User talk:Ckruschke

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
NOTE: I AM DRAMATICALLY REDUCING MY WIKIPEDIA TIME. ANY MESSAGES ON MY TALK PAGE MAY NOT BE RESPONDED TO FOR A FEW DAYS/WEEKS.

Happy New Year![edit]

Fuochi d'artificio.gif

Dear Ckruschke,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--FWiW Bzuk (talk)

This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").

sphere[edit]

Hi, I saw your comment "the Bible says in numerous places that the Earth is a sphere".[1] The only examples I'm aware of are highly ambiguous at best, such as alluding to the planet's shape using a word that applies to discs just as much as bumpy oblate globes. Do you have a reference that explains in more detail the current scholarly estimates of what the various different writers of the bible thought about the earth (and its relationship to the sky and cosmos)? Cesiumfrog (talk) 07:37, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Sayings of Jesus on the cross[edit]

Please see talk page discussion re Andrew Hamilton quotes and similar. Thx----08:22, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Frank Viola III for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frank Viola III is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Viola III until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spanneraol (talk) 12:29, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Content of John[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:Content of John has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jujutsuan (Please notify with {{re}} | talk | contribs) 09:41, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Ckruschke. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey[edit]

Magic Wand Icon 229981 Color Flipped.svg

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

  1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
  2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
  3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
  4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
  5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, SteviethemanDelivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your comments from five years ago at Talk:3-2-1 Penguins![edit]

Hi. I am nominating template:source for discussion. When you used the template, did you mean {{citation needed}} or {{refimprove}}? If not, what template did you intend to use? --George Ho (talk) 04:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Wow - this was a long time ago. Considering I was talking to a keyboard jockey who seemed to enjoy blanking whole sections because they were unreferenced rather than just tagging them, I was probably referring to {{citation needed}}. Ckruschke (talk) 12:46, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Ckruschke

December 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Toddst1. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Year Without a Santa Claus, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. As someone adding or restoring unsourced material, the WP:BURDEN is on you to provide adequate sources. Toddst1 (talk) 20:03, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

And you're above any WP:BURDEN? Toddst1 (talk) 18:20, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi. First - none of this stuff is mine. You can verify that through the history.
Second all due apologies, but rather than deleting the section, I flagged it as needing citation which is a perfectly acceptable option. A ref improve flag, in my mind, is much better than just wholesale deletion when there is material that's probably ok, but just isn't properly referenced. Since I didn't add any of this material myself, either those people who did will add the references or, after giving people ample opportunity to make the proper changes, we can delete the material in a few months.
I guess if you differ that strongly you can go ahead and delete it since you have obviously have seniority over me, but it appears to me that the material is sound and not simply fancruft.
Yours Ckruschke (talk) 18:25, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Ckruschke
It doesn't matter who originally added it. If you restore it, it's yours. Toddst1 (talk) 20:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Sorry - disagree completely. However its a moot point - I deleted the section yesterday. Ckruschke (talk) 03:19, 24 December 2016 (UTC) Ckruschke