|This is CodeCat's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to CodeCat.|
|This talk page is automatically archived by lowercase sigmabot III. Any threads with no replies in 90 days may be automatically moved. Sections without timestamps are not archived.|
2007: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2009: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
An Administrative Discussion Involving You
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Revert talk (Glagolithic)
Hello, please bear in mind that this:http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Glagolitic_alphabet&oldid=650600745 is the original text that was changed by ip user 188.8.131.52 here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Glagolitic_alphabet&diff=637449731&oldid=637449460 and here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Glagolitic_alphabet&diff=637449460&oldid=635483154 for no reason, despite it being sourced. (agenda editing)
Thank you for understanding.
I'm not going to dispute that your logged in but it's probably though Google Hangouts because Google Talk is no longer in operation or supported and in fact if you try to go to www.google.com/talk it redirects to Hangouts and it is not possible to download the software. YborCityJohn (talk) 19:53, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- The service is still in operation, it has been since before Hangouts was even a thing. So either Google Talk is still up, or it was renamed to Hangouts and the article should therefore redirect to it. CodeCat (talk) 20:03, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Proto-Uralic vowel shifts
It is hard to see how the version of The version of Proto-Uralic language to which you just reverted my changes was an improvement on my attempt. Too-free use of reversion is one of the most deplorable features of Wikipedia culture: edits are to be done away with if there is anything wrong with their end state, never mind what came before; so much for being bold and all that.
That previous version spoke of "raising *a-ə > *o-a", which is a raising of the stem vowel and not of the following reduced vowel, and "fronting *ä-ä > *a-e", which is not true of either vowel! (OK, perhaps you take "e" to be /e/ and as such minutely fronter than /æ/, though not in a phonemically relevant way; then all we have is inconsistency in which vowel is the criterial one.) I had meant to rework the second description to be in line with the first, i.e. to have the stem vowel in mind when using the directional language. Anyway, now I've gone and torn it all out and just spoken of "changes", which I trust is unobjectionable... 4pq1injbok (talk) 15:31, 7 July 2016 (UTC)