User talk:Codabray

Ways to improve Paul Napper

Hello, Codabray,

Thank you for creating Paul Napper.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. However, this article is heavily dependent on sources that are not reliable (see WP:RS). Reliable independent sources will include newspapers and other publications with strong reputations for journalism and fact-checking; unreliable sources may include sites associated with the subject, or which rely on information originating from the subject (the Rotary reports and the charity website, for example). Notability needs to be verified through substantial coverage (non-trivial, more than passing mentions) in reliable, independent sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Paul W}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Paul W (talk) 11:41, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul Napper for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Napper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Napper until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:56, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 05:50, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]