User talk:Cherurbino

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Size of English Wikipedia broken down.png

Welcome[edit]

Hi, everybody! This is a talk page I also visit regularly having >380 articles there.


You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Wikipedia Reviewer.svg

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

Kindly read up the following details and please confirm on my talk page that you have read these details and the related policy pages. You should not accept the new revision if in analyzing the diff you find that:

  1. it conflicts with the Biographies of Living People policy
  2. it contains vandalism or patent nonsense
  3. it contains obvious copyright violations
  4. it contains legal threats, personal attacks or libel.

Please realize; you have to necessarily read up on the above mentioned pages and leave a note on my talk page confirming the same. I've given you this right purely on good faith. Thanks. Wifione ....... Leave a message 03:19, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi[edit]

Hi, dear Che! How are you? Glad to see you here! Take care of yourself! Good luck! -- DarDar (talk) 21:57, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Cherurbino. You have new messages at RashersTierney's talk page.
Message added 16:29, 12 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

edit[edit]

Why do you mean by this?. I am confused. Renata (talk) 17:10, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Hey, three things:
1) Something does not have to be online to be usable on WP. I use physical printed books all the time. Presumably someone could make a trip to the library (what an inconceivable idea!) and check the book to verify the statement.
2) That particular book is available for preview on Google, just the link was a little messed up. All you had to do was to type in the quote and Google would give you the full link. So it was very much verifiable. So you should be more careful with the ax :)
3) Though I agree that the ref was not that strong to begin with.
Renata (talk) 23:03, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Hey, re:
  1. "make a trip to the library … an inconceivable idea" — that's what you sayFace-wink.svg. Exactly: inconceivable to tens of millions of Internet and WP users. Who are not so lucky as both of us to have a library in 3 subway stops. Which buys all books in English, from all over the world. Printed no matter where it may, and (important!) - whatever the number of copies is their circulation. Seriously: for those unlucky the WP:V rules that "that the source directly support the material in question". WP:VERIFY means that the text (and the page!) must be (sorry for tautology) verifiable.
  2. "type in the quote and Google would give you the full link" — I assume this is of an editor's concern, not of a reader. If you may obtain closer link — please, provide it. However, this link must bring to a specific page of a book, not merely its title.
  3. well, I did not even consider the reliability of the source — simply, I could not, because its text was out of my reach.
A counterquestion (or a "counteradvice" to your #2): did you try to find exerpts from texts, inaccessible via Google books, by putting the quoted phrase that you have read in a printed book into a searchbox of Yahoo or another third-party query engine? Some texts may be available out of Google. — Regards, Cherurbino (talk) 23:56, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
You are wrong about #1. Per WP:SOURCEACCESS: The principle of verifiability implies nothing about ease of access to sources. And for #2, my point was that with a couple extra clicks and due diligence you could have verified the info. You were too quick to give up and pull out the ax. Renata (talk) 00:08, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Cherurbino. You have new messages at Talk:Passport.
Message added 17:26, 12 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Slovenian vs. Slovakian[edit]

The ISO language code for Slovene is 'sl and not sk (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Employment_Record_Book&action=historysubmit&diff=413755564&oldid=413727170). On the image request: I do not own my delavska knjižica and they are going to be abandoned (afaik). Best regards, --Smihael (talk) 21:16, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Update: They already are [1], [2], [3] --Smihael (talk) 21:19, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Cherurbino. You have new messages at DarDar's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- DarDar (talk) 14:00, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Zimniy Stadion (Saint Petersburg)[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Zimniy Stadion (Saint Petersburg) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:43, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi, please see new note on the DYK talk page. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 02:22, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for fixing the refs. I proposed an alt hook on the talk page, please take a look. Also, you may want to add mention of M.M. to the article on Lenin and other pages to populate the What Links Here section of the page. Best, Yoninah (talk) 10:59, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I added more information about the shooting from the Fritz Platten article. I would like to finish up this nomination now. I think I've provided some very "hooky" hooks to interest readers to click on the page. If you have a better hook, please spell it out. Thank you, Yoninah (talk) 13:57, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your note on my talk page. So what did you decide about the hook? I think ALT1, about terrorists "opening fire", will grab English-speaking readers. Yoninah (talk) 14:59, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi[edit]

Thank you for doing good work! Just keep in mind that every time when you call someone "vandal" [4], another "side" can blame you of WP:CIV violation. Five diffs with alleged NPA violations, and someone will report you to AE or ANI. Just do not use v-word, no matter if you are right or wrong. Best wishes, Biophys (talk) 00:07, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Re: You should simply use this template in articles you create: {{copyedit}} Biophys (talk) 18:01, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
With regard to editors who might help with English and copyedits... One of editors who are interested in Black hundreds-related subjects would be User:Galassi. Biophys (talk) 21:43, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Prep[edit]

Hi, I saw your question, prep is here, your article is in prep3 (right below one of mine) and will eventually be moved to one of the 6 queues. The timetable on top of the page tells you that it will probably go to q6 and appear London time 24 February midnight to 6am. Just enjoy! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:52, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Zimniy Stadion (Saint Petersburg)[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 06:02, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Advice[edit]

I feel you may need a better advice (since you asked).

1. Your discussion with Beyond_My_Ken. Yes, I can see the problem: [5]. Sentence should not begin from "Was documented in local police...". Another phrase: The third type, "служебная прописка" is an intermediate type, when a person and his family. This is mixture of Russian and English (speaking Russian, smes' frantsuzskogo s nizegorodskim). Unfortunately I can not fix it because of my topic ban. Please try to improve your language.

2. Your conflict with DD.

  1. Do not complain about other users, especially if you have content disputes with them, because admins will decide that you want to win a content dispute by complaining. Consider Wikipedia:SEEKHELP instead.
  2. If you complain, collect bare diffs. No one wants to read your bickering.
  3. The diffs must demonstrate behavior problems. No one will rule on content. For example, that could be bare diffs with reverts made by user X in multiple articles.
  4. Demonstrate pattern. For example, user X was previously indefinitely banned for edit warring, evaded his block by creating sockpuppets, was caught and indefinitely blocked again, but unblocked and still continue edit-warring.
  5. Ask advice from an individual uninvolved administrator. Yes, you did it, but you did not follow other rules and especially rule #1. Biophys (talk) 15:48, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi! You should know, that User:Hodja Nasreddin (AKA User:Biophys) has been involved in repeated edit wars (Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Russavia-Biophys#Edit_warring) and is now topic banned from editing articles about the Soviet Union and former Soviet Republics, and all related articles (Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Russavia-Biophys#Biophys_topic_banned). Consider this before asking him for advice. --DonaldDuck (talk) 17:22, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to discussion[edit]

Hi, Cherurbino. You are invited to participate in the discussion on Talk:Punitive psychiatry in the Soviet Union#Requested move. In the discussion, the issue is whether to move Punitive psychiatry in the Soviet Union into Political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union or not. Please use ‘oppose’ or ‘support’, motivating, if possible, your decision. Additional information is on User talk:Hodja Nasreddin#Preamble. Thank you. Psychiatrick (talk) 09:35, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi, Cherurbino. I wish you manage to get the admin flag by your request. Psychiatrick (talk) 03:44, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cultural Heritage RU[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svgTemplate:Cultural Heritage RU has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:45, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Happy New Year![edit]

London Eye fireworks 2005.jpg DarDar (talk) 13:52, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanx, Lieber Freunde! For you, too - Glücklische Neues Jahr und die besten Wünsche! Cherurbino (talk) 14:15, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi, dear Cherurbino! How are you, I hope you are fine, DarDar (talk) 08:58, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, Cherurbino. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ves Peterburg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much for this notice! Now the link points at exact Luga in Leningrad Oblast. Cherurbino (talk) 20:16, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, Cherurbino. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)