User talk:Cnilep

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


RfC[edit]

You might wish to see this Talk:Han_Chinese#RfC_on_inclusion_of_numbers_of_Chinese_people as it involves the page Chinese people. I forgot to inform you earlier. Regards, --Lemongirl942 (talk) 18:49, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Request to review Syntactic Structures[edit]

Hello, I have been working on this article on and off for a long time. I would be happy if you took some time to read the article and gave me some feedback so that I can improve it in terms of content, language, tone, neutrality, precision, concision, etc. Thanks in advance. Zaheen (talk) 08:29, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi again, thank you very much for your review of the article! It has been very helpful. I have followed it up with revisions. I think have addressed most of the issues you have raised in your review. I have mentioned what I did in the talk page. Could you please take a quick look again and let me know if there are other areas of improvement? Zaheen (talk) 20:05, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

In general, I think you've done a good job addressing issues I raised. I wonder if three sections – Rhetorical style, Reception, and Criticisms – are really different enough to require separation? But on the other hand, having all that information in one section would likely be overwhelming. At any rate, I don't suppose I have much additional criticism at the moment. Happy editing, Cnilep (talk) 02:02, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you again for all your comments. I'm glad that you liked the changes. As for the organization of the sections, I think they are different enough to warrant their current arrangement. Also, as you said, it keeps the length of sections balanced. As you have no additional criticism, do you think I should nominate the article for GA status at this stage? Zaheen (talk) 08:27, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Just to add to my rationale of keeping separate sections on those three things : I actually tried to partially follow the organization of the article On the Origin of Species, a featured article where there are separate sections (or subsections) on the book's literary style, on its reception and finally on challenges to Darwin's theory. Zaheen (talk) 11:36, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

I think a Good Article nomination might be a good way to get additional feedback and move forward toward Featured Article status. Best wishes, Cnilep (talk) 01:05, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Cnilep. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)