User talk:Colliric

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

February 2008[edit]

Information.png

Hi, the recent edit you made to Planet of the Apes (1968 film) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:51, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

April 2008[edit]

Information.png

Hi, the recent edit you made to Jurassic Park has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Enigma message Review 06:31, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Witchetty Grub collaboration[edit]

Witchetty grub is the new Australian Collaboration of the Fortnight. You supported its nomination, so please help to improve it in any way you can. Thanks - --Scott Davis Talk 13:17, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Page move of Cold Case[edit]

I requested that an administrator undo the move you made. This has already been done. The term Cold case is already found on the correct location, wiki articles are case sensitive. In case someone looking for the term ends up at Cold Case, there is a link to a disambiguation page on top which will redirect the user to whatever he is looking for. There is no reason to move the page of the tv show. If you had started a discussion about this, prior to moving it, that would have been made clear. Please start a discussion first about such page moves next time.--Fogeltje (talk) 08:26, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Blair Witch video games[edit]

"Original research" doesn't literally mean only doing research; one of us observing something which has not been addressed before in a reliable source constitutes OR too. If the reference is as obvious as you say, it ought not to be hard to find some sources for it. The part about the fanfic is problematic too; fanfic is generally not considered notable; there would need to be WP:RS for them too. I actually have those games, they came with the box set of the movies, but I don't have a system that would play them unfortunately, they sounded interesting. Шизомби (talk) 23:57, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Professional wrestling in Australia[edit]

Your edit on this page was fine, except for the reference to the unencyclopaedic "Graveyard Timeslot" which has been replaced. Also, please provide a reliable source for the claim that One HD has purchased video of the Hulkamania tour. If you can't it will have to be removed under WP:V as unverified. Thank you. !! Justa Punk !! 01:06, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

When seeking reliable sources, stay away from sites that are tabloid in nature and print rumours and so forth. Please refer to this section for guidance. Wrestling Inc and Wrestling Truth are both tabloid sites. Thank you. !! Justa Punk !! 10:22, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

February 2010[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page The Departed has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Hamtechperson 01:04, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

July 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Married... with Children, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 14:30, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Do not edit another users comments[edit]

Please do not modify or delete other users' comments on discussion pages. You are welcome to participate in discussions; but remember that, unlike articles, comments left on these pages should not be edited. Thank you.. Specifically you flagged his comment as a personal insult when no such insult exists. IRWolfie- (talk) 10:59, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Your changes to Star Trek: The Motion Picture[edit]

I reverted your changes because their meaning was unclear. I couldn't figure out what you were trying to say, so I couldn't fix the wording. It sounded like you were saying the Director's Cut master was printed in 480-line SD, which didn't make sense. Please re-work the change and add it back, with a reliable source cited.

Thanks! — UncleBubba T @ C ) 11:20, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

I'm not going to bother... It's what happened, but I guess it's not that important. Yes, The Director's Cut was only mastered in 480-Line SD, due to budgetary constraints(they were only allocated a small budget which mostly went on the new special effects), and the fact that it was specifically edited for a DVD release. It wasn't actually mastered to film(it was never printed to film), it was mastered to DVD. That's the reason the original theatrical cut was selected for Blu-Ray release instead and the director's cut wasn't even included on the Blu-Ray at all. http://www.therpf.com/f47/star-trek-motion-picture-directors-edition-blu-107942/ http://www.startrek.com/boards-topic/33343705/star-trek-the-motion-picture-director-s-cut-bluray

Too bad they're not sources that could go on the page.... Colliric (talk) 14:15, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Mokbel arrest.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Mokbel arrest.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:08, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Prometheus and Zeta 2 Reticuli Hi, thanks for dropping me a message about Prometheus. Unfortunately I disagree that Ridley Scott mentioning it in passing in an interview can be considered an official part of the story, so I've removed it again. Only information in the film itself should be considered official, or 'canon'. This principle is accepted when discussing any fictional universe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pomegranate (talkcontribs) 00:24, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

In which case, you should also delete Alien for good measure, because it's never mentioned speficially as the setting in that film either. It was loosely established though both interview comments made by Ridley and the Star Map(and distance to earth) that is shown in the scene with Lambert.... It was also thus extablished in Prometheus, with a simular scene where David is in the navigation room and sees the hologram showing the engineer's journey to earth. Not to mention the star map that we see on the isle of wright which shows the Reticuli star system. Colliric (talk) 00:48, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Please explain how the scene in Prometheus unambiguously show the star system to be Z2R? Is there a text label? Have you not heard the phrase 'two wrongs don't make a right?'. If it's not actually mentioned in Alien, then yes, it should be removed - but I'm not policing the whole article. I don't have Alien on DVD, but in this scene from the workprint version it is specifically spoken out loud: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/k36oSzI9QRcd4q1066K - perhaps you'd like to check the final version of the film to confirm whether that line was left in? Considering your mention of the "Isle of Wright" (no such place, didn't feature in Prometheus), I'm not sure you can rely on your own memory pomegranate (talk) 20:59, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

The line wasn't in the final version, as Scott thought it gave away too much. The view screen however isn't just random anyway, because it shows the Reticulum constellation.

I'm not scottish.... so I mispelled "Wight". But the star map shown in the cave paintings is actually closely aligned to Ms Marjorie Fish's interpretation of Betty Hill(the famous UFO abductee)'s star map of the Zeta Reticuli system and the surrounding stars(the constellation is shown by the strong red lines): http://www.gravitywarpdrive.com/Zeta_Reticuli_Images/Betty_Hill_Star_Map.gif and the prometheus one: http://www.geeksofdoom.com/GoD/img/2012/06/12-06-12-prometheus_cave_painting.jpg ... the same.

"The pictogram shows humans worshiping giant beings pointing to the stars. The crude constellation depicted in these ideograms is a perfect match for the Zeta Reticula system, some 39 light-years (220 trillion miles) away." http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2012/06/14/prometheus-to-create-you-must-destroy/

and here's some infomation about the constellation and the Hill star map taken from one of those "Ufo believer" sites: http://www.gravitywarpdrive.com/Constellation__Reticulum.htm http://www.gravitywarpdrive.com/Zeta_Reticuli_Incident.htm

I'm not trying to tell you "UFOs are real, etc" I'm just providing you with some interesting information that Scott himself was aware of when setting Alien there(and also Prometheus!). He was aware it was the place UFO believers often cite as where their Abductor's come from and he obviously finds it interesting because of that! Colliric (talk) 11:44, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Mokbel arrest.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mokbel arrest.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:00, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

I have fixed the problem based on the same reason of a simular mug-shot photograph found in the Keith Faure page. Basically this is the most well known image of the REAL(see my previous edits to the page, I got rid of the edits of someone posting fake images to the page) Tony Mokbel due to the fact it's his mugshot AND he was arrested and photographed with a cheap wig on. And most images of him are copyrighted, so may as well use the most famous/funniest/recognisable. Even if changed, the image is likely to reappear on the page later on, due to it's overwelming popularity. Colliric (talk) 06:35, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mokbel arrest.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mokbel arrest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:13, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Sorry dude, but a Vandal actually removed the original article link. I have since restored it. The Article it appears in is Tony Mokbel, and as you can see a vandal edited the photo's page so it was misspelled as "Mobel"(breaking the link), and then proceedede to put their silly images of themselves into the Mokbel article. I have warned them not to do it again and reported the vandalism. Colliric (talk) 14:07, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mokbel arrest.jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Mokbel arrest.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:29, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

see my note above.... I need someone to lock the article so that it can only be edited by autoconfirmed users as it is being altered by a serial vandal. Colliric (talk) 05:03, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

September 2012[edit]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to The Master (2012 film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 15:02, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mokbel arrest.jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Mokbel arrest.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:51, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Underbelly: Squizzy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carl Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:29, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Colliric. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Colliric. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 03:15, 22 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

April 2013[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  (✉→BWilkins←✎) 09:00, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Colliric (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

The other user is Vandalising the Article Village Cinemas by removing the "Locations" section without proper reason. Although Village Cinemas is under the Australian Theatres partnership, the trademarks remained owned by Village Roadshow, as such it is it's own organisation with it's own specifically branded locations. No Cinema in australia is branded Australian Theatres, it is primarily a management and liason group between Event Cinemas and Village Cinemas, The user is unjustified in making this fundamentally wrong alteration to the article. Colliric (talk) 09:08, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Believing that your edits were justified does not make edit warring acceptable. Almost everyone who edit wars thinks that they are RIGHT. In response to your comments below, there is no such thing as vandalism that isn't deliberate, either by Wikipedia's definition or by ordinary common sense. If I do something that I sincerely believe is helpful but I am mistaken that is not vandalism. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:26, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

Although reverting vandalism is an exemption to WP:3RR, the definition of vandalism might be a little different than you're trying to use (✉→BWilkins←✎) 09:56, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
I agree it was possibly not "delibrate" vandalism under Wikipedia's specific definition, but it was certainly Vandalism(delibrate or not). Perhaps I should have put a page-protection request with my second reversion as well as an official warning on his talk page, rather than only reverting it and proceeding to react strongly and "tell him off". My Mistake, sorry. Will do that if it happens a third time. I also hope the Article is not altered misguidingly in the interim by another user. Colliric (talk) 10:46, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
You will note that the other editor has also been blocked for edit-warring. We have content dispute resolution processes for a reason (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:05, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

May 2013[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to Amok Time, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 14:35, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

It is also stated in the page of the Futurama episode. There is no need for a reference here, it is on the page of the Futurama episode. The episode acts as it's own reference since it is a primary source since it uses most of the plot(and the famous fight music) of Amok Time. Colliric (talk) 15:01, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia articles are not reliable sources as discussed at WP:CIRCULAR. If the episode page does not include a citation then it should be removed there. If it does provide a citation then the citation should be copied to Amok Time. In any event, no matter how closely we think an episode of tv resembles another, it is still synthesis to say that without a reliable source. Cheers. Doniago (talk) 15:33, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
I will do that. ThanksColliric (talk) 16:52, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Sikhs Vs Sheikhs[edit]

Please, please learn the diffrence between Sikh's and Sheikh's. Your comments on the Star Trek page are high offensive, although I have now realised you didn't mean to be. Please learn difference between ethnic minorities before commenting. Here is an extract of my comments from that page. SH 14:58, 19 May 2013 (UTC) ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── no offence but you have no idea what you are talking about. North-West Indians are light brown skinned. They have originated from groups like Jat, Scythians from the Black Sea area. They tend to be tall. An extreme variation is the wrestler The Great Khali. There is no stirring by Muslims (please stop confusing Muslims with Sikhs). He is not a Sheik but a SIKH. Motalban looks exactly like North-West Indians or Punjabi's. It's this sort of ignorance that has led to the Whitewashing of the Star Trek Universe. SH 14:58, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

My dear fellow editor. [This http://americanturban.com/] is not a blog, but a legitimate website. It offer news, as well as advice to the Sikh community. It is the outlet for Sikh's to the press in America. Take a look for yourself. Thanks SH 16:01, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Sorry If I wasn't clear, but the reference you used in the previous paragraph was the one I was talking about. That is a blog. Secondly "americanturban" is a biased source. WP:Bias and WP:NEWSBLOG Colliric (talk) 16:10, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The L. Ron Hubbard Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bridge Publications (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

The Twilight Zone (franchise)[edit]

In regards to my recent edits to The Twilight Zone (franchise), sorry about that Star Trek typo. As you suggested, this was unintentional. As for the rest of the edits, I support what I did 100 percent. That article is not primarily about the original show. The original show already has its own article (The Twilight Zone (1959 TV series)). Instead, the article at hand is about the entire franchise that includes all media associated with the Twilight Zone brand. Examples of this include: The Muppets, The Simpsons (franchise), and Star Wars. I think my edit was a starting block towards having The Twilight Zone (franchise) represent what it should. In any case, this article is lacking. --TFunk (talk) 00:01, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

ANI Notice[edit]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Mattel. Thank you. —Guy Macon (talk) 17:58, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Dr Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Statue in Melbourne's Chinatown.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Dr Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Statue in Melbourne's Chinatown.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:00, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ben (The Walking Dead), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telltale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fuck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fuckwit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Fat Tony & Co.[edit]

Hi, Fat Tony & Co. is not part of the Underbelly series, see: [1] TBSfan1223 (talk) 13:47, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Incorrect, the series has been planned as the next installment, and possibly the last installment, of Underbelly. The production has been in planning since Razor was made, which is how I know this. They began working on "The Underbelly Sequel" as it was originally nicknamed at the time (due to it's direct plot links to the first season, and apart from Badness, is the only one set after it). That was simply not made clear in the article, which seemed to consider it a fresh proposal(which is NOT the case). Probably the Author just took it for granted people would know it's Underbelly. The series is made by the same production company, for the same channel, in the same style and for presumably the same timeslot... Ergo it IS UNDERBELLY. Also Vince Colosimo's statement would only make sense in this particular context. Colliric (talk) 16:21, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jurassic Park (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • would help him finally complete the first three episodes of the [[Star Wars]] saga as he saw it. [[<ref>Shone, Tom. [http://books.google.com/books?id=_HMOHsjIb5cC&pg=PA218&lpg=PA218 ''Blockbuster:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:57, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

A Streetcar Named Desire (play) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Vanity Fair
Blue Jasmine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Vanity Fair

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about The L. Ron Hubbard Series[edit]

Hello, Colliric,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether The L. Ron Hubbard Series should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The L. Ron Hubbard Series .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Green Cardamom (talk) 02:37, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Butter-Menthol[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Butter-Menthol has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to locate substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. Perma-stub.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 15:37, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Dirty Harry[edit]

Hi. I reverted your edit to Dirty Harry, because it was not accompanied by any citations of reliable, verifiable sources explicitly, as is required by the Verifiability and Original Research policies. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:57, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Pretty stupid thing to do mate.... I'll go aheard and revert it back with the link, but you could have looked it up yourself. https://itunes.apple.com/us/movie/dirty-harry/id530783541

Colliric (talk) 01:37, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

No, it's not a stupid thing to do, it's the policy-compliant thing to do, which you should know by now. It's not my job to look up sources for material you want to add to articles, it's yours. My Wikipedia workload is already large enough as it is.
But since we're talking about doing stupid things, you spelled its as it's. Again.
And the source you cited makes no mention of the film's sequels, or "high definition". Nightscream (talk) 01:49, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Yes it does. The rest of the films in the series are listed under "Viewers Also Bought", and if you click through to the actual store link and open it in Itunes itself, it lists as "HD 1080p".Colliric (talk) 02:46, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Why do you keep writing the word its as "it's"? That's the third time you did this, after I pointed it out to you twice.
And high definition is not a proper noun. Neither is the word digital.
The phrase "HD 1080p" does not appear anywhere on the iTunes page. A good source is one that actually contains the information in question, and doesn't require clicking on other links. I've added one that does. Nightscream (talk) 04:03, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Please do not add your own personal viewpoints or analyses to Wikipedia articles, as you did with these edits to the Dirty Harry (character) article. As I mentioned to you above, Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of inline citations. If you want to add the assertion of which films were influenced by Dirty Harry, then please include citations reliable, secondary sources to support this. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 05:37, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Lol, so we have to put up with the shitty 1995 film being mentioned as inspired by it, but how dare the comicbook be mentioned, and the far better 2012 film is 100% not allowed at all! Actually despite how idiotic it is, policy wise I guess you are "correct"... Why don't you just rewrite it yourself? Perhaps extract the 1995 bomb, put a new paragraph about how the "Judge Dredd" property and film adaptations are inspired by Dirty Harry? You obviously won't be happy with any edit I make to correct that problem(of the WORST judge Dredd thing being the only one mentioned), so may as well write it up yourself! Colliric (talk) 05:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
I see now you've deleted the whole section. Which I actually agree with. Sorry, I thought you'd just undone my edit when I saw your comment on my talk page. I agree with deleting this, if it's re-added by someone else, it needs to be a reference to the wider Judge Dredd franchise/character. So I'd watch out for that. Colliric (talk) 06:26, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
The article is on my Watchlist, so I should see all edits made to it.
But feel free to re-add the material I removed that you can find sources for. Happy Holidays. Nightscream (talk) 04:14, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nanotechnology in fiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Skynet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Colliric. You have new messages at Wikipedical's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- Wikipedical (talk) 23:33, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

January 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Star Wars sources and analogues may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *''[[tincludes many elements derived from the 1936 Universal serial ''[[Flash Gordon (serial)|Flash

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:36, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Collingwood Football Club (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mark Williams
The Club (1980 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Motif

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prince of Persia: The Forgotten Sands (Wii), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flashback (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 3 March 2015 (UTC)