User talk:Chalkboardchecker

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Chalkboardchecker and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking Insert-signature.png if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 00:21, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

October 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Aidan McLindon has been reverted.
Your edit here to Aidan McLindon was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.queenslandparty.net) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:21, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Who decides which links are worth listing and which aren't? Sounds like biased corrupt editorial slander to me. Who are you to decide which websites are good and which are unworthy? Didn't the owner offer you any money to have his site added? Its a political website. Grow up and stop banning everything in sight. This is why wikipedia is such a poor excuse for an encyclopedia. That and nobody of any talent is allowed to edit the place. Just the 1000 or so core addicts who obviously have no life. Chalkboardchecker (talk) 00:26, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Bob Katter do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.  
Your edit here to Bob Katter was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://m.facebook.com/?w2m&refsrc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2F&_rdr (redirect from http://www.australianparty.info)) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:41, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

No problem you mindless robot. I reverted it back. Robots are as dumb as goldfish which makes them twice as smart as the human administrators at wikipedia. I'll bet there isn't a single published author among the lot of them. I've been published and this site is a joke.Chalkboardchecker (talk) 00:50, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

You're a tool whose edits are designed to mislead. The sooner you're banned, the better. Go find some other website with this level of information about Australia's politicians. Oh, that's right, there are none! When the time comes, don't let the door hit your arse on the way out. Timeshift (talk) 06:08, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry abuse. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:59, 14 October 2011 (UTC)