User talk:ChemNerd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Venlafaxine edit war[edit]

Dear ChemNerd, I'm puzzled as to why you deleted my recent edit on the Venlafaxine Wikipedia page. You mentioned that you deleted the entry due to lack of references, however references to primary literature have been included in the text (see below), so it is hard to understand why you would delete the entry. Many thanks, Christine

"Patients should be aware that these withdrawal symptoms during discontinuation of treatment with venlafaxine may include: Anxiety, confusion, or agitation. Lack of coordination or vertigo. Nausea, diarrhea, or vomiting. Sleep disorders or nightmares. Headache. Dry mouth. Fatigue. Brain zaps (electric-like shocks) [32] [33] [34]"

32: Baldwin DS, Montgomery SA, Nil R, Lader M (February 2007). "Discontinuation symptoms in depression and anxiety disorders". Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 10 (1): 73–84. PMID 16359583. 33: Fava M, Mulroy R, Alpert J, Nierenberg AA, Rosenbaum JF (December 1997). "Emergence of adverse events following discontinuation of treatment with extended-release venlafaxine". The American Journal of Psychiatry. 154 (12): 1760–2. PMID 9396960. 34: Zajecka J, Tracy KA, Mitchell S (July 1997). "Discontinuation symptoms after treatment with serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a literature review". J Clin Psychiatry. 58 (7): 291–7. PMID 9269249.

@Noaanon: I think you are mistaken. The one edit I made to venlafaxine (here) removed content that was added without a reference. It looks like you added a reference in later edits, and those edits were removed by someone else. You will have to contact those other editors to get their reasoning. ChemNerd (talk) 15:25, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

IP sock tagging[edit]

Hi ChemNerd. What's with the Le Prof IP sock tagging? --NeilN talk to me 18:39, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

I'm concerned that this user is currently being disruptive in ways that he has been cautioned for multiple times at WP:ANI. His common use of editing while logged out appears to be a reason why he has avoided consequences related to this disruptive behavior. ChemNerd (talk) 18:43, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Where, precisely am I being disruptive? Perhaps you just wish all Profs to leave. Please, in future, invite me to venues where I am being accused. Le Prof 73.210.155.96 (talk) 06:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
I have no intention of having all professors leaving. I don't see how a reasonable person could come to that conclusion. I have no intention of having you leave either. My intention is to help other editors recognize that edits from these IP addresses and edits from Leprof 7272 come from the same individual. If someone is looking at the history of an article, the fact that you usually include "Leprof 7272" at the end of talk page comments isn't going to help them. Other users have found this behavior, editing while logged out, to be disruptive and evasive (Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive944#Leprof_7272.2C_disruptive_editing_while_logged_out) and you have been asked to stop. This evasive behavior allows you to persist in doing other disruptive things, including the persistent "tag bombing" as was addressed at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive922#Leprof_7272. ChemNerd (talk) 13:39, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Nice try, having a discussion, and not inviting the person being discussed. Note, I always indicate I am Le Prof, and there is no chance whatsoever that I am guilty of being a sock. I edit as time permits, my sec systems log me out quickly, and I do not bother to log back in if logged out in the midst of editing. I also tend to continue as I start, so there is no back and forth, as any check of records will show (i.e., stretches of IP, and stretches of logged). Argue, claim, accuse, all you wish, you will find thousands of IP addresses with "Le Prof". Formal plea is not guilty. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 05:51, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
PS, see the very, very long ongoing discussion about image uses at WikiProject Medicine, if you want a clear case of me going back and forth, with both (IP and logged) work. I am guilty of being annoying, disagreeable, contrary, obstreperous, etc., but not of being dishonest, and disruptive, as you insinuate/claim. Otherwise, the ANI links to no actual Noticeboard discussion, and there is no other link here to give any indication of an ongoing issue, so I (a) remain clueless as to what you are on about here, and (b) am ignoring this unless something clear is brought to my attention. Cheers. Le Prof 73.210.155.96 (talk) 05:59, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Following the pattern[edit]

...of another faculty member who edits, I have identified myself at one of the IP addresses from which (as of April 2017, as these change) I will sometime edit. I will try to do the same, from the public spaces of my offices, the railway platforms, my health club, etc. (other spaces where I may be found editing, when I have been logged out, see above). You had mentioned here, and elsewhere, that there a sockpuppet investigation. Please be so kind, if there is one, please post, here—where is it? Cheers, Le Prof 73.210.155.96 (talk) 21:52, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

I don't believe that I have referred to any sockpuppet investigation. I assume there is confusion about my use of the {{IPsock}} template. After a bit of a search, I think the template {{IP address}} would be less confusing and more consistent with my intention. I have swapped the templates out. ChemNerd (talk) 18:01, 18 April 2017 (UTC)