This user helped get "1804 Antigua–Charleston hurricane" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 7 March 2014.
This user helped get "1806 Great Coastal hurricane" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 12 March 2014.
This user helped get "1815 North Carolina hurricane" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 13 March 2014.
This user helped get "Cyclone Bobby" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 9 July 2014.
This user helped get "Cyclone Winifred" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 19 February 2014.
This user helped get "Hurricane Arthur (2014)" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 29 July 2014.
This user helped get "Mediterranean tropical cyclone" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 25 February 2014.
This user helped "1804 Antigua–Charleston hurricane" become a good article on 1 April 2014.
This user helped "1804 Snow hurricane" become a good article on 28 December 2013.
This user helped "1806 Great Coastal hurricane" become a good article on 6 March 2014.
This user helped "1815 North Carolina hurricane" become a good article on 12 March 2014.
This user helped "1846 Havana hurricane" become a good article on 18 February 2014.
This user helped "Cyclone Bobby" become a good article on 6 July 2014.
This user helped "Cyclone Winifred" become a good article on 4 March 2014.
This user helped "Hurricane Arthur (2014)" become a good article on 8 June 2015.
This user helped "Hurricane Cindy (1963)" become a good article on 12 July 2014.
This user helped "Mediterranean tropical cyclone" become a good article on 24 February 2014.

User talk:Cloudchased

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Wikipedia email re signup[edit]

Hello, Cloudchased. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

HazelAB (talk) 13:58, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Done. Cloudchased (talk) 15:04, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

United States Senate election in Florida, 2016[edit]

I understand you're trying to be helpful, but live updating the article as results come in is not constructive. WP:Wikipedia is not news. Furthermore, WP:There is no deadline. It would be much better if you waited until 100% of the results have been reported. ALPolitico (talk) 01:15, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 September 2016[edit]

The Signpost: 29 September 2016[edit]

RfC for page patroller qualifications[edit]

Following up from the consensus reached here, the community will now establish the user right criteria. You may wish to participate in this discussion. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:47, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 October 2016[edit]

The Signpost: 4 November 2016[edit]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Cloudchased. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer - RfC[edit]

Hi Cloudchased. You are invited to comment at a further discussion on the implementation of this user right to patrol and review new pages that is taking place at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/RfC on patrolling without user right. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:11, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 November 2016[edit]

The Signpost: 22 December 2016[edit]

Cyclone 90M[edit]

Hello, nice to meet you, I have to say that what you did in the Mediterranean tropical-like cyclone was not good, because you removed Cyclone 90M, however, I fixed the page, don't do that again next time. Abdullah Almarri - A.W.S.T. (talk) 21:28, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 January 2017[edit]

The Signpost: 6 February 2017[edit]

The Signpost: 27 February 2017[edit]

March 2017 WikiCup newsletter[edit]

And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. It would have been 5 points, but when a late entrant was permitted to join the contest in February, a promise was made that his inclusion would not result in the exclusion of any other competitor. To achieve this, the six entrants that had the lowest positive score of 4 points have been added to the 64 people who otherwise would have qualified. As a result, some of the groups have nine contestants rather than eight. Our top four scorers in round 1 were:

  • Scotland Cas Liber, last year's winner, led the field with two featured articles on birds and a total score of 674.
  • European Union Iry-Hor, a WikiCup newcomer, came next with a featured article, a good article and a tally of 282 bonus points for a score of 517. All these points came from the article Nyuserre Ini, an Ancient Egyptian pharaoh,
  • Japan 1989, another WikiCup newcomer, was in joint third place at 240. 1989 has claimed points for two featured lists and one good article relating to anime and comedy series, all of which were awarded bonus points.
  • South Australia Peacemaker67 shared third place with five good articles and thirteen good article reviews, mostly on naval vessels. He is also new to the competition.

The largest number of DYKs have been submitted by Vivvt and The C of E, who each claimed for seven, and MBlaze Lightning achieved eight articles at ITN. Carbrera and Peacemaker67 each claimed for five GAs and Krishna Chaitanya Velaga was well out in front for GARs, having reviewed 32. No featured pictures, featured topics or good topics yet, but we have achieved three featured articles and a splendid total of fifty good articles.

So, on to the second round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)