Jump to content

User talk:WILFORD

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:CouchPotato0209)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ambassador (English) (March 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not clear what the topic of this item is intended to be. A more specific title would be required, and much improved sourcing. See WP:YFA and WP:REFB.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Eagleash (talk) 14:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Usernamenteredalreadyinusepleasechooseadifferentname! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 14:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ambassador (English) (March 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Blaze Wolf was:
This draft was resubmitted rapidly, within a few hours, after being declined, with only minor changes. Resubmitting a draft too rapidly after it was declined is not useful and is not likely to result in approval. When a draft that has been declined is resubmitted, the reviewers look at the history, and expect that the submitter will attempt to address the concerns of the reviewers. If the submitter is not sure what the reviewer wants, it would be a good idea to discuss with the reviewer rather than just resubmitting (and annoying the reviewers).

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the declining reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

The author is very strongly advised to discuss with the reviewers, or at least to rework this draft substantially, rather than just resubmitting.

If this draft is resubmitted rapidly again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:25, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ambassador (April 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Pointless citing Wikipedia as a source on Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:06, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Gwansanseong (April 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Blaze Wolf was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
There's a lot of content that's unsourced here, mainly in the "rating" section.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 12:59, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daesaja (May 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:02, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Telegram (historical) has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Telegram (historical). Thanks! Asparagusus (interaction) 22:52, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Telegraphy in Poland (May 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Also, some of this is covered in Telegraphy.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 17:33, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wang Gyu (Ham Kyu) (May 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 00:50, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eulje (September 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:47, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, CouchPotato0209. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Gwansanseong, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:04, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Daesaja

[edit]

Information icon Hello, CouchPotato0209. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daesaja, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daesaja (Ambassador) (October 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Still just using a single source and failing to notability
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:27, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jigwi

[edit]

Information icon Hello, CouchPotato0209. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jigwi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


You're welcome...

[edit]

... Though I'm not sure whether I've ever before been thanked for correcting a one-character typo. 🤨 JBW (talk) 15:27, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what i just tried to work on it CouchPotato0209 (talk) 16:34, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Telegraphy in Poland

[edit]

Information icon Hello, CouchPotato0209. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Telegraphy in Poland, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Wang Gyu (Ham Kyu)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, CouchPotato0209. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wang Gyu (Ham Kyu), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:04, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kadir Ayoub (October 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 21:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jigwi (November 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lightoil was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Needs secondary sources on the subject, encyclopedias are considered tertiary sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Lightoil (talk) 15:40, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Gwansanseong (November 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EmeraldRange was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please see WP:CITEHOW on how to use the citation templates. All quotes must be cited with WP:INLINE citations. Looks notable enough to accept after fixing; haven't properly verified all your sources though.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 00:10, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daesaja (Ambassador) (November 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please do not resubmit without fixing the issues. The cited sources are still inaccessible, provide at least links.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:11, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 November 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 4 December 2023

[edit]
  • Comix: Bold comics for a new age
    "I think we ought to read only the kind of comics that wound or stab us. If the comic we're reading doesn't wake us up with a blow to the head, what are we reading for?" — Franz Kafka
  • Humour: Mandy Rice-Davies Applies
    This page in a nutshell: Whether or not someone has denied unsavory allegations — though such a denial may not merit being given equal weight in an article — a worthless shitpost should still be included.

The Signpost: 24 December 2023

[edit]
  • In the media: Consider the humble fork
    Forky on forky on forky, plus a strange donation scheme and other interesting bits of news.
  • Technology report: Dark mode is coming
    No more must Wikipedia always be a lightbulb in the dark — except metaphorically of course.
  • Crossword: when the crossword is sus
    The Signpost Crossword is a 2018 online multiplayer social deduction game that takes place in space-themed settings where players are colorful, armless cartoon astronauts.
  • BJAODN: Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
    Edit summary: "Only need this page for about 30 minutes to demonstrate to a friend how easy it is to create a Wikipedia page. Then it will be deleted."

The Signpost: 10 January 2024

[edit]
  • News and notes: In other news ... see ya in court!
    Let the games begin! The 2024 WikiCup is off to a strong start. With copyright enforcement, AI training and freedom of expression, it's another typical week in the wiki-sphere!
  • WikiProject report: WikiProjects Israel and Palestine
    What are the editorial processes behind covering some of the most politically polarizing and contentious topics on English Wikipedia?

The Signpost: 31 January 2024

[edit]
  • Opinion: Until it happens to you
    A stream of consciousness about plagiarism on Wikipedia from the perspective of a user who directly witnessed it.
  • Comix: We've all got to start somewhere
    Writing a good subheading for a one-sentence joke is basically like writing an entire second joke so I'm not going to do it.

The Signpost: 13 February 2024

[edit]
  • Comix: Strongly
    That's more than weakly!

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 April 2024

[edit]

Your draft article, Draft:Telegraphy in Poland

[edit]

Hello, CouchPotato0209. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Telegraphy in Poland".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:45, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jigwi

[edit]

Hello, CouchPotato0209. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jigwi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:08, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Gwansanseong

[edit]

Hello, CouchPotato0209. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Battle of Gwansanseong".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:22, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 May 2024

[edit]

Your draft article, Draft:Daesaja (Ambassador)

[edit]

Hello, CouchPotato0209. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Daesaja".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 00:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 8 June 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 4 July 2024

[edit]
  • In the media: War and information in war and politics
    Advocacy organizations, a journalist, mycophobes, conservatives, leftists, photographers, and a disinformation task force imagine themselves in Wikipedia.

The Signpost: 22 July 2024

[edit]
  • Obituary: JamesR
    Rest in peace.

The Signpost: 14 August 2024

[edit]
  • In focus: Twitter marks the spot
    Musk's Twitter acquisition and rebranding have caused long debates on Wikipedia.

The Signpost: 4 September 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

[edit]
  • Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics
    User Hawkeye7 opens up on his experience as a media representative following the Australian team at the latest Summer Paralympics in Paris.
  • News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?
    More changes to RfA on the way in October, final results for the U4C elections revealed, and other news from the Wikimedia world.

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

[edit]
  • In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
    Perplexing persistence, pay to play, potential president's possible plagiarism, crossword crossover to culture, and a wish come true!
  • Book review: The Editors
    A novel about us, from the point of view of three of us.

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 12 December 2024

[edit]
  • Op-ed: On the backrooms
    An editor's reflection on social capital and their changing relationship with Wikipedia culture. by Tamzin

The Signpost: 24 December 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 15 January 2025

[edit]

The Signpost: 7 February 2025

[edit]
  • News and notes: Let's talk!
    The WMF executive team delivers a new update; plus, the latest EU policy report, good-bye to the German Wikipedia's Café, and other news from the Wikimedia world.
  • Community view: 24th Wikipedia Day in New York City
    Wikimedians and newbies celebrate 24 years of Wikipedia in the Brooklyn Central Library. Special guests Stephen Harrison and Clay Shirky joined in conversation.
  • Traffic report: A wild drive
    The start of the year was filled with a few unfortunate losses, tragic disasters, emerging tech forces and A LOT of politics.

The Signpost: 27 February 2025

[edit]
  • Technology report: Hear that? The wikis go silent twice a year
    From patrolling new edits to uploading photos or joining a campaign, you can count on the Wikimedia platform to be up and running — in your language, anywhere in the world. That is, except for a couple of minutes during the equinoctes.
  • Opinion: Sennecaster's RfA debriefing
    User Sennecaster shares her thoughts on her recent RfA and the aspects that might have played a role in making it successful.

The Signpost: 22 March 2025

[edit]
  • From the editor: Hanami
    It's an ecstasy, my spring.
  • Obituary: Rest in peace
    Send not to know
    For whom the bell tolls,
    It tolls for thee.

The Signpost: 9 April 2025

[edit]

The Signpost: 1 May 2025

[edit]
  • Traffic report: Of Wolf and Man
    Television dramas, televised sports, film, the Pope, and ... bioengineering at the top of the list?

The Signpost: 14 May 2025

[edit]

The Signpost: 24 June 2025

[edit]

The Signpost: 18 July 2025

[edit]
  • Traffic report: God only knows
    Wouldn't it be nice without billionaires, scandals, deaths, and wars?

The Signpost: 9 August 2025

[edit]

The Signpost: 9 September 2025

[edit]

(This message was sent to User talk:CouchPotato0209 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

The Signpost: 2 October 2025

[edit]

(This message was sent to User talk:CouchPotato0209 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

The Signpost: 20 October 2025

[edit]
  • Traffic report: One click after another
    Serial-killer miniseries, deceased scientist, government shutdowns and Sandalwood hit "Kantara" crowd the tubes.

(This message was sent to User talk:CouchPotato0209 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

The Signpost: 10 November 2025

[edit]

(This message was sent to User talk:CouchPotato0209 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

The Signpost: 1 December 2025

[edit]
  • Comix: Madness
    It could happen to anyone.

(This message was sent to User talk:CouchPotato0209 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)