This user is a WikiGnome

User talk:Casliber

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive
Archives

Contents

Nomenclature of fungi[edit]

Hey there. I recently stumbled across an issue of Nova Hedwigia Beheift titled "the genera of fungi" (or was it agaricaceae?). It's filled to the brink with mind-numbing nomenclatural discussions of all the genera ever described (I think, anyway). Would it be any use if I looked up the specific ref or any specific genera? Circeus 00:20, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

That would be friggin' trés bién. The first one that would be absolutely great to get a clarification on is Agaricus which was called Psalliota in many texts fro many years and I've been mystified as to why. Other articles I intend cleaning up are Amanita muscaria, which is the one I intended taking to FA first but it just didn't come together well, Gyromitra esculenta as a future FA, Agaricus bisporus as a future FA, and cleaning up the destroying angels - Amanita virosa, Amanita bisporiga and Amanita verna. Boletus edulis would be a good one to check too. let me know if anything interesting pops up. I'll see ifd I can think of any other taxonomic quagmires later today. Work just got real busy :( cheers, Cas Liber | talk | contribs 02:01, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Generally, that's pretty arcane and only relevant to genus articles, or species that were tightly involving in defining them (for example, there seems to be an odd debate over the multiple type species for Amanita). I'll look up Agaricus, Amanita (since A. muscaria's the current type) and Psalliota. I'll also dig up the ref so you can look it up yourself, with any chance. Circeus 04:52, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Cool, keen to see what pops up. cheers, Cas Liber | talk | contribs 05:17, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
I only quickly thumbed through it and noted the full ref (Donk, M.A. (1962). "The generic names proposed for Agaricaceae". Beiheifte zur Nova Hedwigia 5: 1–320. ISSN 0078-2238. ) because I forgot about it until the last minute. Psalliota looks like a classic synonym case. It shares the same type with Agaricus, and might be older. Circeus 01:02, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Weird! I thought Linnaeus was calling all sorts of things Agaricus so I wonder how it could predate that really....anyway I am curious.cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:46, 16 June 2007 (UTC)


Okay, First thing I have to say is... Damn, 18th-19th century taxonomy and nomenclature of fungi is a right mess. Whose bright idea was it to give fungi 3 starting dates in the ICBN???

LOTS of "per" in citation here. See [1]

On Agaricus
Etym.: Possibly "from Agarica of Sarmatica, a district of Russia" (!). Note also Greek ἀγαρικ[1]όν "a sort of tree fungus" (There's been an Agaricon Adans. genus, treated by Donk in Persoonia 1:180)
Donk says Linnaeus' name is devalidated (so that the proper author citation apparently is "L. per Fr., 1821") because Agaricus was not linked to Tournefort's name (Linnaeus places both Agaricus Dill. and Amanita Dill. in synonymy), but truely a replacement for Amanita Dill., which would require that A. quercinus, not A. campestris be the type. This question compounded by the fact that Fries himself used Agaricus roughly in Linnaeus' sense (which leads to issues with Amanita), and that A. campestris was eventually excluded from Agaricus by Karsten and was apparently in Lepiota at the time Donk wrote this, commenting that a type conservation might become necessary.
All proposals to conserve Agaricus against Psalliota or vice versa have so far been considered superfluous.

References

  1. ^ Letter is script and looks like a Russian и.
On Lepiota
Etym. Probably greek λεπις, "scale"
Basionym is Agaricus sect. Lepiota Pers. 1797, devalidated by later starting date, so the citation is (Pers.) per S.F.Gray. It was only described, without species, and covered an earlier mentioned, but unnamed group of ringed, non-volvate species, regardless of spore color. Fries restricted the genus to white-spored species, and made into a tribe, which was, like Amanita repeatedly raised to genus rank.
The type is unclear. L. procera is considered the type (by Earle, 1909). Agaricus columbrinus (L. clypeolarus) was also suggested (by Singer, 1946) to avoid the many combination involved otherwise in splitting Macrolepiota, which include L. procera. Since both species had been placed into different genera prior to their selection (in Leucocoprinus and Mastocephalus respectively), Donk observes that a conservation will probably be needed, expressing support for Singer's emendation.
On Psalliota
Etym.: ψάλιον, "ring"
Psalliota was first published by Fries (1821) as trib. Psalliota. The type is Agaricus campestris (widely accepted, except by Earle, who proposed A. cretaceus). Kummer (not Quélet, who merely excluded Stropharia) was the first to elevate the tribe to a genus. Basically, Psalliota was the tribe containing the type of Agaricus, so when separated, it should have caused the rest of the genus to be renamed, not what happened. It seems to be currently not considered valid, or a junior homotypic synonym, anyway the explanation is that it was raised by (in retrospect) erroneously maintaining the tribe name.
On Amanita
Etym.: Possibly from Amanon,a mountain in Cilicia.

A first incarnation from Tentamen dispositionis methodicae Fungorum 65. 1797 is cited as devalidated: "Introduced to cover three groups already previously distinguished by Persoon (in [...] Tent. 18. 1797) under Agaricus L., but at that time not named. It is worth stressing that [The species now known as Amanita caesarea] was not mentioned."

With Agaricus L. in use, Amanita was a nomen nudum per modern standard, so Persoon gave it a new life unrelated to its previous incarnations, and that is finally published after a starting date by Hooker (the citation is Pers. per Hook., 1821). He reuses Withering's 1801 definition (A botanical arrangement of British plants, 4th ed.). "The name Amnita has been considered validly published on different occasions, depending on various considerations." Proposed types include (given as Amanita. Sometimes they were selected as Agarici):
  • A. livida Pers. (By Earle, in 1909). Had been excluded in Vaginata or Amanitopsis and could not be chosen.
  • A. muscaria Pers. (By Clemens & Shear, 1931) for the genus (1801) from Synopsis fungorum, was generally transferred to the one from Hooker's Flora of Scotland, which is currently considered the valid publication of Amanita (or was in the 50s).
  • A. phalloides (by Singer, 1936) for the 1801 genus.
  • A.bulbosa (by Singer & Smith, 1946) for Gray's republication. This is incorrect as Gray's A. bulbosa is a synonym of A. citrina. Some authors consider Gray to be the first valid republisher.
  • A. caeserea (by Gilbert, 1940). Troublesome because not known personally to Persoon or Fries.

Donk concludes the earliest valid type is A. muscaria, the species in Hooker, adding that he'd personally favor A. citrina.

The name has been republished three times in 1821: in Hooker, Roques and Gray (in that order). Roques maintained Persoon's circumscription, including Amanitopsis and Volvaria. Gray excluded Amanitopsis and Volvariella into Vaginata. Right after, Fries reset the name by reducing the genus to a tribe of Agaricus, minus pink-spored Volvariella. This tribe became a subgenus, than genus via various authors, Quélet, altough not the first, often being attributed the change. Sometimes it was used in a Persoonian sense (whether that is a correct use according to ICBN is not clear to me).
Homonyms of Amanita Pers. are Amanita adans. (1763, devalidated) and Amanita (Dill) Rafin. (1830)
On Boletus
Not including (Not in Agaricaceae, sorry).

Phew! Circeus 18:52, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

I hope you intend to clean that prose ASAP? It's definitely not article-worthy as is. Circeus 01:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
I'm working on it. Got distracted this morning...cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:08, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Pork[edit]

LOL, I love your sense of humour. Maimonedes is a good reference. The reality is that Islam takes food restrictions from Judaism; and Christianity doesn't have any restriction (courtesy of three references in the New Testament). The reason why pork should be restricted (along with many other things) is not given explicitly in the Hebrew Bible, hence Bible commentators have been offering guesses since ancient times. My own favourite, however, is Mary Douglas, wife of Louis Leakey, daughter of a Lutheran pastor. Her theory is excellent, based on her cultural anthropological observations, with a decent feel for how Biblical text works. It's rather an abstract theory though. Anyway, I'll see if I can manage a literature review of dietry restrictions in the ANE, especially if there's anything explicit about pork. Don't think I'll find a reference for "why" the pork taboo is in place, though, if it's documented, I'd have read about that in commentaries. Perhaps a clay tablet with the answer has been destroyed in only the last few years during the "troubles" in Iraq. :( Alastair Haines (talk) 21:27, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the great thing about uncertainty. Lacking an answer, the reports of Maimonides, Mary Douglas and the other guy mentioned are fascinating.Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:15, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Scotish pork taboo is a remarkable article! Thanks for that, lol. Alastair Haines (talk) 21:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Spotted this. I'll look for a ref to the Maimonides comment. The normal teaching is that pork is no more or less offensive to Jews than any other forbidden meat (dog, horse etc) or forbidden part of kosher animal (blood, Gid Hanasheh etc). The pig (NB pig, not pork - an important distinction which is relevant for the Maimonides comment too, I note) is "singled out" because it alone of the animals that have one of the two "signs" (it has split hooves but doesn't chew the cud) lies down with its legs sticking out. Most quarapeds have their legs folded under them. There's a midrashic lesson to be learned there, apparently, that the pig is immodestly and falsely proclaiming its religious cleanliness, when it is not. Anyway, that said, I'll look into the M comment - he was quite ahead of his time in terms of medical knowledge (check his biog). And NB my OR/POV antennae buzzed when I read that little section. --Dweller (talk) 22:52, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Someone has tagged the Religious restrictions on the consumption of pork for OR, though the talk page seems to indicate it is for a different reason....Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:03, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Hmm... makes me more dubious, but I'll check. btw... I'm not Alastair! --Dweller (talk) 23:10, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Have found good stuff, including online version of Maimonides text. I'll dump it here for you to use as you wish.

I maintain that the food which is forbidden by the Law is unwholesome. There is nothing among the forbidden kinds of food whose injurious character is doubted, except pork (Lev. xi. 7), and fat (ibid. vii. 23). But also in these cases the doubt is not justified. For pork contains more moisture than necessary [for human food], and too much of superfluous matter. The principal reason why the Law forbids swine's flesh is to be found in the circumstance that its habits and its food are very dirty and loathsome. It has already been pointed out how emphatically the Law enjoins the removal of the sight of loathsome objects, even in the field and in the camp; how much more objectionable is such a sight in towns. But if it were allowed to eat swine's flesh, the streets and houses would be more dirty than any cesspool, as may be seen at present in the country of the Franks.[1]

So, Maimonides argues "pork contains more moisture than necessary [for human food], and too much of superfluous matter", whatever that means! More importantly, the "principal reason" is that if you keep pigs, you end up with a dirty and unhealthy environment. Important note: Maimonides was writing from Islamic Egypt at the time, which is why he mentions "as may be seen at present in the country of the Franks." (ie France)

The comments about the pig's habit of lying with its legs outstretched come from Midrash Vayikra Rabba (ch 13) where it is mentioned as part of an elaborate metaphor, but not in connection with any reason for particularly abhorring the creature.

Hope that helps. --Dweller (talk) 09:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ Maimonides, Guide for the perplexed, Book III ch.48. Can be viewed online at http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/gfp/gfp184.htm

Alpha Centauri[edit]

I have unfortunately had to revert much of the changes you have made to the Alpha Centauri page - mainly to the structure revisions that you have done. While I agree it is best to standardise between bright star pages (i.e. Sirius), there is significant problems doing so to the Alpha Centauri page. The problem in previous edits is the confusion with Alpha Centauri the star and Alpha Centauri as a system. There was much about alpha centauri, especially its brightness compared to Arcturus as well as the relationship with Proxima Centauri. (See the Discussion with the associated page to this article.) It was thought best to avoid complexity by giving the basic information, and add complexity in sections so information could be understood at various levels of knowledge. Also as there is much interest in Alpha Centauri from children to amateur astronomers, it was best to give the introduction as brief as possible and explain the complexities as we go. As to modifications of articles as drastically as you have done to complex article, it might be better to do so with some discussion in the discussion section before doing so. Although I note that you have much experience in doing wiki edits, much better than me, it is better to make small changes in complex articles paragraph by paragraph than carte blanche changes. (I am very happy to discuss any issues on the article with you in the alpha centauri discussion to improve the article.)

As to the introduction, much of the additions you have made are actually speculative, and are not necessary on fact. I.e. "This makes it a logical choice as "first port of call" in speculative fiction about interstellar travel, which assumes eventual human exploration, and even the discovery and colonization of imagined planetary systems. These themes are common to many video games and works of science fiction." has little to do with the basic facts on alpha centauri. I.e. Nearest star, third brightest star, binary star, etc. As for "Kinematics" as a title, this is irrelevant (Sirius article also has it wrong). (Also see Discussion page for Alpha Centauri with SpacePotato) Note: I have contributed much to this page - 713 edits according to the statistics. (27th April 2008 to today) Arianewiki1 18:04, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

O-kay...taken it to the talk page.Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:29, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Bract pattern[edit]

Banksia menziesii cone.jpg

You know what I don't get? On page 245 of George (1981), and again on page 40 of Collins (2007), George gives a diagram showing the arrangement of unit inflorescences on a Banksia flower spike. Both diagrams clearly show a hexagonal layout; i.e. every common bract is surrounded by six equidistant common bracts, thus forming little hexagons. In support of this, George (1981) states "The unit inflorescences are so arranged on the axis that there are three pattern lines—vertical, and both dextral and sinistral spiral."

I haven't dissected an inflorescence, but in some species the pattern persists right through flowering and can be seen on the infructescence. You won't get a better example than this B. menziesii cone. Look at that pattern. There's no way you could call it hexagonal. It is a rectangular (or rather diamond, since the lines are diagonal) grid. Depending on how you define a neighbourhood, you could argue that each common bract has 4 or 8 neighbours, but there's no way you could argue for 6. Similarly, you could argue for two pattern lines (dextral and sinistral spiral) or four (dextral, sinistral, vertical and horizontal), but there is no way you could argue for 3, because there is no reason to include vertical whilst excluding horizontal). On top of that there is a beautiful symmetry in the way each common bract is surrounded by its own floral bracts and those of its neighbours. But George's diagrams destroy that symmetry.

I thought maybe B. menziesii was an exception to a general rule, but you can see the same diamond grid, though not as clearly, in File:Banksia serrata4.jpg, and I reckon (but am not certain) I can see it in my B. attenuata cone. And in File:Banksia prionotes mature cone.jpg too. What the heck is going on?

(I'm not just being a pretentious wanker here. I thought the diagram was interesting and informative enough for me to whip up an SVG version for Wikipedia. But since copying George's diagram isn't really on, and it is much better to go straight from nature if possible, I was basing my version on this B. menziesii cone. But it isn't going to work if the diagram shows a rectangular grid and the text has to say it is hexagonal.)

Hesperian 13:28, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for reminding me on this one - I think it was Alex (or Kevin??) who told me that every bract pattern was unique to a species and hence diagnostic, but as far as I know not much if anything has been published on this area. The similarity between archaeocarpa and attenuata was noted (the bract pattern remaining in the fossils). I seem to recall feeling bamboozled as well by the description when I read it some time ago. I will have to refresh myself with some bedtime reading....Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:50, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Update: I had a look at the pages in question in the banksia book(s), there is a little bit more in the 1981 monograph but not much. I meant to ring Alex George about this and should do so in the next few days...I guess the photos look sort of like hexagons stretched vertically :P Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:46, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Dipsacus fullonum Just passing through. I am not an expert with flora but I do take photos now and again. Does this image from my personal collection help or hinder your discussion? I see diamonds --Senra (talk) 12:58, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
Haha yeah. Not a bad comparison at all. a diamond pattern it is there as well. You sorta let your eyes go a little out of focus and see two diagonal lines....Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:12, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Question[edit]

If this is what developing flower pairs look like...
then what are these brown and white furry things?

I note that the last six images to be posted on your talk page were posted by me. I'm not sure whether to apologise....

What is going on in the lower image? Clearly this is an inflorescence in very early bud, but those furry white things are apparently not developing flower pairs. Are they some kind of protective bract or something?

Hesperian 01:24, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

You certainly see those thingies on the developing buds of alot of banksias. I'd be intrigued what the Nikulinsky book, which is essentially a series of plates of a developing menziesii inflorescence, says (not sure, I don't recall whether it had commentary...). Another thing to look up. Was about to look up the patterns just now. Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:35, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Now I have looked at the books and bract architecture, question is are they common bracts or are they something which falls off (don't think so but..). Something else to ask Alex. Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:49, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Having found nothing in George, I've been reading Douglas's stuff on ontogeny of Proteaceae flowers, and found nothing there either.

If you snap a spike axis in half, they are just that brown colour, and essentially made of closely packed fuzz. I wonder if there is initially no gap in the axis for the flower to grow, so the developing flower literally has to shove some of the axis out in front of it as it extends. This would explain everything except for the white tip. Hesperian 10:23, 2 September 2009 (UTC)


I have today taken a long lunch and gone bushwalking with Gnangarra. While he took happy-snaps, I did some OR on this question. My diagnosis is: these are peduncles that have developed common bracts, but have not yet developed floral bracts or flowers.

In very young spikes like the one pictured here, they are not yet very densely packed together, so they can be perceived as individual peduncles. Given time, they will continue to grow, and as they do so they will become more and more densely packed together, until eventually they are jammed together so tightly that their dense coverings of hairs form the fibrous brown material that comprises a typical flower spike, and the common bracts at their apex will form the bract pattern on the surface of the spike. At that point, they will no longer be distinguishable as individual peduncles, but will simply be part of the spike.

When the flowers start to develop, they get squeezed together even more. At this point, sometimes, a peduncle may break off the axis and be squeezed right out of the spike as the flowers around it develop. Thus you may see one or two of these furry things sitting at random positions on the surface of a developed flower spike.

As evidence for this hypothesis I offer the following observations:

  1. Wherever one of those "furry things" is found loose on the surface of a spike, you will also find a gap in the bract pattern beneath it, where the common bract is absent;
  2. "Furry things" may occasionally be found partly out of the spike, but partly in, in which cases the white tip is quite obviously the common bract. In such cases removal of the "furry thing" leaves behind a visible hole in the spike where a common bract ought to be.

Hesperian 05:58, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Interesting - Gah! Forgot to ring Alex - evening is a crazy time with little availability for me, but will see what I can do. Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:57, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Not OR any more. Look at the picture of "Banksia flower bud seen in profile" here: clear evidence of the common and floral bracts forming one of those little furry upside-down pyramids, with the flower arising from it. Hesperian 03:38, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

On a tangential point, the first image would most likely pass FPC if it ever finds a home that is appropriate. Noodle snacks (talk) 06:55, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Hmmm, okay, hopefully Hesperian will see this thread. :) Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:31, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Gosh, would it really?! I was quite proud of it but a bit unsure whether it had enough depth of field. But if I'll take anyone's word that it would probably pass, I'll take Noodle snacks. :-) Hesperian 23:27, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Parrot stuff[edit]

doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2009.08.021

is not finalized, but the preprint is ready and formatted. It may well be one of the most comprehensive and beautiful papers on the topic of Psittaciformes evolution. Only gripe: it still does not consider the fossil record fully. Is doi:10.1080/08912960600641224

really so hard to get? 2 cites in 3 years for what is essentially the baseline review is far too little... even Mayr does not cite it - granted, most is not Paleogene, but still...).

But that does not affect the new paper much, since they remain refreshingly noncommitted on the things they cannot reliably assess from their data. And data they have a lot. Also always nice to see geography mapped on phylogenetic trees. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 01:19, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

PDFs sent... let me know if need anything else. Sasata (talk) 08:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Thx :) Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:39, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Banksia menziesii with persistent florets[edit]

Banksia menziesii inflorescence with persistent florets.jpg
Banksia menziesii with persistent florets.jpg

While I was out a-walking in the bush one day last week, I spied a banksia with an unfamiliar jizz. Even on closer inspection I was bamboozled for half a minute until the pieces fell together and I realised I was looking at a B. menziesii with persistent florets. Not just a bit late to fall: there were old cones from previous seasons with the florets still bolted on. In fact, there wasn't a single bald cone on the whole tree. I've never seen anything like it. Have you? Hesperian 04:42, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Hmm..interesting. I have not ever noticed a menziesii like this, but not to say it can't happen. Might it be a menziesii/prionotes hybrid - how far is the tree from you? I'd compare the newgrowth/leaf dimensions/trunk all for comparison. Did it have any new flowers? Some of these old cones have an aura of prionotes about them...Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:11, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
prionotes crossed my mind at first, but the bark is that of menziesii, and nothing like the distinctive prionotes bark. And the flower spikes lack the woolliness of old prionotes florets.

It's quite near my place; about ten minutes drive. Even closer to where Alex lives (assuming he still lives at the address he has been publishing under lately): only five minutes drive from there I would guess. If it's prionotes (which it isn't), then we've extended the known range of that species 10km south. Likewise, a hybrid means there's a prionotes population nearby, so it amounts to the same thing. Hesperian 05:30, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Banksiamyces again[edit]

I finally made it to the library and got a hold of the article you had asked about a couple of weeks ago. There's enough info there to make DYK-worthy stubs on the genus, and three of the species (macrocarpus, katerinae, toomanis), or, alternatively, maybe enough for a GA on the genus. What are the chances of images? Apparently these fungi make small but visible apothecia on the seed capsules. Berkeley and Broome first wrote about the fungus in 1887, so maybe there's a sketch from the protologue that's useable. Anyway, I'll start adding text in a day or two and maybe we can have the first Banksia/Fungi wikiproject collaboration? Sasata (talk) 14:25, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Berkeley & Broome (1887) is online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/13683 — see page 217. There is a picture at Plate 29 figure 18. Hesperian 02:09, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
That's a nice image on plate 29 there. They call it Tympanis toomanis on page 224 decription of plate. How do we capture that image and replicate it on commons? Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Like this. Hesperian 03:37, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
On page 222, they talk about finding it on a banksia cone near the Tooma River in southern NSW, which leaves me thinking it is a cone of Banksia marginata although they do not state this (OR alert ++++). Funny looking marginata cone but marginata is a hugely variable species....Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Check your email; I've sent you a copy of Beaton (1982), where they do state that the cone is B. marginata. (You guys should have asked me first; I could have saved Sasata a walk to the library.) Hesperian 03:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
@Sasata - I'll leave it up to you whether a solid GA and one DYK for the whole shebang, or 4 species articles - you've got the material and I am happy either way. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Am working on the article behind-the-scenes now... that picture you uploaded is excellent, and thanks Hesp for finding the protologue. Too bad the scan resolution is so crappy; I can upload a screen capture/crop to Commons, but will first investigate to see if there's a copy of the original around here so I might rescan at higher resolution. Four DYKs and 1 GA doesn't sound unreasonable for the lot, but I'll see what I can come up with. Sasata (talk) 03:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
The resolution is good. I guess you were looking at it at 25%. Try zooming in. Hesperian 03:40, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, it'll do the trick. I gave the article a good push towards GA. Hesp, do you have easy access to Beaton 1984, or maybe Fuhrer, B,; May, T. (1993). "Host specificity of disc-fungi in the genus Banksiamyces on Banksia." Victorian Naturalist (South Yarra) 110 (2):73-75? I think once those two are located and added, that'll be it from journals (but you may find stuff to add from your Banksia books?). I could start stubs for the species, but it would be a shame to have to leave out B. maccannii. Sasata (talk) 07:09, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
I can probably get Vic Naturalist at UNSW Library next tuesday or friday (slim chance on weekend). Casliber (talk · contribs) 07:25, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
When you get to Victorian Naturalist, you'll also want to grab Sommerville, K.; May, T. (2006). "Some taxonomic and ecological observations on Banksiamyces". The Victorian Naturalist 123: 366–375.  Hesperian 08:43, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for finding that, wonder why it didn't show up in my database search. Cas, if it's too mush hassle for you to get these, let me know and I can order them, would take 1-2 weeks to get here.
I'll have easy access to Beaton (1984) on Monday. No access to Victorian Naturalist. Hesperian 08:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, forgot again. I've just scanned it now. Cas: I'll forward shortly; if you have Sasata's email address, can you forward it on please? Otherwise, Sasata: send me an email so I know where to send this scan. Hesperian 04:16, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
I don't see any email link on your user page... I can wait until Cas forward a copy. Thanks kindly Sasata (talk) 15:25, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
I guess you've never noticed the "Email this user" link in the sidebar toolbox.... Hesperian 23:22, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
! Wouldya look at that... That's embarrassing! Now excuse me while I go give eyewitness testimony in a murder trial. Sasata (talk) 23:46, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Hang on a sec, will send. Also, will be near the library again for Vic Naturalist. Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:03, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Hahaha. Fantastic. I just realised I never uplaoded a funny photo I took in WA a few years ago. I need to double check.
This old cone of Banksia violacea had these dark objects on it which might be a fungus as they certainly weren't on any other cones I saw about the place.
Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:25, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

As OZtrylia has a notoriously under described rang of and field of mycology study - any signs of further fungi or algae work is to be encouraged at all points SatuSuro 01:51, 19 February 2010 (UTC)


Taking pity on poor Cas, whose Banksia books are still packed up in boxes:

From Collins, Collins and George (2008), page 47, first paragraph of a section entitled "Fungi and lichens":

"Many kinds of fungi are associated with Banksias. There is even a genus of fungi named for their association with these plants—Banksiamyces. The first species of these was recognised in the 1880s and placed in the genus Tympanis, then in the 1950s transferred to the genus Encoelia. Further collections and research led to the description of the genus Banksiamyces by Beaton and Weste in 1982, with two further species. Six taxa are now recognised, so far known from 13 species of Banksia (Sommerville & May, 2006). Commonly known as banksia discs, they have all been found on eastern Australian Banksias and one is also known in Western Australia. They are discomycete fungi, growing on the fruit and appearing as small, shallow dark cups on the follicles (Fuhrer, 2005). When dry they fold inwards and look like narrow slits. Their effect is unk[n]own but it seems unlikely that they are responsible for degradation of the seeds."

At the bottom of the page there is a photo of Banksiamyces on B. lemanniana. They look like little light grey maggots on the follicles. Based on the photo and textual description, I would suggest that the B. violacea photo doesn't show this genus. Hesperian 11:17, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Hmmm, that's what I initially thought when I read the description and sketches in Beaton 1982, but after seeing B&B's 1872 sketches, I was pretty sure Cas's pic was a Banksiamyces. I guess I should reserve judgment until I get more info. Sasata (talk) 17:09, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
From the abstract of Somerville and May 2006: "Apothecia of these crops are of different macroscopic appearance, with lighter apothecia being mostly immature, and darker apothecia producing spores." ... so who knows? Sasata (talk) 17:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Anything else to add to this article? Shall we put it up for GAN? Sasata (talk) 17:39, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Yeah put it up, there might be some bits and pieces. I'll take a look. Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:32, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Any Banksia experts you're chums with that might be able to give a confirmation on your putative Banksiamyces photo? Sasata (talk) 05:45, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
damn, I meant to contact Tom May about it (who has been helpful before). Will dig up his email and see what he says. Casliber (talk · contribs) 07:09, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

More bedtime reading[edit]

[2]—the most recent phylogeny and dating of Proteaceae. Easy to miss with such an obscure title. Hesperian 12:08, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Abraham Halpern[edit]

You may want to have a look there as well. Appears to have been improved by a Szasz fan. I've read diagonally this article, but even that doesn't seem to support the light in which the Halpern-Szasz issue is presented in Wikipedia. Tijfo098 (talk) 13:19, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Just go back from a weekend break with no innernet..now where was I.....Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:21, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Figs[edit]

Okay, I'm giving my impression on F. maxima, since I'm not clear what you are actually asking. The description, I must say, is a particularly lacking part of the article under any evaluation criterion. Even as one who appreciates the topic, I'm finding the taxonomy section very confusing. As in Entoloma sinuatum, I'll gladly have a look into rewriting it if you want me to. The huge list of synonym suggest there is significant variation in the plant, possibly infraspecific taxa? I agree the Reproduction section is possibly too detailed. It can probably be reduced to a 2-paragraph primer and merged into "Ecology", though I have a hard time identifying what is species (or could be!) species-specific and what is not, as I have no familiarity with the plants in question (not to mention I am not an actual plant scientist even compared to you).

One of the greater-scale problem I see, which you might want to work on if you're going to take aim at several of these articles, is that information on the peculiar reproduction suystem in figs as a whole is spread across multiple articles (the genus article, Common fig and other species, syconium) and poorly focused, leaving no good article to aim {{main}} links at. I suspect using syconium as he main article and linking to it from others (including Ficus) might be, in the long run, the best course of action. Circéus (talk) 02:56, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Sounds good. Don't worry about rewriting anything yet. I was looking at overall meta-article structure WRT reproduction, which you've given me a good idea to work with. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:21, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

FYI[edit]

All of the following species are worth 2x points; let me know if you'd be interested in collaborating in one or more for bonus points in a later round. Sasata (talk) 06:54, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Hahaha - thank heavens for European mushrooms :))) - yeah, I'd like to buff Clitocybe nuda (which was one of the yummiest mushrooms I've eaten), and we really should be improving the other mass-eaten edibles. Also I buffed the sickener for DYK so would be good to finish the job....Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Ok, I'll move Clitocybe nuda and Russula emetica closer to the top of "the list". I agree the popular edibles would be good to do as well, but they're hard ... we'll see how free time & motivation plays out over the next few months. Sasata (talk) 19:05, 6 February 2012 (UTC)


Constellation task force assessment[edit]

Certainly Assessment boxes like the one for the cardiology task force are made by User:WP 1.0 bot. Just post to talk there and it can make your box easily. —Justin (koavf)TCM 18:37, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for that! I've not used bots in my time here. Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:07, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Aboriginal Astronomy[edit]

Hi Casliber - thanks for your note. Yes there's quite a bit more out there which Duane Hamacher and I are slowly trying to get written up. You can find some more stuff on www.emudreaming.com and you may find some papers you havent come across on http://www.atnf.csiro.au/people/rnorris/papers/papers.htm

Have fun! RayNorris (talk) 03:34, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Great! I'll have a look and if I find anything specific to nag you on...I will :) cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:49, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Gene migration research, India --> Australia[edit]

This http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21569688-genetic-evidence-suggests-four-millennia-ago-group-adventurous-indians points to a gene study you may be interested in.... Likely people from the Indian sub-continent mixed with Australian aboriginies 4xxxx years ago. An maybe brought dingos. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 09:24, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Will read anon. Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:59, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Glasser's choice theory[edit]

Could use some work if you're interested. Someone not using his real name (talk) 09:36, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

ok - will take a look soonish....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:14, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Orange-bellied Parrot[edit]

Neophema99 (talk) 07:58, 19 February 2014 (UTC) Hi. I would like to open for discussion the format of the entry for 'Orange-bellied Parrot'. As news occurs in the recovery program for this species, the limitations of the current format of the Wikipedia entry become more obvious. The heading, 'Conservation Status' should, I believe, be reserved for the actual conservation status in Australia, and in the three states, SA, Tasmania and Victoria. What follows after that, but still under that heading, at present, is a running commentary of events since about 2010. This is not acceptable. I propose another heading be inserted, 'Recovery Program' or similar. In it, a short history of the OBP recovery program could be given - since 1980 or so - and then, new events could be smoothly inserted as they happen. What do others think? The Wikipedia entry is an important first port of call for many people interested in this bird. We owe it to them, and to history, to provide a better entry.

Neophema99 (talk) 07:58, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Agreed. Will take a look. sounds good - helps with seamless updating and no doubt there is a lot of info that could be added. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:52, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Obsolete Constellations[edit]

I just found an amazing source for articles on them: John Hill's Urania Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:55, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Cool! I was judt giving some feedback to core contest and will look at stub. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:00, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Urania's Mirror has gotten a wee bit less stubby. Adam Cuerden (talk)


got any advice for writing a constellation FA?[edit]

Thinking of diversifying and trying Corona B. Double sharp (talk) 16:17, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

It's easier than stars as there is less hardcore physics involved, but trickier as you have to make the material not "listy", which it sort of is by very nature. Smaller constellations are easier as there is less material to list generally. Star guide books, alot of which are on google, are good for general overview, how to find things, what's next to what etc. but alot of their factual info (distance/luminosity) is outdated. I have even suspected this in newer reprints/editions where new material is coming out. SIMBAD is a godsend and makes finding other material easy. I was using it as a ref itself but probably better to use the refs it cites. Overall I find astronomy articles more challenging than biology ones - trickeir to make engaging. We can collaborate on CrB if you like as I did plan on taking it All the Way at some point and then having it as a double mainpage with CrA. Collaborating is good as it makes for less work in some ways - each of us can copyeidt the other etc. 20:43, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Just popping in during some of the rare free time I have at the moment to say that the hardest part of the constellation articles is figuring out exactly what objects to write about, since there is generally quite a bit of discretion in whether or not something should be in the article. I generally try to write about all stars brighter than magnitude 5.0, and the most-studied astronomical objects within the constellation, as well as a few other things such as extremes (e.g. R136a1) and unusual objects. One tip to find notable stars, I've found, is this SIMBAD query, which lists all Bayer, Flamsteed, and variable stars in each constellation by number of refs. Of course further research is necessary for other stars without said designations, but it's a good start. I would help, but I don't anticipate having much free time at all until at least December. StringTheory11 (t • c) 21:18, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
StringTheory11 Wow! Great idea/find! That really helps. Agree with what you've said. I think it is good to get these in order as it also highlights what other articles are underdone or incorrect etc. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:51, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Yup the small size was part of the reason I chose CrB (it's not the only reason though :-P). I'm cool with a collaboration. ST11's suggestions, as always, make a lot of sense. Going to read through some constellation FAs to get an idea of what to write – not least CrA... Double sharp (talk) 02:38, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Double sharp, I have started buffing with this one. Just arting with the brighter stars - SIMBAD is best place to start and then chasing refs. Not sure how much you know about them (figuring distance from parallax etc...) so just ask away..or start on deep sky objects and I'll continue with stars (??) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:05, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Carcinoma in situ[edit]

The carcinoma in situ page has been updated and it explains the different views that sometimes carcinoma in situ is seen as a cancer and sometimes it is not. You will probably remember earlier this year that you supported changing my use of the term "invasive cancer" to "cancer". The expression "invasive cancer" is used frequently in books particularly when talking about cancer of the cervix and in my opinion using the term "invasive cancer" can improve clarity. What do you think of the explanations in the carcinoma in situ article? Snowman (talk) 13:13, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

As it reads right now, which ones are you thinking should have invasive added to them? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:35, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Whoops, I have phrased it badly above, but you seem to have understood me. I should have said that you did not support my use of "invasive cancer" and you preferred the use of "cancer" instead. Actually, to me, it is not as simple as just inserting the word "invasive". Back then, I saw a better phrase in a reference and I thought about using it, because I thought that it would be accurate, readable, and I hoped keep everyone happy; however, the situation become unnecessarily tense and I felt like I was walking on eggs (and you know what that means). I did not get around to developing the article any further nor mentioning the "magical" phrase. I will see if I can find the phrase again. I recall that the solution was to use a short phrase in the place of cancer or invasive cancer in the introduction. I am talking in riddles at the present time, because I want to make sure that I can find that phrase again, and that will mean thinking about the introduction again. Snowman (talk) 20:32, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Okay, let me know what you are thinking of once you get it clear. It is an intriguing question. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:56, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
I would recommend the amendment belew, because the demarcation between non-cancer and cancer varies according to the literature, as we have seen, and this is made more difficult by a simplified language and vocabulary used to communicate the complex situation to patients. A definition of cancer that includes in-situ cancer is well established, but perhaps the world of the cytologist or histopathologist is a small world, where to say "invasive cancer" is not unusual. This is the current line in the introduction; "Cervical cytology tests can often detect precursors of cervical cancer and enable early successful treatment.". I think that it would be more accurate if it said something like; "The main aim of cervical cytology screening is to detect precursors of cancer and early cervical cancer to enable early successful treatment.". In this new line a full spectrum from viral changes to dysplasia to carcinoma-in-situ to early invasive cancer is included, so the controversy over where to put the non-cancer/cancer line disappears, and the meaning is clear no matter where the reader puts the line in his or her own mind-map. Snowman (talk) 13:05, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
I reworded it like this to make it flow better yet be inclusive and cover all interpretations. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:24, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
After some deep thought, I think that your edit is good enough. Snowman (talk) 14:09, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
  • What do you think about making a joint nomination with me to take the cervix article to FA review sometime? I would not be planning to edit much of the "History" and "Other animals" sections, because I do not know much about those topics. I am not usually on the nominator's side of the fence, but I would be willing to step into that role here, partly to test the water. Snowman (talk) 13:29, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
I think it is a good idea - the prerequisites for being a nominator are being reasonably familar with the article and having the ability to address issues raised at FAC. Do you see anything else that needs fixing before listing it at FAC? 02:15, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Oh good. I would like to have a long look at the article before FA nomination, and I expect that I will not feel happy with the article as a potential FA nomination for several weeks. There is some content and page organization in the article (as it is now) that I would like to reflect on. The peer review is also worth re-visiting to see what was not achieved there. I will probably attempt to start a few discussions on the article talk page where relevant. Do you have any time frame in mind or any particular schedule of your own to work around? Of course, I would ask you to constructively criticize my work whenever you think that anything can be improved, and I will try to focus on the issue and answer honestly and objectively trying not to be fractious nor stubborn, with a view to learning from my errors. It think that it will work better like that, than keeping quite or not speaking up when you do not agree with your co-nominator. I am saying that because I guessed that you have not felt easy about not supporting your co-nominator in FA reviews previously. Also, as before, please be alert to my writing style, which can sometimes need re-phrasing owing to clumsy grammar, although the content is often unambiguous (to me at least). Apart from that, it could be challenging writing for general readers and even more challenging writing for specialist readers that are unfamiliar with the small world of histopathology. Snowman (talk) 12:08, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Snowmanradio I have no time scale on this so it sorta takes as long as it takes. The refs need fixing for page numbers. The material is pretty good - only thing from PR left is double checking lymphatic drainage really I thought. Anyway. Posting things step by step on talk page is good. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:39, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
  • I would have though that the "Function" heading would be about normal function. Surly, putting a barrier in front of the cx is not a normal function of the cervix. Also, oc pills are more about pharmacology and modified functioning of the cervix. Should the "Contraception" heading have its own level-2 heading? This has been discussed before, but it is worth starting another discussion on the talk page about this? Snowman (talk) 21:42, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
I think that the human altering of function is fine there. I think it is fine as a level 3 heading underneath function Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:10, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
When medicines affect function, it is called pharmacology. Snowman (talk) 22:49, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
  • In the introduction; "... the cervix is usually between 2 and 3 cm long and roughly round in shape". Change to: ?
1. "... the cervix is cylindrically shaped usually between 2 and 3 cm long and roughly round in cross section".
2. "... the cervix is usually between 2 and 3 cm long and roughly round in in cross section" Snowman (talk) 17:30, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

I think the first one or something like it - will take a look now. I wonder if the fact it is roughly cylindrical makes saying it's round in cross-section redundant. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:22, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Your amendment looks find to me. Snowman (talk) 11:32, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Should there be more consistency in using {{main| under more of the headings where there is an obvious main article else where? Snowman (talk) 11:49, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
Snowmanradio Yes that sounds like a good idea. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 18:54, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
OK, I expect that I will add some when I do some editing there. Snowman (talk) 20:47, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Re Vaginal portion of cervix. Have you got any ideas on what to do with this article on the portio (or ectocervix)? I do not know why WP Anatomy has so many articles on sub-parts. If relevant, I expect that a formal discussion would be needed to consider a merge. Snowman (talk) 20:47, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
I think it should be merged. Will post something. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:42, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
I plan to watch for a while and express an opinion, if needed. Snowman (talk) 22:49, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
It is off to a good start over there. I think that there is nothing on the unreferenced portio page that can be copied over to the cervix page. We could start planing how to present the portio (and its various names) on the cervix page. Snowman (talk) 12:04, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
  • In have found what to me looks like a 2003 copyrighted version of File:Cervix dilation sequence.svg, so I have started a deletion discussion on Commons. Commons administrators will now have a look at it. Initially, I left an message with the uploader on Commons to ask a technical question about the image, and I noticed that he is currently blocked for three months, so I did a search for other copies of the cervix dilation image. The image should show the babies head moving down the birth canal as the cervix dilates, but the head looks stuck. The image is on about a dozen or more Wikis, so they might all be removed by a bot in due course. I am not sure if the image needs removing from the Cervix page at this juncture or not, so I wonder what you think about removal from the en Wiki. Snowman (talk) 09:01, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Oh dear - I suspect it will have to be removed, though maybe hold for a moment and see if an explanation is forthcoming. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:23, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
I recently found a photograph of a rare parrot with the wrong copyright and it was deleted from Commons one week after I started the deletion discussion. Snowman (talk) 14:23, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
That sounds in keeping with deletion discussions elsehwere - around 1 week. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:17, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Update: Image was deleted this yesterday. Snowman (talk) 13:10, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • The Cervical cancer article has had a lot of work on it since about June, and it is well worth looking at. I expect that we could shorten (or otherwise amend) the section on cervical cancer in the "cervix" article, because the "cervical cancer" article offers a good readable account. Snowman (talk) 12:40, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
@Snowmanradio: I will take a look. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:05, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Re HPV vaccines. Sometimes, I like to tidy up the linked pages. This article was moved from the singular to the pleural in March 2014. I am aware that there is more than one HPV vaccine, but I would expect this to be on the singular name, unless there something controversial about it that I have missed. Snowman (talk) 12:59, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
@Snowmanradio: yes that is unusual and I think I prefer it at singular. I think it is worth discussing on the talk page. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:05, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • The "Anatomical abnormalities" section looks like a mixture of acquired and congenital diseases. Could this be organized differently? I nearly did a reorganization, but a little re-organization does not change much, and I suspect that it would be easier to do a bit of a re-write. Also, it may be possible to expand the section with a little about the developmental abnormalities of the female genital tract seen in Cryptophthalmos syndrome, Johanson-Blizzard syndrome, Rokitansky Anomalod, and as less commonly seen in Roberts syndrome and Trisomy 18 syndrome. These diseases are not at the front of my mind, however these are in the index of my rather old second-hand book on human malformation. This is not a small change, so I welcome your opinion. Snowman (talk) 13:34, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
@Snowmanradio: let me take a look. I don't recall it right now and I thought I was happy with it before but will look. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:05, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
I have become unexpectedly busy in real life, so I have not had much time for editing the Wiki. I hope that I will be able to contribute with more editing and work on the cervix article again after about two or three months . Snowman (talk) 10:03, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
@Snowmanradio: no worries. I found that I have lost interest in it. My free time (of which I have little) has to be enjoyable and thus something I have real enthusiasm for. I found I did get a bit enthusiastic about this one but comes and goes. More interested in frigatebird and brachychiton rupestris now. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:11, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Also orange-bellied parrot - very interesting story. I find writing about extinct species makes me sad (I leave them to FunkMonk) but rare ones are ok. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:12, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Apart from manual editing, I was hoping to write a few scripts for fun to do scanning and mass editing tasks on the Wiki this Autumn and Winter, but can not participate in a meaningful way at the present time. I plan to return when I can and I will look to see what you and User FunkMonk are doing then. Incidentally, have you any thoughts on why discussions about anatomy topics tend to be rather brittle? I might ask that question on the WP Anatomy talk page. Snowman (talk) 10:49, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
What do you mean by 'brittle'? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:30, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
I will ask open-ended questions instead. Do you have any observations about discussions on anatomy topics? Snowman (talk) 12:48, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Precious again[edit]

wildflowers and birds

Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg

Thank you for the rare wild life you cover, making this project more beautiful and showing that protection of precious lfe is needed. You won my heart placing daisies on the Main page, - my favourite flowers! Did you know that the section of treasured entries on my talk is titled Flowers? Did you know that several birds were recently translated to Swedish, including the Blue-winged Pitta and the last finch? - Repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (15 December 2008, 30 April 2009, 19 February 2012)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:12, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Three years ago, you were the 75th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, and thinking of that continued stability for the protection of precious life helps fighting sadness, - thank you! Between two birds as TFA in fast succession, look for a third, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

(chuckle) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:31, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. Tough these days. As soon as I finished Martin Petzoldt I came across Maria Radner, can't edit that without emotion, but have to, looking at thousands of readers each day so far. (+ I try hard not to look at the arb case request with a victim although to be declined. Sad, can use all cheering to keep singing like the birds.) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:43, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Today, the bird constellation, thank you again, - did you read mine (mentioned under recents)? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:59, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Yeah...was nice. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:31, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Johnsonia pubescens[edit]

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 14, 2015)[edit]

Man rummaging thought a skip.jpg

A man garbage picking through a skip (dumpster)

Hello, Casliber.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Garbage picking


Previous selections: Antagonist • Dinner


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:08, 30 March 2015 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

DYK for Pseudomugil gertrudae[edit]

Allen3 talk 00:11, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement[edit]

Flest utökade.svg
  • Hello Casliber:
Please consider participating in this week's vote for TAFI's upcoming Week 17 collaboration. Last week's voting did not receive many participants. Thanks for your consideration. North America1000 16:20, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk back[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Casliber. You have new messages at User talk:The Herald/Talkback.
Message added 05:31, 1 April 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DYK nomination of Melaleuca trichophylla[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Melaleuca trichophylla at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:38, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Corona Borealis Supercluster[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Corona Borealis Supercluster at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Wasted Time R (talk) 10:38, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Microscopium[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Microscopium you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Curly Turkey -- Curly Turkey (talk) 07:40, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Microscopium[edit]

The article Microscopium you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Microscopium for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Curly Turkey -- Curly Turkey (talk) 12:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Calectasia cyanea[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Calectasia cyanea at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:00, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi, are you adding something else to the article, or can I approve it now? Yoninah (talk) 21:20, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
finished now. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:20, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Hey, we're overlapping edits. Please see my new note on the nomination template. Yoninah (talk) 21:22, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement[edit]

Flest utökade.svg
  • Hello Casliber:
This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 18 of 2015. Thanks for participating!
Sent by User:Northamerica1000 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:26, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Melaleuca trichophylla[edit]

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 15, 2015)[edit]

Roue primitive.png

The wheel is one of the most famous and useful inventions in the history of technology

Hello, Casliber.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

History of technology


Previous selections: Garbage picking • Antagonist


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

Your DYK nomination of Culex annulirostris[edit]

Hi, as you probably know, the maximum allowed length of a DYK hook is 200 characters, but the one you supplied is 225, excluding "(pictured)" which doesn't count. The hook will have to be edited or replaced with a shorter one. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 00:47, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

whoops. On it. ok, stuck to the main/broad problematic diseases. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:48, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Happy Easter![edit]

All the best! "Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (talk) 02:07, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank You /DYK Dyslexia[edit]

that is very kind of you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

a pleasure. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Smooth toadfish[edit]

Thank you Victuallers (talk) 00:01, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Calectasia cyanea[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

American Politics 2 arbitration evidence phase closing soon[edit]

As a listed party to this case, this is a notification that the evidence phase of this case is closing soon on 14 April. If you have additional evidence that you wish to introduce for consideration, it must be entered before this date. On behalf of the committee, Lankiveil (speak to me) 01:58, 12 April 2015 (UTC).

Today's articles for improvement[edit]

Flest utökade.svg
  • Hello Casliber:
This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 19 of 2015. Thanks for participating!
Sent by User:Northamerica1000 on 12:00, 12 April 2015 (UTC) using Mass message sender.

This week's article for improvement (week 16, 2015)[edit]

CurvedSopranoAltoTenorSaxophoneComparison.jpg

A saxophone is an example of an aerophone.

Hello, Casliber.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Aerophone


Previous selections: History of technology • Garbage picking


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 01:25, 13 April 2015 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

Links to Google books[edit]

I was of the impression that page links to Google Books (as in Butis humeralis) are discouraged, however that is apparently not the case as per Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Linking to Google Books pages. Apologies :) --Elmidae (talk) 08:33, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

No worries Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:25, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Invitation[edit]

Musical note nicu bucule 01.svg

Evidence closed[edit]

The evidence phase is now closed on the American Politics 2 arbitration case, which you are a named party to. You are welcome to add proposals at the workshop. For the Committee, --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Myriophyllum variifolium DYK nomination[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Myriophyllum variifolium at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America1000 02:13, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Culex annulirostris[edit]

Allen3 talk 00:24, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Corona Borealis Supercluster[edit]

Allen3 talk 00:05, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Myriophyllum variifolium[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 20:32, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Rabies[edit]

Hi could you send me the article I requested at resource exchange? i really need it. LittleJerry (talk) 00:49, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Ok. I'll take a look and see if I can get it. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:58, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 17, 2015)[edit]

Niger sat.png

A satellite image demonstrating the Geography of Niger

Hello, Casliber.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Geography of Niger


Previous selections: Aerophone • History of technology


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:08, 20 April 2015 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

Today's articles for improvement[edit]

Flest utökade.svg
  • Hello Casliber:
This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 20 of 2015. Thanks for participating!
Sent by User:Northamerica1000 using mass messaging

Pinniped[edit]

Would you like to nominate Pinniped for TFA? My last one. LittleJerry (talk) 20:27, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Sure - will do a bit later. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:45, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

American politics 2 workshop phrase[edit]

Hello Casliber, the workshop phase on the American politics 2 arbitration case, which you are listed as a party to, has been extended to 24 April 2015. This is the best opportunity to express your analysis of the evidence presented in this arbitration case. For the Committee, --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Hibbertia dentata[edit]

Thanks for your help Victuallers (talk) 22:01, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Corona Borealis question[edit]

In case you don't notice it, I've left a question for you here. Eric Corbett 18:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement[edit]

Flest utökade.svg
  • Hello Casliber:
This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 21 of 2015. Thanks for participating!
Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 00:43, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Corona Borealis[edit]

Hi Cas, I've responded to your ping re Corona. Let me know if you've any queries, and I'll monitor the talk page. Also, ping me when it's back at FAC. Cheers, hamiltonstone (talk) 11:03, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks - much appreciated. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:42, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Hillary Rodham Clinton - Move Discussion[edit]

Hi,

This is a notification to let you know that there is a requested move discussion ongoing at Talk:Hillary_Rodham_Clinton/April_2015_move_request#Requested_move. You are receiving this notification because you have previously participated in some capacity in naming discussions related to the article in question.

Thanks. And have a nice day. NickCT (talk) 18:32, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 18, 2015)[edit]

The Dam (2890371280).jpg

Hydroelectric dams use hydropower to generate electricity

Hello, Casliber.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Hydropower


Previous selections: Geography of Niger • Aerophone


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:08, 27 April 2015 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

American politics 2 workshop phase closed[edit]

The workshop phase of the American politics 2 arbitration case, which you are listed as a party to, is now closed. For the Arbitration Committee, --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:27, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Eta Carinae[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Eta Carinae you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of I am. furhan. -- I am. furhan. (talk) 20:20, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

2001: A Space Odyssey (film)[edit]


Botanical species article style[edit]

Hi Cas. I'm reading/writing about pituri, the traditional Aboriginal chewing mix, and have found Nicotiana gossei (one of the source plants) and a few others don't have an article. Would you be able to point me to either the appropriate style guide or a good example of a botanical species article, please? --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 03:52, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Just cut and paste format from one of my plant stubs - eventually look something like Banksia attenuata. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Will do. Thanks. (Looking.) Gaahh! No way. That is a beautiful FA you have there, man. Mine will be a pretty stub. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 13:06, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement[edit]

Flest utökade.svg
  • Hello Casliber:
This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 22 of 2015. Thanks for participating!
Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 05:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Melaleuca wilsonii[edit]

Harrias talk 19:04, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 31, 2015)[edit]

Washer and dryer.jpg

An example of home appliances is this washing machine and clothes dryer combination.

Hello, Casliber.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Home appliance


Previous selections: Hydropower • Geography of Niger


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 00:33, 4 May 2015 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

WikiCup 2015 May newsletter[edit]

C/2014 Q2 (Lovejoy) is a long-period comet discovered on 17 August 2014 by Terry Lovejoy; and is one of several Featured Pictures worked up by India The Herald (submissions) during the second round.

The second round one has all wrapped up, and round three has now begun! Congratulations to the 34 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our second round. Leading the way overall was Belarus Cas Liber (submissions) in Group B with a total of 777 points for a variety of contributions including Good Articles on Corona Borealis and Microscopium - both of which received the maximum bonus.

Special credit must be given to a number of high importance articles improved during the second round.

The points varied across groups, with the lowest score required to gain automatic qualification was 68 in Group A - meanwhile the second place score in Group H was 404, which would have been high enough to win all but one of the other Groups! As well as the top two of each group automatically going through to the third round, a minimum score of 55 was required for a wildcard competitor to go through. We had a three-way tie at 55 points and all three have qualified for the next round, in the spirit of fairness. The third round ends on June 28, with the top two in each group progressing automatically while the remaining 16 highest scorers across all four groups go through as wildcards. Good luck to all competitors for the third round! Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) 16:26, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Philypnodon grandiceps[edit]

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 20:06, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Philypnodon macrostomus[edit]

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 20:06, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Ambassis jacksoniensis[edit]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:59, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Fuck Lukashenko.[edit]

I think you'll agree, seeing as you use the white-red-white flag. 178.120.183.77 (talk) 23:03, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

I just like pork chops. ;) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:36, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Lovecraft[edit]

I noted that you have H. P. Lovecraft in your some-time to do list. Do you happen to have the newer Joshi biographies? I'm curious as to whether they are worth their salt. --Laser brain (talk) 00:51, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

No not yet. Been meaning to have a look at some at some stage...so many ideas..so little time. But you've got me thinking...will see if they are in uni library....Iä Shub-Niggurath! Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:30, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
I've searched to no avail at the New York City public library and at Columbia, so I may end up just ordering them from Amazon. I've been playing a Lovecraft-themed tabletop game recently, which prompted me to re-read most of his works. I recall fondly that I was introduced to Lovecraft by a stranger with whom I was stuck in a bus station overnight when I was much younger. --Laser brain (talk) 01:53, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
I still haven't taken Arkham Horror out of the box as I don't have 4 consecutive hours spare to play the game...been playing Dominion alot instead....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:54, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Pseudomugil mellis[edit]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:55, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Frigatebird[edit]

Have you talked to Aa77zz? He's edited the article regularly and has form at FAC too. As long as there is no great rush, I'll do what I can, HBWalive is usually pretty good and up-to-date on families, so I'll look there. I've seen Magnificent and Lesser, and I've not given up on Ascension yet (a couple of untwitchable UK records) Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:02, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

'Tis the season[edit]

Every time I harvest my Morchella (yes, I am so lucky they grow in my backyard), I can't help but think of you. Feast ahead !!! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:29, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

We've had a very wet autumn here, with huge mushrooms everywhere but not much edible....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:31, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement[edit]

Flest utökade.svg
  • Hello Casliber:
This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 23 of 2015. Thanks for participating!
Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 09:12, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Frill-necked lizard, frilled-neck lizard, etc[edit]

Hello,

I recall that you had some knowledge about nature in Australia. I was wondering what you thought about the page title for Frill-necked lizard, since the first sentence and the infobox use the form "frilled-neck lizard". Some consistency would probably be nice. I left a note on the article talk page a while ago, but I don't think anyone is actually watching that article.

I'm sure the page title just scratches the surface of problems with that article, but getting the name consistent seems like a good start! Zagalejo^^^ 16:15, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 20, 2015)[edit]

Fredmeyer edit 1.jpg

The food industry is a complex, global collective of diverse businesses that supply much of the food and food energy consumed by the world population.

Hello, Casliber.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Food industry


Previous selections: Home appliance • Hydropower


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:05, 11 May 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

DYK nomination of Dampiera linearis[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Dampiera linearis at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 14:03, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Scarus globiceps[edit]

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 06:54, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Eta Carinae[edit]

The article Eta Carinae you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Eta Carinae for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of I am. furhan. -- I am. furhan. (talk) 01:41, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 21, 2015)[edit]

TAFI week 21, 2015.jpg

Left: Czech bramboráček, a bread made of potato dough, being deep fried. Right: The Royal Navy Trafalgar class attack submarine HMS Tireless (S88) sits on the surface of the North Pole, the northern polar ice cap on Earth

Hello, Casliber.

The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections:


Previous selections: Food industry • Home appliance • Hydropower


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 01:32, 18 May 2015 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

Today's articles for improvement[edit]

Flest utökade.svg
  • Hello Casliber:
This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 24 of 2015. Thanks for participating!
Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 09:18, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Girls Talk (Elvis Costello song)[edit]

Cas Liber, just a ping to remind you to return to the review you started here. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:24, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/61 Cygni/archive2[edit]

Can you please just come around it before it gets dump? -The Heraldthe joy of the LORDmy strength 09:00, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Naretha bluebonnet[edit]

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:03, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Fremantle Prison FAC closed[edit]

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Fremantle Prison/archive2 was closed as "not enough commentary to come close to consensus to promote, plus it sounds like restructuring may be in order ... and ask that further improvements be made outside the FAC process". The prose is now down to 49.9k characters, and I have adjusted/trimmed the lead. I think I've addressed your remaining FAC comments (aside from the bits in the lead, which were awaiting consensus from other reviwers). Would you mind taking another look at the article – in particular, do you think any more improvements or restructuring is needed before another FAC nomination? Thanks, - Evad37 [talk] 13:47, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

I am surprised it was closed. I thought the prose was otherwise ok. As articles get bigger they get alot harder to pass etc. Will look soon. Late over here. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:58, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Do you have any further comments or suggestions? - Evad37 [talk] 02:38, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
I'll take a look later today and get back to you. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:40, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
@Evad37: - I think it's good for another whirl...05:57, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Now nominated again at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Fremantle Prison/archive3. Thanks for your help - Evad37 [talk] 01:25, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Cantuaria dendyi[edit]

Harrias talk 07:17, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 22, 2015)[edit]

Schokolade-schwarz-braun-weiss.jpg

Chocolate most commonly comes in dark (bottom), milk (middle), and white (top) varieties

Hello, Casliber.

The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections:


Previous selections: Deep frying • Food industry • Home appliance


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:49, 25 May 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

TAFI week 22, 2015 update[edit]

Please note that Personality is also an article for improvement for week 22, 2015. Thank you.

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 01:10, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote[edit]

Flest utökade.svg
  • Hello Casliber:
This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 25 of 2015. Thanks for participating!
Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 06:44, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK[edit]

I'm a DYK n00b. The Peter Wilmshurst one I porposed is sitting near the end of the 30 days and I only just became aware that I had not brought a shrubbery, which I have now fixed. Is it too late, do you know? I think it is worth putting him on the front page for his fifteen minutes of fame, the man has taken more than one for the team and is a bit of a legend. Guy (Help!) 08:02, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

No worries. all good now. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Norma (constellation)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Norma (constellation) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 04:00, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Hook for Johnbod[edit]

Could you take a new look at the painter you ticked at DYK and either delete or approve my suggested hook? Thanks for your time at DYK anyway Victuallers (talk) 10:46, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Move request[edit]

Hello Casliber, can you move User:Seattle/West Virginia to List of census-designated places in West Virginia? Thanks. Seattle (talk) 18:42, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

@Seattle: done. and histories merged Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:00, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Seothyra[edit]

Thanks for helping the project Victuallers (talk) 19:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

A beer for you![edit]

Export hell seidel steiner.png Cheers for the help with the Port Adelaide FC page. Will try and incorporate the improvements when I have more time. Thejoebloggsblog (talk) 00:34, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

1472 Muonio[edit]

Notable? Also is this appropriate?♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:03, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

2015 GA Cup[edit]

WikiProject Good Articles's 2015 GA Cup
Symbol support vote.svg

Greetings, all!

We would like to announce the start of the 2nd GA Cup, a competition that seeks to encourage the reviewing of Good article nominations! Our inaugural competition, which ran from October 2014 to April 2015, was such a resounding success that we'd like to do it again. Currently, there are over 500 GANs ready to be reviewed; competitors in the previous GA Cup reviewed about 570 GAs, so we can again make a huge impact in helping editors improve articles in Wikipedia and decrease the traditionally long queue at GAN.

The 2nd GA Cup will begin on July 1, 2015. As last time, five rounds are currently scheduled (which will bring the competition to a close on November 28, 2015), but this may change based on participant numbers. The judges learned a lot during the 1st GA Cup which exposed weaknesses in its system. Using both the feedback from last year's participants and the weaknesses discovered, we've revised the scoring system to make it more fair. The sign-up and submissions process will remain the same.

We also are introducing three new judges: 3family6, Jaguar and MrWooHoo. So in total, there will be six judges. We hope this will allow the competition to run more smoothly.

Sign-ups for the upcoming competition are currently open and will close on July 15, 2015. Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors, so sign-up now!

If you have any questions, take a look at the FAQ page and/or contact one of the judges.

Cheers from 3family6, Dom497, Figureskatingfan, Jaguar and MrWooHoo, and TheQ Editor.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:53, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

My fault -- but we'll both probably get hell for it[edit]

[3] [4] EEng (talk) 00:06, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Umm...what to do. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:09, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Writers Barnstar Hires.png The Writer's Barnstar
For your continued brilliance on articles such a Microscopium which was promoted today. Congratulations! CassiantoTalk 10:48, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
thx! now just waiting for a GA reviewer or two...will go and make karma by reviewing some GANs... Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:00, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Cantonment Hill - Request[edit]

HI Cas

I was wondering if you could cast an eye over Cantonment Hill, Fremantle its been getting a bit of controversial focus locally, I have put in a request to the City of Fremantle for access to the Signal Station. Was looking to see where else it could be polished up. thanks Gnangarra 12:47, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Interesting - am looking now. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:03, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
thank you Gnangarra 00:36, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 23, 2015)[edit]

Buggy RN.jpg

The term Buggy is generally used to refer to any lightweight automobile with off road capabilities and sparse bodywork.

Hello, Casliber.

The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections:


Previous selections: Types of chocolate • Deep frying • Food industry


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:18, 1 June 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Your GA nomination of Ursa Minor[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ursa Minor you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of StudiesWorld -- StudiesWorld (talk) 01:00, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks - added to my watchlist. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:04, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

American politics 2 arbitration proposed decision posted[edit]

Hello. The proposed decision for the American politics 2 arbitration case, which you are listed to as a party, has been posted. Thank you, --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:32, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote[edit]

Flest utökade.svg
  • Hello Casliber:
This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 26 of 2015. Thanks for participating!
Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 04:36, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Cortinarius australiensis at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 23:54, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

I can haz DYK?[edit]

Leonard's Bakery was the result of a merge from two articles, one of which I created on March 6, 2015. Could I have a DYK box please? — Brianhe (talk) 21:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ursa Minor[edit]

The article Ursa Minor you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ursa Minor for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of StudiesWorld -- StudiesWorld (talk) 23:20, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Collaboration[edit]

Serpens and Eta Carinae are both very near FAC at this point. I have a good three months before college starts up again, so how would you feel about a collaboration on Messier 87? I pick it because it's already a GA and won't need that much work to get to FA; thus, I think it can be done by the end of the summer. StringTheory11 (t • c) 00:18, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

@StringTheory11: Sounds good. Let's do it. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:17, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Dampiera linearis[edit]

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:06, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for S Sagittae[edit]

Thanks for helping with the main page Victuallers (talk) 23:35, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 24, 2015)[edit]

1906 Athens stadium.jpg

An example of sport – a view of the 1906 unofficial Olympic Games

Hello, Casliber.

The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections:


Previous selections: Buggy (automobile) • Types of chocolate • Deep frying


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:14, 8 June 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Reference errors on 7 June[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Cytherea (pornographic actress)[edit]

Since you closed the request to move Cytherea (pornographic actress) to Cytherea (actress) as "not moved", shouldn't you have left the article at Cytherea (pornographic actress), since that was its state prior to the request? —BarrelProof (talk) 17:52, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

oops, didn't notice. fixed now. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:35, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
How the hell a 8 against 3 could result in a no consensus?? Ok, it's not a vote, but majority of editors rejected the " misleading" argument, both here and in other relevant and cited discussions, and as long as a 3:1 ratio was not enough I wonder... how much consensus do you expected for making a move? High smell of supervote here.... Cavarrone 20:47, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Look, one goes on arguments not numbers. Both sides have valid points - it's obviously a smouldering issue and needs an RfC on the whole issue. The question should be phrased, "Should a person who has appeared only in pornographic films be termed, "Jane Doe (actress)" or "Jane Doe (pornographic actress)" - hold it over a month, and get wide input and be done with it once and for all. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:51, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
NB:Cavarrone, I really don't care what the title is. Just do the RfC and highlight it somewhere and then there can be a guideline and the bickering can stop. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:53, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Both having valid points is not a reason or a justification for ignoring the consensus, especially if such a consensus was not exactly "surprising" but on the contrary it was consistently supported from a number of extensive moving discussions which in the last months had already settled the question. If there is about a 3:1 ratio which support a valid point over the other valid point and which support the moving, the page should be moved, period. Your request for a RfC is not a justification for your failure to correctly read the consensus in the discussion. Cavarrone 21:07, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Cavarrone you have two choices then. Either stuff around with a Move Review or do an RfC, but doing these articles singly is a waste of resources and hot air. Tell you what, I'll set up the RfC myself in a few hours once I've done a few RL chores. Then it can be big hugs all round. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:32, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote[edit]

Flest utökade.svg
  • Hello Casliber:
This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at Week 27 of 2015. Thanks for participating!
Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 18:18, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Frigatebird[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Frigatebird you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 04:00, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Frigatebird[edit]

The article Frigatebird you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Frigatebird for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 11:01, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Nova Television[edit]

Hi, the proposal and consensus at Talk:Nova television (Bulgaria) were to move to Nova Television (Bulgaria), with Television capitalized as the proper name. Can you correct that?

Also, when closing requested moves, please remember to remove the template {{Requested move/dated}}, per the instructions at WP:Requested moves/Closing instructions § Closing the requested move. Thanks, Wbm1058 (talk) 12:40, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 10 June[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for R Sagittae[edit]

Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:34, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Frigatebird FAC[edit]

Hi, Casliber - you are certainly deserving of all kinds of accolades for the great work you do on WP. I saw your post on bird project and did a quick review of the article. Nicely done. I have some copy edit suggestions that will tighten the lead and make it a bit more lucid and flowing. I didn't go into the body of the article in detail yet - but before I attempted any copy editing, I wanted to consult with you first. Atsme📞📧 15:34, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi Atsme, when I review an article at FAC, I write this, so it'd be hypocritical of me not to have the same done at any FAC I am involved in improving, so go for it. I'll have a look afterwards. Thanks for taking a look! Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:12, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
I appreciate it, but before I make any changes, please take a peak at it first - User:Atsme/sandbox - I moved text around, and shortened the lead a bit. I think a 3rd paragraph regarding human utilization/interaction may be appropriate as applicable to what's already in the body. I also changed a couple of section titles for conformity. You can comment on my sandbox. It's fun to collaborate with experienced editors who have long since grown a protective layer of critic retardant skin. ;-) --Atsme📞📧 23:17, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Hmm, alot of that looks smoother and I think is a net positive - the more I think about it, I think gettiing their ranging across all subtropical oceans should come in sentence 1 - ("Frigatebirds (also known as Fregatidae) are a family of pelagic and aerial seabirds found across the world's subtropical oceans" or something similar). So sling it in and we can play with it. Regarding headers - I always take "etymology" to be more reductionistic in meaning mere meaning (i.e. dicdef) and taxonomy is more global, combining classification (and by definition evolution), systematics and naming. Maybe like this. hang on...Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:22, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
The evolutionary relationships appear to be a topic of debate. I went through something similar when I was working on some of the ancestral fishes and collaborated with a microbiologist or maybe he was a geneticist, can't remember, but we finally got it worked out despite the various clades and scientific debate over whether they maintained most of their primitive morphological characters or were highly derived therefore belonging to a different group (Teleosts). Anyway, I see similarities here so you might want to give the following a read [5]. My brain is frigated so I'm about to turn off the iPad and the lights. --Atsme📞📧 03:34, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
The taxonomic material written on that page is vague, misleading and outdated. I've never seen any studies connecting them with Charadriiformes, and a couple of things linking with procellariiformes (one of which I've covered, the other was to do with parasites I think) but the link is tenuous. For the past 20 years it's been increasingly clear that pelicans (and shoebill) are not closely related to the group containing frigatebirds, cormorants, darters and gannets/boobies -but the name needed changing as pelicans gave their name to the group. Any webpage that still lists frigatebirds as pelecaniformes is way outdated. (look at the age of the references that page uses) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:17, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Whew! Good to know. Atsme📞📧 11:38, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
@Atsme: That lead sure if fiddly. I keep wanting to tinker with it. I meant that a line on the worlds oceans but then should follow description/species etc. Sigh. No am worried that it jumps a bit about too much. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:13, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
I'll take it back to my sandbox and see how you like it after I tighten it up here and there. Atsme📞📧 12:31, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Sure - go for it. I generally edit low-traffic articles, so real time editing is fine too. I very rarely use the sandbox. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:46, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────I hope you like it. I tried to hold true to the order you wanted, leaving the evolutionary references in the 3rd para. I made the text a bit more "engaging". As you know, it's not easy to make encyclopedic engaging. My biggest challenge hit me about 15 yrs ago when I was writing a script for a PBS documentary about endangered unionids. Imagine trying to make a half-hour program about clams interesting when the tendency is to clam-up. *lol* --Atsme📞📧 18:39, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
@Atsme: see talk page - I like para 3, but I think para 1 I'll rejig back more to a safe/default way of most bird articles. To make it not jump around in content means rejigging the material one of two ways and behaviour before description comes over weird...no biggie...it's an interesting one to get my head around....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:52, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Just a small observation, perhaps the skeletal foot image could be flipped, so it doesn't interfere so much vertically with the text and headings? FunkMonk (talk) 08:08, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Don Revie[edit]

Thanks for your help Victuallers (talk) 23:51, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Resident Evil (2002 video game)[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for 2014–15 York City F.C. season[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:23, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Münchhausen number[edit]

Hello - would you please explain your "no consensus" close here? I see above that you have said that "one goes on arguments not numbers" in evaluating an RM discussion. Here, the three !opposers stated that the real-life baron used an umlaut. Which is true. But the numbers were named after the fictional baron, which has one "h" and does not have an umlaut. As with Munchausen syndrome. Thus the argument put forward by the !opposers is not relevant. Would you reconsider your close in that light? Thanks. Dohn joe (talk) 14:55, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Sorry was very later where I was . My bad. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:10, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Frigatebird[edit]

Thanks, if you get a moment then give out a barnstar today. Victuallers (talk) 07:27, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Cathedral Range State Park[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:41, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 25, 2015)[edit]

Side Show main floor (cropped).jpg

People enjoying the nightlife at a nightclub in Cape Town, South Africa

Hello, Casliber.

The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections:


Previous selections: Sport • Buggy (automobile) • Types of chocolate


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:13, 15 June 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Ankylosaurus etymology[edit]

Hi, I and LittleJerry are working on expanding Ankylosaurus for FAC, and I noticed some issues with the etymology that was already in the article. Explanation of the genus name can be found on this dead site[6], but is it a reliable source (in the sense that it would be accepted during FAC)? Also, none of the sources I found give a meaning for the species name, so that is still uncited. So I was wondering whether you know of any workarounds to cite this? Dictionaries? The article already became a GA in 2006, so we can't GAN nominate it, though it probably wouldn't have passed today in its current form. FunkMonk (talk) 05:06, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

i can source when i get home. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:01, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! FunkMonk (talk) 09:33, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
I could do the bare meaning but not the rest - one dino book must cover it, worth chasing....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 15:34, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
So if I just do away with "referring to the great width of the animal's body" about the species name, I guess it should be ok with that citation you added? FunkMonk (talk) 15:37, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Hmmm, mine is only a dictionary so it just does the name. I recommend leaving it for teh moment - let's look through some online dino history to see if we can find the other bits, but remove if we can't. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 15:39, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Alright, will probably take at least a month before we have it ready for FAC anyway (waiting for copy edit alone). FunkMonk (talk) 15:52, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Small question[edit]

Hello! Thank you so very much for your quick DYK review of Bulverket. :) Just a small question: In the review you wrote "Earwig's negative", what does that mean? I'm still not familiar with every special expression in the WP vocabulary. Best, w.carter-Talk 15:19, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Ahaa, this place is a learning process - ici Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 15:21, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Yes it is, and I love every minute of it. One more piece of the puzzle added. Merci beaucoup! w.carter-Talk 15:29, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote[edit]

Flest utökade.svg
  • Hello Casliber:
This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at Week 28 of 2015. Thanks for participating!
Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 20:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for HD 115600[edit]

Thanks for supporting the DYK Project Victuallers (talk) 02:41, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Question for you and your stalkers[edit]

Cas, I've been debating whether to become an admin and am seeking the opinion of various people to decide if I should take a run at it. (yes, 70,000+ edits in, now I'm thinking about it...finally) My question is if I have been around so long that I now have too much baggage and have pissed off too many of the wrong people. I think that by holding myself to a strict code of recusal and avoiding using the mop anywhere my neutrality would legitimately be questioned (i.e. horse articles, mostly), I'd do a pretty good job; I've been there, done that, seem about every kind of drama, and when I'm not involved, I generally can stay pretty cool (sometimes I can even stay cool when I am involved, it kind of depends). I know myself pretty well. But, and it's a big question, how much would experience and some of the battle scars I've acquired be used against me? I'd like to think that the people I've had the nastiest tangles with turned out to be individuals who earned long-term blocks over the long haul, and the rest I've managed to figure out a way to work with on-wiki, but I may be mistaken. I'm asking you (and those who watchlist your page) for your candid views because I figure that you've seen me around wiki a lot, you've helped me out of a couple jams and we've chatted about assorted stuff. And it will give me a sense of what I'm up against. Montanabw(talk) 04:30, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Hmmm, try and think of the most acrimonious situations folks could find and link here. I've been aware of some but may not have the full picture. Maybe try and make up with some folks you're antagonistic with? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:34, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Where to start? (ha) The most recent is this one. Frankly, most of the people I've spatted with over the years that are still around I mostly get along with well enough or we have agreed to disagree and work mostly in our own areas. Frankly, I'm posting the general question because some people I have no interest in making up with, they can bring it... the question is if they would top the 30%. Also, you will be getting mail in just a moment. Montanabw(talk) 06:42, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination for NGC 6067[edit]

Hello, I have reviewed your nomination of NGC 6067 at DYK and there is one outstanding query. Let me know when you reply. Regards, —Noswall59 (talk) 10:14, 18 June 2015 (UTC).

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2 closed[edit]

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

  1. Remedy 1 of the American Politics case is rescinded. In its place, the following is adopted: standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people.
  2. Ubikwit (talk · contribs) is banned from any page relating to or making any edit about post-1932 politics of the United States, and closely related people, in any namespace. This ban may be appealed no earlier than 18 months after its adoption.
  3. MONGO (talk · contribs) is admonished for adding to the hostility in the topic area.

For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:41, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2 closed

This week's article for improvement (week 26, 2015)[edit]

Fatchart.svg

The amounts of fat types in selected foods

Hello, Casliber.

The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections:


Previous selections: Nightlife • Sport • Buggy (automobile)


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:07, 22 June 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote[edit]

Flest utökade.svg
  • Hello Casliber:
This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at Week 29 of 2015. Thanks for participating!
Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 00:47, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Cortinarius australiensis[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 15:45, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Graham Chapman[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 15:16, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Mail[edit]

Mail-message-new.svg
Hello, Casliber. Please check your email – you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.SagaciousPhil - Chat 08:57, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
sigh...yeah. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:22, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for NGC 6067[edit]

Gatoclass (talk) 14:36, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/List of accolades received by Fashion (film)[edit]

I just wanted to know, why the rest of the things were dropped from the hook? Its ridiculous. She won several awrds? Is it an interesting hook? I request you to re-add those lines. I dont know why these casualties happens with me.—Prashant 02:54, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

No idea....will take a look. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:04, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Yeah! Please do look. And, tweak that up. Even the hook mentioned was the original one.. You need to edit in the additions and the main page. This could have attracted so many hits. Thanks.—Prashant 05:18, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Prashant, look at Template:Did_you_know_nominations/List_of_accolades_received_by_Fashion_(film) and follow up with the people who discussed it there. They'd be the ones to convince. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:21, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Majority agreed with the original one, It was just a suggestion from Belle. So, I dont think anything needs to be disscussed. Please edit it on the main page. Thanks!—Prashant 11:32, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Ok @Prashant!: I did it now. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:39, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ursa Minor[edit]

The article Ursa Minor you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Ursa Minor for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of StudiesWorld -- StudiesWorld (talk) 10:01, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Voyager 1 (2)[edit]

Cas Liber, issues have been noted with the image in this DYK that you nominated. Can you please stop by and determine what needs to be done? Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:02, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protection requested[edit]

Hello Casliber. Is there any chance you could semi-protect the article Attacks on secularists in Bangladesh for 24 hours? The page is going to the mainpage on DYK in a few hours, and an IP has turned up who is adding clearly inadequately sourced content in a technically clueless manner. Gatoclass (talk) 09:35, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

no problem/done. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks :) Gatoclass (talk) 09:41, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your illess[edit]

I was sorry to learn you've been stricken [7]. Hope you're better soon! EEng (talk) 13:00, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

yeah....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
I have to do the best I can with the material available. EEng (talk) 14:44, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Sleep deprivation compromises my ability to make witty comebacks...Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:48, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Ursa Minor[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Ursa Minor at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Miyagawa (talk) 13:13, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 27, 2015)[edit]

HCCH Year of Ox Party.JPG

A party in celebration of the Chinese Year of the Ox at a restaruant

Hello, Casliber.

The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections:


Previous selections: Fat • Nightlife • Sport


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:07, 29 June 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote[edit]

Flest utökade.svg
  • Hello Casliber:
This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at Week 30 of 2015. Thanks for participating!
Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 02:24, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

frigatebird references[edit]

I notice some references in the frigatebird article have periods after the author initials and some do not. I intend to make them consistent but I wanted to check with you as to which style you prefer. I don't have a strong preference - I've used both styles (hopefully not in the same article) - but I prefer not to have spaces between the initials. Aa77zz (talk) 17:10, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

My aim is no spaces and periods in the article. cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:22, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

GA Cup[edit]

WikiProject Good Articles's 2015 GA Cup - June 2015
Symbol support vote.svg

Welcome to the GA Cup! The competition is about to begin! Before you all start reviewing nominations and reassessments we want to make sure you understand the following:

  • This is a friendly competition so we don't want any cheating/breaking of the rules. However, if you do believe someone is going against the rules, notify the judges. All the rules are listed here.
  • If you are a new editor or new to reviewing Good article nominations, it is imperative that you read the 4 essays/guides listed under FAQ #4. If you do not understand something, ask a judge for clarification ASAP!
  • The competition is not entirely about who can review the most nominations. Per the "Scoring" page, there is different criteria in which you can earn more points. Theoretically, you could review 10 nominations and have 80 points but another user could have reviewed 5 nominations and have 100 points. Yes, we want you to review as many nominations as you can as this will greatly increase the number of points you earn, but you must also keep in mind that every single review will be looked over by a judge. If we find that you are "rubber-stamping" (in other words, the review is not complete but you still passed/failed the article) you may be disqualified without warning. The same applies with reassessments. If you just say that the article should be delisted or kept with no explanation, points will not be awarded.
  • Remember, to submit Good article reviews and reassessments on your submissions page (Some of you have not created your submissions page yet. Only reviews/reassessments submitted on your submissions page can earn points. If you participated in the 2014-2015 GA Cup, you still need to re-create your submissions page.). Detailed instructions on how to submit reviews and reassessments can be found under the "Submissions" page. Ask a judge if you need clarification.

Also, rather than creating a long list on what to remember, make sure you have read the "Scoring", "Submissions", and "FAQ" pages.

Now some of you are probably wondering how on earth the rounds will work.

The rounds will work in a similar fashion as the previous competition, with the exception of the first round. Round 1 will have everyone compete in one big pool. Depending on the final number of participants after sign-ups close, a to-be-determined number of participants will move on (highest scorers will move on) to Round 2. We guarantee that the top 15 will move on (this number may change), so make sure you aim for those top positions! Moving on to Round 2, participants will be split into pools. The pools will be determined by a computer program that places participants by random. More details regarding Round 2 will be sent out at the end of Round 1.

It is important to note that the GA Cup will run on UTC time, so make sure you know what time that is for where you live! On that note, the GA Cup will start on July 1 at 0:00:01 UTC; Round 1 will end on July 29 at 23:59:59 UTC; Round 2 will commence on August 1 at 0:00:01 UTC. All reviews must be started after or on the start time of the round. If you qualify for Round 2 but do not complete a review before the end of Round 1, the review can be carried over to Round 2; however that review will not count for Round 1. Prior to the start of the the second round, participants who qualify to move on will be notified.

Finally, if you know anyone else that might be interesting in participating, let them know! Sign-ups close on July 15 so there is still plenty of time to join in on the action!

If you have any further questions, contact one of the judges or leave a message here.

After sign-ups close, check the Pools page as we will post the exact number of participants that will move on to the next round. Because this number will be determined past the halfway mark of Round 1, we encourage you to aim to be in the top 15 as the top 15 at the end of the round are guaranteed to move on.

Cheers from 3family6, Dom497, Figureskatingfan, Jaguar and MrWooHoo.

To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--Dom497 (talk) 22:52, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Stub comp[edit]

Hi, your announcements link to the signup page but you don't give a link to the description of the comp. Not easy to get from one to tother on mobile editor - may I suggest you add another link ? Or a link from signup page to info page. Thanks. PamD 23:38, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

I'd not thought of that. You can click on the link on the header I think (should link to Wikipedia:Stub Contest). I'll take a look on my mobile a bit later today. Cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:53, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Norma (constellation)[edit]

The article Norma (constellation) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Norma (constellation) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 16:41, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

It's good to see you[edit]

Just noticed that you are now working the DYKNs, it's good to see that you are still going strong. I am not sure how long this run will linger, but since my last one I acquired a copy of A Guide to the Birds of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands by Raffaele. Do you have this one? If not, I can get it scanned. - Caribbean~H.Q. 10:02, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Hmm, hadn't thought of that. Let me think on it. Sounds like alot of work.....thanks for offering. Since those days, I've managed to get good access to fulltexts of most journals thanks to being made a conjoint lecturer at university :) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:31, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Whoa, wish I had that kind of access. My method is crude by comparison, I keep a web of acquaintances that let me know of any book that comes their way. It's not as efficient, but I come across stuff that is so obscure that you wouldn't believe it. Most don't serve much use when it comes to Wikipedia, but I am aware that at least half a dozen of them are not found in the UPR or the General Archives, which is pretty cool. Anything relevant to Caribbean biodiversity is there, so just ping me if you have a relevant project in mind. - Caribbean~H.Q. 22:48, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Ok will do - conversely, if you need a fulltext of something ping me. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:59, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Issue with DYK nomination[edit]

My DYK nomination of Tyrone Garland was submitted back on June 22nd and has not been touched by a single user since. A bot posted on my talk page that it was incomplete and that I had not done Step 3. However, I have completed each step necessary. Could you help me with this? TempleM (talk) 15:05, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

See here - the bot went mad - ignore. People will get to it eventually. Johnbod (talk) 15:15, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Neoboletus venenatus[edit]

Do try and pass this thank you on. Thanks. Victuallers (talk) 00:11, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 20, 2015[edit]

A summary of a Featured Article you nominated at WP:FAC will appear on the Main Page soon. Was there anything I left out you'd like to see put back in? - Dank (push to talk) 22:30, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Looks ok. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:46, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Voyager 1[edit]

Gatoclass (talk) 13:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 28, 2015)[edit]

Masjid al-Haram panorama.JPG

Mecca is regarded as the holiest city in the religion of Islam. Pictured is the Masjid al-Haram during Hajj, 2007.

Hello, Casliber.

The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections:


Previous selections: Party • Fat • Nightlife


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 18:00, 6 July 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Ariana Grande[edit]

Hi. Since you recently contributed to the Talk page, please note that there is a new discussion at the bottom of the Talk page. -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:04, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

O joy....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:14, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote[edit]

Flest utökade.svg
  • Hello Casliber:
This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at Week 31 of 2015. Thanks for participating!
Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 09:16, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Bio drafts[edit]

Hi Casliber,

Would you be able to add any sources to any of the draft pages at User:BOZ/Draft pages? I am trying to get them improved enough to move back into article space. BOZ (talk) 04:17, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Gosh, I haven't heard of any of them....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:01, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
That might be part of the problem.  ;) But still, sources might be out there, just wasn't sure if you had access to any good ones. BOZ (talk) 13:36, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Ok - if I come across anything I will add. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 18:49, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Norma (constellation)[edit]

Gatoclass (talk) 23:48, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

70 Whitacre Loop Capon Bridge WV 2014 10 05 04.JPG Paladin of Hampshire County Historic Places
Cas Liber, it is my sincere pleasure to hereby name you a Paladin of Hampshire County Historic Places in recognition of your thoughtful review and appreciated guidance, which resulted in the promotion of Capon Chapel to Featured Article status. This article is the first Hampshire County subject and only the sixth West Virginia-related subject to receive this status. Thank you for helping to bring awareness to Hampshire County's historic landmarks! -- West Virginian (talk) 10:54, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
A pleasure. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:43, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Rubroboletus rubrosanguineus[edit]

Thanks for your help Victuallers (talk) 12:01, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote[edit]

Flest utökade.svg
  • Hello Casliber:
This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at Week 32 of 2015. Thanks for participating!
Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 12:31, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 29, 2015)[edit]

Hello, Casliber.

The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections:


Previous selections: Holiest sites in Islam • Party • Fat


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: Northamerica1000 (talk) 00:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

DYK for Ursa Minor[edit]

Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

And after the long wait[edit]

Serpens is finally at FAC! StringTheory11 (t • c) 02:52, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Cool! Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:59, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Enceliopsis argophylla[edit]

Gatoclass (talk) 00:31, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement – discussion about changing project processes[edit]

Flest utökade.svg
  • Hello Casliber:
A discussion is occurring at Change project processes regarding potential changes to the Today's articles for improvement Wikiproject. Your input is welcomed at the discussion.
Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 11:49, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Emu War[edit]

I am working on the article Emu and am puzzled by the so-called Emu War which seems to have taken place in October/November 1932. The Wikipedia article Emu War states "wheat prices continued to fall, and by October 1932 matters were becoming intense, with the farmers preparing to harvest the season's crop ". My question then is, what time of year is wheat harvested in Western Australia? In Britain it would nowadays be July/August or perhaps September for ancient varieties, and I would have expecting it to be February or March in Australia. Are you able to enlighten me? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:34, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Off the top of my head I don't know but my guess would be like yours. i.e. late summer. I don't have any books specifically on wheat so my next move finding out would be the same as yours - i.e. googling it....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:14, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Following your suggestion, I find that wheat is grown as a winter crop in Western Australia. In 2014, for example, havesting was expected to start in late September after a warm, dry winter. So that explains it. Thanks. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:00, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Arcticodactylus[edit]

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

This week's articles for improvement (week 30, 2015)[edit]

Boule chocolat au crumble de fraises.jpg

Dessert is a typically sweet course that concludes an evening meal. Pictured is a chocolate-strawberry crumble ball.

Hello, Casliber.

The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections:


Previous selections: Kayaking • Holiest sites in Islam • Party


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: Northamerica1000 (talk) on 04:00, 20 July 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

DYK for Austroboletus[edit]

Thank you Victuallers (talk) 00:06, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Austroboletus occidentalis[edit]

Thank you Victuallers (talk) 00:06, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

FA review of Ketogenic diet[edit]

I believe I have followed the guidelines for requesting a FA review. I have done this on the talk page of the article. The major editor/contributor initially wrote that he would address my concerns regarding the references in the article. No progress has been done to address my concerns and I, with no malice, want to proceed with the process of a review of its FA status. The major problems are: the references are quite outdated. I have posted other references and left this information on the talk page. I would have edited and inserted the updated references myself but I do not feel as if I have the expertise or familiarity with the topic to do so or I would have fixed it myself. Another significant problem is that the references do not meet the requirements of WP:MEDRS. The references in medical articles should be academic journal review articles, systematic review articles, governmental websites and policies and medical textbooks. I could find none of these as sources (there might one and I might have missed it). My review is not perfect but in good faith, I am optimistic that with the right sources, this article can retain its FA status. Best Regards,

  Bfpage |leave a message  10:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
You're doing the right thing. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 15:09, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
It looks like you are the only other editor that believes I am doing the right thing. I would like to cancel and remove my request to review the FA article Ketogenic diet. Best Regards,
  Bfpage |leave a message  13:31, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Community desysoping RfC[edit]

Hi. You are invited to comment at RfC for BARC - a community desysoping process. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:59, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nu Lyrae[edit]

Hello Casliber,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nu Lyrae for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 22:18, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

@Trivialist: - it's a disambiguation page. I will add the template shortly. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:01, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
@Trivialist: - addtitionally, I was planning on making the target pages but got interrupted. I am now busy for several hours but will attend to this later. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:06, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Neonothopanus gardneri[edit]

Gatoclass (talk) 13:06, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

This week's articles for improvement (week 31, 2015)[edit]

Igloo construction.jpg

An example of an igloo

Hello, Casliber.

The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections:


Previous selections: Dessert • Kayaking • Holiest sites in Islam


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: Northamerica1000 (talk) 00:25, 27 July 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

DYK for Polygala nana[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:36, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Crested quetzal[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:16, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Tunisian Arabic[edit]

Dear User,

Tunisian Arabic has been nominated for Wikipedia GA Status. However, no one has reviewed it. So, please review it soon.

Yours Sincerely,

--Csisc (talk) 16:34, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Two days is not a long time. Some articles have been there for months, but I will take a look possibly soon. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:55, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

TAFI's List of articles[edit]

Flest utökade.svg
  • Hello Casliber:
A discussion is occurring at the TAFI talk page regarding potential changes to the project's List of articles page. Your input is welcome at the discussion.
Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 04:50, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Wendiceratops[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:56, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 16, 2015[edit]

Cas, this one from TFAR is around 800 characters; I've been able to keep them all above 900 so far. Is there anything you'd like to add? I thought this bit from the image description was interesting: "The young stars in the R Coronae Australis complex are similar in mass to the Sun and do not emit enough ultraviolet light to ionise a substantial fraction of the surrounding hydrogen. This means that the cloud does not glow with the characteristic red colour seen in many star-forming regions." - Dank (push to talk) 19:19, 30 July 2015 (UTC)