User talk:Coolguy922

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

June 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Loriendrew. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jordy Nelson, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ (talk) 02:53, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Coolguy922, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Coolguy922! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Reliable sources for dates of birth, etc.[edit]

I note that you are adding specific dates of birth to articdle which had only a tear of birth. Where is this information coming from? Because "date of birth vandalism" is a problem on Wikipedia, you are going to need to provide citations from reliable source for these changes, so we verify this information and be certain that it is correct. I've reverted many of your edits that were not sourced, please do not try to restore them with a citation from a reliable source, they will simply be removed again.

Incidentally, the requirement for a reliable source goes for every piece of information added to Wikipedia if it is questioned by another editor. Thanks, BMK (talk) 02:46, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

July 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Dwpaul. Your recent edit to the page Dr. Seuss appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dwpaul Talk 21:41, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to Jesus, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:29, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Numbering of British Prime Ministers[edit]

British Prime Ministers aren't numbered like US Presidents for several boring reasons. Firstly, the term "Prime Minister" wasn't used until the early twentieth century, before then the office was called "First Lord of the Treasury", in fact to this day the Prime Minister still is the First Lord of the Treasury, that's what it says on No. 10's letterbox. Another thing is, the United Kingdom didn't exist until 1801, before then it was Great Britain, so technically Robert Walpole was the first Prime Minister of Great Britain and Henry Addington was the last Prime Minister of Great Britain and the first Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. Also, there is a debate as to weather non-consecutive terms are counted twice, like the way the Americans count Grover Cleveland, the Downing Street website says Gordon Brown will be the 52nd person to walk through the doors of Downing Street as PM not the 75th. Then there is the issue of how many times Ramsay MacDonald is counted as the government changed part way through his second term but he remained as Prime Minister. Finally, it's just not a British tradition to count the number people who have held a particular office. Regards - Galloglass 19:40, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Compulsory education, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 13th amendment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Original research[edit]

Your view that compulsory education is unconstitutional is not widely held, and your interpretations of the US Consititution is original research which is prohibited on Wikipedia. Your edits to this article have already been reverted twice, so please stop. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:18, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

March 2015[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Kwame Brown. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your test before you revert it. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 00:34, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

April 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Wikiisawesome. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Matt Flynn (musician)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. wia (talk) 20:34, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

September 2015[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Charleston church shooting, you may be blocked from editing. - Cwobeel (talk) 02:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

I am not a regular editor to Wiki. However, I inserted a statement to correct misleading information in this article. It was removed, and I think it was removed by you. I attempted to insert it with a reference, but as a novice, I was not able to get the citation to list correctly. My concern is that the list of responses includes a list of statements by church officials but no mention of many offerings received by local churches for the churches affected by arson. However, there is an intentional effort to mention the monetary contributions of Muslim and Jewish organizations. This leaves the misleading impression that Christian churches made statements and Mosques and Temples gave money. A national effort, reported by CNN, led by Christ Church Cathedral (Episcopal) in St. Louis raised over $550,000 to date for the churches. In my little corner of the world, three neighboring churches gave over $10,000 to the churches. I think the article would be improved by including reference to the financial participation of churches. Otherwise, it comes across as an intentional omission of pertinent information.

Churches from across the country joined an effort led by Christ Church Cathedral (Episcopal) in St. Louis, MO. to contribute over $500,000 to help rebuild six churches burned by arson in the weeks after the shooting.

signed Glenn Ethridge — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 13:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC)