly came down to the idea that people wanted her gone, people pulled the plug because there was too much ink. I would mentor Carrie to be different in life, but I think you've all done her a favor by giving her a life again. Wikipedia publishes what the most aggressive person wants. There's a lot of money to be made if you can control the truth. The mob spilled over in their anger, and went after me? Why does so much anger float in this place? I hope I am wrong. I am done being mad, and want friends and not enemies. Go make good edits, and help the project. I can't. Bob the goodwin (talk) 10:26, 13 July 2014 (UTC)"

Merge[edit]

Pls have a look at this page, Guntur Coast, I suggested merge, can you take any action.--Vin09 (talk) 08:06, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi Vin09, Thanks for the note. Please email me any help requests by clicking email user in the left column of the talk page here. Have a quite exquisite evening!!!

ciao Carriearchdale (talk) 23:54, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

To reiterate a deleted comment: Vin09, Carrie has been blocked indefinitely for several reasons. She cannot take action, as that would be block evasion. I don't know if there is any policy against emailing her, however. - Purplewowies (talk) 00:28, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
There most definitely is not a policy against emailing her. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 01:38, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
I do not know about the user was blocked. I didn't do any mailing, I use only wiki.--Vin09 (talk) 06:11, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
@Vin09: It's ok. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 07:03, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

notification to all interested wikipedia users[edit]

At the present time I have not yet made a decision as whether to place an unblock request here at the english wikipedia. MY decision is still pending based on several factors.

I am not abusing my talk page access by replying to a message left me by Vin09. Contrary to what andythegrump has so prematurely posted on the ANI, I merely asked to editor Vin09 to contact me via the email link on the left to "Please email me any help requests" Nothing was stated in my message left here to Vin09 about anything to do with advising him how to proceed with any matters here at english wikipedia. please govern yourselves accordingly, and as always I hope everyone will have a quite fantastic evening. ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 00:23, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Notice[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.—LucasThoms 00:27, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. Since of course I cannot at present respond at ANI, I will leave any responses or comment here on my talk page. ciao!!! 00:30, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

If it becomes critically necessary, I can ferry comments over for you. —LucasThoms 00:32, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Many thanks Lucas Thoms. ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 00:36, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

In response to john carter post at ANI, I would say that equating his verbose and evilly creative attempts at translation of the actual meaning of the exact statement I typed in message to vin09, "Please email me any help requests by clicking email user in the left column of the talk page here," with intention of what statement meant would be impossible. It is quite difficult to understand how user john carter knows exactly what meant when I typed those nineteen words. How about keeping all the casting of aspersions to a minimum this time!!! To quote Rodney King, "Can't we all just get along?" ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 00:54, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Being that it is customary to notify any user/editor whose wikipedia name is brought up at ANI, I would request that some neutral party notify Vin09 that his wikipedia name has been mentioned at ANI, if that has not already been done. ciao111 Carriearchdale (talk) 01:24, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

There is little if any way you could actually be of any "help" on wikipedia articles while blocked without basically violating the block and effectively attempting to skirt the block. You could reasonably have used fewer words to say "I'm blocked ask someone who isn't. I honestly can see no reasnon for you to request an e-mail on content while blocked except to circumvent the block or maybe being unwilling to say those fewer words.John Carter (talk) 01:15, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Being that it is customary to notify any user/editor whose wikipedia name is brought up at ANI, I would request that some neutral party notify Vin09 that his wikipedia name has been mentioned at ANI, if that has not already been done. ciao111 Carriearchdale (talk) 01:24, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Please make a notice, and post at the ANI that user BeyondMyKen had just for at least the second time vandalized the Carrierarchdale user page by changing the information in the user box which lists the true and actually date I registered with wikipedia. beyondmyken changed the correct year date from 2007 to 2014. That edit was malicious, disruptive, and just continues to show the batleground and retaliatory actions of user beyonmyken towards Carriearchdale. Please see this diff if you wish to verify what I have typed here. [125]

ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 01:33, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

If that's directed at me, I decline. I offered to help you figure out this current ANI case, not to be a proxy for the dispute between you and BMK. —LucasThoms 01:38, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

It wasn't, but no problem, thanks for your help Lucas Thoms ciao!! Carriearchdale (talk) 01:43, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

I doubt he'll do it again. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 02:03, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

notification of current fact[edit]

Name : Carriearchdale

Registered : 21 November 2007

diff [126]

external reference - https://tools.wmflabs.org/quentinv57-tools/tools/sulinfo.php?username=Carriearchdale

ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 01:48, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the note Sturmgewehr88. I hope you have a wonderful evening!!! ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 04:32, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

The basics about contributing[edit]

"Wikipedia is the product of thousands of editors' contributions, each one bringing something different to the table, whether it be: researching skills, technical expertise, writing prowess, or tidbits of information, but most importantly a willingness to help. Nobody owns articles, so if you see a problem that you can fix, do so. Everyone is encouraged to copyedit articles, and add content if they have knowledge of or are willing to do the necessary research to improve the topic at hand."

diff [127]

external reference https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contributing_to_Wikipedia

ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 02:32, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Carriearchdale/Niotso[edit]

User:Carriearchdale/Niotso, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Carriearchdale/Niotso and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Carriearchdale/Niotso during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Orange Mike | Talk 03:00, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Since you are unable to respond due to your block, any critical comments you have I can convey for you. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 03:07, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you Solarra for the note. I believe at this time it would be the best thing to say that I have no comment at this particular time. May I ask you Solarra, to either post, or tell me how long such a "discussion" is customarily run before closing it? Thanks for your time. ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 03:19, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

See WP:AFD for specifics, but generally discussions involving deletion are allowed to continue from 7 days from when they are opened. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 03:22, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

notification to self for the record[edit]

"Wikipedia is the product of thousands of editors' contributions, each one bringing something different to the table, whether it be: researching skills, technical expertise, writing prowess, or tidbits of information, but most importantly a willingness to help. Nobody owns articles, so if you see a problem that you can fix, do so. Everyone is encouraged to copyedit articles, and add content if they have knowledge of or are willing to do the necessary research to improve the topic at hand."

diff [128]

external reference https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contributing_to_Wikipedia

baseless allegations in my opinion[edit]

from ANI - "Probably not as it would be easier to just dust off another sleeper account registered in 2007 and begin again anew. Hence the rather bizarre insistence that she has been around for seven years. She could be the greatest sock-master Wikipedia has ever seen, but unprovable since it's a sly move done over many years (seriously this goes deeper). I find that more believable than a user that doesn't do a test edit in seven years after registering an account. Froggerlaura ribbit11:06 pm, Yesterday (UTC−4)"

from ANI - "Um, given that it is blatant copy-paste plagiarism of this [92] (not a copyvio, as it is public domain), I think that deletion might be advisable. AndyTheGrump (talk) 11:06 pm, Today (UTC−4)"

end of quotes from ANI ciao!!! update Carriearchdale (talk) 04:52, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

attempts to ask questions[edit]

A simple question. Did you copy-paste the article from the source I linked? AndyTheGrump (talk) 03:45, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

reposting for more clarity[edit]

"Wikipedia is the product of thousands of editors' contributions, each one bringing something different to the table, whether it be: researching skills, technical expertise, writing prowess, or tidbits of information, but most importantly a willingness to help. Nobody owns articles, so if you see a problem that you can fix, do so. Everyone is encouraged to copyedit articles, and add content if they have knowledge of or are willing to do the necessary research to improve the topic at hand."

diff [129]

external reference https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contributing_to_Wikipedia

Notification[edit]

Carrie, I wanted to share a little info with you on your user talk page use and give you appropriate notice. Generally speaking, I'm probably the most liberal minded when it comes to how someone uses their talk page when blocked. I've been in more than couple shouting matches defending user's rights in these cases. Still, there are some practical limitations you should be aware of. As long as the talk is more or less Wiki related, isn't soapboxing or violating WP:POLEMIC, etc., I'm pretty easy to get along with, with one caveat, that the idea is eventually the user will be unblocked, so the talk page use serves a purpose, to allow communication, working on future goals and/or articles, mentoring, etc. I find it very useful for that.

You are indef blocked. At some point you need to decide if you are going to seek an unblock or not. If you don't, then the generosity in using the talk page is somewhat diminished, because it isn't serving the above goal. The same holds true with email, to a lesser degree. If an editor has decided that they are not going to seek an unblock, or not seek one in a reasonable period, then use of the talk page falls under greater scrutiny. There is no hard and fast rule, but to me, once a few weeks or a month has passed and they are using the talk page regularly but have no intention of getting unblocked, then I have to at least reconsider the use. Of course, if they go away and come back 6 months later to ask, use isn't even an issue, as you weren't using the talk page.

The same is true of proxy editing, ie: asking others to make edits on your behalf. This is against policy as it is a means to bypass the block. We usually tolerate a small amount of this with temporarily blocked editors, if they are asking to fix small mistakes on articles they work on, as this improves the encyclopedia and the goal isn't really to bypass anything. Indef blocked editors, however, usually aren't afforded the same exemptions. Whether the proxy editing is via email or on the talk page is irrelevant, it is still against policy, so just be aware of that.

In short, soon you will need to either ask for an unblock, or expect talk page and email to get revoked if you continue the way you have. Some of the material you have posted borders on WP:POLEMIC violations, as we don't allow lists of quotes from "enemies" and such. In my singular opinion, the activities you have engaged in since being blocked have not been beneficial towards an eventual unblock. I'm fine with whatever you decide, but out of fairness, I wanted to give you fair and final warning of the repercussions of your choices. Dennis Brown |  | WER 13:08, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for stopping in and leaving a note! ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 19:25, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

notice regarding postings at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Carriearchdale/Niotso[edit]

Having read the comments by the user/editors at the page listed above, I was really quite appalled by most of the comments there so, I will mention no specific user/editor name in my comment. A few postings there are taking quite a gigantic leap by using words such as plagiarism and non-attribution.

I have works and writings that I have personally created all over the internet. I will leave my statement at that, since I am sure what I state here will really make no difference. Anyone that has some concrete evidence that I have plagiarized something, please take no offense, but please put up, or shut up about it. Casting aspersions onto a person or a member of wikipedia with no evidence is what I describe as a baseless allegation.

I mean really people, if this whole extended affair is some attempt to upset me or something, it doesn't. That draft was sitting in there minding its own business, waiting to be reworked. I hope all of you user/editors are also policing all other draft articles sitting in user spaces, because if you are not applying policy to all user/editors across the board, that could be seen as possibly continuing to strike out against one editor in a retaliatory manner for perhaps some other reason. I will end my statement at that for today. I do hope everyone will have a safe and fruitful weekend.

ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 22:14, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

  • I can't speak for this case and have no opinion on the deletion itself (I didn't look at it), but I can from experience as an administrator: When an editor is blocked, it is common to dig around their area to make sure there aren't copyright vios, or polemic stuff, etc. You aren't being singled out in that respect, it is standard operating procedure to poke around a bit. The same is true with edit histories. Admin generally have tools and methods for doing all this fairly expeditiously as this is core to what the community expects from us, ie: act on their behalf. Dennis Brown |  | WER 22:29, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the note Dennis Brown. What you are describing in your paragraph may at first look somewhat plausible. But if sny poster/user/editor that posted there has some evidence of the bad acts that they are alledging, they really should support their baseless allegation with some iron clad proof of wrong-doing. Perhaps I am not aware of the procedure you use in such a discussion. Are accusations by some poster there just accepted as fact? I can count to 20 or 28 whatever the number is, but please be aware Dennis Brown, "you" or "WP" or whoever can line up 100, 200, or 350 persons to mark a vote down, but whatever the outcome of the discussion, it does not mean I a not telling the truth. I stand by everything I have said. Posters can just keep on posting, and casting aspersions that I am "dishonest, deceitful, deceptive..." you can fill in the the other hate speech that billows in and around wikipedia. I am sure you probably read over some or most of it. The truth is the truth, and some people around wikipedia cannot handle the truth, and they instead go around making baseless allegations, accusations without merit, and just pure mistruths for whatever their reason. I have been surprised that during this ANI some posters, and even some admins are questioning others at the ANI regarding issues that have come up there. Maybe wikipedia has a small chance of turning itself around, I do hope so.

ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 22:58, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

It is not a 'baseless allegation' that the text in your draft is to a large extent identical to material posted on the Niotso Wiki. It is a self-evident fact, that anyone can verify. You are of course free to provide an explanation for this - I suggest you do so. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:03, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

I will not be answering any questions from persons who are making baseless allegations against me. But for the sake of civility andythegrump, maybe you should try thinking in a positive manner, and then use the assume good faith concept heralded around wikipeda, and try to imagine some scenario where you are actually mistaken, and there is a perfectly good reason that the draft article in userspace here, and the one posted over at the spot you listed had a lot of the same info, and were similar in nature. andythegrump, have you ever been wrong?

ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 23:18, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

User:Carriearchdale, did you copy an article from another wiki and save it here? ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 23:25, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
The fact that it was copied onto Wikipedia by Carriearchdale from the Niotso wiki is beyond dispute. Observe the Duplication Detector results comparing the last version of the page on the Niotso wiki and the first version of the page on Wikipedia. The last edit to the original source was 28 November 2013. The material was copied verbatim onto Wikipedia on 6 February 2014 with only minor changes, e.g. "we" → "they" and "is" → "was". The fact that the original source has a public domain license and regardless of who had contributed to it (at least 2 people), failure to credit it as the source is plagiarism. The motivation behind the failure to credit is another issue. Many inexperienced and even some experienced editors do not realise that all text copied onto Wikipedia must be credited to its original source. (Note that the Duplication Detector will not work if/when the WP page is deleted, although administrators can still compare the two urls manually.). Voceditenore (talk) 08:22, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
In the "References" section is a link to the article that was obviously copied. Do we know what her intention was? ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 08:35, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
No, only that with her next edit, one minute later, she removed the link [130] with the edit summary "copyedit" and never restored it. Voceditenore (talk) 08:40, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Note also that it was not copied into user space. It was created directly as an article and later userfied by an administrator [131]. – Voceditenore (talk) 08:59, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
"But if sny poster/user/editor that posted there has some evidence of the bad acts that they are alledging, they really should support their baseless allegation with some iron clad proof of wrong-doing."
I find that highly ironic. Have you even at this late stage emailed ArbCom with the evidence for the allegations you have been making against another editor? Your continued misrepresentation of that issue off wiki would suggest not. Harry the Dog WOOF 09:04, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
@Voceditenore: Well then.. May the laws of copyright have mercy on her soul. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 09:08, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
This has nothing do with copyright laws. It was simply a violation of Wikipedia policy on attribution, albeit something that many editors are unaware of. If it remains on Wikipedia (in any space), the problem can be easily rectified by simply acknowledging that the text was copied and from where. In fact, I have just done so. It's needed as long as the page is still on WP. Voceditenore (talk) 09:15, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Well, well, well I must say I missed this discussion when it occurred, but I will make a few comments about what several different persons stated in their post or asked.


"Note also that it was not copied into user space. It was created directly as an article and later userfied by an administrator" by voceditenore

Being created directly as an article usually means a person would use the article wizard to create an article. Another way of course is to use the AFC process. Please check your sources more closely. The work was in fact copied in my user space by the dear departed Cindy lady. I don't recall her exact wiki name but I believe I read where she passed while at a wiki conference in Berlin. Her loss was a hard blow to wikipedia. I believe she was a well loved wikipedian.


"The fact that the original source has a public domain license and regardless of who had contributed to it (at least 2 people), failure to credit it as the source is plagiarism." by voceditenore

This is not a fact, but a supposition, "an idea or theory that you believe is true even though you do not have proof."[1] by some uninformed individual. I suppose the person who wrote this might be able to hypothesize, and try to come to some probable conclusion, if they had all the facts regarding the works being discussed. They don't have all the facts. If I thought the facts might matter, I might decide to include them here, but alas, I believe the die has already been cast, so I will just leave that statement as is for the time being.


POINT OF FACT - I could most likely not be found guilty in any court, witch hunt, or tribunal of plagiarizing myself. Well maybe at sometime back in history where persons had no hope of defending themselves against any charge. Henry VIII and all his wives come to mind, maybe the Salem witch trials, or even please pardon the term nazi germany.


"I find that highly ironic. Have you even at this late stage emailed ArbCom with the evidence for the allegations you have been making against another editor? Your continued misrepresentation of that issue off wiki would suggest not." by harry the dog

As I have stated previously, I turned over any and all info regarding the possibility of Daniellagreen doing paid editing with non-disclosure, that had been given to me by another person over to one of my trusted advisors. I have no possession of the evidence or info any longer, and I have moved forward. I really do not know yet the outcome of anything my trusted advisor has done, or will do with anything he now has in his possession regarding that matter. My trusted advisor is a well informed, and responsible person, that as I understand is going to be handling the matter at the corporate level.

As I have stated here previously my decision on whether or not to appeal the ban imposed here is pending at this place in time.

End of statement for today. Please feel free to discuss if you like, or even ask questions, but remember I will not be answering questions from persons who are making baseless allegations here. I hope everyone has a bright and fantastic Sunday!!!

Not gonna comment on any part of that (because I have no opinion on it), other than the fact that you're blocked, not banned. See here for the difference. I wouldn't point it out, but it's been a source of a bit of confusion (i.e. the talk page abuse issue). Ciao! Yeah, I'll leave the ciao'ing to you. It's not right for me.—LucasThoms 04:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
"As I have stated previously, I turned over any and all info regarding the possibility of Daniellagreen doing paid editing with non-disclosure, that had been given to me by another person over to one of my trusted advisors. I have no possession of the evidence or info any longer, and I have moved forward."
You made the accusations. You know what the evidence for them, if any, is. If you want to have any hope of being unblocked you must follow the proper procedures and either send the evidence directly to ArbCom or withdraw the accusations unreservedly and apologise unreservedly. Harry the Dog WOOF 09:08, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Public domain[edit]

Carrie, in regard to your statement above: ""The fact that the original source has a public domain license and regardless of who had contributed to it (at least 2 people), failure to credit it as the source is plagiarism." by voceditenore. This is not a fact, but a supposition, "an idea or theory that you believe is true even though you do not have proof."

You are mistaken. It has nothing to do with US copyright law in the United States, particularly since our editors are from all over the globe. Our policies are such that all Public Domain text and media must be attributed to the source or they are subject to be deleted. As Wikipedia is a privately owned website, this is a choice the Foundation made some time ago. For our purposes, it is considered the equivalent of plagiarism to do otherwise. Just as we define notability and civility differently here, so too do we define plagiarism in a way that might not reflect normal English usage. There is no such thing as global Public Domain anyway, and we choose to require that non-original PD material be sourced to verify ownership and licensing. Again, the laws of the United States are meaningless here, we have our own policies which are more stringent than the laws in the US. Dennis Brown |  | WER 11:54, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

references[edit]


ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 04:38, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

.

The Bugle: Issue C, July 2014[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC)


deletion discussion of niotso materials bookmarked at this level[edit]

Wikipedia by Vlastní dílo

Orthographic projection SW“ od Strebe – Vlastní dílo. Licencováno pod Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons


Tech News: 2014-30[edit]

07:42, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-31[edit]

08:09, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 7[edit]

Wikipedia Library owl.svg The Wikipedia Library

Bookshelf.jpg

Books & Bytes
Issue 7, June-July 2014
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

  • Seven new donations, two expanded partnerships
  • TWL's Final Report up, read the summary
  • Adventures in Las Vegas, WikiConference USA, and updates from TWL coordinators
  • Spotlight: Blog post on BNA's impact on one editor's research

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:20, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-32[edit]

07:37, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-33[edit]

07:43, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Decision on requesting unblocking?[edit]

I think that over a month has passed since you were blocked, which is generally long enough for most people to make a decision. I think myself perhaps if no request is made in the next week there is a very real chance some sort of a ban will be requested.John Carter (talk) 21:40, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Why not leave her be? Let her on her own time, it's kind of ridiculous that you want to seek a ban when no disruptive conduct is taking place. Tutelary (talk) 22:18, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
I did misstate the above and I apologize for that. I was misrepresenting through an error on my part the material Dennis included in the Notification section above. However I do note that in that section he indicated some sort of action might be taken then. It will likely be a noticeboard discussion and there are a number of possible outcomes of such discussion. John Carter (talk) 22:32, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
OK, what will the noticeboard discussion be about? Where is the incident here? Where is the conduct that a noticeboard would be needed? Tutelary (talk) 22:52, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
WP: STICK. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 06:18, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CI, August 2014[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-34[edit]

07:17, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

GOCE July drive and August blitz[edit]

Guild of Copy Editors July 2014 backlog elimination drive wrap-up
Writing Magnifying.PNG

Participation: Thanks to everyone who participated in the July drive. Of the 40 people who signed up this drive, 22 copy edited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Progress report: We reduced our article backlog from 2400 articles to 2199 articles in July. This is a new month-end record low for the backlog. Nice work, everyone!

Blitz: The August blitz will run from August 24–30. The blitz will focus on articles from the GOCE's Requests page. Awards will be given out to everyone who copy edits at least one of the target articles. The blitz will run from August 24–30. Sign up here!

Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, and Miniapolis.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:10, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-35[edit]

09:21, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-36[edit]

07:49, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-37[edit]

09:33, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-38[edit]

08:34, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CII, September 2014[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:24, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-39[edit]

09:05, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-40[edit]

09:44, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-41[edit]

06:10, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 8[edit]

Wikipedia Library owl.svg The Wikipedia Library

Bookshelf.jpg

Books & Bytes
Issue 8, August-September2014
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

  • TWL now a Wikimedia Foundation program, moves on from grant status
  • Four new donations, including large DeGruyter parntership, pilot with Elsevier
  • New TWL coordinators, Wikimania news, new library platform discussions, Wiki Loves Libraries update, and more
  • Spotlight: "Traveling Through History" - an editor talks about his experiences with a TWL newspaper archive, Newspapers.com

Read the full newsletter



MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

arb committee note[edit]

Case#Review_of_policy_that_led_to_the_blocking_of_Carriearchdale_in_order_to_avoid_repeat[edit]

arb request

Case#Review_of_policy_that_led_to_the_blocking_of_Carriearchdale_in_order_to_avoid_repeat[edit]

arb request — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bob the goodwin (talkcontribs) 01:26, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-42[edit]

08:54, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

GOCE October 2014 newsletter[edit]

Guild of Copy Editors October 2014 newsletter is now ready for review. Highlights:

– Your project coordinators: Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978 and Miniapolis.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Do not buy Russian goods![edit]

Hello! Could you translate an article about boycott of Russian goods in Ukraine for the Farsi or/and Portuglese Wikipedia? Thanks for the help. --Trydence (talk) 14:34, 18 October 2014 (UTC)


[Do not buy Russian goods...

The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014, Redux[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

NOTE: This replaces the earlier October 2014 Bugle message, which had incorrect links -- please ignore/delete the previous message. Thank uou!

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:52, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-43[edit]

13:48, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 October 2014[edit]

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

Tech News: 2014-44[edit]

05:21, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 October 2014[edit]

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

Tech News: 2014-45[edit]

17:28, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

New Wikipedia Library Accounts Now Available (November 2014)[edit]

Hello Wikimedians!

The TWL OWL says sign up today :)

The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for, free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for:

  • DeGruyter: 1000 new accounts for English and German-language research. Sign up on one of two language Wikipedias:
  • Fold3: 100 new accounts for American history and military archives
  • Scotland's People: 100 new accounts for Scottish genealogy database
  • British Newspaper Archive: expanded by 100+ accounts for British newspapers
  • Highbeam: 100+ remaining accounts for newspaper and magazine archives
  • Questia: 100+ remaining accounts for journal and social science articles
  • JSTOR: 100+ remaining accounts for journal archives

Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team 23:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

You can host and coordinate signups for a Wikipedia Library branch in your own language. Please contact Ocaasi (WMF).
This message was delivered via the Mass Message to the Book & Bytes recipient list.

The Signpost: 05 November 2014[edit]

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

Tech News: 2014-46[edit]

15:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 November 2014[edit]

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

Tech News: 2014-47[edit]

18:28, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIV, November 2014[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

RfC United States same-sex marriage map[edit]

I opened up an RfC for the U.S. same-sex marriage map due to the complicated situation of Kansas: RfC: How should we color Kansas? Prcc27 (talk) 21:14, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Bridal Veil Falls Ontario CA

Wikidata weekly summary #134[edit]

Tech News: 2014-48[edit]

19:31, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Bibliotecayuso
Wikipedia by Giulia Forsythe
Cronstedt sketchbooks 1729
Committed identity: 35caa4a267862279964ca051ed1a8eba14a3a4295aaeb8b9b47f980323618632437738f6675c8ba8a3db694ebffe9024216e6218cd86

2f44d9aa8fb7b2b2b8b5 is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

The Signpost: 26 November 2014[edit]

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

Wikidata weekly summary #135[edit]

The Signpost: 03 December 2014[edit]

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open![edit]

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #136[edit]

Tech News: 2014-50[edit]

17:11, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 December 2014[edit]

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

Wikidata weekly summary #137[edit]

Tech News: 2014-51[edit]