User talk:ComputerGeezer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Bernoulli's principle[edit]

Hi ComputerGeezer. Can you supply a descriptive caption to the image you added to Bernoulli's principle? Thanks, Crowsnest (talk) 23:43, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

I think your approach (in sand box) is much better than the old math-centric approach. Actually I would like to see even more explanation, like why the fluid accelerates (same volume of flow) and why the pressure changes (for dummies). John (talk) 02:53, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

List of systems engineering at universities[edit]

Thanks for you excellent work on the List of systems engineering at universities. The list really looks impressive. I wasn't even aware those functions where possible in Wikipedia. I had never seen them before. -- Mdd (talk) 00:51, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Peter Drucker article[edit]

{{helpme}} I have some suspicion that the Drucker article has been extensively modified by someone with a probable conflict of interest. (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/DruckerInstitute)

Is there a forum where this issue should be raised?

ComputerGeezer (talk) 02:19, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

I've warned the user about WP:COI. If you continue to be suspicious of the activity, make a report to WP:ANI. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 02:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
FYI, the user has been blocked because of a username violation. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 02:33, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Rational[edit]

{{helpme}} I've been cleaning up links to the Rational disambiguation page, and I ran into a page that, at best, needs serious help. Diagonal Thinking appears to be a giant essay on a non-notable topic. But it's the author's only significant contribution to Wikipedia, so I'd hate to put too harsh a tag on it. Any suggestions on how to encourage, but redirect the author? ComputerGeezer (talk) 03:11, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

  • I'd say just politely inform them that Wikipedia is not a place for personal essays, then AfD the article. (Wow, that's a lot of red links in the article too!) Ten Pound Hammer and his otters(Broken clamshellsOtter chirps) 03:18, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
    • The editor seems to have disappeared. I proposed deleting the article. ComputerGeezer (talk) 17:56, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Work Breakdown Structure[edit]

Don't you think this article could have a Software item? --Mauricio (talk) 15:53, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

There are too many software tools out there to simply add a representative sample to the article. (This is true in a lot of areas, which is why Wikipedia has some standard policies on external links.) If we add a "tools" section, it should refer to neutral third-party sites rather than particular tool vendor locations. ComputerGeezer (talk) 17:18, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Missile List[edit]

Good progress on the missile list! I was thinking about it and do you think we should add a colomn named User with the origin one? For instance, Iraq is a user of SS-1, but it is Russian-made... --Ŧħę௹ɛя㎥ 02:50, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

I think in order to replace the "by country" list, we need to list each user separately. I was trying to come up with a better word then "origin" -- I think "user" is a bit mild, but I don't have a good alternative yet... ComputerGeezer (talk) 02:59, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
As per the task force's definition of the word User, is the countries, armed forces, or other groups using the weapon, which totally applies to what you mean... There has been a debate years ago about using Users or Operators but they finally decided to choose User. --Ŧħę௹ɛя㎥ 03:18, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Sortable table[edit]

{{helpme}} Is there any way to get null cells to sort to the bottom of a sortable table? I'm working on a List of missiles, and I would like for user to see NATO Codes at the top of the list if that is their sort choice. (Right now all the uncoded missiles show up at the top...) ComputerGeezer (talk) 20:22, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

List of generic and genericized trademarks[edit]

Sorry but you need to re-read our policies. Particularly WP:V. "Any material without a reliable source can be removed..." If there is even a remote chance that one of our articles contains incorrect material, that material should be excised. If you care enough about the subject you are more than welcome to restore the content with sources. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 11:14, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Again I'm sorry but our policies are clear. Articles have to contain reliable sources for everything. You can't just say the reliable sources are on some other Wikipedia article, go find them. If you are aware of a policy that states otherwise, please let me know. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 00:49, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Can you help?[edit]

I think I've exhausted my ability to explain my thoughts on the value of maintaining a List of generic and genericized trademarks here. Perhaps you can take a stab at explaining the issue?

Much indebted,

ComputerGeezer (talk) 01:58, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

I think the better course atm (while discussion is ongoing) would be to go find the references to the terms in question. (The complete OED might be a place to start?) References are typically the quickest way to deal with concerns. - jc37 02:40, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Rocketry activity check[edit]

You are receiving this message because you are currently listed as being a member of WikiProject Rocketry. In order to establish how many members are still actively editing within the project, if you still consider yourself to be an active member of WikiProject rocketry, please go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Rocketry/Members and move your name from the list of inactive members at the bottom of the page to the list of active members at the top of the page.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Rocketry at 19:05, 12 March 2011 (UTC).

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:49, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

File source problem with File:WBS.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:WBS.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:32, 9 April 2016 (UTC)