User talk:Closedmouth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

"annoyinng" ?[edit]

* 20:57, 21 December 2015 Closedmouth (talk | contribs) changed visibility of a revision on page Wikipedia:Requested moves: edit summary hidden (annoyinng) [1]

Curious as to what sort of annoyance (and annoyance to whom) justifies/ed removal from the public record?

I've seen many edit summaries I consider annoying for various reasons. Should I start bringing them to your attention? Spelling 'annoying' "annoyinng"(sic) might be irksome to some for instance ... ;-) ... but personally I find typos pretty trivial and readily forgivable.

Jesting aside, I really am curious what happened. 'Twas an anomalous/puzzling entry to come across. A bit of elaboration would be appreciated.

--Kevjonesin (talk) 05:46, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

It was character spam that screwed up the layout of the page's history. I could have selected RD3 from the dropdown box but I figured "annoying" is more accurate and that nobody would really even care. And yes, my keyboard's "N" key is playing up and I didn't catch the typo before pressing submit. --Closedmouth (talk) 07:12, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for clarifying. Makes sense now. In hindsight—20/20, and all that—perhaps an edit summary of "edit summary hidden (character spam)" would have communicated better as 'annoying' without elaboration can come off a bit capricious. Thank you for responding, --Kevjonesin (talk) 07:35, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

User talk:Xmasvater[edit]

That has to be one of the funnier declines I've seen. Thanks for the comic (yet still apt) relief.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:59, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

 :-) --Closedmouth (talk) 08:30, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Template talk:Short pages monitor[edit]

You may be interested in the discussion at Template talk:Short pages monitor#Need to define and possibly rethink this template. —Anomalocaris (talk) 23:27, 31 January 2016 (UTC)