Jump to content

User talk:Chessterb

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Chessterb, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Chessterb! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like TheAafi (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: KaFe Rocks (January 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Slywriter (talk) 15:17, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boho Beautiful (March 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 20:38, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TMGM (April 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Noahfgodard was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Noahfgodard (talk) 19:29, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boho Beautiful (July 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 07:45, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: KaFe Rocks (July 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Reading Beans were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
R E A D I N G Talk to the Beans? 09:05, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boho Beautiful (July 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 15:26, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TMGM (July 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Urban Versis 32 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TMGM and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:TMGM, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Urban Versis 32KB(talk / contribs) 16:40, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you an undeclared paid editor?

[edit]

If you are being compensated in any way, by anyone for your work on Wikipedia, It's imperative that you declare any such relationships immediately.

Information icon

Hello Chessterb. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Chessterb. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Chessterb|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Quisqualis (talk) 04:14, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No I am not. I am a declared paid editor! You can check my userpage. I have declared all my paid edits! But I am also doing regular edits, whatever I have not declared paid editing is not paid editing. Is there anything in particular you are asking about? maybe you didn't see that I have declared that I am a paid editor? Chessterb (talk) 07:16, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Chessterb! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Draft:KaFe Rocks, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roambee (August 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Stuartyeates (talk) 09:45, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Chessterb, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. MarioGom (talk) 20:13, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]