User talk:Comatmebro

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Please change your user name[edit]

I would like to please respectfully ask you to change your user name. Under our policy WP:USERNAME we are asked to select user names that make other users comfortable. We are asked not to select user names that make harmonious editing difficult. We are asked not to select user names which seem to be intended to provoke an emotional response. Decorating your signature with "come at me" only serves to further demonstrate what can only be interpreted as a confrontational, battle-ground attitude toward collaboration in editing WP:BATTLE and not at all the standard of collegiality of our community. Changing your user name may be in your best interest, particularly if you intend to edit in the areas of politics, climate change, and organized labor. Thank you. Hugh (talk) 04:29, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Really, Hugh? You can't gain consensus on article talk pages so you try another strategy--questioning another user's user name? Somehow I don't think a user changing their name is going to change their tune toward your increasingly problematic editing behaviors. Champaign Supernova (talk) 16:23, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Lol, this is getting ridiculous. DaltonCastle (talk) 18:42, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
I would like to respectfully say that I have been active on Wikipedia with this username since 2012 -- and have never encountered any problems nor have I made another user feel uncomfortable in any circumstance. If a specific user has felt uncomfortable from my username in a specific context, then I would be happy to consider changing it. Thank you for your concern. Cheers, Comatmebro ~Come at me~ 04:15, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
"and have never encountered any problems nor have I made another user feel uncomfortable" Your choice of user name has made a fellow editor uncomfortable. We are asked to assume good faith in collaborating on editing, but your unfortunate choice of username can only be interpreted as an invitation to confrontation. Your deliberate choice to decorate your signature with "come at me" in talk page discussions further evidences a possible underlying shortfall in good faith and civility. Perhaps you selected your user name before you fully understood the civility and collegiality expectations of participating in our collaborative community. Your choice of user name is inappropriate, especially if you plan to continue contributing in some of the most contentious areas of our encyclopedia. Respectfully, please change your user name. Thank you. Hugh (talk) 17:25, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Absolutely absurd. WP:WIKILAWYERING, WP:HARASS, WP:BULLYING. DaltonCastle (talk) 21:21, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make a complaint, Hugh, there's a noticeboard for that. Don't be shy. But first you may wish to respond to my query here [1]. Maybe your fellow collaborators can't pick appropriate user names because spelling iz two hard 4 us. Champaign Supernova (talk) 02:45, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello, Comatmebro. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hugh (talk) 20:05, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notice regarding American politics[edit]

Commons-emblem-notice.svg This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Again, this notice does not imply misconduct. I am leaving this notice on the talk page of all editors who have recently participated in any ANEW report about Americans for Prosperity, because that page is now subject to a 1RR restriction. —Darkwind (talk) 18:24, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Philip Benedict[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Philip Benedict. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

ANI discussion[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Champaign Supernova (talk) 04:04, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Quint Studer[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Quint Studer. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Finally (CeCe Peniston song)[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Finally (CeCe Peniston song). Legobot (talk) 00:02, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Eliot Higgins[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Eliot Higgins. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Center for Media and Democracy as RS[edit]

Are you really of the opinion that CMD is a reliable source? It is a hard-left advocacy org. I would say that it is generally reliable only for its own opinions. Your mere suggestion that it is reliable is being pointed to as support for the idea that ther is a "consensus" that it is RS and the use of CMD materials broadly at the Fred Koch bio article. I suggest that you look into CMD and the materials and reconsider. My assessment is that it is not, you may disagree but I hope you will consider looking again. Capitalismojo (talk) 15:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

@Capitalismojo Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I was attempting to prove a point against the, oh-so-clever Mr. Hugh, and naturally he took my comments out of context. I will strike the portion of my comment that defines CMD as a reliable source - let me know if there is anything else I can do to help improve the page. Cheers Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 16:34, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for looking at this. Capitalismojo (talk) 16:49, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
You see what he is doing right? You know I was trying to prove a point and he trolled the living hell out of me... Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 16:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC)


Speedy criterion A1, "no context" is only for use when it is possible to tell what the subject of the article is. Pleasesee WP:CSWD for the exact wording of the speedy criteria,which are used onlyas defined there. DGG ( talk ) 00:02, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Josh Duggar[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Josh Duggar. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

BLP PROD[edit]

is only for BLPs John of not a living person ;Roger de Newburgh died in 1192. (The article is very incomplete, but major historic noblemen are usually notable) DGG ( talk ) 03:45, 30 August 2015 (UTC)