Please be more modest
You seem to have an unusual interest in the GeaCron historical atlas...is there a conflict of interest? In any case it needs far more recognition by reliable secondary sources before it qualifies to get a link in major articles like Atlas or History. So please don't keep adding it to articles that you have never contributed to. Rjensen (talk) 10:50, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Geacron
A tag has been placed on Geacron, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 05:30, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geacron until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 00:14, 29 March 2014 (UTC)