User talk:Cloudswrest

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

A page you started has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Accumulator (cryptography), Cloudswrest!

Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

It would be best if you simplified the vocabulary a little bit so someone who didn't know English very well can understand it. If you can't seem to do it, though, someone else might.

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for June 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael Collins Piper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coeur d'Alene (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:18, 12 June 2015 (UTC)


Hi, thanks for your edits.

I've enclosed the relevant section from the current RCOphth guidance (

3.1 "It is unnecessary to use disposable tonometry for all routine cases. There is no evidence that using single-use devices for all routine is cost-effective in reducing infection risk. It is acceptable to use reusable tonometer prisms provided that they are decontaminated correctly between patients. Cellular and proteinaceous debris can be present on tonometers after use, although the cornea is now regarded as low risk for prion infectivity. After each use, and before being allowed to dry, re-usable prisms should ideally be rinsed in water, washed with soap/detergent and rinsed again, then immersed in 1% sodium hypochlorite solution for at least 10 minutes; after which they should be rinsed (using sterile water) and dried."

There's an interesting article in Eye by Hillier et al and a letter in the BJO by Mehta et al which are worth having a look at if you have time. Hope you find them helpful. Aspheric Aspheric (talk) 21:30, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)