User talk:Chronodm

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Intentions on Blitzkrieg page[edit]

I am not trying to pursue an agenda, I'm just trying to put to bed some of the falsehoods and myths concerning the subject. The lies and poorly researched books along with assmuptions of various old authors only serve to preserve the ignorance that surrounds 'Blitzkrieg'. The irony is the Germans praticed a more Blitzkrieg style in the German wars of unification and First World War than the Second World War. Infact most of the German military thought 'Blitzkrieg' (for lack of a better word), was based on flawed premise and sought to avoid it in planning for the next war. It was the victory over France that led them to reverse their initial (correct) opinion. Natuarlly, the French campaign was won through luck and a massively incompetent enemy. The Germans failed to realise this. Dapi89 (talk) 14:31, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Soviet Deep Battle and the Blitzkrieg[edit]

Hello David, As you have commented on this issue earlier, you may find my post to be of interest[[1]]. Regards, Steel2009 (talk) 18:45, 13 December 2009 (UTC)


I would appreciate if u could provide me more of gap buffer as i m working on this as my college project of wikipedia.Hitendra Y S (Hitz talk) 16:46, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

I'm not the best person to help you as I've never actually coded with one. Chronodm (talk) 04:17, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Anyways thanks ... hope u will like my editing.Hitendra Y S (Hitz talk) 10:52, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


Hello, and thank you for your interest in WP. The matter of language and tone in a section referring to SA in this article has been tagged since May 2010, but may have been satisfactorily addressed by interval modifications. Unless there are objections, I will remove the tag in 10 days. You provided specific suggestions on the discussion page, and your further thoughts are accordingly solicited.FeatherPluma (talk) 20:18, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for removing the tag. FeatherPluma (talk) 05:29, 7 September 2011 (UTC)


Orologio verde.svg
This user's request to have autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
Chronodm (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log) (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "InnovativeInterfaces". The reason given for InnovativeInterfaces's block is: " Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only you. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. ".

Accept reason:

Autoblock cleared. --jpgordon::==( o ) 17:38, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Hey folks -- I can't control what everybody else in this building does, but I've been editing Wikipedia without controversy for years. Can we tar with a bit narrower brush please? Chronodm (talk) 17:32, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Read up on WP:AUTOBLOCK; you'll see it hasn't anything to do with "broad brushes". --jpgordon::==( o ) 17:38, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Pardon me. Next time I will use the phrase "collateral damage" instead. Chronodm (talk) 17:41, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
That's what we usually call it, and that's why we immediately remove the autoblocks when they are called to our attention by an obvious good-faith editor such as yourself. --jpgordon::==( o ) 19:09, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Chronodm. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)