User talk:Christinedkg

Welcome!

Hi, Christinedkg. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Robby.is.on (talk) 07:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, I'm Robby.is.on. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Manu Dibango, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 07:04, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify: 1. in 1933, when Dibango was born, Douala was in French Cameroon – whether we like it or not, 2. the change to "traditional Cameroonian music called Makossa" suggests he only played traditional Cameroonian music of the "Makossa" variety. This does not seem to be supported by a source in the article. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 07:07, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree the "a literate woman" bit is problematic. Robby.is.on (talk) 12:27, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uchi Uchibeke (July 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Uchi Uchibeke and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Uchi Uchibeke, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lapablo (talk) 08:17, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Christinedkg! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lapablo (talk) 08:17, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uchi Uchibeke (July 1)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Celestina007 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Celestina007 (talk) 17:39, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello Christinedkg, it appears that you may be related to AfricaHacks so you should have a look at our guidelines for editors with a conflict of interest. We for example strongly recommend submitting new articles for review with WP:AFC, they would for example point out problems with the promotional tone. It's also not clear from the sources whether AfricaHacks meets WP:GNG yet. See you around, – Thjarkur (talk) 19:46, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion nomination of AfricaHacks

Hello Christinedkg, I was unable to find significant independent coverage of AfricaHacks, which usually means that the company doesn't yet meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. I've therefore started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AfricaHacks. The matter being discussed is whether it can be shown whether the subject has gotten significant coverage from independent sources. Your input is welcome, the discussion usually lasts for 7 days. If you do partake in the discussion, it's usually recommended to explain what your conflict of interest is.

– Thjarkur (talk) 09:37, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfricaHacks moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, AfricaHacks, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 03:16, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Uchi Uchibeke

Hello, Christinedkg. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Uchi Uchibeke".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:57, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:AfricaHacks

Hello, Christinedkg. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:AfricaHacks, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Uchi Uchibeke for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Uchi Uchibeke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uchi Uchibeke until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Riteboke (talk) 11:41, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]