User talk:Chronus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Disambiguation link notification for July 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rio de Janeiro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Copacabana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Cinema section in Brazil[edit]

Hi, thanks for contributing to the Cinema section I created in the article Brazil, it looks very good! I'm only curious as to why you moved it under Cuisine from below Literature. It's much closer to Literature than Cuisine, after all. Thanks. Cheers, Katastasi and his talk page. 01:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited São Paulo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capital (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

ISIL sanctions on November 2015 Paris attacks[edit]

Commons-emblem-notice.svg Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

LjL (talk) 16:36, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

You're now on notice - please do not revert on the article again. Myself and LjL have begun discussing this on the talk page, where we would value your input. Thanks -- samtar whisper 16:53, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
I don't even like these sanctions, but since I am bound to (and have been effectively limited by) them, I think it's fair to request a moratorium on any further reverts, since you are already at two. I have justified my one revert, straight from the edit summary: Christian symbols are inappropriate when neutral ones exist. You have justified yours with nothing more than an WP:IDONTLIKEIT rationale. LjL (talk) 16:57, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
@LjL: Do not try justified your terrible job as editor with excuses like that. You put a sanction on me just because a photo! Congratulations! Chronus (talk) 17:39, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
I put no sanction on you. I sent you a notice. Calling my articulated concerns "doing a terrible job as an editor" is honestly unwelcome. Feel free to discuss on the article's talk page as asked. LjL (talk) 17:43, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Year, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Copacabana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited São Paulo (state), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Industrial complex (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited São Paulo (state), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wet 'n Wild (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Concerns and controversies at the 2016 Summer Olympics[edit]

Hi, thanks for creating this article. I'm wondering, did you copy content from 2016 Summer Olympics? In that case it would be appropriate to follow WP:CORRECTSPLIT, including adding Template:Split on both talk pages, for proper attribution of editor's contributions. Gap9551 (talk) 04:12, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

@Gap9551: In fact, I just transfer the content to the new article and left an abridged version in the main article. Chronus (talk) 04:23, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for doing that, splitting was a good idea. But you didn't attribute those editors' work in your edit summaries when removing content from the old article, or adding the content to the new article, a procedure described in WP:PROSPLIT. I've asked an administrator to add the attribution. No worries, that will fix it all. Gap9551 (talk) 04:51, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

You're welcomed. Actually I'm still looking for second sources or better citations to established the best WP:NPOV as that section was redacted at first with a clear left-wing politic perception. I don't know of you share the idea with me but if not, Sorry. Leo Bonilla (talk) 18:49, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited São Paulo (state), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wet 'n Wild (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Re: Overdetailed opening ceremony coverage[edit]

I trimmed it for a reason, and much the same reason you've been trimming down the concerns/controversies part: because we have a page with the full details already. Please justify your edits with proper summaries, especially if they involve the reversion of other peoples' edits. ViperSnake151  Talk  16:15, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

@ViperSnake151: Is not because there is a separate article about the opening ceremony that you need to reduce the content to a mere two paragraphs which say nothing about the ceremony. Moreover, for what reason you changed the picture? You do not decide things alone here. We are in a community of volunteers. Chronus (talk) 16:27, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
This is an established format that was used on last year's articles too (see 2012_Summer_Olympics#Opening_ceremony, 2012_Summer_Paralympics#Opening_ceremony. It also feels like, in direct contradiction to your statement about being a "community of volunteers", that you are deciding things on behalf of everyone else. Also I switched the pictures because that's the one the main article on the ceremony was using. ViperSnake151  Talk  16:31, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
@ViperSnake151: Everyone else?! I just saw you complaining about this aspect so far. Moreover, we do not necessarily have to use the same photograph of the main article because there is a huge acquis of images about that event. There is no problem to summarize the text, but do not have to leave just two sentences. Chronus (talk) 16:34, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
@ViperSnake151: Furthermore, here you complain about a "lack of information on environmental actions by organizers", information that you deleted in your edition. I really do not understand that. Chronus (talk) 16:39, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
I meant centralized. I was writing a new section right now. ViperSnake151  Talk  16:43, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Brazil[edit]

Hi. You are now at 3 reverts. Please no more reverts because a report has to be filed if this does not stop. Thank you. Dr. K. 04:52, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 00:30, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 18 November[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Chronus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Template:Largest cities of Paraná[edit]

Please join in the discussion here. Your reverts and lack of discussion are concerning. GiantSnowman 17:09, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Updated data on Brazil article[edit]

Dear Chronus, about the data updates I made in Brazil, the same current sources show the data I updated. I do not need to give or change fonts, the ones that are there show the updated data that I did and that you undid. Please check the sources before undoing again. Arthur Brum (talk) 15:37, 14 April 2017 (UTC)